Blogswell Blogs

(Your mileage may vary.)

Ken Honeywell

Ken Honeywell
Location
Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
Birthday
March 20
Title
Partner
Company
Well Done Marketing
Bio
I'm in love with my wife; a writer and producer living in Indianapolis; partner at Well Done Marketing; founder of Tonic Ball, a benefit concert that's become one of the city's favorite annual events; co-founder of Second Story, a creative writing program for kids; a vegetarian; lead singer of Yoko Moment; a life-long New York Mets fan; a sucker for waltz time; crazy about Pernice Brothers; etc.

MY RECENT POSTS

DECEMBER 24, 2011 9:22AM

What We're Trying To Do At Punchnel's

Rate: 11 Flag

I was a little surprised to read the other day about the demise of Viewshound.comI wasn't surprised that they stopped doing what they were doing, but I was surprised by how quickly it all fell in upon itself. I figured someone doing something that ambitious would try to hang on a little longer.

But I'm sure it was daunting for the publishers. I know a lot of OSers blogged over there, and why wouldn't you? It had not only a big audience, but also the prospect of winning a nice prize every day. Open Salon with cash prizes. Why the hell not?

I'm sure they were flooded with submissions. They were publishing 20+ pieces a day. It had to be overwhelming. I'm sure there was no way they could attract enough advertisers to cover their labor costs, and they were paying out prize money every day.

I never submitted anything to Viewshound. They stated clearly that if they published my work, they owned my ass and any money they made from it was theirs, theirs, theirs.

Which, ultimately, was the problem. They were doing it just for the money. Viewshound might have paid you, but they never loved you. They didn't love writers. You should have known they didn't love writers when you saw the way your stories were announced: "Joe Blow just had their story published on Viewshound." I didn't know Joe was a "they."

For the better part of six months, we've been doing something different at Punchnel's.We've been creating and selecting small bits of content we love--stories, poems, memoirs, humor, photo essays, reviews, and other features--and publishing them five days a week. Every day, we post between one and four new pieces.

And we pay not one big prize for our favorite story of the day, but a little bit for every piece we publish.

Why?

Because we love writers, and we think they should be paid something for their work. Because we think it's validation that your writing is worth something. Because we don't want to add to the avalanche of content out there; we want to give you a couple of new things every day, twelve or fifteen things a week, we think you might love. 

We certainly aren't publishing Punchnel's for the money. We've spent thousands of dollars putting out our literary webzine. The ad revenue we've brought in has not paid for one week's worth of content. Someday, maybe we'll turn a profit, and that will be great. But we're mostly doing it for the experience and to give ourselves a platform to say what we want to say and support the causes we want to support--which includes the cause of telling the world that writing and writers matter. And we've always promised that if we every make money, we'll pay writers more.

So...please read us and see if we're doing anything you like. If you think you're good enough, please submit to us. We may reject you, but that's because we have to reject 90% or more of everything we receive. We reject our best friends and our relatives every week. And we want to be a place where it's harder than easier to publish.

Because it matters. Writing matters, and writers matter. It's great to have a place where you can throw anything you want into the world and get an audience--OS is outstanding for that. We're trying to do something smaller and more selective, and we hope you like it.

PS: if you like Punchnel's, please like us on Facebook or sign up to receive email updates. It's the best way to keep up with what we're doing.

PPS: Watch for a noir flash fiction contest--we're announcing the details at the first of the year. 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Really, even considering that I'll soon be reaching my fourth year here on OS, which is donkey years on the internet, I think what you're doing is my favorite thing on the web Ken. I'm honored to have a couple of pieces up on Punchnel's and hope to get some more to you soon into the new year. And it's not just my affection for you, what you're doing is beautiful, but it's more than that--Punchnel's has soul. Well, the people do anyway. All the folk at Well Done who have a part in the back end are simply gorgeous folk. And then there are the contributors. Ashley makes me weak in the knees, of course, but there's gold everywhere you look.

You matter, Ken, and thank you for making a home for beauty.
Ken, we traded this idea back and forth. I took a shot at doing it myself, but since you are so much further along, there's really no reason for me not to submit and post my rejects on OS. The right of first refusal, as it were.

However, I remain nonplussed by the overload issue you've referred to in this article. We are overloaded, bogged down with excess undifferentiated input....which is making it increasingly difficult to get any notice at all, let alone have an impact on life with your work.

Lately, I've noticed that, despite having been a compulsive reader all my life, I have stopped reading books. I keep trying, but my attention falters very quickly. I attribute this to the overload phenomenon.

Even more troublesome: I've stopped writing, until very recently.

I've written numerous articles that I've never published because I haven't finished them. I haven't finished them because the focal point of public attention has already moved on to something else and the article I started the day before yesterday has lost relevance.

It seems that, with the increase in the volume of information, there is a necessary reduction in the amount of time that anyone can devote to any one fragment of data. The focal point of the lens of collective attention has narrowed to the point where, instead of days, we are now reduced to a focal point measured in minutes rather than in hours.

Consider, briefly, the speed with which Newt Gingrich's campaign has peaked, faltered, been counted out, revived, peaked and faltered again. From apogee to perigee in a matter of days.

This, then, becomes the conundrum. How can have a meaningful national debate on any one issue when we are being inundated with one issue after another?

We are entering an age of "mental collectivism" in which we are telling ourselves - and each other - what we think on an daily, hourly, minute by minute basis, to the point where we no longer know what we think about anything because our consciousness is plugged into and intertwined with the collective consciousness that is emerging from this new technology.

As a science fiction writer, I predicted this would happen and saw it as a great leap forward in human consciousness but, now that it is actually here, I'm terrified by it.

And here's the problem with your publication - and all other publications with respect to submissions: no matter how well intentioned you are, you - we - are contributing to the cacophony with every piece we publish and by contributing to the cacophony. we're contributing to the overload.

The obvious breakdowns in political systems around the world is a direct result of this overload, and that breakdown will inevitably continue as a result of this new collective consciousness.

But, now that it's here, I'm no longer enamored with it: on the contrary, I am terrified by it. This is 1984 and the Brave New World personified.

Now, would you like me to develop this into article?

Consider this a query letter.
Just had a quick glance at the site, Ken, and it looks interesting. I'll spend some quality time with it tonight or tomorrow. Writers *do* matter, and the more venues for them, the better.
Barry: xo. Hope your holidays are swell.

Sage: First: of course. I'd love to see that piece. And of course, I agree. There's just too much stuff, and we're responsible for putting it out there, too. But if you can't put the genie back into the bottle--and I don't think you can--you can at least try to curate your little corner of the world and get a few eyeballs on the things you love.

Boanerges1: Hope you like what you read.
*nods* writing matters.

i love what you are doing. thanks for that.
Trying.

Well, actually you ARE doing it!
I love Punchnel's - I try to get over there as often as I can. It's fresh, clean content and design.