I have noticed something very, very strange going on with liberals' attitudes toward blue collar workers for a long time, and I am desperately worried about it.
Conservatives have never been known for their concern for the working man, but liberals were always the champions of labor. Something new started with TV anchors becoming hostile to American cars. A study would show like a 5% lesser quality in domestic cars as compared to foreign cars. The TV anchors would play it up like it was the end of the world. After decades of seeing this repeated over and over on different media outlets, Americans now just assume that domestic cars are terrible, and they don't even realize that they have been programmed to feel that way for years. So began the unraveling of the great blue collar unions that virtually created the American middle class.
By the way, why would you shout to the world that another country's MAJOR ESSENTIAL INDUSTRY is better than yours? It isn't patriotic. During WWII people were forbidden to trade with the Nazis -- well this is kind of an economic war; it's getting more and more competitive, and even dangerous out there. I don't imply that FOREIGN PEOPLE are to blame. But economically, they will naturally look out for their own countries first, that is just the way things are. I blame our failed trade policies for the current financial disaster.
American auto quality slipped in the past, but the quality has been pretty comparable now for a long time. But the opinion makers never acknowledged that there was that large improvement, they never stopped trying to destroy what was left of the reputation of the American car industry. What the liberal media, normally protective of labor, said, mattered -- a lot. An auto is one of the biggest purchases that consumers ever make. The domestic industry is still mostly American owned and supplied. The foreign makers, even the ones that build their cars in the U.S., still keep the best engineering and design jobs, a lot of the supplier jobs, and most importantly, the PROFIT STREAMS, to themselves. With every foreign car sold, with every foreign plant built here, more and more billions of American dollars pour out of the country to foreign shores. Even if studies show that foreign cars are slightly better, it isn't worth wrecking our whole country over it! Because that is kind of what we're doing, as other countries take over the profits from more and more of other American industries too.We are also giving away our critical technology edge by letting others do all of our manufacturing.
As a result, the Chinese now own us. We are in debt up to our hair tops, buy everything from them, and then borrow more money from them to pay them for the stuff that we just bought. But many Americans still do not understand our predicament.
Why would you berate and destroy an industry that not long ago was the largest employer in the U.S. ? That treated its workers extremely well in every way? If you support good pay for the average worker, than you have to support the industries that pay well. If you care about the average American worker, than you have to support the industries that care about him. And unions pulled the wages of even nonunion workers way up, tremendously benefiting all U.S. workers.
I guess the thing that upsets me the most about this is that I don't think that elite opinion makers and many liberals really do care about the average American blue collar worker any more.
These former defenders of the working man don't seek manufacturing jobs anymore, and none of their relatives and neighbors do. So blue collar workers just don't seem to be a priority for them any more. They assume that because they are college educated white-collar workers, that they know more about the auto industry than the workers and managers who actually work in the industry do. But the unions learned what they know from the blood of generations of American workers.
Yet now some of the descendents of those murdered union members are destroying unions by not buying their products.
I can't understand this. Is it because there are now so many affluent two-income households, and that union blue collar workers have somehow subconsciously become a threat to them? Because they can't afford to both work unless they have plenty of dirt cheap service labor around-- nannies, gardeners, restaurant workers, day care workers? And lots of dirt cheap products made in China to make it worth it to pursue two time-consuming professional careers?
But if so, isn't that old-fashioned exploitation -- the old class system? Since these professionals still pull down large salaries and good benefits themselves. Our beloved President Obama, and some liberals, still seem to care about the drowning working classes, but they now seem to be in the minority. One result of this shift in attitudes is that marginal employment king Wal-Mart is now our biggest employer, instead of GM!
Many white collar people think that these autoworkers are just dinosaurs, and that we just have to retrain them, and they will end up thanking us for it. Well these workers have already been through the retraining thing. They were all going to go into computer work and be better off. NOT!! Because the auto industry was just the BEGINNING of this! The same myths that destroyed car jobs are now destroying all American jobs. The computer jobs were quickly shipped off to other countries. And foreign visa workers that are willing to work for less are being brought in to take many of the computer jobs that remain here. First we made computers here, but now those computers are being made with virtual slave workers elsewhere, and shipped here, just like the foreign cars are. Any product made with slave labor, ( and with no regulations of any kind) will be so much cheaper than American-made goods, that people will buy it every time. So slave labor will end up making everything, and the cheaper the slaves the more "competitive " they will be. Almost any job in the U.S. (including green jobs) could now be given to a smart foreigner who would be willing to do it for less.
Does that mean that we should just hand them all the keys to our country and call it free trade?
Yet the opinion makers continue this naive, nuts obsession with the free trade gospel that never existed. It never existed because other countries maintain artificially weak currencies, because they find ways of keeping American products out of their markets, because they heavily subsidize their own industries, because they dump products in the U.S. below cost just to steal market share, and because they pay American companies to set up shop in their country. Why do we never hear the opinion makers obsess over all these ways that the other countries have always cheated on the free trade rules? Yet we still hear them constantly demean America's essential industries. Something does not compute.
Another thing that terrifies me about this thing is that it is scapegoating. Ugly, depressing scapegoating. Everyone who mentions the American auto industry has to get a kick in! An insult is obligatory. Anyone who wants to feel superior is suddenly a manufacturing expert, can compare themselves, and see themselves as better.
At some point, even liberals, the champions of the working man, veered off, deciding that they should hate the Big 3 because their cars weren't as environmentally friendly as the foreign makers. Well I don't quite see that. Americans have had practically free gas compared to the rest of the world for decades, by their own choice. Foreigners had to buy smaller cars because they made gas a luxury item in their countries. Plus there seems to be some elite hypocracy here. A single urban person can get by with a very small car much more easily than a working class family with six kids who live on very bad roads out in the country. A wealthy couple who both commute to work every day in fuel-efficient cars, but live a very expensive life-style, may actually consume more in the way of natural resources than the conservative idiots with the six kids that they look down on. And you'd never know it, but the foreign makers also build a lot of trucks and SUVs, -- the crime just goes unnoticed and unpunished.
Besides, now that all that American manufacturing has been moved to China, we are really worse off environmentally, because China has little environmental regulation! So a lot of the environmental benefits of the small cars have been cancelled out. Global warming is huge -- but we all must sacrifice, not just blue collar workers. And in all ways, not just in the pet cause of driving foreign cars.
And can't these liberals see that they have joined a most unholy alliance with the most reactionary elements in America? Their big pals are out to destroy the evil, socialist unions, to cripple average workers. Do liberals think that this anti-American-car campaign wasn't planned? The huge blue collar unions, that used to sway elections, and play on the same level as the powers that be, had become a real threat. Instead of attacking the unions directly, which would no longer fly with many people, the unions' enemies attacked the reputation of the products that the unions built. Same result.
The whole miraculous power of unions is in all workers sticking together. That's why people crossing picket lines are called scabs. If one worker undermines the union, it destroys the whole union. Likewise, the nonunion Toyota South has undermined the union automaker North. And auto wages are now headed way down in this country. Union workers died to win fair wages for Americans, and in one generation, Southern nonunion autoworkers have started dragging them way back down.
If our manufacturing industries completely collapse, is the growing list of countries that seem to hate us going to somehow take care of us when we need something?
Unless people have the wealth to escape to some better place forever, everyone will be affected by the continued economic collapse of this country. The union industry people have been screaming a warning from the gates of Hell for decades now, but no one cares.
But with every recession, less and less workers still feel that they are somehow immune to the destruction of the American workplace. And more and more workers are finding out that this monster that we have created values them not the slightest bit more than autoworkers.It values no one but the very few left with their hands on the big money levers.
Liberals must once more guard what is left of our country's blue collar unions. So that those unions can guard what is left of our country.


Salon.com
Comments
He has a lot of really good ideas. I wish I were more optimistic about their becoming Reality. In particular, he emphasizes saving those blue-collar jobs and preserving our industrial infrastructure.
I'm also reading a book called, "The Green Collar Economy," by Van Jones.
Kathy, I have said this for years. My last 2 vehicles have been GM products and have held up very well over the years.
Unions started out with great purpose. Then they got greedy and the auto companies went along with that greed. They are partially responsible for the condition of the auto industry.
Therefor the American blue collar worker is no longer the force that drives the models upon/around which economic constructs are built....The technological advances made in the computer/digital/cyber-space age have caused seismic shifts in they way capital is invested and income is "earned".....The blue collar middle class, as I have said before, is a myth that is being exploded......"Middle class" workers are discovering that the primary difference between them and "the poor" has been access to credit and as credit is manipulated and restricted the so-call middle class blue collar worker is trapped in the posture of the wage slave...and you know how we treated slaves....we are, and have been, a have v have not nation.....the"culture wars" are really a reflection and euphamism for class and poer struggles that have raged on since the country was founded.....Pay check to pay check is not middle class, or even upwardly mobile the talking heads on TV know that and are silently happy as hell that they aren't on the other side of the cameras.............And it shows...........
I don't blame the unions themselves. I blame their corporate overlords for their greed and conniving schemes to make the most money off the backs of their workers.
I don't think this is a straight-line liberal or conservative issue. There's far too much nuance here.
The point was never to attack the American Auto companies it was all about profits for people who do no more than invest. Those stories you mention were to get people used to the idea that if American cars were built in other countries that they'd be both better quality and more profitable to make. This gave them the excuse to start dismantling the U.S. auto industry and move actual production offshore. By paying those people in other countries a fifth of the wage paid to U.S. workers that money was distributed to investors. The balance sheets looked good since they also sold off their U.S. assets to foriegn nations to make those parts and cars for them. Once tha salable assets were gone the reality of people being unable to afford their products became a factor. They moved into the financial business and offered loans to buy their product at rates that many could at least marginally afford. Unfortunately they were no better at running loan companies than they were at guessing what products would appeal to car buyers. Chryslers initial dive into insolvency was in a large part due to spending billions to improve and build the factories that built some of the largest and least fuel efficient cars in history. All on the eve of the rise of OPEC. If not for luck, Lee Iaccoca, and the U.S. taxpayers it would have been gone before 1980. They didn't take our money and use it to build big factories in Mexico or in Korea, they revamped U.S. plants and came up with a winner in the K-cars and the K based mini vans. The cornerstone of the G.M. restructuring plan is to close even more U.S. plants and move them offshore. All with taxes collected from men and women who will soon no longer be taxpayers since they are paying to have their jobs shipped to countries where G.M. will not have to pay as much for labor in order to keep up investment profits and stock values that are not based on viability but on the amount of money they will get for thier investments. It's wrong to expect the people to pay G.M. to steal tens of thousands of jobs from them. Untill the U.S. returns to an industrial economy the recoveries will continue to be smaller and farther between.
As for the auto companies, they are the most crucified managers in the country. No industry is perfect, but no industry has gotten the criticism that they have.
I agree that they should not be moving jobs out of the country. But they have been put in a
damned if you do
danmed if you do
danmed if you do situation
we allow virtual- slave-labor-made products into the county,
products made under virtually no environmental regulation,
products made in countries where health care and pensions are paid by the government instead of the business,
and then we expect American manufacturers to compete with these foreign businesses
there is no way in hell that they can possible compete
then people ridicule them because they can't make money
they have been driven overseas to try to compete with the foreigners
our government has been asleep at the switch, while foreign governments were a friend and protector to their businesses,
The Obama administration gets all this
maybe we will finally see some progress here!
it's a tough blogging world out there, and I need all the friends I can get today!
American workers can compete with any in the world. Most foreign auto manufacturers have plants here in the US that produce every bits as good a product as their foreign counterparts.
If you buy a Toyota, it's likely it was produced here in the US. The issue is just not as simple as "buying American". I wish is were.
I wish this issue could be discussed rationally, instead of with so much vitriolic propaganda.
A link re: a speech that Truman gave on this topic.
...and Crying Wolf on Universal Healthcare and Labor Rights by Donald Cohen & Peter Dreier.
I'm past weary of union workers (whose benefits have benefited even those of us who are non-union members) being constantly castigated. They didn't make the poor management decisions that the auto industry has foisted upon the "free" market for so many decades. And for some reason, only they are required to "give back" gains... no required "give backs" for the "too-big-to-fail" CEOs or other banking or finance bigwigs who have done as much as anyone else to trash the economy.
It is positively disgusting.
You seem to believe that "liberal" views are actually presented fairly on TV by "real" liberals!!! TV has become so ridiculously one-sided over the last few years that I hardly watch any more. If TV were liberal, I think we would have heard how the Bush-
Walker family financed the Nazis during WW II, how Neil Bush cost taxpayers billions with his S&L scandal in the 1980s, how Ronald Reagan is behind de-regulation and how he changed laws more than FDR did and how bad things were in the 1980s when interest rates were 22%, etc., and how the Republicans stole the 2000 and 2004 national elections, how George and Hank looted the national treasury in October 2008, on and on....oh, but we don't hear any of that....because TV is controlled by Republicans who want to act as if the current Depression "just happened" instead of being deliberately orchestrated as it most certainly was!!
I completely agree that we should support the union worker (and ECFA too).
But don't call the media liberal. Man, if you look at the corporations that own the major news outlets, they are anything but liberal.
sorry, i'm all over the place because im' just ignorant these days. my doctor has me pretty much on a news fast because of these stupid immune disorders and stress and whatever. i probably can't compment much on your posts but i admire so much that you know all of this stuff and that you're engaged politically and economically. that rocks. love love love and gratitdue
You're wrong about the record. The # 1 quality producer of cars sold in the U.S. is Ford. You can check it out for yourself. Go to the J.D. Powers homepage.
For kts:
The Michael Moore film is more than 20 years old, and things have changed, though corporate management is still fixated on next quarter's stock price (it determines their compensation, not the health of the company).
If you bring up the car industry to a politician and ask about American cars vs. Japanese or German, or Korean, they will tell you that we have trade agreements that we have to honor. But if there are indeed "agreements," shouldn't they include the sale of American cars to foreign countries? The logical answer seems to me to be yes,\. But ask Ford, GM or Chrysler how many cars they sell in Japan or Korea. The answer is zero, because these countries erect contrived trade barriers and our representatives do nothing to correct the problem. The U.S. producers do sell cars in Europe, but those cars are made in Europe and don't create American manufacturing jobs.
One of the scandals of Japanese auro manufacturing in the U.S. is the way profits are exported openly without being taxed. The Japanese mandate that the most expensive components (engine, transmission and rear axle, i.e. the drive train) must be made in Japan and shipped to the U.S. plant. They require the U.S. plant to pay the Japanese parent for these components. But they charge 2x to 3x their manufacturing cost to the U.S. subsidiary, thus exporting the profit while creating a huge cost (i.e. deduction) for the U.S. subsidiary. This is done openly, and with full knowledge of our solons in Washington. After all, we have those trade agreements that must be honored.
Seems to me they honor their one-sided trade agreements more than they honor American labor. Am I being chauvinistic to say this?
DENIAL IS NOT A RIVER.
IT IS THE U.S. PUBLIC ON TRADE AND MANUFACTURING.