Kathy Knechtges's Blog

Kathy Knechtges

Kathy Knechtges
Birthday
December 25
Bio
Writer and meditator, with an Independent bent. Has written for California and Midwest publications. Interests are the loss of the middle class, American manufacturing, unions, immigration, and the welfare of families and children.

MY RECENT POSTS

Kathy Knechtges's Links

Salon.com
SEPTEMBER 4, 2010 5:47PM

Freedom Is Not Free In The American Workplace Either!

Rate: 21 Flag

 A historian just told me that when our small town was pre-union, if a new employer came into the area offering better wages than were standard, he or she was met by a contingent of current local employers telling them that higher wages were not allowed in our town.

Yet, already, Labor Day goes unnoticed here and all I hear is that unions are horrible.

Labor author Philip Dine recently recounted this story in the Washington Times:

"Coal- company executives strode into the small West Virginia mining town in 1920 and informed the mayor they were now in charge. If boosting company profits meant paying workers in scrips redeemable only at company stores, then that was just smart management. ... If scaring workers into submission necessitated kidnapping a miner here and there and brutally murdering him in ways that would make a jihadist proud, then that was a part of doing business."

These thing happened within the lifetimes of Americans still walking around. People  tell me that all our rights are now guaranteed. If that is true why are wages actually going steadily backward and  health and retirement benefits being lost --  while CEO's salaries reach obscene heights?

A manual for Wrong-Mart supervisors stereotyped workers who might be union sympathizers. An employee who was easy going and lived with his or her parents would have the money to go on strike. Another threat would be someone who was educated and made more money before.

It is becoming commonplace for employers to illegally harass and fire people for union activity. It can take three years for employees to even get back pay after being canned. If the workers had that kind of money they would not need to work.

Kate Bronfenbrenner, a researcher on labor law, concludes,"If recent trends continue, there will no longer be a functioning legal mechanism to effectively protect the right of private-sector workers to organize and bargain collectively."

We need to not only celebrate labor heroes on Labor Day -- the generations who suffered, some even giving their lives -- we should be issuing a new call to arms!

In the meantime, thank you labor heroes, for all you do and have done!

Author tags:

unions, labor day

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
americans don't have rights, only privileges. privileges can be taken away, or eroded by the rulers, and that is happening now. this will continue unless americans discover the need for democracy.

that is not happening, and looks like it never will.
KK, yeah, I can see history repeating itself, and that's frankly scary for anyone in the labour force.

My only problem with unions (and technically, I'm still represented by one) is that they over-reached themselves, going far beyond their original mandate.

Have a good holiday weekend.
At one time, Unions allowed the worker to have their needs and rights protected, however, now, unions take more from the paycheck of te worker and retrain or limit upward mobility of the worker more than a company that is non -union. I have seen that companies that are non union give employees more benifit opprotunities because their money is more flexible and growth can be monitoerd and good work practices rewarded. Union shops have too many "cooks in the kitchen" too many people trying to promote agendas and tapping funds. I used to bea member fo the teamsters back in 1998, I was working at a business that, when I started and in probation, I drew a weekly check of between 450.00 and 500.00, after I was forced ( either join union or loose job ) my pay, after dues, fees and the like was a mere 325.00, and what I get for it, nothing. My point is Unions dont do what they are there for.

As for employers mistreating employees through work scheduel and abrupt and un warned policy change, or making employees work in a manner that breaks labor laws, employees and people within workforce parties do have ways to make things right without retribution, reporting to the local fair bussiness officals and BBB or labor office is an option, and they do maintain annonimity.
How true Al. Thanks for your words.
Boanerges, how have they exceeded their mandate?
Kathy,

Marvelous. A great post for Labor Day.

I think that the average American is fairly ignorant of the struggle for the improvements in working conditions that the unions have fostered: child labor laws, safety regulations, 8-hour day, 40-hour week, sick leave, maternity leave, cost of living increases, life and health insurance, minimum wage, etc.

Since the early 1980's (read Reagan Administration) union avoidance has become an industry in itself. At 35 percent, the unionization rate in 1945 was the highest in American history. By the 1990's the unionization rate in the United States fell to under 14%. Unions now have minimal impact on wages or working conditions. (Economic History Association, Feburary 1, 2010)

@Joseph Timmons. Are you saying that "union dues and fees" cost you between $125 and $175 a week? The following is a list of my payroll deductions circ 1990 (before retirement). I was not a union member, but as a "professional" I enjoyed a semi-annual cost-of-living increase that was hard won by the union members of the factory that I worked in. If the union had not won the increase, you can bet that the "professionals" never would have obtained it. Check the list to see if you might have confused some taxes and voluntary deductions with your "union dues and fees". I recognize that if your union was responsible for your pension and insurance, then the "union dues and fees" might have been higher.

Deduction Percent of Salary

Federal Withholding Tax 25.5
Social Security Tax 7.6
California State Tax 7.0
Employee Medical 0.4
Dependent Medical 0.2
Supplemental Pension 2.4
Accident Insurance
Kathy,

Sorry, I hit the wrong key.

My point in the (incomplete) listing was that a total of 51.6 percent of my salary was deducted before I got my check. If Mr. Timmons union was responsible for his pension and other benefits, then his "union dues and fees" would be high -- but they would cover many of the items listed independently on my pay stub. [Anybody know what I'm talking about?]
Thank you so much dlv! And great to see you.
I couldn't agree more with you! We need more unions to protect more workers! Without unions, no one would be protected and treated fairly. Look at the large corporations as examples of unfairness!
Thanks Patricia. While nothing is on TV to remember the fallen labor leaders, we can remember them here!
KK thanks for the post about the need for effective, honest unions. There is the rub though, unions are no longer seen as effective. More importantly it has been decades since they were viewed as honest. All things in society exist in a kind of socio-political stew. Unions were long ago taken over by La Cosa Nostra. Despite countless prosecutons their influence still exists today. As recently as a year ago my sister watched as the man she worked for, a private contractor managing health care benefits for a local, was indicted for embezzlement. The problem doesn't lie with the union it lies with our laws that give criminal organizatons unregulated markets generating obscene proftit. After that it is merely man's greed that takes over. We pass morality laws against drug use, prostitution and gambling all the while allowing "Wall Street" to operate in a vacum where "you can't legislate morality." My read on the union movement was that if we oraganize enough than labor laws for all will catch up and unions would become obsolete. Which is why corruption crept in, union leaders didn't want their jobs to go away. For me that still is the answer. If our labor laws provided the same benefits unions do to all than there would be no need for a union, and every worker's life would be better.
Thanks for mentioning a serious concern Barry.
Kathy,
I have to address Joe Timmons claim chat the union took that much out of his paycheck. To him I have to say bull_ _ _ _! I worked for some time as a Teamster member and shop steward, with a major bank courier company. I have never known "union dues" to be taken out of a paycheck. You had a booklet, and you paid your dues in person. It was never deducted. That amount sounds phony to me! Dues were never that high.
Theres more to this story. While working for that company, they decided to go non union. It was put up to a vote. They promised that all existing employees would be kept on at the salary they were currently making. New hires would be called "junior couriers". Benefits would remain the same. I warned my co-workers, that they were up to something. They didn't believe me. Within a year everyone at that meeting, had been fired, and the new hires were making less than half the amount they were being paid! I walked off the job, the minute the vote came in. Mr Timmons is fooling himself, if he thinks he is better off without the union.

Good post for Labor day! We need to remind people what this holiday is all about. Rated!
Americans were killed and beaten to get unions in this country. The corporations had to give people health care, sick days, even a pension. Those days are almost gone and if the republicans have their say by saying no to regulations, the day of the union job will be a dinosaur. They are already dying, and if people don't wake up and start taking action, as in voting, writing letters, and marching in the streets, the conservatives, and I'm putting the Supreme Court in with them, they will never get another chance to save the unions.
Appropriate post for Labour Day, Kathy. I may be wrong, but I think unions are seen as socialist in America, so that the rich get richer while the worker is not protected. The more the privileged class gets stronger and richer, the less the chance of freedom and equality for the majority. ~r
It is unfortunate that most people don't realize that we all benefit from the sacrifices that were made to organize unions. As my grandmother used to say, "if it ain't one thing it's two". The latest trend is for companies to contest unemployment benefits. R
Iread recently that certain customer support phone jobs were leaving India and coming back to the US. Why? Because wages were depressed enough to make it worth bringing them back.
I have never been in a union, having worked as either an insurance underwriter or an oil and gas landman all my life. Yet I believe unions are necessary to the health of the country now more than ever. The workplace is NOT democratic, it is autocratic by nature. For workers to enjoy democracy in the workplace we must have a healthy labor movement or even better, do what the Germans do (and they have a healthy economy now) require that 1/2 of the board of directors of any corporation be workplace representatives.
thanks for your comment Joseph

nice to see you Peter
Scanner, you are right. This is it. Save it now or bye bye.

Fusun, Americans some how do have an antiquated idea about the work place. I appreciate your thoughts.
Fay, so true, most people are unaware of all the negative trends that are happening.
Tim, thanks for sharing your thoughts.
I would say that Kate Bronfenbrenner is right. The hard-won gains are eroding bit by bit. Maybe the cycle will start all over again, and we will see a resurgence in union activity before it's too late.
Kathy, it's so good to see you in print again. I've missed you. This is a wonderful and timely post for the holiday. My take on the issue is that unions are a necessary balance in the scale of commerce. When their influence is lost then the worker's health, wealth and standard of living erode.

We have seen the pendulum swing wildly and erratically, but both sides serve a purpose and help to control the faults of the other. Too much power on the side of the union and the business retaliates. Too little union power and the business retaliates.
Rated. I grew up in a Union household. All throughout America, Unions do mostly good.

However, in cities like Philadelphia and NYC, I see lots of Union Corruption and graft, too. Lots of lazy folks in my own family join unions and never do anything on the job. The Left needs to purge these types from labor as well.

My opinion is this: Corporate America allowed organized crime, lax standards and a poor work ethic to pervade the labor movement in order to discredit it among middle class, suburban America. This has worked. Labor must shirk off the parasites and go commando, so to speak, if it is to survive.
I was busy trying to save my computer over the weekend & missed your excellent Labor Day post! It seems like Labor Day has lost meaning over the years & people just look at it as a day to barbecue. My grandfather was in the union, my father, too. I was in the union back when I worked in the cannery. The unions made sure we had medical care, they stood up for us when the "boss" tried to cheat us, they fought for us to have good jobs at good pay, & gave us pensions. Yeah, we paid in, but we could afford to because the union assured that we made a decent living wage & didn't get our salaries cut so that the guys at the top could pay for their swimming pools & vacation homes. Glad to see someone acknowledge what it's all about.
If unions are so bad, then why is Europe in less of an economic funk than we are? And why do the workers of Europe have more time off for vacations, maternity leave and the like? And why does many parts of Europe actually have a higher standard of living than we do?

Oh yeah. I forgot. America is #1 in everything. not