Best Movie of All Time: “Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan”
My personal choice for best movie of all time is Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan.
Many would say that the best movie of all time is, by definition, Citizen Kane, that the matter is no longer even open for debate. And make no mistake, I think Citizen Kane is a fine movie. It was expertly done, tells a good story, and was a source of substantial innovation. But I don't join the bandwagon of people who say it's the best movie of all time.
There are also a lot of people who will rank Wrath of Khan at the top of SciFi movies, but I disagree with limiting it that way. I do not mean to say here something so trivial as that I like SciFi movies, Wrath of Khan is the SciFi movie I like best, and therefore clearly it must be the best. Rather, I mean to say that I watch all kinds of movies, and that this is simply “the best.”
First of all, the story is a powerful story. It is full of timeless themes: the quest for adventure, the defense of family, matters of youth and aging, anger, revenge, sacrifice, and even technology at its worst and best.
Wrath of Khan managed to do what Star Trek: The Motion Picture had previously attempted and failed. It took the soul of a well-loved television series and brought it back onto the screen. That was itself quite a landmark. In so doing, it changed the endgame for the television series forever and established the notion of television as multimedia franchise opportunity.
But more than that, it was transformational in a different way. Before this movie, the standard model for beloved characters appearing in movie sequels was like James Bond or Superman, where the character never aged even if the actor did. Aging was not spoken of. Actors were replaced when used up. Wrath of Khan went where none had gone before. They used the time that had elapsed between the television episodes and the movies to their advantage. This movie broke the taboo on aging and did what Star Trek as a TV show had been famous for, it made it ok to talk about something that previously people had only danced around.
Ironically, Citizen Kane was praised for its innovative use of special make-up effects to allow actors to appear to age. One thing that Wrath of Khan does the best is make innovative use of not making people up, or at least not overly, and instead using the actual aging as raw material. So I would say these two masterpieces share in common their having made important innovations, even if in very different ways, in the big screen portrayal of aging.
Khan had been a powerful superman kind of character in the TV show to which this movie was sequel. Rather than either get a new actor or pretend there was no aging, the movie capitalized on the length of time in order to underscore the degree to which time can intensify an emotion. Khan's hatred of Kirk has simmered for far too long, and the result is powerful. But Kirk's friendship with Spock and McCoy and Scotty has also continued over the years, and the power of that friendship is likewise drawn onto the screen. The actors' fears of being old, of being put out to pasture, and their struggle to stay relevant is capitalized upon in order to play Star Fleet officers with exactly the same set of concerns.
The movie was also a transformation in other ways. On the show, one always knew that as the hour closed, things would get better. Even people who had died during the show were often brought back to life. But in the movies, it was not so clear. No one ever quite knew if there was to be another movie. There is a definite feeling of “playing for keeps” in this movie that leaves television behind and forces us to grow up, all of a sudden, and to boldly go where we have feared to go before. As Kirk admits he has always only cheated death—and never really faced it—he brings us to a new understanding of the words “final frontier.” He faces problems we all must face, and in the best tradition of the television series, he brings us along to witness and learn from his experience.
The movie is also well-paced, and full of history-making special effects. For example, the movie-within-a-movie of the Genesis Project was the first ever fully-computer-generated movie sequence. And, aptly enough, the production of this movie shared in common with the Genesis device it portrayed the fact that it was a one-way ticket into the future—once released it could not be undone; the sequence itself was too expensive to redo, and yet it was also unpredictable so no one knew how it would come out until they saw it in action! It had to just be tried to find out how it would work. (Proof of this claim is easily visible in the movie if you watch carefully where the viewer's viewpoint, or “camera,” follows around the equator of the quickly evolving planet and at one point accidentally passes through a mountain rather than over it. The creators couldn't go back to refilm it, so at the last moment on the screen a hand-drawn valley is opened up for the “camera” to miraculously pass through. It's easy to spot once it's pointed out. One could easily call this detail a flaw, but I find that it is more of a badge of honor that helps to underscore the truly revolutionary nature of the computation that was done to create this sequence.)
Performances by Shatner, Nimoy, and Montalbán are top-notch. The movie is well-paced and uses a nice mix of serious and humorous elements. It builds on the TV series but does not require that; knowledge of the series merely gives the viewer's understanding a bit more texture.
The plot begins with abstract ethical dilemmas posed by the Kobayashi Maru test used for training in Star Fleet Academy and leads quickly into real life dilemmas, culiminating in Spock's personal solution to the Kobayashi Maru toward the end. It shows us honor, sacrifice, and even hope in a way that is simply hard to top. It goes, quite literally, light years beyond Citizen Kane.
If you got value from this post, please "rate" it.


Salon.com
Comments
(It needed to be said.)
That aside, I didn't know that Khan was played by one of the original Hispanic actors of Hollywood.
Ah, yes, he wore some soft, Corinthian leather.
I have seen them all. All of the television series and all of the movies... and I have never approached the intellectual appreciation for the Wrath of Khan that you brought out here. To be clear... now that you have so clearly pointed these attributes out... I agree with everythng that you said. I just never saw it in the way. I loved the movie... but I would have hardly recognized it for the landmark achievements that you highlighted.
This is an extraordinary post... and this is from someone who would have claimed himself to be an expert. (rated)
An excellent choice and a flawlessly logical analysis of the film. Your nugget about the computer graphics used is a priceless piece of film trivia. Thanks for sharing it.
Rated for overall goodness and because I'm proud to be a Trekkie.
Americain, indeed, a case can be made for 2001. I understand there are those who think that. For me, it would be an odd choice because although I think it has many fabulous scenes, it also has one of the most boring scenes in all moviedom (the speech scene on the moon). And the pace is quite erratic. It's very Clarke in that way. Some of his books are that way, too. I'm willing to pay the price to get to his many other magical contributions. But as an overall work it falls a little short for me. Nevertheless, we can perhaps agree to disagree as Asimov and Clarke did... There was a dedication from one to the other in one of their books that said soemthing like: From the world's second best science writer to the world's second best science fiction writer. Or some such thing. Heh.
Saturn, yeah, he was quite something in it. Curious, too, that when they asked him to do the movie he didn't even remember having done the TV show, which wasn't really memorable to him. I'm sure once he went to do the movie he pulled up a video copy and relearned it though. Quite a performance.
Coyote, thanks. That bit of movie trivia came to me from people who knew people in the industry by a kind of word of mouth. I trust the people who told it to me, and it certainly matches what you can see onscreen. The work was done on a supercomputer somewhere, before it was cheap enough for anyone to have a supercomputer (e.g., an Apple G5) of their own. I assume there must be some public account of those details somewhere but I've never gone looking. If anyone knows and wants to post a pointer, that'd be useful. (Even if it contradicts anything I've said, I'd appreciate knowing.)
If I recall, writer/director Nicolas Meyer completely reworked the script just prior to production (though he only took directing credit). And Leonard Nimoy commented on more than once occasion how wonderful it was to have a gifted writer available before production and on set.
For example, the pre-production script included this dialogue from Spock to Saavik, “We can't all be perfect, Saavik. You must control your prejudices and remember that as a Vulcan as well as a Romulan you are forever a stranger in an alien land.” Meyer’s rewrite included things like switching out ‘control your prejudices’ to ‘govern your passions’.
And I’m sure you’ve heard George Costanza’s ‘Khan’ primal scream, yes?
I'm always hesitant to say anything is THE best of all-time. But this one is definitely one of my all-time favorites! And you wrote a nice review of the movie.
RATED
However, my heart belongs to Star Trek IV, the San Francisco one. I have always felt that the Treksters were at their best when they were most whimsical. IV was the natural analog to the TV episode named "The Trouble with Tribbles". More of a romp than a drama.
Rick, thanks. Sometimes you've just got to take a stand. I agree there are other contenders, but I'd have to justify any of them. And this is the one I worked out a while back is really at the top for me.
Rich, yeah, that's a little icky. Kind of like the ROUS's in The Princess Bride.
I've seen the TV episodes on the big screen. The Lecture Series Committee at MIT got a couple of them to show. They are serious cheesy when blown up big enough to see in that detail. The sets were all designed for small screen and don't stand up to the large screen at all, except to people who just loved the show and are watching for fun.
And the plots kind of follow suit with the sets.
One of the few virtues of the ST: TMP (the original movie) was that it showed how the majesty of the screen could work for the visuals, so I won't claim this movie initiates that. But what this movie does is make sure the plots are similarly able to stand the scrutiny of the big screen. This is a plot designed for the theater, no doubt about it.
But the number one reason it is better is because in the bit Kirk-Picard controversy...I am solidly in the Picard camp. The scene between Alfre Woodard and Patrick Stewart where she calls him "Ahab"...and he falters in his anger...and compellingly quotes the part of Moby Dick about Abab's obsession with the white whale is one of the best scenes in cinema...period.
yek, First Contact is good but is really a scifi lover's movie, not a movie for general audiences. To follow even the basic plot structure requires detailed knowledge of the Star Trek universe. The themes of Khan are much more accessible. Star Trek IV was one people liked, too, and was a popular success. But I think it's hard to understand it as a piece in isolation; it's more a part of a series. Although II was a part of a series also, it works better as a free-standing element. And it's more ground-breaking, as I've enumerated.
Actors, at least stage actors, like to be part of an ensemble (that's what rep companies are).
Star Trek, over a forty year span, showed how commercial television and film could sustain good stories with appearances by hundreds of able, even great actors.
Star Trek is a very large ensemble of players.
Many notable performers in the English speaking theater, as well as American and British film and television, appeared in character roles in the various Trek shows.
Another example of the points made about Khan, in terms of showing characters in real time, was one episode from the Deep Space Nine show where the three aged Klingon warriors go into battle one last time with Lt. Dax.
The Klingon characters were based on the original NBC show from the mid Sixties; and the actors who played those characters at that time performed, for the last time, those roles in the DSN episode.
Not too shabby.
But the Trek ensemble is probably larger than any other.
The "Khhhhaaaaannnnn!!!" scene is perfect because of the setup by Montalban: "And now, Kirk, I leave you as you once left me--marrrrooned for all eternity, in the center of a dead world!"