Death
The viewing of the movie Bambi is one of modern society's ritual introductions of death to children. It's a difficult concept to explain. As a young child, in probably first or second grade, I recall having spent many long hours, including many nights where it was hard to get to sleep, obsessing about death. I did the math and worked out that most people live to at least sixty or seventy or some impossibly large age like that. Whatever the number, I recall finally coming to the conclusion that it was something like ten lifetimes away. A comfortably long time. Nothing to worry about. And time passes slower when you're a kid, too, so that added to the buffer I felt.
As a teenager, I lost my dad suddenly, to a drunk driver. I had never really known people to die. I came to see death differently. It almost wasn't the thing itself. That was quick. But it was the staying dead that was hard to grapple with. I recall sometime later being frustrated that he was still dead. Death is so darned permanent.
It's part of growing up, I suppose, to grapple with the fact that part of life is death. The fact that it can happen. We'd like to believe it can't. We try to ignore it lest it consume us full-time all the time, but then it hits all the harder if it does. We do not allow ourselves to conceive of the loss of any one of us. It's too complicated to imagine all the adjustments we'd have to make, so we put it off until we have to.
Cyberspace adds an odd wrinkle, too. We often don't recognize the societal texture it creates nor think of those among us who make it up. We're apes and used to looking into the eyes of our friends. I started using the net in 1977 and had my first telecommuting job in 1978. I had net friends from all around the country. And I think it was in 1979 when the one named UNCOLA (our user names were 6 letters or fewer, in all capital letters), who had written the UNTALK program—a fancy version of a talk program that allowed two people to have a split screen, typing in one half of the screen and reading the typing of the other person in the other half of the screen—committed suicide. He left a note in the description part of his login ID saying “see you on the dark side of the moon.” Friends of mine who followed the music of the time explained to me that this was a lyrical reference. With that brief statement, he was gone. Not a close friend, but someone I knew. A reminder of the tenuous human fabric that makes up our lives, and how easily it is torn.
In my mind, I recall it as him dying “on the net,” though of course he died in the real world and I just learned about it on the net. But our friends live on the net, and so in our perception they die there, too.
Sometimes when people die I am sad for them, but once in a while another emotion crosses my mind that I'm never quite sure what to make of. I think “at least no one can bother them any more” or “they have finally become what they were to become.” It's possible to view life as a process that has ended, but it's also possible to view it as creating something that transcends one's time. One builds the best legacy one can, and then one leaves it to stand on its own. I never used UNTALK without thinking of UNCOLA.
The Counting
I worked for a company, Symbolics, for a long time in the 1980's and into the early 1990's, when it finally went bankrupt. How I personally fared in all of that is a tale for another day, but what's relevant at this moment is that suddenly at one point there were layoffs. People didn't understand this well because in those days you only got fired for cause, and layoffs were a new thing to us. Someone getting fired usually meant they were people you didn't like anyway, and might be happy to see go away. But this was people who were our family, who we didn't want to go, who were torn from us abruptly, like a death. They brought in grief counsellors, who over a matter of weeks helped the staff who remained behind to adjust. It was a long, complicated thing coming to grips with the issue.
Unfortunately, layoffs at Symbolics didn't happen just once. They happened again, and again many more times, as the company dwindled in size from more than a thousand to less than 200, and we all became more efficient at coping. After a while, one knew the signs. One checked quickly to see if they were in the crew of people staying or going. People staying went to the room where they announced the casualties. People who'd been cut went to their offices to pack. Everyone back to work and life moving on by 11am. No more grief counselling. Just business cranking along.
I'm reminded of some movie I saw once, and a quote I'd love to relate with exactness. Only the essence of it sticks in my brain. It was a reference to World War I, which the person referred to by saying something like, “We called it the Great War, before we had the presence of mind to realize we needed to number them.” I guess the thing that struck me about that is that when the first of something happens, one often doesn't think “first of many,” or if they do some friend gives them grief about being at least negative if not an outright doomsayer.
In my mind, I still think of UNCOLA as a unique case. Death almost defines him. He is the one that died. But we all will. And there will not be so much ceremony for the others. Society cannot afford it. That event was for our community a kind of collective viewing of Bambi, a realization that it could happen. After that, we were not as much children as we had been.
Recently with the death of Dakini Dancer, this community endured the same. I didn't know her but I understand the void she left, with the sudden realization among people here that it could and would happen. Kellylark's If YOU Die, How Will I know? grapples with the problem directly, for example. Many others wrote their tributes.
At least in a place like Open Salon there is a legacy of writing that we all leave to the future, and so upon our death we can say we have become something and left something. Even those of us without religion can have an afterlife here, as we do in all the people and places our lives have touched.
What Mourning We Afford
Many tributes were expressed to Dakini, but I'll bet that not as much will be said when others die later. There are too many in the community and the community will not bear a two day period of mourning for each of us that falls away. That isn't to begrudge the time spent on marking Dakini's passing, but rather to say to those whose personal friends are not similarly heralded in the future, this doesn't mean those people are less of value.
Part of what people are going through right now is the loss of an individual. And that loss is real. But partly they are working through the concept that loss can and will happen. And they will become, of necessity, practiced at that, as we were at Symbolics when layoff after layoff caused each of our hearts to ball up and insulate us from the human aspects of the casualties around us.
This would happen for any such trauma.
We are outraged by Hurricane Katrina, but I sometimes find strange comfort in the notion that there are so few Katrinas thus far—that they still have names and not just numbers. I'm not bullish on Climate Change and so, doomsayer that I seem to have become, I expect worse things to become more common, and for us to look back on Katrina and long for the day when we could confront such problems one at a time. If Climate Change worsens, and more cities suffer problems, the reactions of other cities in the future may well be “leave us alone, we have our own problems.”
We bemoaned the loss of the twin towers in New York because we had the luxury of time in which to do so. Had there been more such attacks, we might quickly have learned we didn't have the time. We fight wars in which any given day may be, for those who participate, as horrific as 9/11. But we don't mourn the individual days and events. We compartmentalize it, package it up, aggregate and consolidate it—all ways to keep from individually confronting the details at a level we all know is morally called for, but that we all know would bring civilization to a standstill if we had to do.
At some point, life is for the living, and so we budget a day—or perhaps a weekend—per year to look back on all that has come before us, and then we get on about life.
If you got value from this post, please "rate" it.


Salon.com
Comments
I hear what you're saying. I think part of it is that, as you get older, folks die more frequently, and we find that if we spend as much time mourning them as we did the first time someone we loved died, we'd spend a lot of time in mourning. I watch older people--in their 70s, say,--whose friends are dropping like flies, and I wonder how they cope.
Right now, I'm coping with the fact that several people I know all have cancer. It seems as if there's been a spate of it. Two years ago, I didn't know anyone who had cancer, except my former MIL, and now, it's all around me.
Does it mean I feel it any less? No. I've just learned, as you say, to compartmentalize it so that I can continue on with my life.
Still, I mourn, I grieve, I process. And I hope, each time, that it won't happen again.
I certainly don't wish that we lose another member any time soon, but for me, I don't think I would simply file it under "there goes another one" and brush myself off and move on. I hope I never become that way, on line or in my daily life.... If anything, Dakini Dancer's death has highlighted our ability to transcend the internet and *feel* in ways that other sites simply don't allow or afford by the very nature of what we do here every day. Even though OS is sure to grow exponentially in membership, I hope the core of that feelings never changes.
Max, thanks for sharing that bit of history. That's a very sad thing about the delayed naming, but I guess it was a help to those who had to go through that. We do what we have to in order to cope.
odette, I'm glad if this offers you useful thought. I wrote it mostly because I needed to. I wasn't sure if it would resonate with anyone else. These things strike people in very personal and differing ways.
That doesn't mean that a person's death affects us any less or we feel any less bereft at their passing. Perhaps it does indicate that we have some sense that once our tribe is gone from this world, we may be content to be next.
One: I wondered when I was young, as I expect all children do, what the world would be like in the future--more than that, I wondered what I would be like in the future. Some of my thoughts (again, like those of all children born more than, say, 30 years ago) were about the milestone year 2000. I don't know how many times I counted forward to figure out that I'd be 37 in that year. (And now I realize that I was wrong all those years--I'd only be 36 on New Year's Day, turning 37 on my birthday in the yeare 2000. Oh, well.) All that year, an occasional feeling of mortality would steal over me, the thought, "When I was a child, I imagined what it would be like to be old. Now that time has come, and even if I don't feel old, I know I won't live forever."
Two: (Okay, I started to write this out, but it turned out to be so morbid that I can't continue--too depressing! Instead, I'll just wish my best to you and your family on Memorial Day.)
It's a Pink Floyd album, released in 1973, "frequently ranked by music critics as one of the greatest and most influential albums of all time." It is also one of the best selling albums of all time, and remained on the Billboard 200 list "for 741 weeks".
Many of the songs touch on themes of insanity. (Sample lyric: "You raise the blade, you make the change, you rearrange me 'til I'm sane. You lock the door, and throw away the key. There's someone in my head, but it's not me.")
Perhaps you are right when you talk about the idea of others being given less attention when there are future departures. We have to remember there are a few beloved members who are ill, and the mourning process was begun and is ongoing, regardless of the varying levels of fluctuating health and vigor. We have time to build our resistance to sorrow in the cases of folks who are facing the fact of their mortality...with all of us helping them through it in the best way we can.
The suddenness of Josie's death caught all of us off-guard, having no expectations about her well-being....the shock seemed to deepen with the mounting reactions from the community.
Like the means by which we measure visual phenomena, we see things by contrast. The fate of the Towers naturally over-shadow the attack on the Pentagon, and the crash of the passenger jet in Pennsylvania.
Similarly, we have to notice how easy it is to forget we are involved in two major wars at the moment......it seems we tend to notice in the context of the myriad other conflicts in the world, and our anguish is diluted.....It is hard to think of what else to say, because I do not know the solution....
Julie, yes, I think firsts not only of this kind but the others you cite do have that specialness that is sometimes not quite to be repeated.
Thanks for a thoughtful post.
Time DOES pass slower when you’re a kid; it’s an interesting phenomenon. I don’t generally feel badly for a person who has died, but rather for their family and loved ones who now must deal with that loss.
I remember the first time I went to a funeral. I was really young, maybe 7 or 8 years old, and I remember feeling sad for everyone who was sitting there crying. I had not really known the person who had died, and did not feel a real sense of loss, but I did feel a sense of sadness for everyone who was crying. Of course, when we are actually close with someone who has died, the sense of loss overwhelms us. I think Gary Justis’ remark is pertinent:
“Like the means by which we measure visual phenomena, we see things by contrast.”
Personally, I think American society, perhaps most “Western society”, is fairly cold-blooded by “contrast” with many other cultures. The nature of the competitiveness that is innate within that culture is not exactly accommodating to emotional needs and relationships. There was a time when up to about a year was considered a reasonable amount of time for family members to mourn the death of another family members, but now a reasonable time is often considered weeks or days, and if you aren’t back at work, you will most likely not have a job. And that is the norm; it’s all about jobs, competition for livelihoods, money, etc. Much of the humanity is simply not considered.
___________________________
One more comment about “Dark Side of the Moon”; as I recall, that album was largely inspired by the mental illness of Sid Barrett, who was an original Pink Floyd member but who left the band in ’68, supposedly due to his mental illness, which was supposedly made worse by excessive drug use. (I don’t know how much of that is true and how much is speculation.)
You make a good point. There will be other deaths among our community and each will be handled in its own way, some mourned quietly by a small group of friends, some acknowledged and mourned across the larger community, just as it is in the offline world.
After the death of my late husband, I began to plan for my own (some details in response to JKBrady's post on how our virtual friends could be informed), but it's really a theoretical exercise at this point. Sometimes I feel my mind skitter around the coming event (no, no - no time-line and I feel fine), and I contemplate deaths before me.
As I get older, I contemplate the coming deaths of contemporaries... I don't feel all that philosophical about it all... But, as with everything else that comes our way, we live (or die) thru it, because we have no other choice.
I think a special OS obit section is a great idea. Cuz there's gonna be more, and any time... It would be like a virtual graveyard that we could visit FTTT (and place virtual flowers)...
You write, “In a way, mourning seems to me a luxury of a successful society, and perhaps its loss is more an indicator of our society having backslid some. Maybe that was your point, though.”
That was my point, and I think you make it stronger with your assessment of a “successful society”. Of course, that success is based on other than monetary assessments.
Rick, of course, I'm reminded of the story of someone finding a man on a beach in Mexico or some such place, I don't recall precisely, and trying to convince him to come to the US, the land of opportunity. Why? the man asks. Because you could make a lot of money. And what would I do with the money? Buy things, go on vacations. Vacations? To where? Well, you could visit this beach... But I already live here and can come any time I like, the man replies. So, yes, Rick, wealth is measured in various ways.
Ruminations on things passing seem to occupy a goodly fraction of my thoughts these days. Is it possible this is just an age thing – like the book Passages? Don’t know, I read that too long ago to remember much beyond “everyone feels like this at 30” and realizing that was exactly as I felt at the time.
What you are speaking about, however, is not so much death as it is how a community like OS handle seminal events and then succeeding ones. Brave line of thinking to take on, especially given the outpouring of emotion over Dakini’s untimely passing.
The reference to 9/11 and the towers smoking and falling is an excellent comparison, but largely because not many of the current generation who would communicate this way (online) remember the smoking and sinking ships of Pearl Harbor as a current event, so they attach different, weaker emotion to it. Or perhaps it would be a better analogy to use the example of the early use of photography in a war and remember Gettysburg. Could we imagine people in the 1860s seeing those photos of their brothers, husbands and children rotting in long lines in the fields and then feel what they felt? Yet these other two events would have been as impactful in their time as seeing planes hitting the towers were for us. Each of us needs to learn to grieve anew and then each of us needs to realize that we are still living, so there are things to do.
Thanks, as always, for being so provocative.
Funny, too, an opposite experience happened to me when my mother recently died. Not only was I completely prepared (I thought) for her death, I have a history of phlegmatic reaction to death. Was I in for a surprise! It has been as though I'd never known anyone who died. So weird. It's not that I feel like an orphan, which many have suggested, it's that I thought I understood the finality of death, then she died and I was back in death nursery school.
Anyway, you've captured many of my thoughts and feelings about Dakini's death and death in general perfectly. Thank you.