Kent Pitman

Kent Pitman
Location
New England, USA
Title
Philosopher, Technologist, Writer
Bio
I've been using the net in various roles—technical, social, and political—for the last 30 years. I'm disappointed that most forums don't pay for good writing and I'm ever in search of forums that do. (I've not seen any Tippem money, that's for sure.) And I worry some that our posting here for free could one day put paid writers in Closed Salon out of work. See my personal home page for more about me.

MY RECENT POSTS

Editor’s Pick
JUNE 7, 2009 10:16AM

Three Little Words We Like To Hear

Rate: 34 Flag

I'll let you in on a secret of mine. Three little words that make all the difference. A simple little sentence that school forgets to prepare you for in spite of its amazing power.

“I don't understand.”

Those who teach empowerment seminars probably tell you to go the other way. Certainly all the schools I ever attended did. But in my experience the whole point of learning something well is so that you don't have to know everything well.

I recall being with a friend, a fellow student, and encountering someone I didn't know in a lounge near my office at MIT. “Who are you?” I asked. He said his name and it meant nothing to me. “Oh, what do you do?” He told me about his research. He mentioned no title. Later, my friend was mortified. “I can't believe you just asked Carl Hewitt who he was and what kind of research he does,” she griped. “Why?” “Don't you know who he is?” she asked harshly, obviously mortified with embarrassment. “No, I don't. That's why I asked.” She explained that he was an important professor in my field of study, and seemed to think if I didn't know this, I should have just been quiet about it. “He didn't seem offended,” I noted. “He seemed happy to explain. Now I know about it, where if I hadn't asked I wouldn't. And anyway, if he had cared but hadn't gone to enough trouble to make himself known to me, that wouldn't be my fault, it would be his.”

I learned quickly from this experience and others to just boldly tell people when I didn't know something. They were always happy to fill in. I went to conference after conference, never hurting for small talk, because I was never short of things I didn't understand and I found I was forever in the presence of people who felt they did. It was quite a symbiotic relationship, actually. I learned a great deal and people were happy teaching me.

People distrust people who purport to understand everything. I think they are reassured by being around people with the confidence to identify what they don't understand. The phrase is therefore naturally collaborative. It invites helpful cooperation.

Saying you didn't understand something creates an opportunity to listen. People like it when others listen to them. It makes people feel wanted. While there are surely some experts in the world who enjoy humiliating people who admit a lack of understanding, I think such people are few—and I'm not so sure they should be catered to in many cases anyway. Most experts enjoy using their expertise to help, so saying you don't understand something is saying “I need you.” It's as close as the professional world ever comes to showing a sense of family.

And then there are the faux experts or experts who are not as expert as they think. True experts generally have sufficient additional brainpower left over when thinking about their area of expertise that they can spare a little to help others, but some experts are secretly struggling, too. The gracious among them will have learned to respond simply “I don't understand either,” disarming the situation and allowing both of you to feel comfortable. But the charlatans will stubbornly resist, hoping to resolve the situation by making you feel bad. Don't let them. Simply repeat the remedial phrase, “I still don't understand.”

“I've come to realize you must sometimes think of yourself as the least enlightened one in the room. This seems to keep the mind open.”
  —Gary Justis, in a comment

People who admit they don't understand something are poised to learn something about it. One cannot learn something new from the posture of “I already know.” Cognitive dissonance will refuse to allow the new knowledge in even if someone is providing it. And if you're busy focusing verbally on how much you already know, why would anyone be bothering to offer you new information anyway?

It takes a humble soul to admit weakness gracefully. People admire humility and react warmly to it. That dosn't hurt either.

Even politically, the phrase is useful. While much is made of the need for strong leaders, it is the strongest leader who is not afraid to admit he is not Superman. The false bravado of George Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld did nothing to make sure our country was pointed in the right direction. All it did was assure us that when we regained our collective senses, we couldn't get them to see how off course we were. We'll be struggling for a long time to dig ourselves out of the obfuscations put in place in that era and to learn the truth of what went on. Yes, some of the obfuscation might be national security, but history suggests that a lot of national security is really just about face-saving.

It took a regime change—which fortunately the founding fathers had planned for at timed intervals—to replace that Administration with another that is more comfortable speaking about our occasional weaknesses. And in spite of heckling from the Hannities and the Limbaughs in the crowd, Obama's admissions of our weaknesses have only seemed to make us stronger. No big surprise, for reasons I've explained above.

Especially, too, in these hard economic times, be reassured by the fact that we all still need each other for one thing or another. Focus on what you can reliably contribute and then step back and let others contribute what they can.

Hopefully that covers today's subject. If you're left not understanding my point, feel free to say you don't understand. If I've failed to make any of these points clearly enough, that's surely my problem, not yours.


If you got value from this post, please "rate" it.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I looked at the link for Carl Hewitt on Wikepedia. Now I'm really confused! What the hell is all that about?
You are so right on with this topic. The worst failures were people who not only wouldn't admit that they didn't get a concept, but would encourage others to fake it, too.
Having only just returned from Capitol Hill, it seems to me that the bravado remains thick and vile in the American political cogs.
Good post, Kent. Ironically, the older I get the more willing I am to admit that I don't understand something. Definitely a connection with how secure I feel, but also related to being more receptive in general. Enjoyed this.
Life is too short to pretend you know what you don't. Great post.
Risa, there's no significance to the fact that it was Carl Hewitt that the story happeend to be about. I just linked him because I like to speak in hypertext. The only significance was that as an undergrad, my friend felt I should either speak about things I know or be silent.
I remember, even as a child sitting in a classroom, being afraid to admit I didn't understand something. It seemed like failure and was quite embarrassing. Not until I was in my 30's did I finally feel comfortable with admitting to things I did not understand. Now, much older, I realize I certainly was not the only one and I admit it to myself and others regularly. LOL The older I get, the less I do understand... and so it goes!
Kent, great post. I learned a long time ago (but not as soon as I should have) that it's OK to admit I don't know, followed by a "Can you explain that to me?" Like you, my experience has been that most real experts are delighted to share a teaching moment.

I sometimes wonder if this is at the crux of the science vs. creationism debate (and maybe at the heart of the God vs. atheism debate, too). Scientists are comfortable saying they don't know. This seems to make creationists angry. Creationists believe they know, which they think is the same thing as knowing they know. Now I have to go think about this for awhile.
Great post, Kent, possibly my favorite among the pieces you've posted here. (I'm thinking, "Gee, I wish I'd written this.") I'll second Sandra (and you) in admiration of another three words, "I don't know," and I'll add another three that I use regularly: "I was wrong." The world would be a very much better place if people used these phrases much more often than they do. But people tend to get heavily invested in their knowledge and beliefs, treating flaws and weaknesses in such as applying to themselves, personally. It drives me nuts, sometimes.

I looked at the link for Carl Hewitt on Wikepedia. Now I'm really confused! What the hell is all that about?

Risa, I have a Ph.D. in computer science, within the discipline that Carl Hewitt works in, and there are a lot of aspects of his work that I just can't follow. He's a really influential, really smart guy.
You are a very in=depth kind of writer and sometimes on previous posts, I had to read two or three times to be able to absorb the volume of material you were determined to share. This post was (ironically) easier to understand and didn't leave me feeling as dumb as I have felt after reading some of your other posts. And I loved Gary's comment that you highlighted. He is absolutely right.
Great post.
A lot of frustration comes from people being denied the "voice" to ask questions.
"I don't understand." Sometimes people don't get the chance to say that.
I guess I still consider it a privilege to be able to ask all the questions.
I'm glad questions are being asked and answered, and I think you do a great job presenting questions!
You always make me think - much harder than I would otherwise.
Thanks.
Knowing everything must be a trick others can pull off. I'm miserable at it because I discovered the more I worked, the longer I went to school, the more I read etc. the bigger my frame of reference became. There is so much to know about any subject that it is an obvious pretense if one knows it all or most of it whatever it may be.

I do not know to whom to attribute this old saying but "the only people who can't learn are those who think they know everything."

Thanks for posting this. Rated and appreciated.
sigh, wish I were better at communicating this when I've felt it- which has been about 99% of my waking existence. When I say these words (or versions of these words) people seems to take my questions as a challenge to their knowledge or simply an imposition. Great piece Kent, wish more people felt like you!
Julie, my feeling is that for people who take it as a challenge they may have something to hide. People who are being honest should be able to say, as I suggested, “I don't understand either.” if they're really stuck. But if they're stuck and can't acknowledge they're stuck, it's a bit of their own fault, and it's they that need to grow, not you. And if they treat it as an imposition to have knowledge that you don't, well, there's a person again who needs to be apologizing, not a person you need to apologize to.

There's a bit of alleged wisdom I made up and sometimes dispense on topics quite similar to this, and it almost stretches to this situation, too, so I'll try it: “There's no shame in being treated badly.” It's common for people to get this wrong and somehow think it's an embarrassment to themselves when they witness or sometimes even provoke a bad action in another. Bad actions by people do not reflect badly on the recipient, and if someone thinks it's too much of a chore to be nice or humble or forthcoming, let them think so. The situations you describe in people is not exactly mankind at its lowest; people could be worse people than merely to be unpleasant in conversation. But even so, I think the basic formulation is right, and that while the consequences may be less for screwing up manners rather than screwing up ethics, it doesn't mean one shouldn't try to get both right.
Zumalicious, yeah, that's a weird problem when someone's decision to hide behind non-information infects another. I've sometimes seen this at work—in a more benign way because some information has to be withheld according to certain business practices, but the effect is the same. Person A says not to say something about something for reasons that person really understands. Person B clams up dutifully but can't always really understand it, so they often make up fictions or cover stories or hypotheticals to cover, but Person C, if persistent, will debunk until they discover there is Zero behind Person B's story. This will make Person B appear irrational or capricious, and all the more so if they are loyal to Person A and do not admit that it was all a sham. Meanwhile Person A takes no heat at all. There may be some analogies to the Bush administration now that I think about it. Perhaps I should have just led with that. But I guess my point is that this is a general pattern that really transcends any particular set of individuals and arises from the behavior. Much better to be, where possible, forthcoming because it's contagious as well, and in a much more comforting way. (I do, by the way, think there are real, good, sound reasons to have and keep confidences. I just think that the number of places where this need arises is way smaller than the number of places it's alleged to be needed.)
Kent,
I'm honored by the inclusion of the quote....and I have to say I was coaxed in learning this by practice and by suggestion of ones much wiser than myself. I loved your response to my original comment:

"Gary, I've never had a problem conceiving of myself as the least enlightened person in the room. I think the key is learning not to fear it. Gives me an idea for another post. (scribble, scribble) Thanks! "

I've not known you to scribble anything my large-minded colleague.
If anyone has scribbled on this forum...It is I.
Valuable post! I have to remember that..."I don't understand." Another one, "I made a mistake," is a good phrase for me to have on hand. And "I'm sorry." Explaining really does bring people closer. Thanks for the thoughtful work you're presented here.
Hey smart guys, Kent and Rob, thanks for coming to the rescue of this damsel. But really. I was only trying to top Kent by demonstrating my humble stupidness. I dropped out of physics in high school and then again in college. Just couldn't hack it. There, I've purged.
Risa, you won't get away quite so easily. I'm as likely to credit the way your math and physics was taught for that. I'm convinced a lot more would get through such programs with better teaching. Honestly, I think math is the likely culprit. (For additional depth on this, see the recent post by Libertarius Smarter Quicker, Dumber Longer, and my comments on that post, for more thoughts.) But no, you being “stupid” does not ring true to me as the most likely cause. If anything, the number one cause of people failing in math in the US is (in my opinion) the too-easy willingness of an entire society to blankly echo Barbie's ridiculous claims on the matter and to just assume that people not succeeding should be allowed in the first place.
Agreed, Kent. Nothing worse than someone who claims to know everything when you know full well they're making it up.
I've recently been taught four new words by the man I love: "I could be wrong."
They help a lot, too.
Thanks.
Great article....even though my three favorite words are, "I love you!" Seriously, I've never had a problem telling people I don't understand because I love learning and that's one way of learning. Plus, it does get people to open up and talk!
Food for thought. We all know things that we "don't know." For me it would be: physics, chemisty, business..... What about the things we don't know that we don't know? :)
This is lovely, Kent.
I couldn't agree more. It is the politician who wants our trust and blind following that I distrust the most. Cheney in his paternalistic "let me tell you" offerings; is the one I trust the least. I much prefer the humble servant over the "let me take care of you" politician. We are all human and prone to err. Those who are up front about their weaknesses are infinitely more believable and I am much more inclined to follow or listen to them.
Unsurprised so many people have read and enjoyed this essay.
It took me too long when I'd graduated and had the arrogance of the very young to ask often for help. In the testosterone-fuelled environment of a car factory converting to using computer-control for many of its functions (late 1960s), it was seen as weak to admit that you could not solve every problem.
Thinking it over, it was re-training to work as a teacher that cured me partly of being in splendid isolation. It takes the village of a co-operative and unified Staff Room to bring out the best in students, and I soon learned to be frank in answering student queries: "No, I don't know the answer to your question, but, together, we can find out if we tackle it methodically."
At this stage I began working in a Boys' Grammar School with an all male staff who were much older and experienced than me, and had developed in an atmosphere rarely admitting that they did not know "everything".
At Staff Meetings I would find that asking questions was usually left up to another relatively new member of staff and me, and that both of us were thanked for asking for information those who might be expected to know did not wish to be seen as ignorant of - trying to blind students with your own superior knowledge was not at all to be recommended either.
On various committees it has been the same story - experienced people saying thanks when you have been unafraid to say "Could you explain that in a little more detail, please?" or even (especially because I was seen as an English teacher) "I'm not sure exactly what that word means - please explain". This is especially so when speakers lapse into the jargon of their trade, something all of us can do without realizing from time to time.
Thanks for raising this issue in language all of us can enjoy and understand, Kent.
One of the advantages of being a "dumb blonde" is that people expect you not to understand. That's how I've gotten my most important knowledge. Apparently, this applies to people with other hair-colors, too. Learning is the way we humans grow. Asking is the way we learn. Thanks, Kent!
Kent,


“Focus on what you can reliably contribute and then step back and let others contribute what they can.”

Knowing our own shortcomings is to our own advantage, no doubt. Recognizing that someone else might do something better is, also.

It’s always interesting to me how some people just don’t get this point, while others just seem to understand it without thinking about it. The times in my life when I’ve been in management positions, I always perceived people’s strengths and weaknesses – including my own – and tried to assign duties in ways that allowed people to contribute according to their best abilities and then after some time I would challenge them to expand. This has always been a successful formula for me. And in those times, I never found it to be a disadvantage to admit that someone else was better at something; as you say, it opens lines of communication and cooperation.

But you make a good point about situations where admitting our own lack of understanding can actually become a problem. I would have to agree that “Obama's admissions of our weaknesses have only seemed to make us stronger”. I hope he can find ways to expand that approach to other areas of his policies.

RATED
I have no trouble acknowledging that "I do not know" the stuff I do not know.

Of course, I've had lots of practice not knowing stuff.

Even "way back when"...back when I was in first grade...I always had the impression that everyone else had started school a week or so before me. They seemed to know stuff that absolutely stumped me!

I remember waiting on a line to speak with a teacher..holding a card I apparently had to hand to her when I got to the front of the line. I was fidgeting and at some point, the card slipped down the hole where the desktop was attached to the desk.

I panicked! As far as I was concerned, the card had dropped off the earth.

The kid behind me just opened the desktop and got me back my card. He gave me a look like “What the hell is your problem?” Hey, I had never seen a desk with a lift up desktop!

At that point, I realized that life was not gonna be easy...and that there were gonna be lots of things I did not know.
The post os supremely excellent (is that a redudacy?) and I couldn't agree with, you more. I don't understand is the key that opens all doors. Like someone else those three little world will establish a long- lasting symbiotic relationship. I have said your work is great so many times that there should be a revisionist adjectivial (wd,?) structure;

great greater greaterer, greatererest.

And , also my younger say exoperiences were much like Frank describes.

GREATEREREST rated
This is a huge message. I had a boss once who taught me this and it's one of the most valuable lessons I've ever learned. I gotta start looking at some of the editors picks again---sometiomes they get it right!
What they call in Zen "the beginner's mind." The antidote to the "expert-itus" that is so stultifyingly boring and ultimately prevents new understanding to blossom.
Very well put. I recently read a book by Don Miller call "Blue Like Jazz" Don expresses repetitively the importance of listening and being honest in our interactions with others. Don describes this as "speaking from the heart" and it allows for powerful inneractions.

Your blip on the subject captured my mind and heart.

Keep it up

N