Kent Pitman

Kent Pitman
Location
New England, USA
Title
Philosopher, Technologist, Writer
Bio
I've been using the net in various roles—technical, social, and political—for the last 30 years. I'm disappointed that most forums don't pay for good writing and I'm ever in search of forums that do. (I've not seen any Tippem money, that's for sure.) And I worry some that our posting here for free could one day put paid writers in Closed Salon out of work. See my personal home page for more about me.

MY RECENT POSTS

NOVEMBER 18, 2009 11:40PM

When the Bow Brakes

Rate: 11 Flag

Sandra Stephens' post Land of a Thousand Bows reminded me of some remarks I had wanted to make about Obama and bowing:

There are different ways to show strength. I often think the neocons don't get this. They project a kind of cartoon underestanding of strength and weakness that attempts a sort of “Rule by Stereotype.”

In my dating days, I was warned that on dates with women I must never “show weakness.” Women prefer a strong man, or so goes the advice. I never found this to be true.

I do think it takes a certain level of strength to be comfortable enough showing weakness. But I think what the showing of weakness indicates to others is much more subtle than would be summarized by saying it was “always bad.”

Everyone is weak in some way or another, and people who are really comfortable this fact often send the message that they know who they are and are not bothered by it. Being willing to expose a weakness can, if done right, make the point “I have enough strength elsewhere that I can afford to not worry about sharing my weakness here.” This can, in turn, add an almost enigmatic power even while appearing to be utterly straightforward because it does not require one to reveal the source of strength.

In fact, the origin of the handshake is rooted in this same notion. The hand one shakes with is the weapon hand. Extending one's hand says, “I carry no weapon.” Superficially, this might be regarded as exposing weakness. But in showing that particular kind of weakness, one adds via the subtext, “I am not threatened.” This, in turn, shows strength.

I think Obama shows this kind of deep understanding of the symbolism of strength and weakness. He knows he commands from strength but doesn't feel a need to be forever beating others over the head with it. By contrast, when Cheney has historically refused to bow, it has shown what I would regard as weakness because it seems to project the notion that “the entire fate of the free world rests in my doing this gesture right, and if I slip up the US will be at risk.” Nothing could be less true, and by projecting that this is where the battle is fought, he has shown incredible short-sightedness.

It is said that one must pick one's battles. I'll go out on a limb and say that Obama has consciously elected his to be “not while greeting someone hello at a diplomatic event.” Obama's understanding that this can't possibly injure us shows strength.

I would liken the entire fuss over bowing to the superficial fuss over lapel pins, as a sign of patriotism. If our friends and enemies around the world come to think that we are ruled by the trivial, that's where I expect they will lose respect. And, indeed, they did lose respect for us in recent years. We only just recently got a lot of that respect back, in case the Republicans didn't notice.


If you got value from this post, please "rate" it.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Thanks, Bill. Glad you liked it.
Honoring others by respecting their customary behavior is never a sign of weakness. However, misunderstanding what that honor signifies surely is.
Hmmm, I'll have to rethink this. I'm getting no different answers from the regular responses than from the Placebo. :) [PS--Thanks]

Coyote, good to have some additional confirmation. It does seem simple, doesn't it? I wish the people fussing about bows (which is the Republicans) would fuss at least as much about his bowing out on the opportunity to fuss about Health Care. But then, it wouldn't suit the Republicans' agenda to say that Obama should push harder. And yet, it's probably that which shows a slight bit of weakness. And the alleged patriots in Republican Central are probably grinning at that.
Yes indeed, you understand.

R
You're absolutely right. It can't injure us. And no one who thinks it can has been able to explain exactly how.
Kent, you missed the point by a country mile.

Americans DO NOT bow before any monarch or tyrant. EVER.

We just throw up on their representatives.

/sarcasm

Rated. If it weren't so sad (the "uncommonness" of 'common sense'), it would be funny.
What a lot of those who criticize the bow don't get is Obama has to negotiate with other countries who dealt with the cultural ignorance and xenophobic arrogance of the previous administration. In order to really begin a conversation he has to acknowledge at least through physical body language that he recognizes damage was done and he works differently than those before him. Cheney never came across as strong to me -- just arrogant and inflexible. Anyone who has ever taken any sort of mediation training knows one can't negotiate effectively from that starting point.

Rated ;0)
Kent, reading your following sentence gave me a new way to look at this: ("They project a kind of cartoon understanding of strength and weakness that attempts a sort of “Rule by Stereotype.”). Thanks!
Thanks, Buffy. That's quite often exactly the question I'm wondering... Things always seem so clear in my mind and I wonder why others don't get it.

Jeanette, yep—I ran into that phenomenon on Sandra's thread, just not buying the explanations I saw.

Bill, don't forget shoulder rubs. We broke tradition on that one, too, I think.

Dorinda, thanks for detailed show of support. Something about what you said reminded me, too, about the question of home building material in Japan, and learning that rigid buildings fall over in storms and earthquakes, while ones capable of swaying can survive by being flexible.

Designanator, I'm glad someone picked up on that phrase. I was pretty pleased with it.