I hereby propose a $1.00 flat tax on dying.
I'd even waive it for people who die without means to pay.
Call it The Death Tax. That would be its official name.
Then when Republicans start ranting about how the “death tax” is too high, rational people could say “No, it's only a dollar.”
They would, of course, say “No, I mean that other tax.” And one could reply, “Ah, you mean the Estate Tax. Why didn't you say so in the first place?”
And then a rational discussion could ensue. Ok, just kidding about that part. But at least those who were duped by the spin could have something they could look up.
Because honestly, the whole “death tax” naming by the Republicans is intended to provoke the notion that you get taxed just for dying. And you don't.
The tax could later even be removed. No more dollar. Then when people asked about it, you could say “Death tax? Oh, that was gotten rid of.”
Or, if you don't like that plan, we could keep things as they are and when the Republicans pull the “death tax” card we could say, “Hey, don't you always say you should tax people on what you don't want them to do. You don't want them to die, do you?” After all, it'd be rather callous of them to be wanting to make it easy for people to die, isn't it?
The Democrats should just say they've learned from the Republicans to make everything be about money and to work through the tax system to incentivize what industry should be doing.
We could even say we think rich people are especially important so we want there to be a very strong disincentive for them to die.
If you got value from this post, please "rate" it.


Salon.com
Comments
Consider it rated!
Another warped perception is we tax people. We tax money. If we taxed people, it truly would be an "arm and a leg."
Good idea, Kent
R
Bonnie, I'm not big on the notion of dynastic fortunes... And, curiously, it was a friend who had such a fortune that convinced me it was a bad idea. (No, not by me judging him. He had a job and contributed value to society like anyone else. He had a brain on his shoulders and good solid arguments for why things were set up wrong as they are now. But that's topic for another post.)
Stacey, thanks for tuning in. Please make sure to visit our well-stocked concession stand for drinks and popcorn.
There was a similar thing done I think by accident in Massachusetts by creating an “Independent” party. What you think of as independents are called “unenrolled” in Massachusetts due to this fiasco. Creating a named thing where no name had been can successfully supplant an informal name even when nobody likes it. I can assure you many people in Massachusetts would rather use the term Independent in the way everyone else does. But often they're forced not to. That's what I want to do with the so-called death tax (really the estate tax): make them use another name than death tax.
I hope that clear that up.
So I think you have a good approach. I think Tea Party meetings should be held where we serve tea. We can explain your $1 death tax at them.
So we can have your death tax (but a dollar might be too high; maybe a penny) and we can have the Republican "massive wealth" tax. Yeah, it's all how you frame the issue.
Paul, indeed. That must be why those bankers aren't getting the haircut they are said to deserve.
Dr. Spudman, tempers and rhetoric are running high so let's hold the moral high ground and avoid suggesting the death of anyone... but I understand your sentiment about people all-too-comfortable with the notion of the Rapture. I'm glad you liked the piece.
Donna, you have to be pretty rich for the estate tax to even affect you. I don't think most people need to go into cryostasis. And those who might need to have money to spare anyway.
Coyote, glad you caught the extra buzz word.
Hi, Robin. Glad you got a chuckle out of it.
lorelei, isn't that always the way? Those poor children...
Lisa&Lisa, thanks to both of you for visiting.
Mishima, I take your point about the price. Maybe $0.01 would have been better.
I like the idea in theory, but don't there need to be considerations and provisions for METHOD of death? Should a kid from Detroit who gets gunned down for his tennis shoes have to pay the same price as the terminally ill guy who takes his own life, or the random drive by shooting victim? There are just too many means of death to make it a blanket tax, IMHO. Maybe a BIRTH tax on the family who want to have children? Say .50C for every child born?
Just a thought
I once got into an argument with an elderly couple about the 'death tax'. They drove a 20 year-old car, lived in a house in the bad side of town in a house that was probably $20,000 tops and they were damned and determined that they THEY would be slapped silly by the government when they died. The thought made me almost split in two! But they would not be swayed from their belief that the men (and their minister) would leave their children destitute when they died because of an 'unfair tax'...
The programming is good, you have to give them that (GOP/etc) and the fearful are fixated on the lies...
BBE, indeed. A complicated tax code creates a “can't see the forest for the trees” problem.
As for the Grand Old Propaganda, that Party permanently retired the Orwell Award for deliberate obfuscation way back when they rebranded Trickled-On Econcomics as Supply-Side Economics and convinced millions of blue-collar idiots they could become as rich as Wall Street wizards and multi-national corporate fat-cats if only they'd take away welfare Cadillacs. If ever a performance deserved an Oscar for a starring role in a tragi-comedy, it was Darth Raygun as good ol' neighborly Uncle Ronnie.
Bob, great to see you. Thanks for your support!
Kent, given that in the Senate virtually everyone is wealthy, will they ever get the estate tax where it was in '09? The legacy of idiot ex Pres on this, 0 for 2010, high again in 2011 is the single most absurd idea. Not that he didn't do much worse, Bush I mean. Is Obama going after this nonsense. Love the 1 dollar approach cause it changes the entire dialogue.
Dolores, thanks for the support!