I wanted to say a few words about life's flow. That is, to step back from the actual choices I make and look just at the series of actions as if it were a fluid, pressuring me to do things at certain times in certain ways, just because that's where the flow is going. I think it happens a lot. I'll offer a couple of examples, but I'm sure there could be more.
Some people listen to music as background noise at home. I tend to listen to television. Sometimes it's a regular drama, but frequently it's C-SPAN or MSNBC or CNN. I like it because it fills the little spaces of my time with extra information. I feel less like life is passing me by because I am continuously informed.
There's a lot of repetition. Some people think that's bad. But it allows one to not be always focused. In fact, you can notice when there's something actually happening in the world by sensing a change in the repetition. So a lot of the time I find it quite calming.
But sometimes I feel like it takes over in a bad way. It isn't the noise, oddly, but the structure. When watching network television, life becomes divided into one hour chunks and subdivided into secondary chunks† by commercial breaks. And although these secondary pieces are longer than seconds, they often remind me of the space between the ticks of a metronome, establishing a kind of pace to the day.
On the days I don't like it, I think it's because I become conscious of the fact that the rhythm it is imposing on my day is incompatible with how I wanted to pace myself. I find myself coming up for air at times not especially of my choosing, not related to my train of thought, merely because a show timed out when it did. Maybe that's why I so often like to tune to C-SPAN. At least the chunking of time that it does is more irregular. But the effect happens even there.
So, now and then, I take control of things and just turn off the TV and allow myself to get immersed in thoughts that run to their own natural completion. It's important to feel like one has a sense of control of one's life, but it's also important to make a space for things to happen that would not happen if one tried to box them into the spaces that are created just by the boxiness of routine.
†A bit of trivia about the etymology of the word “second,” as a unit of time. The minute was chosen as a unit of time because dividing an hour by 60 meant you could get a lot of subdivisions without resorting to fractions. A half hour is 30 minutes, a third of an hour is 20 minutes, a quarter of an hour is 15 minutes, a fifth of an hour is 12 minutes, a sixth of an hour is 10 minutes, and it's not until you get to a seventh of an hour that you have to resort to fractional minutes. I assume the name “minute” was chosen because the chosen time unit was a minute, or tiny, part of an hour, but I've never been sure. I do, however, know where the word “second” came from. The subdivision of an hour into mintues was thought sufficiently successful that it was decided to make a second such subdivision, that is, a “second minute.” This implies that if you wanted a name for one sixtieth of a second, the proper name would be “third.”
I also wanted to say something about flow on a larger scale.
I was raised in a time when people were taught to save things. Coins, stamps, memorabilia. It's hardly a surprise to me that there are TV shows like Hoarders. The featured people are extreme cases, but the notion of hoarding is something many people with more modest hoarding impulses can relate to.
People of my generation collect things because they think they might be useful. We crossed a line at some point in modern society where we no longer fix things, we get new ones. Throwing things away so often has been terrible for the environment and we should surely change the practice. But for now the result is that people who save things for possible future use are considered dinosaurs or freaks. We live in a disposable society, but it's not even good for us.
But the reason I mention collecting today is not to talk about the environment. I'll come back to that another day. For today my interest in it is the administrative aspect. We save things often because they mean something to us personally. (See my poem The URLs of the Mind for a discussion of this.) But then we die and someone who often knows little or nothing about those things is charged with disposing of them. So the things get swept into a garbage bin or sent off to auction. Sometimes they're inherited by family who have no use for the items but can't bear to get rid of them. And they get hoarded again.
We do this because it's the flow of things we're used to. We don't stop to consider we have other ways to do things. Just as shutting of the TV is a choice, so too is the decision to do things differently.
When I turned 40, I remember thinking it was a big life event and that I should do something. I devised a concept of something to do but then didn't do it. The moment passed. Perhaps in the future I'll get the energy to do it. But I thought for now I would share the thought.
The first and most obvious observation is that it's too bad we have memorial services posthumously. We shouldn't wait for people to die to tell them how great we think they are. We should do it while they're alive.
But also, we collect stuff a long time, accumulating baggage whose purpose will be to hand down. In some ways, we go through many lives in a lifetime. There are intervals of time spent with a person, with a job or with a home that come to an end and then one puts the artifacts aside in the basement. It's hard to give them up. So we should have ritual activities that help to enable that. People should be encouraged to clean house, both literally and figuratively, so they are free to move on to something new.
I think some sort of every twenty years milestone event, not just a coming out party when you're becoming an adult and a retirement party, but a chance to stop and regroup event at intervals, might help shake out some cobwebs and give people a chance to reflect on where to go next in their life, while there's still time to do so.
But we take so much on autopilot. And I'm not sure the autopilot is tuned in a very practical way. We have more control than that of our lives, if we choose to use it.
If you got value from this post, please "rate" it.


Salon.com
Comments
Well more than normal..:)
Rated with hugs
My point is, too much of America (and now the world) is tied to the idiot box, where there's always more and more about less and less. When I go to Mexico to a comparatively media free zone, I find myself much more in tune with my environment and I do a lot more reading and intellectual exploration.
As to your observations on collecting, I say "Bravo!"
Linda, sometimes I feel like a nutcase, but the issues are real and can't be ignored. I wish we were living in a time when politics was optional, or even somewhat optional, but we're beyond that. Too many really active crises, and I don't mean the alleged scourge of gay marriage. Health care, the food supply, the economy, climate change... These things matter and cannot be ignored.
Risa, glad you found it entertaining. It's intentionally a bit open-ended. We'll see what comes of the discussion.
Lefty, my commute to work is very long, so I listen to the radio a lot in the car. But most talk radio seems right-leaning. There are exceptions, of course, but I tire of a lot of the radio offerings. C-SPAN is a lot like radio in that you don't have to watch the screen all the time, and in fact many news shows are. In the case of the TV news shows, the issue isn't what's on the screen, it's how they decide what to cover. If there are no pictures (whether I would be looking at them or not), there's no story. That's the downside of most TV. But C-SPAN is an exception on that. You have to listen to it for a while to run across a nugget of interestingness, but it really is quite interesting from time to time. It's just not scheduled.
"We shouldn't wait for people to die to tell them how great we think they are. We should do it while they're alive. " Yes!
Robin, the trick is getting into's someone's head and finding out why they needed it. That's why my poem The URLs of the Mind is relevant. It's a hard problem knowing ... In most cases only the original owner can truly know.
re: hoarding, I was footloose until I was almost forty, so selling, giving away or just leaving what I had was something that happened at least every two or three years, now I wish I had some of the things I left behind, especially the books and records
Roy, perhaps too late for you, but often I photograph things before getting rid of them. Then I can still remember them even if I don't use them. I know some people need the tactile for some things to activate the memory, but a lot of things that would otherwise be kept can be handled this way, especially now with digital cameras and disk being cheap. Just keep backups.
Personally, I get a lot of mileage out of being in an environment where my activities flow. It might be programming, or writing, or just thinking. (Doing stuff online, unfortunately, interrupts my flow; it's also addictive.)
On the technical/scientific side, there's relatively new interest in cognitive science in the topic of embodied cognition, the idea that "step[ping] back from the actual choices I make and look just at the series of actions as if it were a fluid" is what people do almost all the time, rather than making a series of decisions about what to do next. It's a compelling perspective, I think, though difficult to get a handle on because we don't yet have all the concepts figured out. If you haven't read about this sort of thing, Suchman's Plans and Situated Actions is a good place to start; volume 17 of Cognitive Science gives a variety of other perspectives, some in support of, others in opposition to the idea that stepwise symbol-manipulation is the "right" way to view cognition. Clancey's Situated Cogntion is excellent, too. (You probably know some of these folks as well.)
Abrawang, I think every-ten-years celebrations vary with the individual. Personally, I hate birthday parties, so that wasn't quite what I meant. I was thinking of a more “functional” event with goals other than entertainment. But I admit I didn't have a specific idea beyond that... or none that I was conscious of. Maybe it will come to me.
the book Plans and Situated Actions by Lucy Suchman. From the sample pages, it looks quite interesting. Looks like Clancey's book and quite a number of other books on situated cognition come up with that search. Thanks for the new search term. :)
"give away all that you have, and follow me." or buddha, or kungfutse or mohammed or laotse.
your atoms were born in the heart of a star, and will be dispersed in a cosmos vast beyond imagining. the stuff in your basement won't make a bit of difference, give it now to someone who needs it more, salvation army will be glad to assist.
On a different note, it was amazing what I had accumlated when I left the mountains. I gave away a house full of 'stuff' and traveled light. 'Tis absolutely a strange day when you have nothin' left to move but two plastic tubs and a bicycle.
But the 'flow' of time you describe is dead on. I too, often fell like I have lived several lifetimes already. Time is a strange concept as far as I am concerned.
Mission, congratulations on traveling light. That must save a lot of money, too.
Emma, does the noise from online mean you watch a lot of videos or something else? I usually have my sound coming out of a headset that I am usually not wearing. I put it on if I need something, but usually my computer, at least, is pretty silent.
Bonnie, I think I have the thunder CD. I also have tropical jungle, ocean waves, etc. Haven't played them in a while, but they are very pleasant.