Kent Pitman

Kent Pitman
Location
New England, USA
Title
Philosopher, Technologist, Writer
Bio
I've been using the net in various roles—technical, social, and political—for the last 30 years. I'm disappointed that most forums don't pay for good writing and I'm ever in search of forums that do. (I've not seen any Tippem money, that's for sure.) And I worry some that our posting here for free could one day put paid writers in Closed Salon out of work. See my personal home page for more about me.

MY RECENT POSTS

DECEMBER 6, 2010 9:22AM

Memo to the White House about the Bush Tax Cuts

Rate: 27 Flag

Dear Mr. President,

I was among those who wrote you as a Senator years ago to ask you to run for President. I supported you and voted for you for President. But I cannot support you further if you extend tax cuts for the wealthy.

It would be foolhardy to take a deal with the Republicans to extend tax cuts for a couple of years.

They just want to kick it down the road to election time when they will mop the floor with you.

If you give in in any way you will lose the tenuous credibility Democrats now have on the deficit. Right now the Democrats can point to this and say the Republicans don’t care. If the Republicans can point back and say “this was so important even the Democrats made an exception” then the card is lost. Do not borrow money to add to the deficit in order to continue the subsidy of the wealthy. Not even for two years.

If the tax cuts just completely expire, the middle class and the poor will survive. They won't have an easy time of it. But they’re used to sacrificing for the cause. It's their daily stock in trade. And the tax cuts at that end aren’t that big anyway.

Call on voters to understand why you didn’t compromise—not because you thought they should have to do with less, but because the Republicans put too high a price on the proper action. With the savings as these lapse, you can create a great many programs to help the poor through any consequential rough patches.

After the cuts expire, make your own tax cut package to your own liking, and get the Congress to vote on it. It will be fun watching Republicans vote against tax cuts just to spite you.

If you instead give a dramatic windfall to the rich, it will just go back into TV ads against you. They won’t thank you, you can be sure of that.

Have the courage to risk your image. Make that sacrifice. Stop worrying so much about what you promised people to get elected and worry about doing the right thing. The worst thing that could happen to the US is not you breaking a campaign promise. There are more important things. Stand for them.

And anyway, if you even think it breaks a campaign promise, you’ve given into Republican spin on this. This is Bush’s doing. He dodged deficit scrutiny under the Byrd act by using reconciliation. Make that point. Do not make this your tax cut for the wealthy that you’ll be forced later to give up.

Call the Republicans’ bluff. Let the tax cuts expire if they won’t give you the extension of just the cuts for the poor. Do not give in. They expect you to give in. They revel in seeing you defeated. Don't give them the satisfaction.

For once, the balance of power is on your side. Use it. Make them have to explain to the people why they voted as they did. By allowing a compromise, they won’t have to and you’ll be in a bad state later. Show some political savvy.

Compromise on this is not only economically foolish, it is politically foolish. They say at the poker table if you don’t know who the fool is, it’s you. Do you know who the fool at this poker table is, Mr. President? Frankly, I have lost confidence that you do.

Sincerely,

Kent Pitman

If you got value from this post, please "rate" it.


Copyright © 2010 by Kent M. Pitman
Permission is granted to anyone who wants
to cut&paste any or all of this text
in order to create their own memo to the President at
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
No one listens.. not even those we thought we chose well.:(
Rated with hugs
Old New Lefty wrote a letter to Obama also. I'll tell you what I told him - if you decide to actually send this letter to Obama, I'll sign my name to it. It's time we all speak up!
Kent, the Republicans have demonstrated that there is no upside to compromising with them on most issues. Why should federal employees have a two year wage freeze when the wealthy continue to have the lower rates? We keep hearing that this creates jobs or whatever. Many have commented about how few jobs this traditional trickle down approach worked during the eight years of Bush the Junior.
maybe he [Obama] will read this... i do hope so.
I'll happily -- well, not so happily -- sign my name to this.
I wish I could rate this 50,000 times. It's almost like you crawled into my head and wrote what I've been thinking. Phrased better, of course. I wonder if we could get a letter writing project going where we use this or a combination draft and have as many of us here on OS sign it as we can get? Not that it would really make a difference, but hey...
Make this an internet petition and I'll add my signature.
Great Post! I've said the same thing. Let them all lapse and go on national TV and tell the people why. Tell the people we need to sacrifice to make this country whole again. Tell the people that the rich are tearing this country apart. We will undrstand. We did it in WWII and we can sacrifice again. Never in our history have we fought two wars without anyone sacrificing anything. It will never happen, but it should!
This extension is said to benefit approximately only 2% of taxpayers. 2% !!!!
A true oligarchy can be managed by even fewer. Many of them are simply being appeased in the time needed yet to set a much darker system in place.
The extension is a ruse for what lies ahead. It must be stopped.
I wish he would read your memo.
To the several who have suggested they'd like to sign, just click on the text you'd like to paste—don't copy my name—and then click on the link to the white house and leave it as your own comment. Maybe if more than one person submits such comments, they will notice. Yes, it could be a petition. But personal messages are better than a petition in my opinion.
Hell yeah, I'll sign!!! I'm fine with the tax breaks expiring. I can't understand why the Dems can't win this simple argument. It's a slam dunk all the way. Stand up and show who's side your on. How hard can it be? Let the Republicans spend the next year fighting for tax cuts for the rich and bloke them at every turn.
The reason Obama is just going to sign it all away is because he's really a Blue Dog. If he had any balls, he would let the process play out and then veto the bill. No chance of this ever getting 67 votes to pass after that. Then the Republicans would wake up and take notice. That is what Clinton had to do to get anything done.
As you stated, people forget that those tax cuts were passed using reconciliation.
And screw the economy. The economy only works for the rich anymore. They'll just find a way to pocket the savings. They aren't interested in creating jobs. They are sitting on a trillion dollars right now and they won't use it.
There is a middle ground here, which would be a partial lapse across the income distribution, more lapsing at the top, but not all, because there is a fiscal drag issue that has to be counter-balanced with long-run fiscal concerns, especially given the flow of money to finance the deficit from abroad, and especially for the latter because of concerns about monetization under QE2.
Linda, I really wish I thought someone was listening. I think, and I'm not really kidding, that this is one reason the Republicans want to cut the size of government—to limit its effectiveness.

Proud, thanks. I did send a similar note yesterday at the contact address above. I've revised it some and will probably re-send it today or tomorrow. But really, you should send your own. It's said that personal messages have greater impact than a big petition with a lot of signatures.

Designanator, Obama's practice of pre-compromising (unilaterally making concessions) drives me nuts. See my other recent posts Political Fumbling and Boardwalk Empire 2.0 and The Entitlement Class for discussion of the trickle-down issue.

Chuck, there's a URL there you can click on to get to the White House to send your own. Feel free to cut&paste from mine or make your own. That will mean two chances to win.

Jane, you might be right. Still, one must behave as if there is a chance. It's why I think the Democrats should “primary him” though.

Tom, you're a good writer. Click on the URL and send your own (copying as liberally, or conservatively, as you like from my post—just so you feel like you're making good progress).
Blue, I'm convinced the personal approach is better. Go to the White House site and send your own, borrowing from mine as you like. They need to hear it from different people.

Tim, you've probably seen my instructions to others. Maybe someone will make a petition. You could contact Credo or ActBlue if you have more time than me. Tell them they can borrow text from mine (though some of it needs to change). But meanwhile just send a personal note.

Scanner, sounds like the text of a note you could yourself leave in their email box. Go for it.

aka, I agree. Get on board and send some feedback like I've been suggesting for others above. The URL is in the post.

Razzle, maybe if you send such a memo he'll read yours. :) Help up the chances by sending something personal yourself.

Michael, I know your situation is not great, so you should add some personal details of your own but send such a message. It should matter much more coming from someone who's on the worst end of it still saying “I can bear it.”

Don, the whole point is that lapsing can be done without compromise. It just happens. The compromise is making trouble where none existed. Then when it has lapsed, the Republicans have lost their bargaining chip. At that point, you just start proposing tax cuts that happen not to help the super-wealthy become the ultra-wealthy and let the Republicans say “sorry, I won't do it.” ... And, incidentally, I'm not opposed to helping the wealthy create jobs. I just don't want to help them because they might create jobs. That kind of maybe isn't good enough. Rewarding performance is what I want. They'd ask no less of someone of less means asking for a government handout.
Kent, I took as much of your letter as the template would allow. I couldn't say it any better, so I used yours. The important thing is the noise. It might not help, but we'll never know if we don't at least try. Thanks for taking the initiative.

Lezlie
L, that's great. Our chances are now officially doubled. :)
OK, I'll send it. I previously sent a letter, though not as well written as yours. There was a place where you can check if you want a response. I checked it - but still no response!

I just hope all of us who are frustrated and writing about it on Open Salon - will forward what we write to the White House!
Gee, it took only two years for Obama to lose credibility with his base; as predicted, he runs neck and neck with Jimmy Carter for his place in history.
I emailed him last week telling him not to cave, that we are with him. Why in God's name would he go against 67% of the American people who do NOT want those tax cuts extended? What is wrong with the man? If he caves, I am going to have to go to bed, pull the covers over my head, and whine until I have the strength to make some signs and march around town like a maniac.
I just checked Huffpo and apparently he's made a deal. How thoroughly disgusting. I cannot believe this is happening. What a spineless coward. And the rich get richer.
Proud, I guess it was too late, though I doubt it would have helped. The handwriting was on the wall.

Daughter, he just funded the entire election season of anti-Obama ads.
I don't know if I'm angry, or pissed, or just tired......
Having watched the CNN coverage of the Obama announcement, it was interesting to see the hangdog demeanors of both Obama and Ed Rollins, the GOP operative. The Republican female spokesperson left herself wide open by giving a Stalinist spin on the deficits. Guess what? Suddenly deficits don't matter a bit! As a matter of fact, did you know that some kinds of deficits are better than other kinds, especially when they unleash the mighty buying power of all the richies who'll benefit from this??? BUSHWA!

The Republicans are like the dog who chased after the car. Now that they've caught it, they'll have to figure out what they're going to do next because they put so many eggs into the deficit basket, and they just managed to piss away $700B. There might be some fear that the Rs will be left holding the bag for all of the economic wonderfulness that will be created in the next two years.

If I were a big, fat Republican hypocrite, I'd be worried, too.
Well, the deal has been done. On Big Salon and in Slate, the first columns ar that it isn't so bad, considering that it extends unemployment benefits another 13 months and provides for some payroll tax cuts. I'm of course concerned that the two year extensions means it will certainly be an election issue in the 2012 race.
Abrawang, you're right. It will come up in the 2012 election. And when it does, the Republicans will shrug and say “we're exempted from criticism because the Democrats sullied themselves, too.” That will be that and there will be nothing to criticize them for.

Lefty, there's comfort in numbers. They're hypocrites but the Democrats have joined them in the name of bipartisanship, thus nullifying the criticism.
If he doesn't smarten up he'll get a primary challenge; perhaps it's already too late to stop it. The worst thing that could happen would be to let it swing back to the Republicans but if the Democrats aren't doing any better it is worth the risk and we should try to elect an independent that answers to the people.