Kent Pitman

Kent Pitman
Location
New England, USA
Title
Philosopher, Technologist, Writer
Bio
I've been using the net in various roles—technical, social, and political—for the last 30 years. I'm disappointed that most forums don't pay for good writing and I'm ever in search of forums that do. (I've not seen any Tippem money, that's for sure.) And I worry some that our posting here for free could one day put paid writers in Closed Salon out of work. See my personal home page for more about me.

MY RECENT POSTS

JULY 23, 2011 5:47PM

WRITE YOUR REP

Rate: 27 Flag

MEMO

Date:   Today, Now
To:   My Representative
Subject:   RAISE THE DEBT CEILING

JUST RAISE THE DEBT CEILING NOW.

STOP THE GAMING.

THE DEFICIT CAN AND SHOULD BE ADDRESSED SEPARATELY.

Click here to contact your representative.

Be direct. Be brief. Be clear.

Tell your friends you did. Ask them to do the same.

Do it now. Do not wait.

“This letter is to ask for your help and support, and that of your colleagues, in the passage of an increase in the limit on the public debt.

...

“the Treasury's cash balances have reached a dangerously low point. Henceforth, the Treasury Department cannot guarantee that the Federal Government will have sufficient cash on any one day to meet all of its mandated expenses, and thus the United States could be forced to default on its obligations for the first time in its history.

“This country now possesses the strongest credit in the world. The full consequences of a default -- or even the serious prospect of default -- by the United States are impossible to predict and awesome to contemplate. Denigration of the full faith and credit of the United States would have substantial effects on the domestic financial markets and on the value of the dollar in exchange markets. The Nation can ill afford to allow such a result. The risks, the costs, the disruptions, and the incalculable damage lead me to but one conclusion: the Senate must pass this legislation before the Congress adjourns.”

Ronald Reagan, in a letter to Howard Baker, Senate Majority Leader, November 16, 1983

“Congress consistently brings the government to the edge of default before facing its responsibility. This brinksmanship threatens the holders of government bonds and those who rely on social security and veteran benefits. Interest rates would skyrocket. Instability would occur in financial markets. And the federal deficit would soar.”

Ronald Reagan, in a radio address September 26, 1987

If you got value from this post, please "rate" it.

Click here to contact your representative.

Other posts by me on the debt limit:

Taking Charge of the Debt (29 Jun 2011)
How the 14th Amendment relates to the debt limit.

Compromising Government (13 Jul 2011)
About Mitch McConnell's “compromise” offer.

The Risky Business of the Greedy Old Party (13 Jul 2011)
About the looming risk to our credit rating and its timetable.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Here! Here! I already wrote him! Aaron Schock..... ugh! He's too busy showing off his abs to get anything done in Washington. He also voted against equal pay for women. What does this tell you????
Great information, Kent. I regularly write to my representatives and am unendingly angered when some of them write back not to tell me they will take my views and needs into account as a duly elected representative should, but that my views and beliefs and needs are wrong and here's the right wing reason why. But I will continue to write because to keep silent gives tacit assent to their treasonous actions.
MAWB, nice to see you. I'd already written my rep a few days ago, but given the urgency of the crisis, I wrote him again today. I see no reason that we have to limit ourselves. It's especially important for those of us (like me) who have a Republican representative.

Coyote, thanks for pitching in.
I just wrote to Charlie Bass telling him to start listening to his constituents.
why will you write to your rep, but not demand citizen initiative? pandering to special interests is what got america to its present position, and that is what 'writing to your rep' is, pandering to people who want to get something from the government in secret, so the majority don't know they are being stolen from.
My rep, Peter De Fazio is A-OK. And by the way, google "De Fazio chained CPI" to see what the White House wants to do with Social Security.
al, I don't oppose the notion of citizen initiative. I think it's not likely to pass, and I happen not to expend resources on it, but I say positive things when you mention it. That said, right now we have the issue we have, and we have very few days before a crisis. Actually, I have argued the crisis is here already and only by luck have the ill effects not happened yet, they could any time. So we have to work inside the existing system. There is no time to do otherwise.

Lefty, I'm not surprised your rep is already on the right side of things. But maybe you know people in other areas who have reps that are still opposing the debt limit hike...
Oh, this is just perfect! How brilliant of you to use their beatific St. Ronnie's words to plead the case against their insanity. I write to my Congress members frequently, for all the good it does, and I will do it again now. Thanks for this great call to action.

Lezlie
Thanks for the straight-forward approach to contacting our representatives.
It's depressing so many feel it has no power, maybe we need Wisconsin's approach and surround the Capital as united people and demand in chant.
L, Rachel Maddow had offered references in her coverage. I found them compelling quotes and figured others would, too.

JT, it's true that often one feels powerless. But I think with modern social media, the chance to enthuse others and have that enthusiasm be contagious is worth trying. I wanted to write something with a nice simple message today that had half a chance of getting some of that “viral” thing going. It will require serious numbers to get those representatives to pay attention, but the polls suggest that those numbers are out there, presumably just wondering what they should do.
Might be better to let the GOP lemmings carry their party over the cliff, as they did when Gingrich tried the same thing.
Matt, as discussed not only by Reagan's ghost in the above but also in my post The Risky Business of the Greedy Old Party, this is not an issue where we can afford to let things fail. It would very probably spell catastrophe not just for them but also for the US and the world. The US credit rating (and that of at least 5 states) would probably be cut, and we'd be paying higher interest, which would not be good. Sure, it would make people unhappy with the Republicans, but the cost is too high if that were someone's goal. It needs to be resolved successfully, even at the risk that the Tea Party and the Republicans will, as they surely will, find a way to spin it as “see, there was no risk.” That's not how risk works. But facts have never stopped them from spinning in the past.
Kent, thanks for this important PSA post! I can certainly write to my U.S. rep and have on many occasions since she was sworn in earlier this year. The downside of my rep is that she talks and walks the tea party line which is quite ironic because she is a very well educated individual. Why the majority of constituents in my district voted out a competent representative who was attuned to our problems is a story about what's going wrong with America.
Jonathan, you're welcome.

designanator, I think it's an uphill battle with Republican, especially Tea Party, reps. I'm in a similar boat. But the point is they are the ones who need to change their mind. And hearing from constituents is the only avenue. My feeling is that if they hear from enough to worry that sentiments have changed and they might not remain in office, they'll start to care.
Will do. Thanks for the sanity check. Actually I think many of them checked their sanity in at the cloakroom and haven't missed it since. When RR is a paragon of centrality we know we are in trouble. R/
I have written my rep. Unfortunately, my rep is Darrel Issa. 'Nuff said.
I just wrote John Kline
he thinks to the right of rain
I can always hope

rated with love
A great service Kent. Thanks. My rep is David Price (D-NC) and he's a good one. Wish we had more like him.
Somebody, I think it may have been the Progressive Congressional Caucus, co-chaired by my rep, the unexcelled Keith Ellison, circulated the Reagan letter to all the republicans in the House of Reps. Not that it did any good. Many of those who are now running around crying that the sky is falling voted for every one of the many debt ceiling raises while GW Bush was president (I've seen 7, I've seen 19, guessing 7 is more accurate) while at the same time supporting unfunded wars, the unfunded and phenomenally expensive Medicare Part D with its mega-giveaways to big pharma, the unprecedented tax cuts in wartime and killing pay-go.

Look at Wisconsin, Ohio, Minnesota. You're not a crackpot if you see a conspiracy in this. If you don't know about ALEC, read up on it - their own site: http://www.alec.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home the other side: http://www.thenation.com/signup/161973?destination=article/161973/alec-exposed-koch-connection

The tea partiers are pawns of the very rich and it's class a war that's been underway for a long time. It's not just the Koch brothers, they're the face that's been exposed but there's a whole crowd of them. I know people who travel in those circles. (They've also been circulating the racist Obama imagery for a long time and are blatantly and proudly racist.)

Solution? No clue. I'm hoping in 2012 there will be a national reaction like the Wisconsin one. It may get worse before it gets better. The "job creators" may be letting enough people remain comfortable and protective of their comfort that the opposition may never achieve sufficient critical mass to fight back effectively.

Personally, I've got a lot of experience coping with poverty.
I agree with you they need to raise the debt ceiling. I will write tomorrow.
I've done written already!!!

Rated anyways!!

(They won't stop the playing around ---- my cock is bigger than your ball that they seem to play every other week it seems!! Playing with peoples' lifes and they don't even give a care, neither side!!!!)
I'm curious. The two Reagan quotes you use, one from 1983 and the other from 1987, both years the Republicans had the majority in the Senate. Of course the House was overwhelmingly Democrat those years. Do you know who exactly was stonewalling the debt ceiling back then? Reagan's Republican majority in the Senate? The Senate minority Democrats? The House majority Democrats?
Steve, I agree. Things have drifted a lot. Thanks for stopping in and for promising to follow-up.

Walter, it's an uphill battle to write to the people on the right, but it's even more pointless to write to the people on the left, since they are already pretty agreeable and are not the obstacle. It's hard to change minds, but at least you have the opportunity to try. Thanks for trying.

Grif, thanks. Yes, there will be some housecleaning to do next election.

Whirlwind, I don't have a detailed recollection of that era, but searching around a little, I found a book excerpt from The Deficit and the Public Interest, by Joseph White and Aaron Wildavsky, which appears to treat some of the history of that time in quite a bit of detail. Scroll down to page 274, and it really gets into the issues you're talking about around page 278.
Poetess, thank you.
Though it's an uphill battle,
Worse is to lose hope.

nerd cred, some definite concerns there. Add to that this, which if true creates additional obstacles to electoral victories. Bad enough with the issue of voter identification being used to exclude voters, fake candidates being used to confuse voters, etc.

married, thanks!

Tink, thanks for getting involved.
You really do make this easy. I'm in. I like your memo: right to the point, and that simple, blunt imperative, "Stop the gaming," calls them out for the lobotomizing ideological agendas that have preempted what they were elected to do: execute the will of the people. The use of Reagan is inspired, given that virtually every politician these days seems to be dancing around his totem.
Jerry, thanks. I got the idea from Rachel Maddow, but apparently Democrats in Congress have been sending these quotes to Republicans hoping to sway them. It's bouncing off mostly, probably because of all the absolutism in play with the reps. But my feeling is that it can still sway voters, who are often not as absolutist as the people the party machinery has managed to slip onto the ballot.
I'll try to write to my representative. Unfortunately, ours is one of the new tea partiers who defeated a well-established Democrat, who actually worked pretty hard for us. This is what happens when people vote against their own interest.

Thanks for sharing the quotes. That will be very helpful.
Sounds good. Its sad that the words of Ronald Reagan are probably more persuasive to most modern-day Dems, than the words of FDR, who strike fear into the hearts of most Dems. If they were seen supporting the words of FDR, then, my god, they might be seen as "socialist!"

This just shows how effective right-wing media centralization and domination has been in terms of perpetuating consensus thinking. We should definately use the Reagan quote, and throw it back at them.

But we also need more essays in defense of FDR and TR and the Progressive movement.

Until we do that, we will always be fighting a rear-guard retreat.
I wrote my Rep in the Senate. I got a letter that started off with:
Dear Friend of this office.....
I write mine on any reason I see to alert him/her to addressing my concerns...somebody reads them I hope Kent...
Good work here.
Kanuk, good luck. It's not going to be an easy argument to make in any situation where it matters. But it's important to add to the noise so that at some point if the person wants to change their mind, they feel they have cover from their constituents.

RW, the main reason I included the words was to say this isn't really a partisan matter. It should be well-agreed by all parties that this just needs to be done. I'm happy to defend progressive principles on other days, but my point was to divorce this from any notion of “only people on the left think this.”

Mission, to clarify (in case I created any confusion), it's your Rep in the House of Representatives that is most important to write. Writing to any politician is good, of course. They all need to know where the public stands. But it's the Republican-controlled House specifically that is blocked, and although as I mentioned to RW above the message is not partisan, the people refusing to hear the message are all pretty much in one party, so it's mostly Republican reps that need to hear. Anyway, thanks much for your efforts in any case. :)
Mission, further clarifying: In the quote from Reagan, it was the Senate that needed prodding. In the modern situation, it's the House.
I have written them, until I am blue in the face. I get replies telling me how they think cutting spending is more important, and that raising taxes is simply out of the question.

So I am sitting here, getting angrier and angrier by the minute. I have already written Boner and told him in no such terms, that when heads start to roll, his will be the first!

I've stopped being a "nice guy". I have stooped to calling some of these dickheads, dickheads!
Kenny, I don't know that it's the description I'd have picked myself, but I'm afraid I have no strong argument at hand for why that would be an inappropriate description, so... carry on. The only logical case they're likely to hear is the one that says “you're not going to get re-elected.” If they realize their spin on this is not working well enough to control the voters, that's where they might change their minds.