We've added a smarter spam filter to the in-site messaging system. It's been trained over the past few months to recognize the unsolicited commercial emails that invariably make it into any system. We're hopeful that it will make a big difference.
Here's how it works:
1). You now have a Spam folder in your Inbox. It will place all messages it believes to be spam into that folder -- but you can go in and check, too, if you're worried that a message from a friend might've been incorrectly filtered.2). You can mark as "spam" messages that come into your Inbox that are, in fact, not messages you want. The more you do this, the smarter, and more restrictive, your filter becomes.
3). You can also go into the spam folder and mark a message as not spam.
Note: When you do either of the two steps above (No. 2 or No. 3), you are training your spam filter. If you mark legitimate messages as spam, you run the risk of training your filter to withhold messages you might want to see. Conversely, if you mark as not spam messages that are actually from someone offering get-rich-quick schemes or offering true love, you will continue to probably get them, unfiltered in your inbox.
As always, this will all be permanantly stored in the FAQ, if you're looking for a quick reference.
A few more related news and notes:
1). You won't get email alerts for messages we think are spam.2). A reminder: Some have complained about getting an alert every time you get a message or comment. You can easily adjust your settings so that you get as many -- or as few -- alerts as you'd like.
3). We've quintupled the number of messages on a single page, so that you won't have to spend as much time scrolling through your inbox for new messages.
4). The "search messages" feature should work just fine now.
Have at it. And let us know -- either in the Comments below or at open.problems@salon.com -- if you encounter any trouble.

Salon.com
Comments
Also hungry.
For tinned pork product.
Why am I no longer email alerted when someone adds me as a friend? It is still listed as an option and I have it selected.
Oh, and at the risk of sucking up, I am encouraged greatly by these new improvements. Thank you!
Like Verbal Remedy, I never got spammed here either.
So appreciate my longer list of friend's post. I was beginning to need to rent a storage unit...
Better and better.
But ya know what would be da bo-b0-bomb? If we had a way to access our comment history. 5 is just so....paltry. I know how to do the Goog and find 'em, but having them here would be so much yummier.
Thanks!
Thanks, too, for the spam folder. Now I know where to file all of those "love letters" I receive.
I just got spammed by a wee thing with pink hair.
I had to promise an immediate plane ticket on Lithuania Air.
Totally not sucking up: thank you to all in the back room who worked their tushies off making these improvements and continue to do so!
@VR - I have rec'd spam and you wouldn't like 'em unless you swing both ways
But I will accept offers of true any time any day.
I don't much like having someone else decide what is spam. I'm a big boy, and I think I can be trusted to do that for myself.
I have a few questions/requests.
1. In the new system the folders I have made for saving messages, set up by name, are no longer in alphabetical order. Can that be changed back?
2. Can it be set up so that I can rename, move, or delete folders I create in the PM folder list?
3. Is it possible to show more data on an individual message, like w from, subject and time received? The latter then could be the way we index the messages rather than saying the date we moved the PM into the file.
I'll shut up now. I have other questions/suggestions that I will not mention here. I know it has to be frustrating to make changes for the good only to receive more complaints/ suggestions, but if this PM system were just set up more like a regular email system essentially all of my questions would go away.
Thanks again, Kerry, for all the hard work you guys do.
Monte
Second, on another matter, the "search for people" function is pretty non-functional. In trying to re-locate some people's posts, I don't always remember their complete moniker. I put in half of it, but that doesn't seem enough for the "search for people" function.
Paris: In short, no. We've been working for a while on a raft of navigation changes to more easily allow you to find content you want. But the "open" nature of Open probably precludes that sort of blocking of content -- at least in the near future.
LaP: I like to think of the filter as a good little doggie, too.
MR: I'm glad!
CB: Maybe?
Freaky: Might I suggest the "freaky" section of Craigslist?
Verbal: Spam(tm) is making a comeback because of the recession, I keep reading. So gross and yet. . . mmmm, Spam.
Jodi: Odd. I'll flag this for tech.
O'S: Don't feel bad. The spam was never much fun.
Bees: Comment history; your wish is our command! Soon!
Lisa, Sally, Without: You're welcome!
Mhellman: Yes, open.problems@salon.com is the way to go. I got the message you sent to open.editor -- but by that time, they had already responded to you. Two weeks is an anomaly -- we're usually much quicker than that. I really do appreciate your patience.
Wayne: We looked into that, and this stage gets us closer to allowing that in the future. But we needed to weigh pressing needs -- increasing spam -- with expediency. This was clearly the best option we could accomplish in a reasonable length of time.
Jim: I sympathize -- but I also think members are reasonably good about describing their plugs in the subject line so you know what it is before you click, right?
Lonnie: This was a complaint from several members we fixed -- glad you're happy with it!
Monte: Good requests, all. I suspect some of these will be straightened out in the next few days, but will follow up.
Voicegal: The search function was working for me yesterday, when this went live (I tested it!). I'll check again -- but you should, too. This was something we improved in this round of changes.
Kerry, you might try searching for "tar" with Names checkmarked. You get Sharon Bond, whose user name (?) is "Tar Heel Fan", but you don't get "Token Tarheel".
Ya have a case of cold Spam?
I think some canned Spam @ O.S.?
No here? I guess Spam awful?
I mean in my dank basements,
there's cancan Span in rust can.
apologies. I no will cry if deleted.
My heels! My toes! My arches! Yea verily, and also the other parts of my unpedicured feet! All are launched gleefully into the suspiciously chemtrailed air, excited at the prospect, and surprisingly enough, they carry with them the rest of my body, including the clappy hands!