There's a terrible stereotype about Web editors, that we just care about traffic. Page views, unique visitors, clicks, hits, eyeballs, drivebys, furtive peeks, longing glances and everything in between.
And it's true!
Except I'm here to tell you that there's no easy trick, no gimmick, to draw people to read your Website. Trust me, we've tried.
A few years ago, as Salon (like all publications), tried to right our ship in deeply troubled recessionary waters, we followed the familiar script of other sites -- we laid off terrific staffers to lower our costs; we brutally pared down our expenses; we revamped staff priorities so that writers could simply produce more; we experimented in a fair amount of low-calorie aggregation. And yes, there's that word: Aggregation, the most inflammatory (and sometimes, hilarious) in our industry. So let me explain exactly what I mean by it: Short (a few hundred words) summaries or explainers about a major news event covered more in depth by somebody else. In its best form, we wrote short little decoders of a big story, and tried to link generously to the original source. At its worst, we monitored Twitter and Google for trending topics, and dispatched an intern to cobble together our own summary, posted it quickly, then prayed to the Google gods that the effort would win, if only briefly, their favor.
I'm not proud of that last approach, a mandate from above, which we were able to quietly scuttle after it was proven to have absolutely zero impact. But a terrible, pernicious thing has happened to journalists in the past decade, that's had us second-guess everything we know. Sometimes that's led to brilliant new reinventions of the form. Other times, it's just led to self-doubt, something I see in the sea of job applications of fine mid-career journalists every time we post for a new position.We've been trained to rethink everything, even if it leads to producing useless information at the behest of people whose only contribution to the marketplace of ideas has been to sneer at it, shrink it, and dumb it down.
But a funny, delightful thing has come out of it all. We ended 2011 on a remarkable high note, with over 7 million unique visitors for the first time, without any giant, viral hits that could be outliers. And now we've finished January in similar fashion, at 7.23 million.
There are concrete reasons for this. First, as I think I've mentioned before, our founder, David Talbot, returned as CEO, and having the person who founded the whole shebang suddenly come back holding the purse strings has been enormously liberating -- he's encouraged me to run an editorial team that unambiguously pursues a progressive vision of Salon at a time of populist upheavel and party alienation. We've also -- completely against the trend -- slowed down our process. We've tried to work longer on stories for greater impact, and publish fewer quick-takes that we know you can consume elsewhere. We're actually publishing, on average, roughly one-third fewer posts on Salon than we were a year ago (from 848 to 572 in December; 943 to 602 in January). So: 33 percent fewer posts; 40 percent greater traffic.
It sounds simple, maybe obvious, but: We've gone back to our primary mission and have been focusing on originality. And it's working.
We'll be doing more of the same, as the year continues, and we sharpen our campaign coverage (more on that in a future post), and have carved out a bigger budget for high-impact, important stories from freelancers -- experienced and brand-spanking new, who have important information to share. (And if you're one of them, I hope you'll pitch us here.) The state of our union is strong!
The business side of things? We're still, like most of our peers, trying to figure that out, especially post-recession. But we have a ton of confidence that our team -- including our whiz sales team and our renewed Salon Core membership program -- will develop big things.
Open Salon? Ah, that's another story entirely. After a painful year migrating the backend of Salon's technology (which did free up server space for Open, and make it much faster) we have plans for a bigger revamp to Open in the months ahead, with an improved registration program, better social tools and improved integration within Salon (and hopefully a few other ideas generated on Open) high on the priority list. I founded Open, so it's my great blue hope, and I'm still consistently dazzled by the writing and thinking here. So much so that I'm going to start blogging here weekly, just to keep you posted on Salon events, and OS news, as I have it. If you like it, I hope you'll give me thumbs up -- and if not, take me to task in the Comments!

Salon.com
Comments
`
KIMPO
`
Today is the day
for one last view
of Mount Fuji.
`
You ever sip:
`
Japanese plum
a wine from de'
gay-kee-kan -
`
It's Plum Wine
`
Gekkeikan. '?'`
I no drink it.
`
Howdy . . .
`
Holy Mountain
It's sublime and
so beautiful too
`
I saw you @
Con Chapman
Thank You too.
`
Please no delete.
for... calling it taks!
Always good to get a view to the inner workings.
The news is encouraging. Good job, or was it luck? Whatever!
All good..
will be looking forward to your Tuesday blogs here
and to the promised future OS upgrades
`
Kerry?
You read?
I comment.
`
My old body
a drop of dew grown
heavy at the leaf tip.
`
He died at ninety.
He wrote simple.
He a `Taoist too.
`
Live long and prosper...
──▄████▄▄████▄
─▐████▄██▄████▌.(\(\----♥----/ )/)
─▐█████▄▄█████▌(=':')-------(':'=)
──▀██▄▀▀▀▀▄██▀o(..(")(")..(") (")..)o
────▀██████▀ *•.¸¸.•*`*•.¸¸.•*`*•.¸¸.•★
──────▀██▀ ★•*`*•─(¯` v´¯)¸♪•
╔╗╔╦╗╦╔░╔═╗♪•*☆.(¯`:❤ :´¯)´¯)*
╚╗║║║║║░╠╣★*•.¸¸.•*.(_.^._)❤:´ ¯)
╚╝╝╝╝╩╚═╚═╝───.¸¸.•*`*•(_.^._) ★*• And will you be my Valentine? I hope so!
Thanks for letting us come over and play.
:)
Lezlie
Am I doing something all wrong a `gin?
Do I have to 'cough-up' $90.00 bucks`gin?
`
Remember?
`
bebop-o
&
GoodCelery!
`
no refunds
`
one was my son @ farm
2- gold star memberships
bebop-o and GoodCelery!
`
both were denied comment.
`
goat gouda blueberry was too.
that was free - so was clownsense.
`
if you refund - I sent to WETA
the radio has double match today
for $ 90.00 - I get double matches
That is a great radio-deal - $180.00
a deal?
send my refund to WETA radio asap!
"... and if not, take me to task in the Comments!"
It's simple really, the quality of minds and the quality of writing here are equal to any I've seen on Big Salon or anywhere else on the Net -- and superior to most of what I've seen on the Net. I could name names, but that wouldn't be fair to those I fail to mention.
That that continues to be the case in a venue that also provides a social/therapy/gossip environment, suggests others feel the same.
That's a long way around the barn to day, keep up the good work.
PS How about spellcheck for new posts and comments? Pleeeease!
To the beginning of bettah
It's clear this will be smooth as buttah
Cuz OS rocks every othah.
Eek! Art James has stolen my brain!
Sites I return to on a frequent basis are Science Daily, Hacker News, Bloomberg (for market updates), the CIA's website for background (albeit tinged with a bit of Americentrism), on countries in the news, youtube for music trends and favorite artists refreshers, the BBC, Der Speigel, and Aljazeera for expanded world coverage as well as Plos1 for in depth coverage of breaking scientific studies. Kahn academy also helps offer me a cursory understanding of unfamiliar subjects.
The reason I'm taking a bit of time to tell you what interests me and why, is to ask, no plead, as a new visitor to your site, for unbiased (if possible), in depth, news offering analysis and commentary from a variety of viewpoints. I don't need more sales pitches and P R releases. I get enough of both every time I stand in line at a supermarket's checkout stand.
Thanks for the explanation and thanks, in advance, for the efforts.
Linda tips her hat.
HUGGGGGGGGGGG
Open Salon remains a gem. None of the other sites I read have such a dedicated, lively place for non-staff writers, and I'm sure many Salon readers come over here to get our take on the world.
SO glad to hear you will be polishing the gem. And soon please, for your good and for ours.
Nice to hear from such great, long-time twinkling lights of Open here, as well as two of my favorite editors (Scott and Maer -- hi!).
Quick answers:
Algis: Yes.
Scanner: Just be yourself, pal.
D-ator: That's really great to hear.
Stacey: Between Joan, Glenn and Steve, we're on TV all the time now. Better representatives do not exist -- they're awesome.
Jacob: You and me both, pal.
Greg, Tom, Sally, Lea, David, etc.: Thanks for sticking around. You make the place great.
rather important in my book.
The business side of things
is for warriors of
Postmodern Capitalism,
and many of us OSers
have small understanding
of such things, but
many opinions
regarding
things we know nothing of...
for..OS is a protection from this...
a grace..a place to just BE.......
mission- bound, editors:
" We've gone back to our primary mission
and have been focusing on originality.
And it's working. "
it indeed is.
Originality is like freedom.
It aint free.
Good people must create an atmosphere for it.
Thanks for my 3 yrs of amazing self-building on this
site, Kerry.............
http://open.salon.com/blog/jlsathre/2012/01/11/25_things_i_learned_from_opening_a_bookstore
And hang on to Alex Pareene; he's a jewel.
And, please, do keep Open Salon going.
In short, growth means resources means a better enviroment here as well?
Seriously, I've really had no problem with Open Salon or Salon. I still marvel that this community is a free (free!) supportive place to exchange and connect with other writers, and if sometimes there are technical glitches that's to be expected.
Maybe Roseanne Barr.
A little.
:)
R♥
And he only got detained 52 times this year. Sheesh, think I was Anti-Kerry or Anti-Open!!!
I'm giving this place a good name. Have you seen my numbers? Old posts ranging off into the half millions with just two!!! WHAT A COUNTRY!!!
I haz readers in Iran!! THEY LUV ME!! :D
Love love kiss kiss!! Who's your best friends? Not those suckers you laid off trying to save a buck!! :D
I don't think Kerry looks like Joan Walsh, he's got that Truman Capote look!!!
:D
But... who do I have to bribe--er talk to, to get an EP one of these days? =o)
More frequent changes of the 'open call' topics.
I'm looking forward to more aggressive, involved management of Open Salon. Thanks!
Got Larry out from hiding. :o)
Sometimes absent mindedness works.
@ Tom C - surely you write your posts first in a Word application where you can proof before posting, no?
I'm glad to hear that you will be devouting more resources to OS. R
Bravo! Death to the quick take! Anyone can do 'em and, as you point out, everyone does and no one gives a hoot. Always good to see someone disprove conventional wisdom. Keep it up.
If ya love me, do me a tiny favor--make OS work better with Chrome, ok? Damn near broke my heart trying to embed video. Worked in IE first time.
As you can see your loyal fans just want to hear from you more often. We're hanging on your every word now. :)
Are you really looking for writers?
::wanders away to add tags that say "will write for food" on all posts:: :)
XOXOXO
V
_____♫♥♫_____♫♥♫
____♫♥___Peace___♥♫
___♫♥____Love____ ♥
____♫♥ Happiness ♥♫
______♫♥______♥♫
________♫♥__♥♫
___________♥
Can we ever go out on a date?
Many many many posters who were the reason I visited and posted have gone, and left the pond fairly stagnant. You mention lively news posts, but some in the Open community were attracted by creative writing of all kinds. I hope your plans for the future will include that.
Huffpost and others appear to be moving in the opposite direction - heading toward “information overload” with many long essays which repeat the views expressed in original source documents.
Your “short summaries or explainers about major news event(s),” I believe, are exactly what net-viewers are looking for these days.
For three years I posted daily poems on Open Salon about current events, society, religion, and relationships, but six months ago I started writing an epic about scientists, so my daily Open Salon blog is on hiatus for now. It is a great platform and filter for writers to improve.
Yes, Kerry, regular updates would be much appreciated. OS denizens start conjuring all kinds of terrible scenarios when deprived of information.
Good luck with the new undertakings.
This is a "progressive site?"
Aww man, that means I'm preaching to the choir. Now what am I gonna do? I can't rock a boat if everyone is in the same frame of mind. Hell with it, I'll keep trying anyway.
Great news all the way 'round. (I always hear the sap from "Office Space" every time I use the word great. Yeah... we're gonna have to work Saturday. It's mandatory. And if you can come in Sunday, too, that'd be Grreeaat. Yeah.)
Someday, when I grow up, I want to be paid for what I do. You keep that dream alive here on OS. So thanks.
This place is much more like a forum than a blog space. But, people do write, and some of them even do it well...just not usually the people you put on the front page.
This is understandable, as with only so much time in the day, you fall back on people who are professionals, former professionals, or a small group of favorites you've read over time.
I'm sure you or your staff reads the random other post here and there, but mostly you stick with a static list of people who quit being hungry and writing exciting material many moons ago.
There are already people here who read MANY posts each day, and there are, as far as I can tell in the little time I spend here, even different little cliques with different types of writers, and as always, leadership chains form within each and those are the people you need to snatch as mods.
Mods are free, they can be helpful in innumerable ways, and most of all, they can read through many more inches of copy, collectively, than you can.
Then, they recommend and you choose.
Hell, get enough exciting, decent stories flowing around here and you just might get a buzz going and have people who want to do more than just exploit the place to PROMOTE THEIR REAL BLOG.
After that, figure out a way for stuff to show up on Google, because sometimes typing the exact title to a post, and this is on posts with obscure titles, mind you, still doesn't put the post as the top of the google search list.
What the hell is that about?
One thing I would like to see more of is Open Salon represented in big Salon, especially in the Life section, which I feel is currently the weakest section (although I love Cary). For instance, there are a number of OpenSalon bloggers writing eloquently and moving about caring for their aging parents. Instead of yet another dreary why-my-boyfriend-and-I-Broke-Up piece in the Life section by some MFA grad (granted, it's been a while since you ran one) why not feature some of these fine writers?
Happy to hear about the renewed mission at Salon. It comforts me that a news organization has it's values, as a news organization, in the right place.
look Im rooting for you but it sounds like david talbot is your sugar daddy. or daddy warbucks. or whatever. & that the whole thing is flying on a wing and a prayer as far as profitability. oh well. there are more things in life than profit, huh?!?
ps big credit to Talbot for doing that nervy oliver stone interview. oliver stone rocks!! talbot had a lot of cajones to do that one.
Whew, been looking for a place to get that across because it is driving me crazy. At least have a close proof-read on them please?
PRICELESS!!
rated with love
One more request for the revamp of Open Salon: When editors pick an 'editor's choice,' the editor should write a short comment pointing out what he or she liked about it. It's a fine way to respect and reward good writing, and it'll help all the writers who are hoping for a front-page slot to know what the editors are looking for.
And on occasion, having such a comment from the editor will solve a real puzzler.
If Salon editors work this right OS could prove to be your best source for interesting content.
JMac