Kevin Gosztola

Kevin Gosztola
Location
Mishawaka, Indiana, USA
Birthday
March 10
Bio
Kevin Gosztola is a multimedia editor for OpEdNews.com. He will be serving as an intern for The Nation Magazine during the spring in 2011. His work can be found on OpEdNews, The Seminal, Media-ocracy.com, and a blog on Alternet called "Moving Train Media." He is part of CMN News, which produces a weekly podcast or radio show on Talk Shoe. He is a 2009 Young People For Fellow and a documentary filmmaker who graduated with a Film/Video B.A. degree from Columbia College Chicago in the Spring 2010. In April 2010, he co-organized a major arts & media summit called "Art, Access & Action," which explored the intersection of politics, art and media and was supported by Free Press.

Kevin Gosztola's Links

MY LINKS
MY LINKS
No links in this category.
Editor’s Pick
OCTOBER 4, 2010 9:48AM

"One Nation" Event A Bit Disappointing, We Didn't March

Rate: 7 Flag

 

 

On the Metro, as I was leaving downtown D.C., I saw a few individuals wearing United Auto Workers T-shirts. Being a journalist, I was curious about what any of them might have thought about the "One Nation Working Together" rally I was leaving. I asked the person closest to me for his thoughts, and he said he was a little a disappointed. He said he was glad people came out and there was good camaraderie but he was disappointed.

 

I asked why he was disappointed. He said, "We didn't march." I smiled at him and told him, "He was right, we didn't." The organizers used the word "march" when there was no plans for people marching at all. They said those at the rally were going to march for jobs, education, immigrant rights, justice, and more. But, they weren't talking about what people on the National Mall were going to do after the 4-hour rally ended.

 

The use of the word "march" was, instead, an act of cheapening activism. Liberal-leaning institutions involved, like the AFL-CIO, American Federation for Teachers, NAACP, SEIU, Sierra Club, etc.---organizations that can always be counted on to convince people to vote Democrat---co-opted the word. What they really meant was they and others were going to "march" on the polls on November 2nd and overwhelm the efforts of the Tea Party to take control of Congress. And, in effect, these institutions and other organizations involved were doing a service to political leaders, who have failed Americans miserably since President Obama was elected. By managing the anger and frustration of people and ensuring it did not produce any kind of an independent movement that would result in major acts of civil disobedience, direct action or electoral activism outside of the two dominant parties in America, these institutions were helping the politicians and corporations that finance them out.

 

When I first got to the rally, I hung around the peace contingent. There were a couple hundred people from various groups of significance in the peace movement present. They had a right to be proud because the organizers of the event had invited representatives of the peace movement to be a part of the organizing committee (something that usually doesn't happen with these big liberal groups).But, then, the peace movement also had plenty to bothered about; they really didn't get to have any speakers from the movement get up in front of the Lincoln Memorial and address the tens of thousands of people who were present.

 

 

The peace contingent held a small rally near 14th & Constitution Ave in D.C. before joining the main rally that went from from 12 to 4 pm. Michael McPhearson of Veterans for Peace, members of Gold Star Familes for Peace, Glen Ford and others spoke to those who gathered around. Perhaps, one of the most memorable issues brought up during that small rally was the issue of FBI raids on progressive activists that happened recently in Chicago and Minneapolis. An individual shared how a grand jury is going to be convened and activists will be expected to respond to subpoenas, however, the activists are refusing to go before the jury on the basis that this is a "witch-hunt," McCarthyism, or, more appropriately, a result of the PATRIOT Act and its expansions.

 

A satellite photo image led organizers to claim the rally had more people in attendance than and the "Restoring Honor" rally put on by Glenn Beck had. Interestingly, the Associated Press is disputing this claim and do not think the crowds were as dense as they were during the Beck rally.

 

 

 

 

As someone who was there, I contend there were at least 50,000 if not more. I don't know how many were present for the Beck rally and, if you followed that crowd count, there were disputes on the numbers.

 

This event provided group therapy for community organizers and Obama supporters looking for a way to reaffirm their dedication to hope and change. It was not only a chance to unify around the need for jobs, education, environmental protections and clean energy, immigrant rights, college affordability, etc. but also a chance to reclaim history and, one month later, send a message to Glenn Beck and the Tea Party that they would not be allowed to pick and choose who the real Americans are because America is a nation of immigrants and everyone who is in this country has a right to a pathway to citizenship.

 

Many of the speakers made sure they addressed this dominant media narrative that there is some kind of "enthusiasm gap" among liberals and Obama supporters. People are dissatisfied, but they do not want to make it harder for Obama to his job by offering up criticisms or demands. Liberal institutions and much of the grassroots present were there to raise doubts about the existence of any kind of "enthusiasm gap."

 

None of the speakers really bothered to address how Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, Vice President Joe Biden, President Barack Obama and others have been attacking progressives for "whining" and being petulant and unrealistic, who have raised expectations for the Obama Administration most of them helped elect in 2008. Few in the audience bothered to address how they are victims being abused--that they are dealing with a dilemma that battered wives often run into. Not much was said on how they were going to gain respect for the vision they have for America.

 

 

 

 

The prospect of this rally impacting "the game" now depends greatly on whether the people start to ask questions, whether they choose to make demands, whether they come here today and they hear about the issues that are being talked about and in the back of their head they start to think there is an issue with how the Democrats and President Obama have not been responsive to the people.

 

Unfortunately, an opportunity was likely squandered in the same way the Obama Administration has squandered opportunities for significant progress. It is hard to say what demands the organizers are going to make on Obama. There was a vision, but what is a vision without a connection to realities in Washington?

 

 

 

 

It seems like all this event did is give Democratic Party politicians and strategists a chance to see what principles and ideas are currently important to Democratic Party supporters. And, it is likely liberals and progressives find themselves at another rally like this in the future, re-affirming commitment to issues that do not have definitive specifics on how to get government to act, because demands with consequences attached were not issued for the Administration.

 

I very much wanted to walk away with a positive outlook. But, I am not one to delude myself when uncomfortable truths lie in plain sight. That's not a claim to be holier-than thou or an expression of purism. The event does not mean all is hopeless; many there clearly were looking for a way out and came dissatisfied and afraid. They need leadership from progressive or social movements in this country.

 

They're counting on bold people to step up and take the lead. They want the progressive movement to step it up, be decisive, and be more organized.

 

*Here is a podcast report I recorded for CMN News with host Chris Novembrino from the Lincoln Memorial while I was at the event.

 

VIDEO  - Harry Belafonte Calls Upon "One Nation" to Embrace Greater Ideals

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Thanks for this interesting perspective on what you came away with. I also attended, and if "all this event did is give Democratic Party politicians and strategists a chance to see what principles and ideas are currently important to Democratic Party supporters" I'd call that a success. If you visit the onenation site you'll see the post event action is "Demand the changes we voted for" with the info to do so. The event was not promoted as demand / consequences rally -- but as a unifying strategy with three policy points: Jobs, Education and Equality to lead to grassroots action. I also hope the energy is translated into getting out the vote and continuing to put the Administration's feet to the fire.
That's the problem. We needed a "demand/consequences rally." I'd be willing to debate that further should you disagree that the only way we will get the Obama Administration to give us jobs, education, equality, justice or even peace is making demands and delivering consequences should those demands not be fulfilled.

Thanks for the comment.
Peace must come first -- a fact constantly overlooked by many (if not most) so-called progressives. The country is going broke, no sane person doubts that, and we simply cannot afford both massive social programs and an empire-worthy war machine.

It's never been as simple as "Tea Party evil, Obama-Pelosi-Reid good." Heck, even some Tea Party folks, e.g., the Ron Paul camp, understand that the wars and overseas meddling have to stop.
I completely agree with you that we need to continue to demand progress on all those fronts, thus my hope that this energy converts to action. Consequences are more challenging, since our vote is our clout the rigid (and in some ways rigged) election / political system we have now doesn't allow for much consequence it seems.
Excellent post! Informative and well-stated. I also agree with your comment about a demand/consequences rally. That's something I could certainly get behind. Personally, I see signs like the one you have above - "Hell yes, we can!" - and I scratch my head in bewilderment. "We can, what...exactly?" What fight has President Obama led us on since he won election? I was signing petitions and writing emails and snail-mail letters and making phone calls for the longest time after he took office. Fighting for single-payer health insurance, for accountability for Wall Street etc. Then I realized he wasn't even interested.
Voting is not the answer, nor are the Dems, when it's CORPORATIONS that rule the planet. Congress, both Dems and Repubs, the White House, the corporate-controlled media, and Wall Street are only their servants and whores!! As Ralph Nader said, they're all the same. Didn't Obama's election prove that?!!!!!
so...it's the Sierra Club's fault for being a "liberal" organization that stole your favorite word? My family has been in the Sierra Club for over 80 years and there wouldn't be redwood tree left standing if they hadn't fought like h&^ll about it. I fail to see how organizations like them "co-opted" anything simply because some participants wanted to be led rather than lead.
cruzy,

I'm going to resist your attempt to make this conversation turn into the kind of conversation one would read on HotAir.com. I'm not going to get into some petty back and forth. If you re-read, I didn't attack the history and work of Sierra Club at all.

I did call out the Sierra Club for always being willing to help Democrats win elections when the Democrats record on the environment is shabby at best.

Thanks for your comment.
The recent arrests of peace activists in the Chicago area were very disturbing. But then the intimidation goes back years, and during Bush's tenure, of course, many activists found themselves on the no-fly list. (Hmm...restricted travel, no press freedoms, habeas corpus suspended...this is sounding familiar.) I wish Obama would get serious, but his administration is more and more involved in the security apparatus and the economy that's building up around it. We need solid issues: housing, gentrification, affordability of healthcare and not just access, and labor rights. To combat the growing creep culture.

rated.
You were careful Great post. Thanks. I need your involvement I'm stuck here. So and we all thank you, Thanks.
The most important aspect of the protest movement isn’t the rallies or the marches but the educational opportunities for the public. The problem is that it is hard to tell whether this is happening or not and even if it does the media will ignore it since they work for the corporations not the public as they imply.

Were there many good educational speeches? Was there an effort to pressure the media to report on the issues for a change? Was there an effort to inform the public that the media has been asked to actually address the issues and has declined to do so?

These protests of course still have an important job though since they let them know the public isn’t going to lie down and take it. It will take time and education but hopefully there will be some positive signs after the election which will need to be followed up with more educational efforts.