Thoughts. . .

Karin Greenberg

Karin Greenberg
Location
Long Island, New York, USA
Birthday
April 12
Bio
freelance writer and full-time mom

MY RECENT POSTS

Karin Greenberg's Links

Salon.com
Editor’s Pick
NOVEMBER 2, 2009 11:03AM

Wimpy Kid Books: Are They Turning Our Kids into Terrors?

Rate: 12 Flag

I read an article over the weekend that harshly criticized Jeff Kinney's Diary of a Wimpy Kid book series.  The author claimed that the protagonist of the book,  Greg Heffley, was a terrible role model for young children.  According to the article, his rogue ways (which include stealing, lying, and bullying) are not exemplary for the millions of kids out there devouring the books like candy. 

Anyone who has read these books cannot condemn them with a straight face.  Open to the third page of the first book and you'll read, "Let me just say for the record that I think middle school is the dumbest idea ever invented.  You got kids like me who haven't hit their growth spurt yet mixed in with these gorillas who need to shave twice a day.  And then they wonder why bullying is such a big problem in middle school."  And then a few pages later there's the "Cheese Touch."  A moldy piece of cheese that has been on the school basketball court "since last spring" is the object of this hysterical game where kids who touch the cheese and get the "cheese touch" are contaminated until they pass it on to someone else through tagging.  

In the new book, Diary of a Wimpy Kid Dog Days, Greg complains because his mom tells  him he can't open his birthday cards the way he used to:  "I have a GREAT system for opening cards.  I put them all in a neat pile, and then rip each one open and shake it to get the money out.  As long as I don't stop to read anything, I can get through a pile of twenty cards in under a minute."  

This is not just cute humor--it's laugh out loud hilarity.  Critics feel that the books send the wrong message by condoning Greg's disrespectful and immoral behavior.  But since when does every fictional character have to be moral, well-behaved and righteous?  One of my favorite books is Kate Chopin's The Awakening.  Though I relate to many of Edna Pontellier's struggles, I do not agree with all of her actions, and have certainly not been moved to do anything as drastic as she did.  Likewise, the children reading the Wimpy Kids books will not turn into mean, terrorizing people.

I can only speak for my own children, but they are NOT PERFECT.  Yes, they have morals and they seem to know the right thing to do more often than not.  But they are children, still navigating their way through the rough seas of our complex society.   Literature is supposed to help them relate to the world, not teach them the perfect behavior code.

There are hundreds of classic books that enhance children's minds through brilliant writing and underlying lessons.  But reading should not only be about learning right from wrong.  Children, especially the over-programmed ones of today's world, need to be able to let loose too.  If they can do that through reading a book instead of watching an iCarly episode, all the better.  

 

  

Author tags:

books, censorship, children, reading

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I don't know the books in question, but I can appreciate your point of view.
"Literature is supposed to help them relate to the world, not teach them the perfect behavior code."
If books can do that, and be hilarious too, they've got my support.
My kid loves, loves, loves the Wimpy Kid books. Like yours, he's a good, caring kid, and that he chooses to save up his money to buy books means the world to me. He also loves Harry Potter and the old Calvin and Hobbes comic strips.

And I think the Wimpy Kid books are especially creative.
The worst thing about the Wimpy Kid books is that they are written at a first or second grade level for kids in middle school. They are the ultimate dumbing down of the American reader.

The books are cartoony.

Also, like cartoons, they frequently have characters being mean for laughs. I think too much humor for kids involves meanness. My son has had difficulty recognizing the inadvertent meanness in some of his attempts to be a funny guy. I think it is due to the frequency with which meanness passes for humor in books like Wimpy Kid and Garfield.
Gee, my kids were reading Proust at 9.
R
I still like "The Secret Diary of Adrian Mole" and "Captain Underpants and the Invasion of the Incredibly Naughty Cafeteria Ladies from Outer Space."
The Wimpy Kid books are excellent for reluctant readers. My son, the poster boy for reluctant readers, loves them. Yes, I've read them. Anything to get his nose in a book is fine by me.

I think people who don't like Wimpy Kid are the same spoilsports who don't like Captain Underpants. In an earlier generation, they wouldn't have liked MAD Magazine, or rock and roll music, or anything that would separate "those darn kids" from their fuddy duddy parents.
As a 5th grade teacher, I find these books below grade level, but still mildly amusing. The kids love them, and reading something is better than reading nothing.
As for moral characters:
The best characters show the best and worst of ourselves. They doubt, they hurt people, they steal. They also rise above their circumstances, they forgive, they learn and they grow. There are a lot of authors out their who are not watering it down. See:
Christopher Paul Curtis, Lois Lowry, Dicamillo, Spinelli, et al.
Malusinka: I fully agree that the Wimpy Kids books are not much of a challenge for kids over 2nd grade, however, why does every book have to be an intense intellectual pursuit? If I, as an intelligent 40-year-old, can appreciate the books' humor, why can't children feel free to laugh at them too?
Believe me, I agree that there's too much meanness all around--in TV, movies, and books. Our job is to make sure our kids get enough of the great literature and good role models so that they can enjoy the other stuff without being drastically influenced by it. And of course, it's how we, as parents guide them that matters most.

john--tell me your secret: how did you get your kids to read Proust?
I think what kids really need to read is something that their parents disapprove of or would if they know their kids were reading it. For my generation, there was Mad Magazine which seems tame now but was downright subversive back then. Given their over-programmed lives, kids should have access to something anti-authoritarian and clandestine to fire up their brains in innovative directions - even if it isn't great lit.
At first, I didn't want my kids to read the Wimpy books. Not because of the mean characters, but because of the use of the word 'moron" which I really don't want to hear my kids say. BUT they read them anyway, checked them out during library time at school, and after working their way through the whole series, I still haven't heard them utter the word. A good lesson for me that they are developing an appropriate filter and know the difference between fiction and real life.
For kids who are a little older, my friend John Green's books are superb. He characters are typical high school kids who drink and swear and have sex and do all sorts of stupid things. Teenagers adore him, because he speaks to their experience.
I'm sorry now that I've stopped reading kids' books just because my girls are a bit older now. I love simply the IDEA of a whimpy kids' book. How original. If parents want to be so protective and critical they should go right back to nursery rhymes, Mother Goose (talk about terror tales) and Aesop's Fables. And Great Books studies for critical thinking in school would be burned with the autumn leaves! We're such a paranoid, neurotic, befuddled country. And those are just the kind of people I'm attracted to. Dang. Not the righteous kind -- they're just scared bullies. I feel for them but no attraction there.

Anyway, thanks for the great scoop and clear perception. I'm rating and faving you.

Oh, and I'm new to OS and was just fumbling through some other person's favorites and liked your face. That's how I found you and I'm glad I did!
Not being familiar with the books in question, I can't comment on them directly. However, judging from what I observe as my brother and sister-in-law raise their 10 and 7 year old kids, I see the world of parenting being divided, like so many other aspects of society, into two camps. There are those people, such as is embodied by the critics of the books here, who seem to want their kids to have been born at 40, with a full set of moral and intellectual facilities, and be fully responsible for their actions from the moment they leave the womb. On the other hand, we have parents who over-value a child's childhood, and want to keep them young and innocent and niave, and not give them a real look at how life can sometimes be cruel and unusual.

And in this case, category 1 become the bullies, and category 2 become the victims, at least until adulthood when the victims carry on the cycle of abuse and the victim becomes the abuser, thus continuing the perpetual mobius strip and widening the divide between too protective of the real world and not protective enough of the real world
I'm started to get a little weirded out with all the fear and concern over what I can't help but feel is silly stuff. For example, telling kids at school they may not dress in scary costumes. THAT is ridiculous.

I bought this book for my child about a monster under the bed. I read it to her. She loved it. We laughed at it. She did not start screaming at bedtime.

Plus, what about all the books we read as kids? Many of them dealt with 'touchy' subjects or mean behavior or ... etc. etc.

We mustn't treat our kids like they are idiots who won't get it or that's what they'll become.
Kids are all different. I think it's silly to suggest that scary books will scare kids or that scary books don't scare kids. The deal is that scary books scare some kids, and those parents are usually very aware of the problem. Therefore, parents who keep scary movies and books away from their kids are not necessarily weird, overprotective parents. Perhaps they are just-right parents for their own children. Same goes for all other kinds of books and movies. All of which makes it hard for teachers and librarians, whose job it is to provide literature for the masses. It's one thing to have all kinds of books on hand. It's another thing entirely to have to choose a book to read aloud or assign to one's whole class. A book that is--for each child--current, compelling, clever, and won't first do harm. That's no easy task.
PS As to the Wimpy books in question--they are wildly popular in the schools I teach in. I haven't read one through but have read parts of some. They are easy (read: below grade level) and funny, but in that new cynical kind of funny way. I don't think they are harmful, but I would be lying if I said I didn't worry that kids are exposed to far too much cynicism these days. Really. Children are grandly cynical these days, and I genuinely wonder what the consequences will be for them as individuals and as a governing society.
I am 21 years old and I freaking LOVE the "Diary of a Wimpy Kid" books. It's like listening to a comedian. Not ALL the jokes have to be true. That's why they're jokes. Two thumbs up and rated!
I feel priviledged every day that I can read books to my grandson, only 2.5 years of tender age. He loves books and watches the expression on my face while I read to him. Some books have repeat performance written all over them as he never tires of hearing the same words, again and again. He asks for his books with the word, "again," as he hands his favorites to me over and over. We have a shared excitement when reading and sitting side by side, closely, together, wearing out the pages of his favorite books, and mine. You illuminate more than what meets the eye with this wonderful post.
I completely agree... My experience is that children that are reading for pleasure are rarely the ones with problematic behavior or ethics. The ones we need to worry about in that department, for a variety of reasons, are the kids that either can't read or have substantial difficulty doing so.

Regardless of whether a problematic kid reads, though, it seems clear that books are just being added back into the usual list of scapegoats... It's easier for our society than to do the hard work of figuring out the causes, admitting all the areas we've gotten wrong, and doing whatever is necessary to fix the problem.
Gotta say I'm in the minority here. I do try to censor some stuff that is ubiquitous in Kid World. We didn't do Spongebob. We won't buy Wimpy kid. We are trying to cut down on the sarcasm and casual meanness our kids are exposed to. And I think it has made a difference.

Yes, I do understand the human condition-- and that no kid is perfect. But I've lived in other places, and in other cultures where the casual cynicism and constant put-downs aren't so ubiquitous. Its nice to live in a place where the kids don't all sound like smart alecky sitcom refugees. All in all, it isn't about making squeaky-clean kids, its about making happy kids, empowered kids.

There are other ways to expose kids to humor, to questioning authority, to the fact of bullying.

And for the record-- that's what we do in our own house. We don't worry about what goes on in friends' houses, even when our kids are there. We aren't purists. If my kids picks up a Wimpy kid book, I'm not gonna wrestle it out of his hand. We're just trying to cut down on the stuff. And in a few years we'll be hands off. But for now, when its fairly easy to avoid what we don't like, we do.
Glad that my boys prefer more heroic stuff. They love "The lightning thief" series, etc. The good thing about that is that they also learn about Greek mythology incidentally.