Nick Leshi

Nick Leshi
Location
Bronx, New York, United States of America
Birthday
December 13
Bio
Writer, actor, media professional, fan of entertainment, pop culture, and speculative fiction. Contact nickleshi@aol.com for more info.

MY RECENT POSTS

Nick Leshi's Links

New list
Editor’s Pick
DECEMBER 2, 2009 10:44AM

Hollywood, Please Stop Annihilating My City

Rate: 16 Flag

A video montage has been circulating around the Internet the last few days with a compilation of scenes from movies over the last four decades that show the destruction of New York City.  Click here to see it on YouTube.  It includes scenes from Armageddon, Cloverfield, The Day After Tomorrow, The Day the Earth Stood Still, Deep Impact, Ghostbusters, Godzilla, Spider-man, The Watchmen, and many more.

While it was cool to see the mighty King Kong rampaging through the streets of Manhattan and climbing atop the Empire State Building in the 1930s, and while the image of a destroyed Statue of Liberty was an iconic and clever ending to the original Planet of the Apes, and while it was cool to see the Man of Steel battle superpowered villains from Krypton in the streets and skies of a very NY-looking Metropolis in Superman: The Movie, the repeated setting of disaster scenes in New York City is become somewhat tiresome.  Especially after 9/11, it's actually quite tasteless the more it goes on. 

I know that my fair city has a lot of landmarks that are recognizable around the world, but can't filmmakers find other images to blow up?  Seeing devastation in the streets of New York on the big screen, even in a fictional context, still strikes a raw nerve with me.

Some of these post-9/11 destruction scenes arguably might be a metaphor for terrorist attacks (like in Stephen Spielberg's remake of War of the Worlds) or for society's angst about the end of the world (like in the recent hit 2012), but if that's the case, your point has been made, so can we move on and stop with the hyperbolic devastation of the Big Apple?  At least try coming up with a more original idea.

Action movies and disaster flicks are popular genres that appeal to audiences looking for escapist entertainment.  I don't have a problem with that.  I just think blowing up New York has been done to death (no morbid pun intended).  Enough, please?

Thanks.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I agree. Our city is an expression of the best hope for humanity, especially since 9/11. I love movies (like Woody Allen's) that glorify her beauty, diversity and vitality. I won't watch anything that's about destroying her. New York City is my heart's home. She is one of my many Muses. I will spend the rest of my life here, if I have anything at all to say about it. Amen.
Greta rant of a sensible idea.
Asking blockbuster action flicks to retire overplayed, unoriginal metaphors?

Good luck with that.
I agree. I would much prefer to see LA blown up over and over.

Then again, you know what they say: Tokyo would have ruled the world by now if they didn't have to rebuild it every six months due to a Godzilla attack. Just ask a Japanese person what the most popular city to blow up is...
Good point. But what are they going to annihilate instead?. My first choice would be the entire state of Alabama.
R
I agree.

And you can't escape the imagery even if you never see the movie. It was unnerving standing on the subway platforms under the sign that says To World Trade Center while staring at the Cloverfield posters showing lower Manhattan being destroyed. I've seen real life look like a movie. I'm not too interested seeing a movie look like real life.
Get your facts right, tomreedtune, "Center of street violence and random murder?" NYC is the 8th safest city in the country, and the largest safe city in the top 10 by a factor of about 10. It's safer than Columbus, OH and Kansas City. http://www.forbes.com/2009/10/26/safest-cities-ten-lifestyle-real-estate-metros-msa_chart.html

Feel free to be a crotchety misanthrope, just be an informed one.
I'm collecting "the worst of" ideas for an end of year list and two of my friends wrote in to list periodic annihilation of New York City by Hollywood. Great minds, etc...
I guess we New Yorkers should take it as a compliment that we are so often the victim of these destruction movies. But I completely agree that it's enough already, especially after 9/11. That image from Planet of the Apes has always haunted me!
I think it's because they can't get good deli and bagels on the West Coast.
One more thing, you never see them taking out Staten Island or The Bronx. It's always Manhattan and Brooklyn
I never understood why New York always got hit. Wouldn't people just as easily recognize the Hollywood sign as they would the Empire State Building? But, what do I know.
I agreee! A couple of years ago I went to the base of Grand Canyon where, by chance, at dinner in the cafeteria I was seated next to Will Smith's agent or manager and his wife who recommended I watch 'I am Legend', and my response was - 'I would love to but I just wish you guys would stop destroying NYC every chance you get.'

The whole idea is so tired and worn out!
Doh! Richard, thanks for correcting me about Superman II!
It might also be nice if other international cities were destroyed, the way American cities regularly are. Let's see Londoners or Parisians get the same "respect" (note sarcasm) that American cities do.
The pleasure film producers take in destroying New York is just another development in a much older dream of mayhem. Just take a look at H.G. Wells's 1907 sci fi novel "The War in the Air," which is focused around a surprise aerial attack on the Big Apple by Imperial German zeppelins. Around the same time, the Kaiser ordered the drafting of secret plans to attack the city by sea. The Nazis came up with more plausible scenarios entailing intercontintenal bombers, V2-equipped U-boats and long-range missiles. Of course, New York always figured large as a target in the Cold War.

Part of the fascination is probably due to the fact that America - as symbolized by New York City - has always been seen by the rest of the world as getting away with everything without so much as a scratch. Somehow people abroad think we can dish it out but can't take it ourselves. Since I've been thinking about this topic for years, when the Twin Towers fell it was more like the second shoe dropping than anything else. Horrific, and yet anything but surprising.
"It might also be nice if other international cities were destroyed, the way American cities regularly are. Let's see Londoners or Parisians get the same "respect" (note sarcasm) that American cities do."

But Placebostudman, that's the whole point! London was extensively blitzed in World War II. Paris was burned in the Commune of 1870, was occupied in 1871 and 1940, took plenty of hits from Big Bertha in World War I, caught a few bombs and suffered street fighting in World War II, and very nearly got blown to smithereens by the Germans on their way out. That sort of thing never happened in New York, which has been giving certain people ideas (and not just movie producers).

No one would ever pay to watch Berlin get blown up: been there, done that. (Although one TV series had the TV Tower blown up by terrorists, which was kinda cool to watch.)

So welcome to the club, New York. Getting blown up is a bitch, but as we Berliners know, you rebuild and get on with your life.
It's just not as fun when a monster eats Sheboygan Heights....
I would like to see Omaha obliterated. I don't know why.
The video looks like a Sarah Palin's wet dream.
I'm with you, Nick. Ever since 9/11, I have stayed away from movies that have big destruction scenes. Saw enough of the towers falling over and over and over again.
Eva T.--That's why it's always such a poignant sight--and such a reliable go-to--when a film needs to show not just destruction of property and death of people, but the loss of hope and defeat of our society. New York City is more than a place, more than the people who live there. It's a symbol of human ingenuity, American culture and humanity as a whole.
This is not to say that destroying NYC hasn't dropped into cliche by now, but there is a good reason for it.
The direct-to-cable or direct-to-dvd sci-fi movies I've seen recently seem to enjoy blowing up the St. Louis Arch...
I agree with Voicegal - kinda don't want to see big, identifiable buildings - in any city - dissolve in a cloud of smoke and debris. Seen it happen in he news, don't want to see it happen in entertainment venues. Just don't. But I may have a personal prejudice about movies showing extreme car chases, lots of machine-gun fire, and dissolving 200-story buildings.
Personal thing. Other people are free to indulge their fantasies.
But what are we going to watch? Sacramento doesn't have an Empire State Building.
You will be pleased to hear that 2012, the new end of the world movie, completely bypassed NYC, choosing instead to give D.C., Los Angeles, Las Vegas, and Yellowstone National Park the business.
I couldn't agree with you more and have wondered the same thing for some time! Enough already! Love the Big apple and can't bear to see it annihilated time and time again. Give it a rest!
"repeated setting of disaster scenes in New York City is become somewhat tiresome. Especially after 9/11, it's actually quite tasteless the more it goes on. "

Get over it. NYC embraces being a target. When you spout out you are the greatest city in the world, you're asking for trouble. Still, it's a pretty incredible place, if you can afford it.
MadPointDown -- I can understand how boasting that you're the greatest might inspire others to prove you wrong by being great themselves -- nothing wrong with healthy competition. But how does it warrant the urge to destroy?
Speaking as someone who enjoys seeing New York (and Paris, and Tokyo, and Cairo) destroyed in a safe, cinematic fashion, I cannot believe this bullshit is being taken seriously.
I love New York, and some of it's natives are dear to me, but living in the greatest city on earth means SUCKING IT UP when someone uses your city to make art that hurts your precious feelings. (Frankly, the sheer amount of New York Hagiography garbage is enough to counterbalance every cgi disaster that will ever be inflicted on it.)
Finally, using 9/11 as a bludgeon to advocate self-censorship is pathetic, and deserving of nothing but contempt. (Watch what we say, eh Ari Fleischer?)
Wycked, I'm not promoting any kind of censorship, self-or-otherwise. I'm merely tired of the cliche, think it's been overdone, and requesting that they think twice before blowing up a New York landmark. You can call it art if you want, but the way I see it, it's just played out and lazy. I enjoy action movies too, and some of those earlier New York scenes of mayhem/destruction I mentioned were imaginative and served a stroytelling purpose. Now, especially as a New Yorker who witnessed the real thing in 2001, I'm just pointing the emotional toll that recent movies that continue to faux-decimate NYC have on me (and other New York-based film fans).
That title alone gets a rating. Am I right or has San Francisco only been destroyed twice? Once by the radioactive octopus in Harryhausen's "It Came From Beneath the Sea" (1955) and then by Magneto in the third "X-Men" movie. Oh wait, SF does receive a drubbing in "Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home" if memory serves me right.

I still think Tokyo has all of us beat though.
Bob, speaking of Tokyo, the first Godzilla movie was a powerful metaphor, no argument there. And even though the many Godzilla flicks that followed lost their artsy feel, they were still guilty pleasures for me because I love seeing giant monsters duke it out. BUT WHY WOULD THEY SET THE GODZILLA REMAKE IN NEW YORK CITY??? That's all I'm saying. :)