Nick Leshi

Nick Leshi
Location
Bronx, New York, United States of America
Birthday
December 13
Bio
Writer, actor, media professional, fan of entertainment, pop culture, and speculative fiction. Contact nickleshi@aol.com for more info.

Nick Leshi's Links

New list
Editor’s Pick
SEPTEMBER 1, 2011 2:39PM

Is the New TV Season Sexist?

Rate: 17 Flag
Is "Jiggle TV" making an unfortunate comeback? In the old days of television, when Three's Company and Baywatch dominated the airwaves, the spotlight on many female characters was focused simply on their looks.  Even shows like Star Trek, which aimed to show the progressive strides of human beings in the future, arguably displayed some sexist depictions by today's standards.  Yet, maybe today's standards haven't really changed much at all, as some might say, judging by the new shows coming our way this season. 

September is here and new television programming is on our doorstep, ready to come into our living rooms.  TheWrap.com joined some other critics who have been pointing fingers recently at the networks for their new shows that seem to emphasize "T & A" instead of showing their female characters in what they profess should be a more positive and well-rounded light.

ABC has a remake of Charlie's Angels, the poster child (no pun intended for the late, great original angel Farrah Fawcett) of 1970s "Jiggle TV."  Is the super-model-looking crimefighting trio actually an example of the empowerment of women, or are they merely serving as nothing more than eye candy for a male audience? 

ABC also has a show about 1960s airline stewardesses (before they were called flight attendants) titled Pan Am.  NBC, likewise, has a drama set in the '60s with ladies in skimpy bunny outfits -- the highly hyped new series The Playboy Club.  Are these just retro chic shows aiming to capitalize on nostalgia and the success of AMC's Mad Men, or is the period setting just an excuse to be sexist and misogynistic with a built-in excuse that they're not actually showing women in a poor light? 

In their defense, both Pan Am and The Playboy Club seem to have plots that center on other dramatics beyond the bedroom.  Feminist icon Gloria Steinem, however, is calling for a boycott of The Playboy Club and some network affiliates across the country are refusing to air it.

Even the first teaser for NBC's remake of the highly acclaimed British series Prime Suspect was mildly gratuitous, showing Mario Bello in her police locker room, strapping on her gun and donning her police uniform.  I don't recall a similar closeup butt shot of the original actress Helen Mirren whenever I saw an episode on PBS.

I haven't seen full episodes of any of the shows mentioned above, so it would be unfair of me to take a stand on either side of the debate at this time.  Nevertheless, I do hope that the new television season provides some good characters, regardless of gender, and avoids relying too heavily on stereotypes.  The human body is a beautiful thing and should be celebrated, but not at the expense of objectifying women for the sake of television ratings. 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
For the record, The Playboy Club has eye candy for the ladies, too, with Eddie Cibrian and David Krumholtz, among others. At this point it's impossible to say how often the men will be showing some skin, but I think it's safe to say it will happen on occasion. I plan to watch the first episode just to see them, and to see if the merits of the show live up to its visual appeal.

The ads for Prime Suspect make the American series seem quite different in focus from the British series. I don't recall Helen Mirren celebrating being beaten up as "a good day at the office". But then, I only watched the first season of the British version, so I can't judge definitively one way or the other - certainly not until I watch at least one episode.

As for Charlie's Angels and Pan Am, you fellows (and ladies who enjoy thaat kind of visual appeal) are welcome to them.
TV is extremely sexist. Find a man on TV that isn't fat, stupid or evil. Yes, TV is sexist. And men, not women, are the butt of the joke.
The difference is there are plenty of shows with women in power no to balance it out. There will always be teaser shows just as there will always be chick flicks.
I say bring back witty, psychiatrist themed sitcoms, possibly featuring various supermodels as the main character's romantic foils.
I don't object to skimpy attire, or nudity, I'm not that prudish, and I think sex on TV is less harmful than violence, but sexism comes into play if those women are just there as objects with no substance beyond looking pretty. The same can apply to men as well -- cheesecake vs. beefcake -- but obviously women are more often depicted as mere sex objects than men.
Stereotypes?! TV doesn't rely on stereotypes. TV reflects faithfully the life I see around me every day.

Beautiful cops, beautiful lawyers, beautiful doctors, and people with low incomes who live in large, well-appointed downtown apartments.

What's wrong with you, Nick?
And don't forget the vampires and zombies, Man Talk Now. :)
desert_rat, you need to watch different channels. Right off the top of my head:
White Collar (USA)
Burn Notice (USA)
Royal Pains (USA)
The Closer (TBS)
Law & Order - the whole franchise
CSI - the whole franchise
And with a few exceptions, the women in these shows are also not stupid, vapid or ridiculous.
I think you're confusing "sexist" with "sexual".
Imagine the response if the Fall lineup were filled with stereotypical Black characters (not that we've come far in that regard either). It's gotten so I can't watch a show without shouting to the professional women, "Button your blouse!"
Harry's Ghost, I think you can depict female characters in a sexual way without having them be perceieved as sexist. In the new Charlie's Angels for example, I've seen some early images from the new season that show one of the lady detectives bound and gagged by, I assume, the villain of the week. Heroes being captured and tortured are nothing new (how many times have we seen Batman and Robin, or Kiefer Sutherland's Jack from "24") in the same predicaments. But some argue that women depicted in such a way is done for titillation or as an expression of misogeny.

If the new shows, Pan Am and The Playboy Club, are showing women as subservient or weak, are they truthfully depicting the era of the 1960s and making commentary about the gender roles of that decade (and how far we've progressed or haven't) which would be a noble endeavor, or are they, as I said, just using that time period setting to show some skin and tell stereotypical tales that depict women in a sexist manner.

Will Prime Suspect delve into good stories about the struggles of a female law enforcement officer in a male-dominated, testosterone heavy profession, or is it just an excuse to play on female stereotypes and add to negative tropes rather than oppose them.

So, yes, I think sexism is very different than merely displaying sexuality.
It's gotten sexist as far as both genders are concerned. Pretty boy eye-candy and willowy, brainy, sexy women. Perfect for the hetrosexual, bi-sexual, gay or any other orientation you can think of. And, I'm getting old. Very little of it appeals to me--although I enjoy good premise, good writing and good acting. Go figure.
Network TV is pretty much a wasteland. I just gave up on it. As for The Playboy Club and Pan Am, I think it's just a desperate attempt to cash in on the success of Mad Men.
At least if the T&A thing takes over again, there might be less reality shows!
The "Law and Order" franchises are getting to be almost as stupidly-written as the "CSI" franchises, but at least their police stations look like police stations and their female detectives, M.E.s, and lawyers dress appropriately for their jobs.

That said, the gender balance of various law enforcement offices in TV land is WAY more balanced than it is in real life...and for the most part, the female characters on Law & Order, CSI, the remake of Hawaii 5-0, NCIS, etc. are depicted as extremely competent at their jobs and are treated as equals by their male co-workers.
They say that scary times make people look to the past for imagined or not simplicities, so maybe its that, although in your case, its opposite to the suppoed hemiline effect, in which hard times induce more conservative dress, but then those shows would seem to reflect more conservative social mores in their own way as to sexual relationships and the power within them. congratulations on EP, well-earned, as you've always had a good blog.
"Are these just retro chic shows aiming to capitalize on nostalgia and the success of AMC's Mad Men, or is the period setting just an excuse to be sexist and misogynistic with a built-in excuse that they're not actually showing women in a poor light?"

Thank you for articulating exactly what I've been thinking, Nick! And all I've seen is the commercials. Plus you've saved me from writing a blog. :) (R)
As a friend of mine said to me, if nothing else, the teasers and commercials for these shows are definitely sexist. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt until I see a full episode of any of them. There's no doubt the ones set in the 1960s are trying to re-capture some of that Mad Men vibe, but will they succeed or have they missed the point?
I'm not against a bit of eye candy now and again no matter the gender, as long as there is some depth of character and storyline. A bit of originality wouldn't hurt either. And that goes for the big screen as well as the small!
When I first saw the listing of new shows, I wondered if we had entered some kind of time warp and gone back 50 years. Hopefully, the shows will be a little more sophisticated than I expect. But I'm not holding my breath.
I like TNT's offerings better than most of the network stuff. The Closer, Leverage, Bones (in reruns) - nice to see some women with power and brains there.
When I watched the first season of "Mad Men," I was concerned that it was using its period setting to objectify women and show men behaving badly with no repercussions. The last season of the show proved that portraying the empowerment of women (aside from using sex as power) is part of the show's agenda. Only time will tell if "Pam Am" and "The Playboy Club" will do the same. I have no hope for anything truly serious from "Charlies Angels."
It's not so much that it's sexist, just boring as hell and utterly unoriginal.
I have to say, I'm a sad sucker for retro. There's a fine line between sexy and sexist. I'm not convinced yet that these shows will fall behind the sexist line. I don't think Charlie's Angels did. We shall see