Nick Leshi

Nick Leshi
Location
Bronx, New York, United States of America
Birthday
December 13
Bio
Writer, actor, media professional, fan of entertainment, pop culture, and speculative fiction. Contact nickleshi@aol.com for more info.

Nick Leshi's Links

New list
DECEMBER 14, 2011 11:23PM

More Big Budget Movie Productions Biting the Dust?

Rate: 1 Flag
I previously wrote about Hollywood's cold feet as budgets skyrocketed on some highly anticipated productions, such as The Lone Ranger remake starring Johnny Depp and the ambitious production of Stephen King's The Dark Tower by director Ron Howard, forcing those projects to temporarily shut down and trim their costs or seek funding elsewhere.  Now, a few other high profile movies are in trouble before filming has even begun, and it's all because film studios are becoming squeamish about investing hundreds of millions of dollars in this economy.  Deadline Hollywood reports that Legendary Pictures is pushing back its heavily hyped version of John Milton's Paradise Lost because the estimated cost to make it has skyrocketed beyond the $120 million mark, and it also writes that Warner Bros. has nixed Arthur and Lancelot because the estimated $130 million budget was deemed too high a risk.  Universal Pictures also turned around its greenlight of the adaptation of the H.P. Lovecraft story At the Mountains of Madness.

It's understandable that Warner Bros. is nervous about Arthur and Lancelot, since movies based on the mythic story of the Knights of the Round Table have been hit or miss.  Would the contemporary retelling of the King Arthur saga attract an audience as did the cult classic Excalibur or the Disney favorite The Sword in the Stone, or would it fizzle like First Knight and countless others?  The story continues to be told to death, with the BBC's Merlin and Starz's dramatic re-imagining of Camelot, just to name two of the most recent.  Arthur and Lancelot would have been directed by David Dobkin who previously gave us Shanghai Knights, Wedding Crashers, Fred Claus, and The Change-Up, and would have starred TV actors Kit Harington of Game of Thrones and Joel Kinneman of The Killing in the leads, both unproven as film stars -- not exactly the kind of names that can guarantee the success of a multi-million-dollar tentpole picture.

Yet even big names cannot quelch the trepidation of producers facing shaky economic times.  At the Mountains of Madness would have been helmed by Guillermo del Toro and possibly starred Tom Cruise, while Paradise Lost was set to have been directed by Alex Proyas and to have featured Bradley Cooper, Camilla Belle, Dominic Purcell, Rufus Sewell, Casey Affleck, Djimon Hounsou, and others.

The good news is that the latter epic hasn't been completely shut down, but merely postponed until the numbers-crunchers can figure out a way to minimize the budget.  The scheduled January production start will not happen, but maybe they can get their act together to begin filming in a few months.  The promising and eagerly awaited Paradise Lost may not be utterly lost but only "Paradise Delayed."  I hope they can find a way to make it happen.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Was bound to happen when everything that used to work barely carries its own thrust.
They used to run this interview with Harlan Ellison on TNT way back when the network was showing reruns of the original "Outer Limits" (yeah way, way back when). Ellison said that the budget limitations had a way of kicking the creative process into overdrive as the producers, directors and special effects crew had to figure out how to tell their science fiction tales with what was available. The special effects for the episode "It Crawled Out of the Woodwork" are pretty inspired: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23tfAkly0LM
Bob, excellent point. Also, I know all of these fantasy concepts (Dark Tower, Paradise Lost, etc.) require a lot of visual effects, but wasn't one of the selling points for computer generated imagery that eventually it would be cheaper than practical special effects? Why on earth are these budgets through the stratosphere instead of becoming more manageable? (And we're not even counting the marketing budgets, right?) I certainly don't want cheesy production values, but there seems to be a disconnect. Could it be costs for 3D?
Nick, I remember seeing a review of Serenity when it came out (which is what sold me on going). The reviewer said this filmmaker (Joss Whedon) figured out that the most important special effect of all was making us care about the characters. The special effects of Serenity are no doubt cheesy, but it's an excellent movie all the same.

It slays me when these Hollywood people forget, almost every damn time, that the story is more important than the effects. If there are plot holes, cardboard characters, people doing ridiculous things for no reason, all the effects in the world won't make me sit on the edge of my seat.

How much of that crazy budget goes to a damn good writer (or adapter) to make sure the movie has a solid foundation? I would bet not enough.

I don't need gratuitous explosions. I need stories.