The Body Politic

Sensible discourse on issues of the day since 2003

Kimberly Krautter

Kimberly Krautter
Location
Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Birthday
October 26
Bio
Southern fried iconoclast and Atlanta native Kimberly Krautter is The Anti-Coulter. She blogs about the intersection of public communications and public policy with a side order of musings on pop culture. For 22 years, Ms. Krautter has been a strategic communications consultant to Fortune 500 and emerging industry companies as well as a freelance journalist published in business magazines in the U.S., U.K. and France. Her social commentary has been featured in the Atlanta Journal Constitution with light-hearted series featured in Atlanta magazine and others. A popular early blogger, "The Body Politic" was originally hosted on Typepad and has now migrated to Open Salon. Known to have the swiftest soapbox in the South and for being staunchly anti-wing nut, Ms. Krautter believes, "Liberal is not a four-letter word, for that matter neither is Conservative, and solutions are found in the Sensible Center where people are eager to speak with each other instead of just being heard." She is currently authoring a major journalistic work titled "Foreclosure on the Fourth Estate: How spin-fluence and info-tainment killed the American newspaper." Follow her on Twitter @kimbrlykrautter [note: there is no "e" in the "kimbrly" portion of the Twitter handle.]

Kimberly Krautter's Links

Salon.com
AUGUST 12, 2009 5:41PM

The Dangers of "Nazi" Name Calling

Rate: 5 Flag

Carol Smaldino just posted a new blog that directly addresses the licentious and dangerous use of "Naziism" by health care reform opponents and how that really compares to what is happening in America right now. 

Bullies Delight in Town Hall and Center

By Carol Smaldino, CSW 

A probing and shocking book, The Nazi Conscience by Duke University Professor Claudia Koonz, examines the kind of conscience and ethical convictions that spread throughout Nazi Germany while she makes the reader feel close to the same dilemmas. 

Conscience, as used here, is any set of rules based on an ethic that is not always seen by the rest of humanity as having anything to do with justice or decency.  Conscience, she writes, "tells us to whom we shall and shall not do what.  It structures our identity by separating those who deserve our concern from alien 'others' beyond the pale of our community." She reminds of Greek, Jewish and Christian tendencies to extend charity and care only to members of the group of inclusion throughout Western history.

During the recent town hall meetings on healthcare, we have witnessed a spate of violent bullying and psychological (sometimes physical) assault, moods of hostility and derision which has stooped to levels that defy any clear intention to act for the greater good. It is about conserving the welfare of the "us" against the "them," with "them" being perceived as unworthy, unfit and dangerous to our future.  "They" are accused of trying to destroy the capitalistic way of life and of trying to take away the God given right to ownership and property rights.

One wonders which "God."

In this context, charity is reserved for exotic causes and people far from our shores and comes in packages or checks, but it surely isn't for citizens on our soil who don't comport with our concept of who counts as deserving. To trivialize Naziism as these protesters too often do, or to reduce any side of a contemporary conflict to the degradation of inflamed name calling is not only repulsive, but it is also unhelpful. The electric charge stays in the air and does only damage.  I think it is nothing less than necessary to study with curiosity the human tendency to have aggressive and genocidal strains in our behavior here as well as anywhere abroad.

There is a duality in our midst, and it goes beyond polarization along political party lines. The river running through this dichotomy of values and actions also has to do with the idea of how we see ourselves.  And as long as any group sees the mirror image of good and pure and innocent, there is the implied sanction to assault, eject and negate others who are perceived as "less than." 

 Read the rest of the article here... and learn the conclusions she draws on this important issue.

In the interst of full disclosure, Carol Smaldino is one of my clients. She has a regular blog on The Huffington Post, and I think she is terrific. From time-to-time, when I think it is appropriate, I will share her work with OS readers.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I agree, "Nazi" is not a good term to be using here. I believe that "Marxist" would better describe Obama.

I am not saying this to be a smart ass. My opinion is based on his writing and his associstions during anad after college.
"Marxist" has no more credence than "Nazi". Both are used way too loosely.
Yes, they are used loosely but I stand by my opinion on President Obama.
While Nazi is a pointless insult, it's ironic to hear it thrown around by the right wing, considering Nazism is an extreme right mind set. It's used for its emotional impact by people who are basically stupid. (as opposed to ignorant - stupidity is acting on ignorance)

Blackflon, You make yourself look silly, and ignorant of politics. I know you're not a stupid person overall, but that thinking is stupid.
I find it amazing that someone can seriously judge a person based on what they believed/explored in college. Isn't that what people are supposed to do there? Be exposed to all kinds of ideas?

Hell, I had much more radical beliefs in university than I have now, but I'd be hella upset if someone judged me by what I did 25 years ago. Good grief.
@Paul, I didn't call Obama a Nazi.

@Emma, yes people can change over time. Even I was a flaming leftist at one time. But in my opinion Obama has stuck pretty much to his early beliefs.
@Blackflon

I didn't say you did. You called him a Marxist, which has to be described as an expression of ignorance, which you confirmed in your second comment. I think you know what I was saying, and because you have no defense, you come back with a pretended misunderstanding.
Don't worry, I don't want to discuss what Marxism really is. You don't know and I don't care - because it has no place in an America that has never been further from what even you think is Marxism.
Boys and girls, play nice... Btw... Marxism had little to do with Communist Russia or China for that matter. Communism is a bastardization of the Marxist ideal and as implemented proves the Capitalist case that human beings are incapable of an utopian concept because 20% will always cheat the system for personal gain, 20% will always slack off leaving the 60% in the middle carrying all the weight... kinda like what we have everywhere else in the world. The free market is the natural order of things -- expressed either as a barter system, a black market or a purely capitalistic one.

The ISSUE of health care reform -- even if a public OPTION (as opposed to a blanket MANDATE which is not and never has been on the table) is part of the equation will be just another competitor in the field. It has NOT squelched private insurance competition in any other country, and it will not do so here. Setting aside the other very successful international examples, as proposed for the U.S. it absolutely will not come close to any definition of socialism. What it will prove to do is reduce the monthly premiums currently pricing middle class Americans out of the the healthcare market and acting as a guillotine to anyone who has a health scare, much less a real health emergency. Health Care Reform will also hold insurance companies accountable for coverage. The only person or entity threatened by Health Care Reform is the top executives and shareholders of the big insurance companies who are reaping (some might say raping) obscene profits while denying care (rationing) to people who trusted them for coverage based on years and years of very expensive and ever-increasing premiums (well above the rate of inflation).

Now... everyone -- including teacher -- needs to take a time out and write 100 times -- I will not call people bad names, and I will tell the truth, I will not call people bad names, and I will tell the truth, I will not call people bad names, and I will tell the truth...
Yes, Kimberly
Communism wasn't really applied per Marx. This is what the American communists (both of them) like to point out - as if a "proper" communist system just hasn't been tried.
It's basically the same thing conservatives say about conservatisms' whopper failures over the last 30 years, and especially the last 8 -it wasn't "real" conservatism.

The labels are almost entirely pointless, and highly distractive. The real question should be whether or not it works, and is within the bounds of the Constitution.

99.9% of those who call themselves conservative have little clue as to what it really is. They don't know Burke from Kirk, but if they did...they'd know they aren't really conservatives. So, they don't even know their own ideology, yet hang labels like "Marxist" on others. Go figure.
Thanks, Paul. Btw. I need the link to your fabulous primer on Liberalism that explains all of this in such clear terms. I need to revisit it, and I'm sure all of the readers here will appreciate it... especially those who **think** they are conservatives...
Here's the link-

http://open.salon.com/blog/paul_j_orourke/2009/06/01/explaining_liberalism_to_liberals

I've been slow-cooking a post about conservatism, which, in it's original form, isn't a bad way of looking at things. But it was only "original" for a short time before it was absorbed and converted into typical Republican politics.
Yeah, I am sick of "nazi" being used by all indiscriminately as a cudgeon. "Nazi" should be reserved for actual nazis, not as a generalized term for reprobate or "someone who thinks differently than I do."
PS, Emma Peel: "I find it amazing that someone can seriously judge a person based on what they believed/explored in college."

Great observation. I mean, good gawd, we were tall children.

PS, a lot of Conservatives, who have embraced Mussolini's ideas, shouldn't throw rocks at Jolly Old Karl. That apple is not far from~
Good piece. There are some things I want to say in response, but they're more complex than would fit here. I made some notes for a future post. Thanks!
Yeah, the comparison is apt. The Nazis built concentration camps, forced work camps and extermination camps to brutalize and destroy Jewish and other ethnic European populations. Nazi doctors experimented on human prisoners often performing major heart and lung surgeries without anesthesia. But Barack Obama wants to give us health care in the form of a public option so that costs can be contained. Yes! I see the parallels! It's so obvious.