Everyone gets tired of copy and paste. So sue me. I could publish a link, but why? I don't think Roger Ebert would see this and think I'm plagiarizing his work. It has his name on it and I'm stating in the title and here. Sorry, but I have no patience for people complaining about inane stuff like that on a site that neither values my contributions, good or mediocre, nor pays me one red cent. There's no difference between placing a link and posting this review. There's one mouse click difference. Had I put my name on it, obviously a different story. But, I digress.
I was somewhat leary of this film coming out, as Mr. Ebert pointed out as well. I plan on seeing it tomorrow now that I've read his review. All the other critics have given similar reviews as well. Ebert is consistently on par with my feelings on films and has always been my favorite critic. When you find a well known critic that predominantly sees eye to eye with you, follow him/her. He has very, very rarely let me down.
Considering Michael Jackson was a big influence on me musically growing up I want to see what he sounded like near the end. I don't have any macabre desire to see him looking like a man in a death spiral. That was what was telling me not to go see it. Mr. Ebert points out that this was not the case. But I have seen very functional drug addicts before. This doesn't appear to be exploitative.
For me it's about the music. His private life was his business. The allegations against him for sexual assault were never presented to me in a court of law so I cannot and will not judge him guilty. It's not comparable to me to the O.J. Simpson case where DNA matches were found everywhere. Whether you believe Simpson did it or not, at least there was knowledge that DNA matches were found. Were they planted? I have no idea. I myself don't believe so based on about 10 books I've read on each side.
I also believe Robert Blake was guilty, so for me it's about justice, nothing to do with race. Far too many black men and women are in prison proportionate to their percentage of the population. O.J. Simpson was no saint people and he was a batterer. It's not a stretch to commit murder.
Jackson to me was merely troubled and child-like. He appears in videos that I've seen of him with his kids, to have been a gentle and caring father. I believe that he did sleep with those kids at Neverland, and he may very well have gotten naked, but I've always felt it was more on a child-like level. I could be wrong.
I hate that he died so publicly and so needlessly. I'll let everyone know what I think after watching. Below is Mr. Ebert's review if you aren't so offended that I copy and pasted it, to read it. If so, you can Google it.
Michael Jackson and dancers in rehearsal for the planned series of London concerts.
The film has been assembled from rehearsals from April through June 2009 for a concert tour scheduled for this summer. The footage was "captured by a few cameras," an opening screen tells us, but they were professional high-def cameras and the sound track is full-range stereo. The result is one of the most revealing music documentaries I've seen.
And it's more than that. It's a portrait of Michael Jackson that belies all the rumors that he would have been too weak to tour. That shows not the slightest trace of a spoiled prima donna. That benefits from the limited number of cameras by allowing us to experience his work in something closer to realistic time, instead of fracturing it into quick cuts. That provides both a good idea of what the final concert would have looked like, and a portrait of the artist at work.
Never raising his voice, never showing anger, always soft-spoken and courteous to his cast and crew, Michael with his director, Kenny Ortega, micro-manages the production. He corrects timing, refines cues, talks about details of music and dance. Seeing him always from a distance, I thought of him as the instrument of his producing operation. Here we see that he was the auteur of his shows.
We know now that Michael was subjected to a cocktail of drugs in the time leading up to his fatal overdose, including the last straw, a drug so dangerous it should only be administered by an anesthesiologist in an operating room. That knowledge makes it hard to understand how he appears to be in superb physical condition. His choreography, built from such precise, abrupt and perfectly-timed movements, is exhausting, but he never shows a sign of tiring. His movements are so well synchronized with the other dancers on stage, who are much younger and highly-trained, that he seems one with them. This is a man in such command of his physical instrument that he makes spinning in place seem as natural as blinking his eye.
He has always been a dancer first, and then a singer. He doesn't specialize in solos. With the exception of a sweet love ballad, his songs all incorporate four backup singers and probably supplementary tracks prerecorded by himself. It is the whole effect he has in mind.
It might have been a hell of a show. Ortega and special effects wizards coordinate pre-filmed sequences with the stage work. There's a horror-movie sequence with ghouls rising from a cemetery (and ghosts that were planned to fly above the audience). Michael is inserted into scenes from Rita Hayworth and Humphrey Bogart movies, and through clever f/x even has a machine-gun battle with Bogie. His environmental pitch is backed by rain forest footage. He rides a cherry-picker high above the audience.
His audience in this case consists entirely of stagehands, gaffers, technicians, and so on. These are working people who have seen it all. They love him. They're not pretending. They love him for his music, and perhaps even more for his attitude. Big stars in rehearsal are not infrequently pains in the ass. Michael plunges in with the spirit of a co-worker, prepared to do the job and go the distance.
How was that possible? Even if he had the body for it, which he obviously did, how did he muster the mental strength? When you have a doctor on duty around the clock to administer the prescription medications you desire, when your idea of a good sleep is reportedly to be unconscious for 24 hours, how do you wake up into such a state of keen alertness? Uppers? I don't think it quite works that way. I was watching like a hawk for any hint of the effects of drug abuse, but couldn't see any. Perhaps it's significant that of all the people in the rehearsal space, he is the only one whose arms are covered at all times by long sleeves.
Well, we don't know how he did it. "This Is It" is proof that he did do it. He didn't let down his investors and colleagues. He was fully prepared for his opening night. He and Kenny Ortega, who also directed this film, were at the top of their game. There's a moving scene on the last day of rehearsal when Jackson and Ortega join hands in a circle with all the others, and thank them. But the concert they worked so hard on was never to be.
This is it.


Salon.com
Comments
I will see his film and I will enjoy the last images of his greatness.
He is an icon, a permanent contributor to America's musical history, and as one of the greats. This film will provide some money for his children and to clean up his estate. Good.
Excuse me? How is that folks can overlook that fact?
How do you honor this guy? It's the equivalent of honoring OJ because he was aquitted. Look at the big-picture of what Jackson did---paying millions to squelch others from testifying.
Are you fucking kidding me?
LOVED the music and especially the dancing, HATE the molestation!
Provide me with an explaination of the "warning system"discovered in his bedroom that alerted him to anyone approaching, and the stock of toys and alcohol therein, and maybe I'll celebrate him as well.
I am sick to death of people stupidly celebrating a kid-fucker.
Bring it ON!
Oddly enough I found myself creepily nostalgic. Now I listen to him from time to time. Nice rant at the top btw.
Rated.
Maybe in a few years, I will feel differently but great article my friend and damnit, I appreciate you!!!! But I still don't pay you 1 red cent, maybe two, but never 1!! ;)
Rated!! Because I can!!!
I will go and see it again maybe twice more before it comes out on DVD. I took both my teenagers (14 and 16) and a friend of theirs and they didn't move for the entire thing. Dancers and singers, awesome all of them. Only critique is that I could have watched 5 times more footage on the Thriller sequences.