By Con George-Kotzabasis
Barack Obama in another crucial test of leadership--the others were his withdrawal of troops from Iraq and his diplomatic parlay with Iran—has irretrievably failed. In his response to John McCain’s proposal to suspend their campaign and postpone their debate that is to take place next Saturday and concentrate all their efforts in persuading Congress to pass immediately and urgently, in a modified form, the financial measures of Paulson-Bernanke-- measures that were elaborated by the experts in the field and not by primitive “tzu-tzu” practitioners nor by populist nostrums--that would have a better chance than none in saving America from descending into depression, that they should not postpone their debate and by having it they would allow the American people to have their say on the financial package, shows Obama to be abjectly and callously irresponsible to the “main street” people whom he presumably professes to represent and protect, all in the name of a stampede of voters rushing toward him on the heels of the debate that would facilitate him to capture the White House.
In his delirious manic run to catch the fleeing damsel of the ‘oval shape’, he is completely careless and unconcerned that this unprecedented financial crisis since the 1930’s depression that threatens many millions of Americans of losing their jobs and their houses, and, indeed, their life-savings, as there is a high probability, if the Paulson-Bernanke measures are not passed promptly and expeditiously by Congress, might engender a stampede, a run on the banks by ordinary Americans that would bring the collapse of the whole American economy.
Thus Obama’s sinister aim to have his debate for the purpose of bringing a stampede of votes to his side will turn out to be a stampede on the banks. And while he gives his glorious victory speech to Americans the latter will ingloriously be losing their savings. Hence, his ‘victory’ will rest on a pile of ashes, on the ashes of ordinary Americans’ savings.


Salon.com
Comments
Also, don't even get me started about U.S. troops in Iraq or the necessity of negotiating with your enemies. On the first point, the war in Iraq is not an exercise in foreign policy, it's a crime spree, so Obama's original opposition to it was morally and logically correct. And as to the need to negotiate(parlay?) with Iran, we have seen the mess that shooting first and asking questions later has created in the afformentioned Iraq war. This is all fairly obvious, but you missed it, why? I suspect it's because like George Bush, John McCain and company you don't spend much time in the REALITY based community. 'Nuff said.
To be a cynic standing next to the tub of Diogenes is a mark of intelligence. To be a sarcastic cynic is to disabuse yourself of the idea that you are intelligent.