I wonder how many old flames have been reignited because of Facebook. I wonder how many affairs are going on right now that began with a friend request. Quite a few, I would bet.
I signed up for Facebook less than six months ago. I love it. I live thousands of miles away from where I grew up and went to college, and I’ve gotten back in touch with many old friends. It’s a fantastic tool.
I’ve also become “friends” with more than one ex-boyfriend. With most of them, we say hi, give a quick status update, check out each other’s photos, and that’s that. But a few have made definite romantic overtures. They’ve sent questionable emails, and flirted, and told me I look great. The problem is that at least two of these guys are married.
I think this is pretty common. I would guess that it’s happened to most people on Facebook – at least, most of those of us who are old enough to have lost track of old lovers.
Would it happen without Facebook? Probably not. Until I signed up for Facebook, this didn’t happen to me. And for all we like to wail about the loss of privacy on the internet, most of us aren’t actually googleable. I’ve googled lots of old friends and acquaintances and had zero relevant hits turn up. And even when google does turn up with something and you find an old flame, you have no valid reason for contacting an ex-lover out of the blue. To send an out-of-the-blue email to a long-lost lover, you must be either very curious or very brave.
But this all changes with Facebook. Suddenly, we can find old flames in an instant, and there’s a perfectly good reason to contact them – we’re friending all our high school buddies, why not them too? Friending is so casual. It doesn’t violate any etiquette. It’s all too easy.
I haven’t been tempted to engage in online flirtation with these guys, but that’s because I’m not what I call an IVP: an Intrigue-Vulnerable Person. But IVPs are common. My workplace is crawling with them. And a few years ago, I was one. Here’s what makes for an IVP:
· Boredom with your relationship and/or homelife
· Stress related to your relationship and/or homelife
· Loneliness and/or a feeling of being undesirable or taken for granted by your mate
· Unrequited love for someone from your youth (this one is the most dangerous)
If you’re an IVP, and you get a flirtatious email from an old flame, a little spark goes off in your chest. A tingle. It puts a smile on your face. So you start corresponding, perhaps innocently at first, and now you have a fun little secret. You start reliving old memories. Online, you’re both at your charming best. You carefully compose your emails and you choose your words to be witty, self-deprecating, and fascinating. You anxiously await a reply in your inbox. Your instant messages are effervescent.
Not only do you put your best self forward online, but your old flame sees you that way too. They remember you when you were young. They still think of you as young. They don’t see you as middle-aged, they see you as a vibrant 19 year old in a grown-up body. It makes you feel young. It makes you feel sparkling and interesting and desirable. It’s intoxicating.
Some of these emotional affairs will never leave the bounds of the internet. But some will turn physical, and some will break up marriages. I posit that this phenomenon will grow by leaps and bounds because of Facebook.
I am not blaming Facebook, nor excusing adulterers. We are all responsible for our own behavior. But in my assessment, most people are vulnerable to affairs and one point or another. The reason they don’t happen more often is not because most people have wonderful self-control but because opportunities are either non-existent or come at too high a cost.
But Facebook significantly decreases those costs. It allows people to fool themselves. It starts so innocently. It provides both the means and the motive for contacting an old flame. Hell, you can chat with your ex-lover on your laptop while your spouse is in the same room! But an “innocent” exchange can turn into attraction and emotional attachment very, very easily. The allure of the old flame – of the person who knew you when you were young – should not be underestimated. It can be very powerful.
So while I believe in personal responsibility, I also have sympathy for those who struggle to resist something so powerful. Technology dangles an exponentially-increasing number of temptations in front of our noses: 5,000 years ago, we didn’t have to struggle to avoid that last piece of pizza, or that unnecessary credit card purchase, or surfing on our boss’s dime, or having an online affair – those things simply didn’t exist. Today, we must all exercise constant vigilance against incessant social and technological influences that do not have our best interests in mind. So I’m not quick to judge. But I do worry.
Am I making something out of nothing here? Should we all just trust ourselves and our partners to use proper self-restraint, and go on our merry ways? I’m admittedly a cynic, but I work around middle-aged family guys, and judging from the boredom and dissatisfaction most them express with their lives, I doubt they could be trusted to maintain appropriate boundaries if they were contacted by a flirtatious ex. (Note: the same could be said about women, I just happen to work with mostly guys). What do you think?


Salon.com
Comments
You stated, "Some of these emotional affairs will never leave the bounds of the internet." Call me old fashioned, but it makes no difference whether it leaves the Internet. Committed couples have taken vows to draw definite boundaries. Why should the Internet be any different?
We act like we now have to rewrite our moral code...no we don't. It hasn't changed. There's just too many of us who want to find any excuse to say, "I didn't know." They know.
Great subject. Thanks. Rated.
(shakes head sadly)
I just can't help but think this is going to become a common problem. I've gone years with no contact from ex-boyfriends, and all of sudden, half of them are back in my life (well, on facebook anyway). This doesn't currently pose a problem (I'm so happy with my current relationship it would make you sick), but I know a lot of people out there who are looking for an escape. Facebook offers a seductive hatch.
These days when people are pulling back on going out; trying to save a buck here and there...more and more are spending time online.
I have noticed something, during the springtime the activity on such social sites increases dramatically. Maybe it is the impatience with winter leaving, but the amount of unsolicited romantic interest emails and friend requests goes up dramatically. Where I would get none for months, all of a sudden come April men crawl out of the woodworks. Maybe women too, I can only go by what I have experienced.
If one is going to cheat the opportunities are there. Be vigilante in your relationships with your mate...be as attentive to them as you would want them to be with you. Nip it in the bud.
Rated.
I know of at least 6 ex-girlfriends of mine on Facebook, whom are friends of friends. They won't be friends of mine.
Easily the most accurate observation in the entire essay and it's very unsettling for most people.
@ incandescent - Interesting take. I have deep sympathy for people trapped in boring/stressful/miserable relationships. I am divorced, so I know what it's like. If I had been on Facebook during the last year of my marriage, I doubt I would have resisted answering an ex's "cry for help." So I get it. But I also think that trying to fix your relationship by escaping into intrigue is very unlikely to be helpful. Most of the time, it just makes things much, much worse.
Like Buffy said, we should all strive to be vigilant and attentive -- it is very difficult not to take long-term romantic partners for granted. And there is not much that feels worse than being taken for granted. When people get taken for granted for too long, they tend to jump at any little scrap of attention they get.
Also, I do not think that Facebook decreases the costs of an extramarital affair. Regardless of "sales channel", the costs of a materially-compromised marriage tend roughly to be the same: Significant emotional pain for the couple (and their children, should they have any), loss of assets, and in general a marked disturbance of everyday life. Instead (sticking with the consumer-transaction model), Facebook significantly decreases "barriers to entry" (double entendre acknowledged, but not intended) by making it easier to create situations that could catalyze an extramarital affair.
One of my wife's high school friends (now one of my business associates, thanks to my having married well) recently mentioned that at least two of his high school friends have had their marriages compromised by Facebook-catalyzed affairs. So the threat is real, based on what I have heard.
Facebook is not personally an issue, as I have the sort of nasty career habits that make Google hits easy, and what few "old flames" are in my history are more on the order of hyper-combustive disasters that sensible people acknowledge as best left alone.
Personally, I suppose the greatest threat could be the fact that my away-from-home apartment (I am bi-coastal as part of my "day-job" demands) is in NYC's West Village. Apparently, an unaccompanied middle-aged man, even with a wedding band in clear evidence, is evidently of interest to straight women who find themselves in the neighborhood. Of course, I can see the wedding ring as well, and remember that it actually means something, so the threat is not material.
You have basically summarized the reasons that I have decided not to jump on the FB bandwagon. I don't want the complications of previous folks contacting me when I am in a lovely, strong marriage. It is too precious to let anyone near it with a 10-ft pole. So, I highjack on my hubby's FB instead. We have co-pictures and common friends, some mine, some his, but we share it. He recently deleted a woman who sent a flirty email, even with my obvious sharing of his account! That takes nerve... great post.
Thee morning after the wedding vows:`
~
I took your ring off last night. Why? huh.
Thee ring pinches me. It's way too heavy.
I shedding a ring because it pains me so.
~
I'd not go on facebook 'fling' seeking either.
I met a divorce and funeral lawyer. She say:`
Computer tryst are her # one income source.
~
I agree with the ten foot pole idea? Use a pinkie?
Touch with a pinky? Yea. Shake hands? Troubles.
To shake hands with a little pinky leads to spanks.
Hanky Pinky.
OY! Be careful.
Shake toes? O, oho.
No merry anybody?
Sometimes Ya can.
I'd just be a Friend.
Then Ya can go kiss.
Ya fun to think with.
I wanted to speak to the one person who could give me perspective on what was missing from my marriage. I couldn't have been more surprised that he had never married or had children.
He came to visit for two days and within 24 hrs we were trying to figure out how to be together forever. 2 days after he left town I asked for a divorce. On the 3rd visit after that, he proposed to me. I accepted. We had a house under contract when he proposed.
We are still on cloud 9 every time we are together. I'm sure everyone thought he was a crutch to get out of my marriage, but 15 years later it still feels like a good marriage...even more so.
Thank God for Google and email.
My old boyfriend that I Facebook Friended...it's nice to just feel good about him and be finally over the hurt that I carried for years over how it ended. The guy I dated once who emailed me out of the blue...I'm flattered he appears to still carry a torch and enjoying learning about his life since high school. But, the man that I have always loved...finding him again was like Sleeping Beauty getting kissed back to life.
There are two basic schools of thought:
1. If a relationship is happy, healthy, and satisfying, with good communication, a third person can not cause infidelity. Infidelity stems from problems in the relationship, not outside influences.
2. Infidelity is a natural tendency and does not necessarily stem from problems in a relationship. Given a very attractive offer with little chance of being caught, many people will cheat, even in a happy relationship. A highly desirable person can absolutely interfere with a happy relationship. So those who intend to maintain a monogamous relationship must be vigilant and work to prevent these scenarios from happening.
In the US, philosophy # 1 is much more popular. I happen not to believe it. I think it is emotionally satisfying and provides people will an illusion of control over their lives, but I don’t think it actually describes reality. It just doesn’t accord with my experience and observations. Clearly it is much easier to get wrapped up in an affair if you’re unhappy with your primary relationship. But a happy relationship isn’t affair-proof.
I once bought into all the Redbook magazine cliches about temptation and working at one's marriage. I fought off temptation a bunch of times and never once slipped until those last couple of days (and even then we kept it pretty clean).
Now all I know is real love isn't work, it's a pleasure. As to why one person makes me happy and another doesn't, I've stopped pretending to know.
Facebook accomplishes in this respect what the internet accomplishes generally--it provides a level of detachment and anonymity that allows one to act in a way one wouldn't if face-to-face. Hence flaming emails/posts. Hence cyber-nookie, as well--the old flame who was scared sh%tless to call you uses his e-courage to send you a email, or make contact through facebook/myspace/google.
First people will do what they will do. Facebook will only span the distance that our modern life has created.
In days past people still did what they did, but we didn't travel like we do now. Times were that you may have never left the county you were born in much less the state you were born in. So what you would have done with your neighbor, you can now do across the country with FB.
I have contacted some of the people that I have wondered what happened to them. Not wanting anything more than to start conversations and catch up. I have to say, some have just been very rude about it like I'm going to come and kill their husband and kidnap them or something. An old friend can't say hi, how has your life been?
I know that I've gotten busy with life, kids and jobs to no put the effort into maintaining contacts like I should. I also have to admit to being guilty of saying I'll do it tomorrow.
However, there has been a change to tomorrow. My friends are starting to die, and we are in our early 50's. So before you die, or I die, I would like to know that you're okay. Is that so wrong?
Qualification: One girl got in touch to say we had been classmates in HS. I wrote back confessing I couldn't put a name to the face. Her response was somewhat huffy. I then remembered one party where something may have happened between us, which I guess would explain why she was pissed I didn't remember her.
During the initial visit we kept things pretty aboveboard...mostly hands off. I won't lie and say nothing happened, but a lot more could have. And then when we realized my feelings, I immediately asked for a divorce. We didn't have an affair. I left my marriage solely based on the strength of the relationship we had when we were young.
In addition, with my now fiance, we had never had a fight back in the day. We broke up because we had dated for a very short period of time at college, then I moved to another state. The majority of the time we dated long distance. The feelings back then weren't strong enough for one of us to move to make the relationship happen. There were no old fights to rehash; he never violated my trust nor me his.
The strange element to it was that as nice as it was when we were young, what we have now is a thousand times more intense and magical.
So, yes, it was a case that the only reason we broke up was that we were young. But, additionally, we somehow were more in love when we got older.
This very afternoon I found him on Plaxo, and Linked In, and Facebook! I haven't been able to figure out if he's married or not but I did send a message via his Plaxo page.
I just couldn't help it. I want to know. If he answers me I don't know how I'll feel or what I'll do, I just hope he does.
The biological imperative to mate and keep the mate for the rearing of offspring makes biological sense. But what about when the offspring no longer really need support? What about when the mates have changed and grown differently and have different needs and different attractions to different people and ideas than the ones that first bonded them long ago? What if the mates were able to maintain loving ties and bonds as parents of their offspring but could also explore and develop with others? What if their marriage prevented these important personal needs to be met to the detriment of the mental health of one or both of the pair? What if the marriage was more of a stifling requirement by society than a still chosen and preferred pairing? What if the marriage became more of a method of ensuring security, dependency, or ownership of each other rather than a loving, letting-go of the other person to develop other relationships of whatever nature they were to become?
One can be in a healthy relationship (and yes, that is a very subjective term), but still perhaps a) have areas of emotional vulnerability, b) not be fully emotionally mature, or not at all times , or c) really like what it feels like to have one's ego stroked (ahem) and for someone other than your partner to find you attractive. Of course, those are just some of the things that can potentially compromise a healthy relationship. And yes, who isn't prone to some of those things at least some of the time?
This doesn't excuse people's lack of will and responsibility when they cheat, but is just to say it doesn't only happen in broken relationships, although that is the prevailing view.
I would like to do a post on dating sites, at some point, which present similar temptations / dangers like Facebook as well as their own unique dangers.
It's funny how euphemisms can mean the exact opposite of a word. For instance, Plenty of Fish uses the term 'intimate contact' to mean anything but intimacy. People looking for so-called 'intimate contact' essentially want anonymous, sexual encounters without any kind of intimacy or commitment.
More to the point, I was surprised how many people on the site indicated that they were married or in a relationship... and wanted to date 'discreetly' (or have discreet 'intimate contact'). And that is only the people who actually 'fess up to their relationship status.
Marykelly also had a good post on Facebook that I agreed with. I commented, only to lose it in etherspace (and didn't have the time to repost).
I guess the key is to know one's partner and be cognizant. Not hyper-vigilant, per se, but aware of what's happening.
Rated.
http://www.facebook.com/editprofile.php?sk=interests#!/group.php?gid=116151325079301
This after my boyfriend left me after 15 years together after his high school old girlfriend showed up. Yes, as the article says, there can be some boredom, but what couple doesn't after a while. Most time you just catch up with an old boyfriend/girlfriend, but once in a while, something was left unfinished. It should have remained closed and did for years, but facebook makes easier to get in touch for no reason and there it is. Join if you lost your couple/marriage by facebook and old flames.