K.T. Drasky

K.T. Drasky
Location
San Francisco, California, USA
Birthday
January 13
Bio
K.T. Drasky regularly writes about online culture on her blog KazzaDrask Media. In a print and online career that started back in 1984, she claims to have written "millions of words". She has probably published half. An accomplished digital photographer, her photos have appeared in 7x7 Magazine, the San Francisco Chronicle and Google Schmap.

K.T. Drasky's Links

New list
Editor’s Pick
DECEMBER 28, 2010 12:17PM

What If We Canceled Gay Pride Parades in 2011...

Rate: 15 Flag
Photo courtesy of Reuters.com

What if we gave a big gay party and nobody came? What if gay pride parades around the country were canceled in 2011? What if we – the LGBT people of America and our supporters – took all our boa bluster and motorcycle muster and aimed ourselves toward Washington this summer?

I know the big marches on our nation’s capital never have quite the impact we want them to, so I’m not suggesting we all set about on a mad frenzy to book cheap air fares and develop intricate co-housing schemes for a weekend. What I’m talking about is getting everyone to agree that on the last Sunday of June, we will march toward Washington and demand full federal equal rights. With the sweet taste of victory from the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” still on our collective lips, here’s the chant, “We’re here, we’re queer, we demand equality this year!” Repeal DOMA, pass ENDA and let’s permanently wipe discrimination against LGBT people off the books. Why not?

Now, I know you don’t recognize my name and you don’t see a prominent logo from a big LGBT rights organization next to a gigantic “DONATE” button at the top of this post. But I come completely qualified, I assure you, having lived a lifetime (in 2011, it will be 50 years, in fact) as a second-class citizen. And, honey – I’m tired of it.

You can do the math. When Stonewall happened, I was 8 years old. I was growing up in the suburbs of New York City – in Fairfield County, Connecticut – 45 minutes from Manhattan by train. My total neighborhood domination of backyard whiffle ball games and giving Barbies buzz cuts was interrupted by my Dad to tell me Judy Garland died.

“Do you know who that is?” he asked me. ‘Over the Rainbow,’ no doubt was playing on a nearby transistor radio.

“The girl in the ‘Wizard of Oz?’” I half-asked, pretty sure I was right.

“Yep. Dorothy,” he said, going back to whatever he was doing – newspaper, Rheingold beer, Judy music followed by Peggy Lee on the radio station he listened to. The ‘60s of the Beatles, Rolling Stones, Aretha Franklin never permitted on the playlist.

The gory details that Dorothy was long past being the pigtailed, Toto-toting, ruby-slippered girl from Oz and had stumbled through 30 years of Hollywood hazed, pill-popping, excruciating career lows, typically followed by tremendous highs on concert stages in London and New York, her floodlights to permanently burn out at 47, would be discovered in time. Within a decade I’d come to realize Judy’s path kind of mirrored that of all of us who would have our wide-eyed innocence exchanged for the realization that we were “in the life”. Hopefully you were going to end up on top, belting out encore after encore at Carnegie Hall. The flipside of this, of course, was that you’d OD on a toilet seat.

The Stonewall riots happened in the early morning hours after Garland’s New York City funeral. The drag queens who refused to be “searched” to reveal what was under their dresses, the stone butch who was clobbered with a billy club and shouted “Why don’t you guys do something!?” as she was shoved into a paddy wagon. And then, those who went, in the words of one witness, “berserk” got it all started.

By the time I, along with a couple of my suburban homies, “followed the crowd” from Metro North to the subway to Times Square and then downtown to Greenwich Village on a June Sunday in 1980, we weren’t out to make a statement. We were going to a party. We were young, single, gorgeous and most probably stoned.  

We caught the tail end of that year’s Gay Liberation March. We arrived in time to see a frazzled haired “feminist” in blue denim work shirt and Mork from Ork rainbow suspenders carrying a boom box down the street. Two Tons of Fun (before they became the more mainstream “Weather Girls”) blasted forth, at the top of their gay game. A group carrying placards of known enemies – Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Anita Bryant – followed. Next came the placards bearing known (and suspected) friends – Oscar Wilde, Gertrude Stein, Eleanor Roosevelt. And then came the bullhorn, a fabulous queen chanting, “2-4-6-8, how do you know your husband is straight?”

We were outsiders, then, daring not to think beyond this one day each year when a section of a city’s streets were ours. Tomorrow we would go back to the various stages of the closet we were in. But today, we followed the crowd to Christopher Street, where we bought drinks in plastic coconuts and watched couples holding hands and kissing as they wandered through the street party. Secretly we vowed to ourselves that next year we’d have “a lover.”

Time marched forward. Lovers became “domestic partners” – a legal title, depending on where you lived, that afforded your relationship certain marriage-like rights and responsibilities (even though it sounded like you had wedded your vacuum cleaner). AIDS happened, and the community was nearly brought to its knees, watching so many of our friends die of an unexplained horrific illness. Hearing the stories about the parents, siblings, even cousins sometimes of a man who died of AIDS showing up on his passing and taking everything out of the home he shared with his partner – who had no legal rights. In some cases, they took the home.

The marches and parades of the late ‘80s and the ‘90s were politically charged and celebrity infused - mayors and members of Congress rode in convertibles down Fifth Avenue and Market Street. Samantha and the second Darrin (Dick Sargent, very ill at the time with AIDS) were Grand Marshals in West Hollywood. Straight friends and family joined in. Once you got your rainbow on during “The Year of the Queer” or “United by Pride” each Monday morning after fewer and fewer of us went back in the closet. Some of the new kids never spent any time in one at all – taking same-sex dates to their prom.

In the 21st century, the Holy Grail – gay marriage – is painstakingly being grasped, one of five states at a time. Temporarily legal long enough in California so that 18,000 gay and lesbian couples have the inalienable right (at the state level) that cannot be taken away. A handful of other states and cities concede “marriage-like” validation in civil unions (a newer, more palatable name that no longer implies you are sleeping with your microwave).

All of this, however, remains blocked at the federal level, where 1,138 rights to gay couples are unattainable. And will continue to be so – along with full federal equal rights - for the foreseeable future. Certainly through the throwback 112th Congress coming in next week, unless we start to push ostensibly from the outside. Which is why – the big what if? What if we took that last Sunday in June in 2011 and canceled the march down Main Street and instead faced toward our nation’s capital? What if we, 50 or 100 million Americans, stood proudly in one direction and demanded that our country stop treating anyone as less than equal? What if?

Why not?

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Good column. I think maybe we need to do it in every major city, set off a chain reaction of alternative pride events that address pressing political issues, such as ENDA and also the high rate of homelessness in our community (40% 0f homeless youth, for instance, are queer) and the lack of resources for seniors (I'm almost one)...what do you think? Instead of just D.C., let's at least do D.C. and SF!
Thank you so much for sharing! I think I even got a few goose bumps reading the section describing the nights you all could let it all hang out and just be yourselves. You make a very good point about heading to Washington. I think that would be a much more valuable use of your time. And Tommi, I'm with you on that! I'd be all over a march if there were one within a weekends travel of my city!
Ending the gay parades wouldn't have that kind of impact. While I don't mind, a lot of people don't like gay parades.

Now if a parade everyone was into was canceled, maybe then there would be some results.
When Stonewall happened I was 22.

You missed out.

TOUGH DARTS!
"Stonewall" wasn't just one night, BTW. We OWNED the street for a week.

Then the organizations were formed. I was on the "Media Committe" of the Gay Activists Alliance with Vito Russo. Very few of us left today.

As you you DAMNED KIDS(!) don't get me started.

Y'all have it SO damned easy you have no idea.
Don't take this the wrong way, but I think the Pride parades would be more effective, in terms of civil rights affairs, if the flamboyance was extremely dialed down. I'm all for gay people being allowed to do what they want to do and wave rainbow flags and wear outrageous outfits, but I think it would send a stronger message to the rest of America, if they saw how normal the average gay person is. Sure Americans shouldn't be afraid of a little flamboyance (or in some cases a lot), but I'm all for gay rights and I generally just hate parades (whether they be gay or Irish or Canadian what have you) and all obnoxious in my face displays of stereotypical differences that they seem to degenerate into.

I know being an American and being a human being doesn't look like one particular thing, but a lot of America seems to think otherwise. I think it would be kind of great to turn the whole idea on it's head as big civil procession minus the stereotypes inevitably manifesting themselves.

I don't know if this comment I'm making is the most ignorant comment in the world, the most brilliant, or somewhere far in between...and I'm not suggesting everyone dress like a white businessman. Our differences are wonderful, but then again so are our similarities.
@evan kessler

good comment and intelligent sentiment.
I don't think I.C. London is getting it. I think what you are describing makes sense and would definitely be easier for the average person to do rather than take a car/plane/train to D.C. If I'm understanding it correctly, we'd organize in cities (as many as possible) to take up a space (potentially a park or by a city hall) and symbolically march towards Washington, D.C.
I dig it.
I'd do it.
Good idea ! Most of us LGBT are rather "normal" looking . My girlfriend/fiancee and I will be on a road trip to another state next year to get married . It won't be recognized here , but for every couple that does this , we score one more for "the team" . Let the powers that be know just how many of us are out there . I'm an Army veteran , I defended EVERYONE'S rights not just the chosen few . I think if we ALL just started walking towards D.C. it would scare them enough to realize ...we're mad as hell and we're not gonna take it anymore !!! HOOAAH!!!!
I'd like to see everyone march on Washington. Quite literally--everybody.
Rated.
Hey, flash mobs pull it off--Or maybe at every parade, at exactly the stroke of o-something -thirty, everyone stops, goes silent and holds up a serious statement about equality rights. It could be done. It would all be on TV.
In any case, now that DADT has been repealed, it is only a matter of time before a gay serviceman or woman is injured or killed. They will be legally married in some state or other. The federal government will then face the dilemma--to federally recognize next of kin..federally notify spouse of injury or death..federally award spousal benefits to survivor--they will have no choice, they will have to set a precedent. And they will have to do it in the full public eye.
Good blog, thanks..
I do like your idea, but I think it's also important to have local parades. I am just a tiny bit younger than you and I can remember what it's like to be threatened, beaten up, etc, for being gay. It makes me feel very proud, strong and recognized to have a local parade. What I don't like is the commenters who are saying we should tone down "all the flamboyance" because they are so "normal." Granted, there are all kinds of gay people, but some of us are out of the box, on the fringe and at times, yes, flamboyant. We are the ones who couldn't hide our sexuality and made it possible for everyone else to be accepted. We have a right to be seen and heard too.
And no matter how many laws you pass, I don't think gays will ever really be accepted by many in our society until there is much more education. I just moved back to Austin two years ago and have been surprised to realize how much subtle homophobia there still is here, especially after living in the Northern U.S. for a time. You can pass all sorts of laws, but you can't force people to like us.
What a great summary of the history of the struggle K.T. As for the march towards Washington, hard to say what it might accomplish. Consciousness-raising and gays coming out have been the main instruments of progress IMO. Once normal apolitical folks know some family members or their neighbor's kid is gay, and they seem OK in other ways, a lot of barriers go down. But it's always worth pushing on the elected representatives. The interests who spend millions on lobbyists certainly know that.
From a Human Geographic perspective, the Gay Pride Parades were extremely effective at inverting the "normal heterosexual landscape". You cannot be known if you are never seen.

Keep the local parades but, by all means, plan a big one in DC!
Great article. I so agree with Boko: "I'd like to see everyone march on Washington. Quite literally--everybody." Or everyone stop just for a moment in their day, like you suggested, and face Washington. Now there would be a powerful moment. Rated.
And there are no small numbers of we straight folks who would like to have domestic arrangements honored as marriage is. 'Marriage' carries waaayyy too much baggage. Good post. R
Every lesbian I have ever met does unusual things to their Barbie dolls. Nobody really cares about LGBT. You'll figure it out as you age.
I heard that the Methodists organized a Straight Pride parade, but that nobody showed up.
Beyond your post being stuffed with copious amounts of wonderful phrases and ideas, and images, your premise holds great promise! Personally, I love hanging out with a funloving "flame." Pragmatically, what seems to work, though in slow motion, for my partner and me is our steady, persistent normalcy. We are small town locals, both raised in this area, who live like most of our neighbors and conduct ourselves quietly, respectfully, and openly. We have enjoyed favorable response from most of our family members, and essentially the community at large. We held our union ceremony ten years ago at the oldest community center downtown, fully decorated inside and out, and feared (and received) no interference.

I applaud and support the more dramatic approaches to societal acceptance of gay and lesbian and allied groups. I think these approaches must be grounded, rooted in the day to day "mundane" activities of everyday life. Balance.

In the sense that she and I practice, each day, a life of commitment to one another, openly and honestly and respectful to our communities, we are embraced by our community at large.

Balance....

And thank you for a provocative and well written article!
not a bad idea. we are finally reaching a critical mass.
I am a straight white female in my 60's. I love to go to gay pride parades with my lesbian friends. It is such a fun time for me. I'd be so disappointed if my city permanently canceled their gay pride parade. I feel young and happy when I attend one! :-)
"I know the big marches on our nation’s capital never have quite the impact we want them to..."
Wanna bet? Sometimes we just don't have the collective patience to allow it to sink in.
Growing up in Dallas, Texas the thing that's come to annoy me the most about "Gay Pride Parades" is that they happen in the "safe" part of the City.

Back in the 70's and up until now, they always took place in Dallas' "Gay Ghetto" Oak Lawn/Cedar Springs.

It's not so "ghetto" anymore, except that the Gay Bars are still there.

Most of the "Gays" moving into Dallas from rural parts of America can't afford to live there anymore. Why would they even want to considering how "Gay" Dallas "suburbs' have become.

I'd love to see the Alan Ross Freedom Parade (What the LGBT Community calls "Gay Pride" in Dallas) move to downtown Dallas.

Taking over Fair Park where the Texas State Fair is held every year would be something!

Instead we have the "Pride Parade" ever year where the local gay bars can get the most traffic.

It's all about "corporate sponsors" showing us how much they love us with the hope that we'll do business with them, and far less about the politics of what it means to be Gay.

But I'm sorry, and I do agree, we should "cancel" Gay Pride Parades in 2011 and emphasis what it means to truly be Ga7 in America.

Being Gay is no longer a "social statement," but more so a political one.

GLBT's represent the whole of the American Experience.

We're rich and poor, educated and not so much, Democrats AND Republicans.

Marching down the street in the Gayborhood isn't so much of a "statement' anymore as it is an excuse for the local bars, and those who wish to profit off of the event as a chance to make money.

Granted "some" of that money makes its way toward LGBT causes, the Parades no longer make the statement or have the impact that they once did.

I'm onboard!
I'm with you! I think right now we need some proud pro-gay protests! It's important to have pride, but I think becoming political instead of social would be the best way for that. We're proud now, think how much pride we'd have if we were all equal?