Larry Summers, eat your heart out! ...er, I mean stereotype!
My BF sent me this link because he thought I might wish to do a blog post about it. I'm grateful that he also mentioned it to me, or I never would have seen it, since that particular email, for some unknown reason, ended up in my junk/spam folder.
Is there some mysterious force at work trying not only to keep girls and women from studying and majoring in math, but also trying to keep me from even writing about the non-existent gender gap in mathematical ability? Most likely not. So, I'm just going to attribute the near-miss to Mercury still being in its "shadow" after finally ending its latest retrograde period.

From the article:
The researchers knew that if guys were born with math on the brain, so to speak, the gender difference in mathematical ability should be somewhat universal. But some countries showed a larger gap than others.
Countries with low gender equality showed a greater gender gap in math.
For example, India and Iran ranked low on gender equality and low on the percent of females scoring high in the International Mathematical Olympiad, a competition for those with exceptional math skills.American girls
In the United States, which scored relatively high for gender equality, girls perform on average as well as boys on standardized math tests.
In other words, any differences are a result of nurture-- or more precisely, culture-- not nature.
From one of the authors of the study:
"I have to say that Larry Summers' comments in 2005 inspired me," to complete the current study, said Janet Hyde, a University of Wisconsin-Madison professor of psychology.
Image: wikipedia One of my own more interesting memories of learning math happened in the 7th grade. Because my father was in the Air Force, we moved frequently, and not always at the end or beginning of a school year. In fact, we moved in the middle of both the 7th and the 8th grades. As if Junior High weren't difficult enough. (We didn't call it Middle School back in the old days.)
Keep in mind that I had already been in separate schools for K, 1st, 2nd, plus 3 schools in 3rd, and one school each for 4th, 5th, and 6th. Still, I was a decent student. And why not? It's not as if I had any other life. How could anyone make friends moving around like that? But that's another story.
The real story-- the one about learning math-- happened with the move in the 7th grade, from Sarasota, Florida, to Ellsworth AFB, South Dakota. Yep, it was a pretty grim change, especially since the climate was not noticeably warming then. To make matters worse, I was never going to fit in with the kids in the new school. Mostly officer's children, they were far too sophisticated for me. Much too fast. And in math class, they were studying things I hadn't even seen before. My earlier 7th grade math class had not discussed variables, sets of numbers or anything remotely resembling preparation for algebra. That likely would have come a little bit later. But, there I was. In the middle of the year in a class where I would have to sink or swim.
So, my father and I sat down with my "New Math" book every night (that's what they called it in the old days) and we worked our way through it, one chapter at a time. By the time I was ready to take a test with the rest of the class, I knew the material and earned an A. What a surprise... perhaps they all thought I was just stupid, and not that I simply hadn't been exposed to the material before then. My father was pleased with both of us.
Unfortunately, that was the last time my dad was actively involved in anything to do with my education. In no way was my mother ever going to be of any help with anything related to school. In fact, whenever I or any of my siblings had an opportunity to be in special programs or to skip a grade, she would prevent it happening. So, by 8th grade, I was, strictly speaking, on my own.
I know that there are lots of kids these days whose experiences are similarly non-supportive at home. If they're not going to get help and encouragement in school, they're simply not going to get it at all.
Although the weather in SD was absolutely miserable and Ellsworth AFB was bleak, it's too bad we didn't stay there longer, because I might have considered doing more with math. But, in the middle of the 8th grade, back to Florida we went (this move was my mother's idea), and to a different school in the same district, where I now received more notice for my language skills than for my math ability. I still got good grades in math, and I really loved geometry, but math teachers in those days seemed to derive a special kind of pleasure from terrorizing the boys in the classroom. Mr. O, in particular, would relish slamming his meter stick on the top of some 8th-grade boy's desk. Perhaps that was the only way that he knew how to "keep order and stability." I don't think that would be allowed any more, which is a good thing, since it made the environment a bit hostile for learning purposes.
My 9th grade math teacher spent an awful lot of time talking about when he taught at a private boys' school, when he wasn't pretending he was swinging at a golf ball. Naturally, he also taught driver's ed. We did some math, too-- it was supposed to be Algebra 1, after all.
I can't even remember my 10th grade math teacher's face, only that I really loved geometry for its purity and simplicity and logic. I loved it the same way I loved diagramming sentences in English the previous year.
In 11th grade it was Algebra II and I really could have used some extra time with my dad then, but that wasn't a possibility. So, by the time I got to 12th grade and Math III, with Mr. C., I might have still had potential, but I had much less confidence, and I really don't think he considered me as a possible serious math student. Too bad. I coulda been a contender.
In the four decades since those pre-Title IX days, I have had friends with daughters who would suddenly-- out of nowhere-- develop some kind of anxiety about math. For no apparent reason. For the most part, they worked through it. I did my part by giving their mothers a pep talk.
Why is it that in this country, in this century, girls still feel that if they want to be liked not just by other girls, but especially by boys, then they better not be too smart academically, especially in math? They seem to feel they have to choose between relationships and academics.
I know... there are exceptions. But that's exactly what they are. Exceptions.
Imagine how differently things might have turned out on Wall Street during the past decade or so, if there had been more ovaries in the financial seats of power. After all, most of the news-worthy whistle-blowers of late have been women.
[There is a very good reason that organizations like Kiva focus on empowering women, rather than men... when they empower women financially, they raise the SES level of the family and the community. Not so, if they focus on men.]
As for me, I intend, at my advanced age, to learn calculus, and I even asked an online acquaintance for a recommended site or two. If I only manage to stave off Alzheimers, the time will be well-spent, but I actually hope to accomplish more than that.
It is no longer enough merely to be literate in this world. Because we now know that we cannot trust the financiers in their global sandbox, we must all strive to be numerate, as well.


Salon.com
Comments
Have you ever noticed, too, that it's AOK for a guy to have more confidence than he merits, while a woman must usually have less than she merits?
Women/girls like to understand the big picture before they accept and use a new theory. Men/boys are much more likely to adopt a new theory when given to them with little questioning. They tend to take things more at face value, and have no problem adopting the new formula right away.
Some might say that this displays a failure in abstract thinking by the women/girls, while others might counter that this demand for evidence of it's practical derivation before they adopt it themselves speaks to the care that all women have had to use throughout evolution. One does not hand over a new type of berry found in the forest to her child because it was handed to her by another member of the tribe. Such nonchalance could easily result in the death of her most precious commodity, her offspring. She might want to observe birds and other animals eating that berry, ideally she'd want to see others of her own kid eat the berry before she ate one herself or let her child have it.
That's what I think.
Legal concepts are often taught in the same manner as mathematical concepts. Why I have no idea other than men once dominated law schools and very little has changed in typical legal educational methodology, which is a horribly inefficient manner of teaching, over the past 100 years.
Many years ago, I taught a word-processing course to adult women. I always had them pair up, so they could help each other. It worked well.
Supposedly, that's all changing at the NIH, and if it is, hopefully more women in academic research will benefit from new opportunities.
Gratefuldan, I can only say "thank you" for ackowledging your female math teachers here.
You'd think that after Title IX, that there would at least be a little more equity in sports at school, but apparently not. That balance thing... must be why there are so many more male than female ballet dancers, right?
Of course, I would never accuse you of anything like that, nor any of the other guys who have commented on this post.
English, otoh, is usually taught with context only, and not enough attention to structure. Iow, either you get it or you don't.
People learn differently. Reversing the English/Math methods, at least occasionally, might actually do some good.
And, I later learned that they do something like that at St. John's College, using Euclid's Geometry primer as a text.
bstrangely, I would have loved your parents. Perhaps I should have been less impatient while waiting on that other plane. ;~)
Apparently, you just needed some context for using numbers.
One of my favorite stories from my ex-husband was about learning to count. He told me about going out on rounds in the Amish countryside with his veterinarian father, and talking with a little girl, who said she could count really high, like to a 100. He wanted to know what she counted. Interestingly, he wanted something concrete. He thought that to be able to count something you had to be able to visualize it at the same time. He used matchsticks, but could not count as high as 100. Who could?
My Pre-Algebra teacher spent most of his time telling me how sexy I was even though I was a 14-year-old virgin attending a Catholic school with a strict dress code policy so I never asked him for help no matter how much I struggled.
My Algebra I and Algebra II teachers didn't flirt with me but mistook my shyness for stupidity and my greatest fear was to speak up and prove them right.
Oddly, I excelled at Geometry, but that's because I had a lady teacher who would give up her lunch period to help me in private. As for Algebra II, the only reason I passed it was because my friend's mother tutored me after school.
If it wasn't for those women and my AP English and History, I don't think I would have graduated high school with any confidence. Of course, the worst was yet to come in college -- calculus and statistics!
Fortunately, our older daughter seems to be taking after her mother in the math department. Fingers crossed for the younger one.
Even now, if a girl says that she's not good at math, many people will just shrug their shoulders and think "What do you expect? And why does a girl need math anyway?", instead of helping and encouraging her. The reaction is usually different if a boy says the same thing...
By the time I was nine years old, I had integrated the societal message that math is not for girls so well that I proudly told my mother that I would stop learning math when I knew enough to do all the calculations necessary to use a cookbook! Fortunately my parents panicked at that proclamation and decided that what I needed instead was *more* (and more interesting) math--and the rest is history.
As far as dating goes, as a young woman studying mathematics, I found there was no shortage of intelligent, self-confident young men who were interested in me. Indeed, telling potential dates that I was a mathematician turned out to be a great filter for eliminating those with whom I probably wouldn't have wanted to go out anyway! :-)
Now that roughly 25% of PhDs in math in the US are awarded to women, the big problem is figuring out how to retain the women in academia. It's a very leaky pipeline, leading from graduate school to professorships...Working for tenure and having babies are activities that are very difficult to combine.
And, ktm: congratulations on attacking calculus! You might have even more fun with linear algebra. While perhaps conceptually more sophisticated than calculus, it is technically much easier to get into. Feel free to PM me if you'd like suggestions of books to read!
CwithA: You really had great parents... I am a bit envious, I must admit. Even without the study, my intuition told me that it was society pressure. How else to explain a "sudden" math anxiety in girls who'd never experienced that before? And just about the time that puberty sets in... I couldn't believe it was due to hormones. ;~)
Asta Charles: I hope we'll hear more stories like yours. It's wonderful that you were a slightly later bloomer socially, since that extra bit of time imprinted you with the value of math.
I already PMed CwA for some linear algebra title suggestions. Her description sounds exactly right for me. Perhaps, I'll be a late-blooming math prodigy.
Haggis, your candor is refreshing. I'll bet you would ask for directions, too, when driving, if you needed them.
Patricia K, you and your colleagues are our hope for the future. We definitely need more women involved in quantitative decision making and analysis.
aoafe... Obviously, you get the importance of studies like this, and the potential they have for saving other girls from fates like yours and mine in math classes.
Thanks, All... for reading & commenting.
It was on women’s rights that Pres. Obama sought to truly, as Mr. Shrum said, show cultural sensitivity, completely and totally ignoring the horrific issues women face in Muslim and Arab countries across the world. That is the threat of death if they do not kowtow to the men who make the rules and enforce them through beatings, rapes, honor killings and all manner of abuse, mostly in the name of religion. It is a cause I have fought for since the 1990s, when Mavis Leno took up the charge of Afghan women under the Taliban. But today, Pres. Obama chose instead to respect the cultural differences that are not only dangerous for women, but deny them basic human rights. When it comes to violent extremism towards the populace, talking about an older woman getting blown up was okay, but acknowledging the wholesale violence against women and girls, Obama offered an American shrug in reaction to what women in Arab and Muslim countries have to endure. Mentioning that was just too much. Instead, Pres. Obama focused on, unbelievably, hair and traditional coverings of Muslim women. As for a 13 year-old-girl stoned to death, that was just too much.
Later she writes:
It’s hard to worry about literacy when the basic rights of women are ignored, held hostage by the whims of fanatics in a place where tyranny towards them reins.
Ah, yes, one speech cannot change everything, as Pres. Obama said. But if the American president doesn’t lead on calling the horrendous treatment of women out who will? Obama ducked his responsibility on this, choosing instead to have “a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world,” which didn’t include calling out the barbarism perpetrated against women across the world.
Patrick J. Buchanan judged Pres. Obama’s policy a new direction for which he offers approval.
Bob Shrum talked about “cultural sensitivity,” which reminded me of Speaker Pelosi going to China to talk about global warming, but not feeling compelled to say anything about women’s rights, the forced abortion, and human rights.
It’s the new Democratic Party diplomacy, as we not try to stray too far into another country’s business, because we “do not presume to know what is right for everyone.” On diplomacy, it is not our business to tell countries how they should operate. But it should always be our duty to stand up for the oppressed, the beaten, the raped, those killed in 19th century murder called “honor killings” and say this is not only wrong, but immoral and against the cause of human rights. That doesn’t mean we can stop the behavior of nations, or hold our diplomacy hostage to their barbarous ways, but they sure need to know we’re watching, see what’s happening and condemn what they do. We should never stand silently as Pres. Obama did today.
Taylor Marsh worries that literacy must wait for basic human rights.
I'm not so sure that is true. One of the most transcendent books I've ever read was Frederick Douglass's narrative of his life as a slave. He didn't wait for freedom to learn to read. Instead, he "stole" his education and in the process gained his freedom.
One could make a case that oppressed women need education even more, just so that they can become free.
Carrying that even further, beyond literacy, we can say the same thing here about Numeracy. Is it just a coincidence that women still earn less than men (for comparable work), that they ask for smaller and fewer raises than men do? I don't think so.
I don't think she feels any pressure to be interesting to boys (she's not interested in them), but she likes to have friends in her classes and her activities. She has not shown any interest in the Math Counts activity.
So, even at a young age, with no pressure to act dumb to impress boys, the imbalance to girl/boy math ability is impacting her progress with math.
Single-sex education for girls clearly would be better in some subjects, especially because boys and girls often (not always) have different learning styles. A collaborative style that would work for girls, probably would not be appealing to boys.
Only parents and school boards... AND more research... can make something like that happen.
Perhaps, if one or two school systems could be persuaded that it might up their test scores, certainly for girls, and perhaps for both boys and girls, they might try it, and we would have a demonstration project.
Have you ever shown them how to diagram a sentence? They might find that an easier way to understand grammar?
Others have said that boys sometimes need the socialization.
But, I've never really heard anything negative about all-girls school education.
I'm inclined to think that often (not always, but often) math and spatial abilities are correlated.
But, suppose it will require another study to clarify that point.
also for taking the time to read and comment.