Ktm's Links

Follow me on...
Reference
Nutrient-dense (more to follow...)
Keeping tabs
These blogs should not be so necessary
Open Salon Friends in Random Order
Old Friends from the early Salon blog days
Close Connections
JUNE 18, 2009 6:34PM

Dan Froomkin: Fired! Guess he wrote about Torture too much?

Rate: 7 Flag

froomkin   

Well, I did have some other things in the works, but I guess on June 26th, I'll be posting something about Dan Froomkin. I've been a fan of his for quite awhile now.

The best blogger at what metro DC could once properly call a newspaper has been let go. Terminated. So says Andrew Sullivan, and he's usually on top of his sources.

Guess this is how the legacy media gets back at you when you decide to cover "verboten" topics. Like Torture. Or, when you make a case for what journalism used to be, i.e., knowing when to call bullsh*t.

In other words, my June 26th post will not be just about Torture, though that topic is certainly big enough, but now I will have to go "meta" with it, and "cover" how the legacy media likes to "cover" for their sources, rather than report about them.

Oh, and if TPTB try to say it was something about his numbers or traffic, well, we know that simply isn't true. Froomkin has always been a destination blogger.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I've heard of Froomkin but I'm not that familiar with him. My take on this is that, it's not just about torture and how the legacy media covers for their sources. It's also a illustrative of why the legacy media IS the legacy media, and will soon have been left behind completely by anybody who values timely amd relevant information.
Clearly, Froomkin was too good for the WaPo op-ed page. He made poor Charles Krauthammer look silly. No wonder he had to go.

On the bright side, now Fred Hiatt has room for another neocon. He is probably going to be the proud owner of the world's largest collection.
Undoubtedly, Norwonk! No need to click to or to link to WaPoo any longer. But, I really would like to update the Froomkin link on my sidebar here. Guess I'll have to wait a bit... taps foot impatiently.

Of course, you're right nanatehay, as there's always more to the story, but it is quite a coincidence that Froomkin only recently had a contretemps with Krauthammer on that very issue. Torture. Krauthammer, of course, thinks it's all to the good. Froomkin called him on it. Guess who's still there?
All I have to say is: "liberal media," my ass.
Ditto, Ignatz!
The newspapers aren't just dying, they are committing suicide.
Thanks, ktm. Today's news on Froomkin has been very bad for my blood pressure. I think it's not a stretch at all to link his firing with his determination for truth and accountability on the torture issue.

It could be argued that he had perhaps the most prominent venue from which such a position was being promulgated. With "White House" in the name of his blog and all that truth about torture, it just probably got to be too much to bear for those in the White House who want to "look forward".
I've had similar thoughts, Jim... that perhaps some invisible hand from the WH brought pressure to bear.

Procopius... You are soooo succinct!
Okay, now it's time for a Procrustean feed bump...
Honestly, if I didn't read Glenn Greenwald every day, I wouldn't know anything. Reporters who "tell it like it is" are extinct, or near. "Journalists" who flourish in the business are the ones who know very well the source of their paychecks, and play the game, which is not reporting, but propaganda.

Amy Goodman is the only trustworthy TV anchor/reporter, but since I don't watch TV, I'm not in the habit of looking for her online show. Bill Moyers, probably another one I can still trust.

As for print, I still have some faith in McClatchy--maybe Froomkin can find a home there?
Cindy: I agree with absolutely everything you've written here.
Comments are now closed.