.

Lainey

Lainey
Location
Ohio,
Birthday
February 25
Bio
working on restraint

MY RECENT POSTS

Lainey's Links

Salon.com
Editor’s Pick
JANUARY 29, 2010 10:25AM

On Self-Deception, or Being Ted Haggard

Rate: 49 Flag
ted_haggard2

 By November of 2006 Ted Haggard was at his professional peak:  pastor of the humongous New Life Church in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and leader of the National Association of Evangelicals, an organization of 45,000 churches whose mission is to consolidate the influence of American Protestant Christians. And Pastor Ted was indeed influential, so much so that he exuded a disarming generosity to his political opponents and the media, using his winning personality and cutting edge technology to spread Christ’s teachings and hold sway with the Bush White House, the Republican Party, and conservatives in general. Interviews with Haggard for documentaries show an enormously likeable man who talked about sex often and comfortably. His position on the subject:  homosexual sex is wrong, as made crystal clear in the bible, and heterosexual sex between married, evangelical spouses is better and more frequent than that of the general population. His pronouncements, offensive and reductive to some, are tempered by his miles-wide smile, broadly open face, and almost girlfriend-like demeanor, a man whose persona, admittedly filtered through youtube.com, seems incapable of true exclusion in any kind of personal way.

~ ~ ~

After days of speculation among television talking heads about allegations that Haggard had sex with and bought drugs from a male prostitute, an apparently chastened Pastor Ted admitted to the nation and his congregation that he had engaged in occasional sin (“immoral sexual behavior”) with the accuser and had consequently agreed to resign his position at both his own church and the national alliance.  He was instant fodder for pundits, and particularly ridiculed months later when, after a mere three weeks of intensive, preacher-administered therapy, he was pronounced “completely heterosexual.”

 Who on earth believed that?  Sophisticates knew instantly that the so-called therapy was a sham, beyond even the typical faith-healing, TV evangelist con act.  This was among the most obvious, simplistic solutions to a political embarrassment to come along in a while.  But his followers and the knee-jerk religious conservatives—surely they know as well?  Surely they see not only the expedience of the slick recovery but that the man is clearly, clearly, gay—Don’t they?

 David France wrote in a feature piece for New York Magazine that  “gaydar,” the sense of knowing without any affirmation that someone is gay, is legitimate; that is, that there are particular physiological characteristics that occur, in statistical significance, in the homosexual population.  He acknowledges that those who claim that Ted Haggard’s sexual orientation was something less than a revelation were operating on an intuitive understanding based on science. The information is fascinating:  gays are more likely to have counterclockwise hair whorls and longer index fingers as compared to their ring fingers, for example.  France, who himself is gay, has collected the conclusions from a growing body of research in the field[1] and expresses ambivalence at how the information will be received.  He is mostly optimistic that this kind of work will ultimately gain rights for gays and steal some ammunition from those who dismiss sexual preference as a choice and, worse, consider gays sinners and subhuman.  He understands, though, that the complexity unfolding—the confounding riddle that only 50 percent of gay identical twins share a sexual orientation with their siblings, for example—could also cement bias, and that the newly identified shared traits, like hair whorls, could become red flags that invite mistreatment.

 ~ ~ ~

 Just over three years later, Ted Haggard is in the news again, making the rounds with his wife Gayle, who wrote a book about forgiveness and “the marriage I’ve always longed for,” as she told Meredith Viera of NBC. Haggard’s trials, apparently, are no more organic than a dieter who says “I’m not going to eat that today,” and then eats that today. To Oprah Winfrey’s question, “Are you gay?” Haggard says he did wonder about that. He asked a therapist, “Am I gay? Am I straight? Am I bi? What am I?" I find his recounting poignant--both for his naivte in the asking and for the potential for devastation in the answers.  His therapist’s response seems to sit well with him: “You are a heterosexual. With homosexual attachments.”

 I feel weary just imagining the complexity of living a life as inauthentic as Haggard. But my contempt for the man’s foolish self-deception falls away when I realize that he, like all of us, is suffering the indignity of existence. He is journeying through the same muck of fear and anxiety as we are. Plato said it best: “Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.”



[1] Research about the science of homosexuality is dominated by homosexuals, France notes.


Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Don't you hate when you accidentally post something instead of press the "edit" button? Hmm....checking to see if it's done.
Well, if anything is missing, I didn't notice....

This is really, really interesting, and surpassingly fair and kind. It is so easy to judge and condemn a man like Haggard for "letting the side down," and perpetuating discrimination and wrongheaded beliefs about sexuality. At the end of the day, though, he has to live the rest of his life and live with himself and live with his decisions and not for the benefit of any other cause or person. Emphatic "R."
I love the Zimmerman song. Almost as good as "Jerry Falwell's God".
You know, Ann, it might just be my mood, because I can be as cutting as anybody sometimes, but I just don't have it in me today to mock the man, who is facing new allegations that he had an additional "encounter" back in 2006 that he hadn't revealed before. At some gut level, I like Haggard. Is it naive to say he seems like a nice guy?
My husband and I talk about this kind of thing a lot. M. Scott Peck wrote a book called: "People of the Lie" where he explains how evil people "hide" in churches. It's their best way to blend with normal people. So it's not that churches create evil people, evil people hide out in them on purpose. For example, the BLK killer. But also, for those who say church people are hypocrites because they have the same struggles as everybody else, that's the point. Perfect people don't need church, only flawed people do. Rated for your last paragraph.
I don't know, Deb. I'm not sure why a church is any better a place to hide than anywhere else. Frankly, I think there's hypocrisy and hiding in all facets of life. What I'm curious about, though, is the self part of the self-deception. I am not as apt as others to say Haggard is hypocritical because I'm not at all sure he's lying. That is to say, I think he's lying to himself. I find that people do that all the time, on issues great and small.
There's a tragic number of Christian people who hate/despise themselves for their homosexual feelings and work really hard to ignore and suppress them. I know of a few myself. It's really sad that these people live such unhappy lives because they don't have the freedom to be themselves.
You are very generous. And honestly, I believe he deserves generosity and compassion. He is a sad soul. If the therapist's description of his sexuality suits him, oh, hell, who are we to judge OR care? r
I want to make sure I come back a re-read this. I like the balance with which you've presented this, and have much to think about . . . (but must get back to work).
This is interesting but it answers the question: "why is Ted Haggard?
I had no Ted Haggard in my life. I was aware of him, but not being a fan of organized religion, much less evangelical religion, he carried no weight in my conscious mind.

Then I saw a documentary about him - was it on HBO? - a year or two ago. And yes, I understand what you're saying. I just feel sorry for the guy. He's a Positive presence, and the sooner he learns how to just be himself, the sooner he can apply that positivity toward doing good for others, something to which he's obviously drawn.

I didn't expect to feel this way, but I could not condemn this man.
I have a friend who chose the Calvinist faith as a college student and denied to himself for years that he was gay, it was like everyone saw it but him. I watched him come so close to suicide, thankfully he moved away and has happily lived an openly gay life for years. There is a strong movement here in MI of religious zealots who believe they can pray the gay out of you. Sad.
This is really well balanced, Lainey and gives me a lot of food for though, but I'm on a hypocrisy kick. I imagine he'll turn his "healing" into something that makes him millions and millions.

Great piece!
Thank you for this, Lainey. When I have made this point to other gays, I am generally considered to be ridiculous. I feel for the man. Being out is difficult, perhaps more so right now, than ever. This is one reason why I am OUT OUT OUT. Straights wonder why I am so big on that...well...look at Ted Haggard...how would his life have been different if he had been out as a teen? The pain of the lie he is living must be a true prison. As a pastor, Ted could have had just as large a congregation, if not larger, as an openly gay minister. At any rate, if he ever decides to come out from the back of that dark old closet he's in...I'll be the first one at his coming out party. xox
Nice job with this, Lainey. And I love the Plato quote. I'd never heard it before, although I came to a very similar conclusion myself some years ago. (Hey, I'm as deep a thinker as Plato!)

I share Connie's hope that he can put his personal charisma and seeming desire to help others to a positive and authentic use some day.
What I remind myself of when it comes to Haggard is the very large and powerful system he comes from...a system that rejects homosexuality as natural. He has another large system which is his family and a wife who has remained devoted. However, Haggard has plenty of connections with high profile Christians who have made the sacrifice to live truly authentic lives and live...god forbid...the way God designed them to be. Mel White, a former ghostwriter for Billy Graham and Jerry Falwell, came from such large and powerful systems. He battled and fought, with his wife's knowledge, his strong homosexual feelings for twenty years. When it got to the point where he felt suicide was his only option, his wife gently told him that perhaps they had gotten it wrong. Fortunately, a therapist at Fuller Seminary in Pasadena counseled him that his problem wasn't that he was gay but that he was trying to live a straight life. "Get divorced, fall in love with a man and be happy." Exactly what he did with his wife and children's blessings. There is more than enough support from outsted Christians to support Haggard and his family. The church he pastored has let him know that he is NEVER allowed to be part of their "fellowship" again. So, it's not like he would be losing their support. Like Stellaa, the compassion is a little more difficult for me to muster because of the way he is promoting this, she is writing a book and they are making the book tour, including Oprah. Haggard knows, of this I am quite certain that he is gay. But for whatever reasons he doesn't allow himself to embrace who he is, he and his wife are now dragging down thousands of closeted homosexuals with them, and that makes me very very angry.
I didn't know who Ted Haggard was until I read this excellent post. Despite initially agreeing with Stellaa and others who have commented here that they have trouble feeling compassion for the man because of the sense that he's capitalizing on the publicity, I find myself persuaded more by Lainey's marvelous last paragraph.

Perhaps the people he can now minister to are in a similar purgatory of half-denial, and can take comfort in following someone as conflicted as themselves.

Lordy, what a web we weave... (r)
I watched Haggard verbally attack a kid (I think he was 12 years old) in the documentary "Jesus Camp" before Haggard got outed.

Haggard strikes me as a spiteful man. Sure, he's probably spiteful because he's a closet case and a head case, but is it always OK to cause others harm because one has issues of one's own?

I have a hard time mustering any sympathy for the man.

He's a liar and a coward.
I can't get past how he stood up in front of millions of evangelicals and condemned homosexuals and druggies -- all the while keeping it a secret that he was participating in the very sin he condemned. How he and his church friends prosyletized jews and other nonbelievers -- claiming that they knew a better way.

I don't give a shit what he does -- but it just sounds to me (as a former drug user) like he's giving lipservice when he jokes about how he lied when he said he threw away the crystalmeth -- and gets a laugh from the audience. He's still "on" -- he's clawing tooth and nail to get back in the good graces of the people who made him so rich & famous.

He still makes it seem as if homosexuals are bad -- he seems to lump them together with drug users.

Go away Ted Haggard. Go get some humility.
Thank you, everybody, for your comments. He is confounding, isn't he?

Regarding the merit of the compassion angle, I've been thinking about it. I appreciate the comments representing the angry or cynical view, and I know someone who thinks Haggard is actually doing harm. I realized today that I feel less angry about him than I did during the Bush years, if that makes any sense at all. The political influence among religious conservatives at that time worried me, because I know that they constituted a voting bloc that didn't agree with my values, and I didn't like any encouragement of power.

Mostly, I draw a distinction between the anti-gay ravings of an influential, ultra-right heterosexual man and those of a gay man in denial. There's an editor and columnist at The Plain Dealer who is uber conservative, whose anti-gay views border on the paranoid, and I wrote to him once accusing him of just such a thing, that he was doing harm. I absolutely get that--the idea that someone like this Kevin O'Brien could influence readers who want permission to remain ideologically inflexible, and those readers could in turn influence their children into self-loathing or cruelty to others based on the intolerant views.

But there's something just pathetic about Ted Haggard. I don't buy that anybody in the whole world, much less young people, are looking to him for counsel or mentoring. I don't think he has that kind of clout anymore. Mary, what you say about systems is true, but the fact that Haggard could have found some support with gay Christians suggests he's genuinely in denial. And he could just as easily hawk books that said, "Hey, I'm Pastor Ted, and I'm OUT!" with his big goofy smile and a foreword by Ellen Degeneres.
Well, I'm flattered, Cummins1985,Cummins1985! I do believe you're my very first retail salesman to visit my blog!
A fascinating, informative take on this. I like how well you make your points without resorting to the easy punch line. I want to say I agree but am not as forgiving and kind as you.

Yes, I have compassion for all who struggle with identity and faith. Yes, everyone is "fighting a hard battle." It's the hypocrisy that bothers me deeply. Haggard was --still is to many-- a spiritual leader, holding his flock to a higher moral standard than he was willing to follow. I wonder what would have happened if he'd never been found out.
He hath sinned a mighty Sin. (And all the mightier for accomplishing it with someone, who, in my own humble opinion, well, let's just say, he could have done better, even with the drugs...) And he shall pay the Wages of this Sin in the Beyond. (HurumphHurumph) Amen.
marytkelly writes: "Haggard knows, of this I am quite certain that he is gay. But for whatever reasons he doesn't allow himself to embrace who he is, he and his wife are now dragging down thousands of closeted homosexuals with them, and that makes me very very angry."

But it's a basic human right to be able to define your own life for yourself, and to live your life in accordance with who you believe you truly are.

Ted Haggard has chosen to define himself as a heterosexual, but with homosexual inclinations. That means that he will live as a heterosexual, while continuing to struggle with homosexual desires. Surely that cannot be easy.

In other words, he's chosen his own suffering and identity, based on his own values, based on the things that are most important to him. And if "closeted homosexuals" or others can't live with that, too bad for them. They don't walk in his shoes, and they don't have his life experiences and history.

I personally wish him well, and hope that the life he has chosen proves to be all that he hopes it will be.
As usual, Lainey, you've made me think. I came here with one opinion (he's a hypocrite) and am leaving with another (he's flawed like the rest of us.) I do wish he'd embrace his gayness. He could do so much to help other gays by coming out and getting it over with.
Listen, I was involved in this church and it was a cult. Ted is a gifted speaker and cult leader extraordinaire. He is a master manipulator and his wife doesn't stand a chance of getting away from him. I totally understand why you want to feel sorry for him, but he has taken so many people to the cleaners and now he continues to do so with these books. He really comes off as this pathetic poor soul who really wants to do the right things - I fell for that for years - he is really good. Thank God I'm out - I wish he would come out! Anyone who can say the things he did from the pulpit for years and years and then be doing them behind closed doors is seriously sick. It has taken me a few years to deprogram from the cult teachings at that church - maybe I should write a book too! I'd donate the proceeds to therapy for all the kids that were totally screwed up by this guy after they were told he was so perfect and then he turns out to be this huge liar. His wife really needs help too - what a doormat - unfortunately she is so brainwashed, she doesn't stand a chance against his deceptive ways. I think all of you who have compassion for him may be boiling down his problems to issues of being a closeted gay man and I think your kindness is wonderful; just know megalomaniacs like Ted eat that up - seriously he is not a nice guy once the camera turns off. He uses your acceptance and kindness to justify his attention whore ways. Sorry for such a negative post. He is a sad person, but he did it to himself.
Hello and thanks to everyone who's stopped by this evening. I'm fascinated by the conflicting emotions people seem to have for Haggard. I think most everyone feels/sees both the impulse to condemn as well as the need for compassion and we seem to fall just over one line or the other.

For those who talk about hypocrisy, I'm hoping for a little discussion about the notion of self-deception. Can one be a hypocrite if he's lying to himself? I'm not so sure. But then again, there's certainly some ambiguity about whether he's lying to himself at all rather than just lying to everyone else. I still don't know why, at this point, unless he genuinely feels either a deep denial or deep struggle with what he considers to be his own sinful nature. In either case, that feels worthy of compassion to me. I think the only case which doesn't--if he's merely tromping around capitalizing on the public's gullibility in spite of some internal gleeful knowledge of his own real nature and in cahoots with his wife--isn't likely. When I watched the video of him with Oprah, I can only say this: I believe him. Which is to say, I believe he believes himself.
MaryJaneB, I don't at all mind your "negative post," most especially since it comes with some personal experience that I don't have. Did you meet Haggard? I am very skeptical of TV-type evangelists and certainly don't buy into them; what has fascinated me is this: What do they themselves believe? It sounds like you think they are, or at least Haggard is, a scam through and through, which is interesting and valuable insight for this thread.
I've given this some thought, and read the comments. I could probably write a post in response to this, but will try to keep it short.

Several people who have experienced the world from whence Ted came, including myself, have varying degrees of suspicion or judgement or compassion regarding his situation. I find myself with mixed feelings (what a surprise). Can I believe that he believes his own line of reasoning? Yes. The pressure to toe the company line is extremely strong for any "true believer," let alone for someone who is "called by God." After all, in addition to losing the respect of those around you, you could lose your immortal soul for all eternity.

Can I believe that it's essentially a sociopathic ploy to rebuild his personal power base, this time with a serious glory story testimony? Sure. I've seen it done. Hell - if I wanted to go that route, my folks' church would be all about it - I could probably ride my testimony to BECOMING a televangelist . . . but only if I was willing to betray myself, my chosen family, and other GLBT people who are struggling to come out, and live out.

So, I shrug. I withold judgement. I may never know. I live my life. I do what I can, when I can to bring a little more good into the world. I fail. I succeed.
That's all anyone can do with something like this, owl. Nobody but himself knows this man's heart. I agree with you that either thing can be true, so, who knows?
You know, I've always thought the "judge not" advice had to do with the fact that we simply can't know enough to make a final judgment of someone. Haggard is a mystery to me. He behaves horribly, that's for sure, but what does his behavior look like to himself? I have no idea. Heck, most of the time my own motives are murky to me. How can I hope to know what propels a Haggard? Maybe he's a lying hustler who knows what he's doing, and maybe he has a personality disorder or so much shadow stuff going on he's long since lost his grip on reality. I don't know, I can't know. So I'll send my kids elsewhere for religious education because I know he's dangerous but I'll back away from final conclusions about him. Just because I don't think we can ever know enough about what lies in somebody else's heart.
Thoughtful, informative post and very interesting comments.

I feel for anyone who struggles with knowing who they are, but the common "Do as I say, not as I do" thing bugs me.

If I have it, I'll send money, but it will be to an orphanage, the senior center or the local animal shelter where I know how it will be used because I can expect an accounting.
Hi Lainey, Yes my husband and I do know Ted and Gayle. He was our pastor for more years than I care to admit . To me, he is as I described him, manipulative and much different off the stage and away from cameras. It is true no one knows a man's heart, but you can take a look at his actions and decide for yourself. He has not shown any true repentance to the congregation or the kids that were so disillusioned as far as I've seen - and I do live in Colorado Springs. To me, he is an extremely self centered person and very immature emotionally. He said something on Oprah that reminded me of a junior high kid bragging about his conquests - he said he has lots of proof that he is a heterosexual - I almost threw up. He really doesn't get that he hurt others and only sees himself as a victim . From what I've seen, he craves attention and power and he also needs money. From what Gayle says in her book, he had homosexual encounters long ago but he a still chose to build a church where he constantly spoke against homosexuality. He chooses to believe that he never was hateful towards gays, but I sat in his church and the gay lifestyle just wasn't accepted and was very much looked at as a perversion. It is a very judgmental group. I haven't spoken to Ted or Gayle since the "scandal", but I know them well enough to comment on this article.
"suffering the indignity of existence"

and "Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle"

These two phrases are wonderful. I happen to know nothing about this man, but I like your compassion and apparently so too do many here. Thanks, Lainy.
Lainey put down the Kool-Aide pitcher. Haggard's a lying scumbag and so is his wife. A minimal amount of Googling will lead you to the kids they had three-ways with.
Hmmmmmm...Feeling any compassion for a total narcissist is hard for me to do. At a human level I can muster up compassion for just about anyone but he simply doesn't get it. If he had any real or lasting humility he would back off the schtick; but, he doesn't. And now he's cured of his homosexuality? I don't even know where to begin. There is no logic in what people like Ted do and think, and so logical or rational thinking just doesn't apply.
I put him in the category of dangerous personality disordered narcissists who will do anything to feed their never ending self-love. Phew, I feel better.
Lainey, this is a wonderful, serious, thoughtful piece. You may the first person to have written about Ted in a reasonable, sympathetic way. No jabs, no sarcasm. Truly excellent.
HeDelivers, thanks for picking up on the self-deception concept, which is sort of where I wanted to go with this. What you say here really rings true:

On self-deception, particularly among public figures...I think part of what drives a person who aggressively seeks a public persona and renown is a compelling need for external validation of their own worth (though isn't this true for all of us to some degree?). I think self deception is just another way of trying to create this same feedback loop from within. For someone whose identity may be tied to their public persona, this must be a desperately hard cycle to break.

That sounds exactly right, as a matter of fact.

For those who come from the evangelical world or, as in Marytkelly's case, from Colorado, where the political influence of said evangelical world is baldly felt, I recognize that your experience trumps mine any day of the week. I vacillate when it comes to compassion for public figures, not only by figure but by day. In other words, if I get enough of Ted Haggard in the next few months, I suppose my own tolerance will wane. It's always a challenge, isn't it?
Lainey, if anyone should be compassionate about Ted Haggard I suppose I should be. I am not.

I know we would like to think that the "Ted Haggard Issue" regards his homosexuality and all the ramifications of that: personal deception, effect on family, living with bifurcated feelings, etc. For those who have not followed his "career" and know nothing of his history I suppose it is easy to come to that conclusion. But I think that is a mistake. I suggest we take out the homosexuality issue completely and look at his "body of work" as a man of the cloth. Even omitting the recent issue about his sexual identity his track record is nothing short of disgusting.

I despised what Ted Haggard stood for long before he was outed. Long before. He was at the forefront of the Evangelical movement in this country that turns the teachings of Christ on its head. He used his winning personality to create a cult of personality around his person just as much as did Jerry Falwell, Jim Bakker, Oral Roberts and all of the other allegedly "Christian" charlatans who have sought to keep their flocks in bondage with threats of hell fire and damnation and to perpetuate their brand of "Christianity" by imposing their beliefs on the people of the nation as a whole by influencing public opinion and governmental decisions not through logic or reason but by emotion and fear.

He was and is a false prophet who gets rich by playing on the emotions and fears of others. And that is one of his better qualities.

So, no, I feel no compassion for him. I could had he faced this latest deceit honestly AND admitted that he has preyed on innocent people who believed in HIM by preaching the gospel of Haggard not the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Rather, he has turned this latest episode into a way to make more money, pull more people into his web of deceit, and convince sincere people to believe that he merely confused to feel sorry for him. I don't. I feel sorry for all the people he bamboozled over the years. They are the ones who deserve our compassion and caring.

Monte
Thanks for your substantial comment, Monte. It looks like you've developed a bit of a following here ;)
I think Haggard's a delusional fruitcake. Like Lainey, however, I do feel more pity than contempt. I hope he can find some kind of peace one day -- doubtful, considering how little he loves his true self.
Like others, I don't have either the desire to excoriate or judge Haggard. I do, however, feel immense pity for him. It takes the sort of courage and self-awareness that Haggard does not possess to stand up to the winds of a not so accepting world that is built upon discriminating against a 10% minority that, in reality, has never done anything to harm the 90% majority. Same holds true for his religious beliefs about the subservience of 51% of the population - females. Self-deception is a tool of the insecure who desperately need to feel a sense of power. Haggard could just as easily allied himself with any large social grouping. The reality is that MOR white guys in America can and do hide themselves all the time in social constructs. Fundamentalism is just the most accessible, incurious and inexclusive.
I also think that Haggard has been and continues to be self-deceiving. That's not surprising, given the environment he comes from. That doesn't negate the harm he's done, of course. But yes, I think a certain amount of compassion is warranted.
I'm kinda with Stellaa here but I appreciate your balanced your generous and balanced view.

What I find disturbing is this kind of personal material being relayed to friggin' Oprah Winfrey. It's all so...distasteful.

So yes, self-deception happens in all facets of humanity...but when it's broadcast to nth degree like this...ugh, it becomes a new monster in and of itself.
For me, compassion doesn't come with an exception rule.

Ted Haggard has my full compassion as does the people who participated with him in those acts and his children and his congregation and those he profited off of, etc., etc. However, keep in mind, people wanted to give this money away, too, and they want to stay stuck in this rigid belief system. Who was really betrayed? It is just another life experience as far as I'm concerned.

Many gay people now want them for their poster child - I can imagine that would be incredibly intimidating and confusing, too. There is a lot of pressure coming from every direction for Ted.

"“You are a heterosexual. With homosexual attachments.”"

I find it interesting that any therapist would tell Ted what his sexual orientation is - that is for him to determine. He was abused as a child, and when that happens, it will affect your sexual bearings. Being raised in a rigid belief system on top of that, where everyone else is invested in you being their golden boy, only adds to the fierceness of the pressure.

Many people believe sexuality is part of a continuum. If any part of this fragile foundation is interrupted, it can take a lot of work to figure out what is what for oneself. To do it in the national spotlight is even harder. While I don't think a therapist should have framed that for Ted, it may be closer to the truth than anyone wants to give credence to.
If Reverend were simply an ordinary gay man living in the closet as some do for fear of ostracism, unemployment, harassment or violence, then I could understand him. I could forgive him his hypocrisy and self-deception.

But he was the leader of an organization dedicated to taking away the rights of not just gay people but of all adults who wish to live like adults and not like children in a Jesus camp. He is or at least was part of America's "religious right" which is rapidly changing the country which put men on the moon into a grotesque caricature of medieval Europe. Mr. Haggard deserves little more than pity and contempt.
"Excoriate and judge"? That's what Haggard and his ilk do for a living.

Watched "Elmer Gantry" on TCM the other night. Sinclair Lewis's charlatan is downright wholesome compared to Haggard.
I believe the very worse lies we ever tell are the lies we tell to ourselves. Self-deception is big part of us being our own worse enemies.
Thank-you for the post, I hadn't really thought about feeling sorry for Haggard.
I am mystified by some of the comments. The guy is not that young and says he and his wife have a frisky sex life, whatever the hell that means.

And, he admits to finding guys hot.

But, he doesn't want to fuck them anymore. He just wants to be married and hetero.

Call me old fashioned, but plenty of straight people seem to find themselves not having a lot of sex. With other people, anyway.

I'm sexually attracted to 21 year old women, but manage to live without fucking them.

So, why is it unbelievable that the guy is now keeping it zipped? Banging his wife. And just saying no to the boys?

Do gay people absolutely have no ability to control their urges?

And some notion that once people figure out the true north of their sexual proclivities, everything will work out. Then why aren't all straight people happy as clams with their sex lives?

So, how can people be so sure they fully understand WTF is going on.
I appreciate everybody's thoughtful, slightly different takes on Haggard, and each speaks well for itself, which is why I don't feel compelled to respond to every one. Please know that I'm reading, enjoying, and learning from each one.

Beth--your Oprah Winfrey remark kind of alludes to something that no one brought up and I didn't really even attempt to address. Haggard's demeanor while relating his early abuse and bed wetting was just...weirdly guileless. It's like he is still a kid or something. It was just so not the way anyone I know personally would address such potentially humiliating topics. Something about that exchange is what really made me think he's being honest, at least as he knows it.
from Nick:
So, how can people be so sure they fully understand WTF is going on.

Bingo.
Sparking says, For me, compassion doesn't come with an exception rule.

I find it really interesting to see who gets extended compassion in a liberal community. I fall down on the job all over the place, so I'm not judging at all, mind you, just noting that the moral relativism charges against liberals don't hold up consistently. Liberals can be as unforgiving as conservatives if the "sin" in question happens to offend our particular brand of morality. When people like Rush and Hannity complain that for liberals, "anything goes," they discount the depth of our animosity for, for example, abortion doctor killers.
Lainey writes: "Liberals can be as unforgiving as conservatives if the "sin" in question happens to offend our particular brand of morality."

Frankly, it seems to me that liberal morality is upside-down. I think for most people, the fact that Haggard is staying with his wife and trying to make his marriage work, based on the marriage vow that he took, is a good thing. In the liberal world it's a bad thing, "inauthentic" and dishonest.
Mish, I'm going to take up your "inauthentic" challenge, assuming the quotes suggest you disagree with that vocabulary. I used that word b/c I think that sexuality is as inborn as anything is. So, if he is attracted to both men and women, it strikes me as inauthentic to reject a label we have for just such inclination: bisexual.

But I take your point: We each choose whichever life we want, given, of course all our earthly and biological limitations, and he chooses this particular path. I think--and really, this is just me--that this choice would be harder than simply acknowledging the easy categories society has provided for him, but at the end of the day, I respect his choice. And I also acknowledge that there are many, many choices I make that increase the difficulty of my own existence and facile categorization, foremost the decision to be a teacher without certification. But it is exhausting.
While my first instinct is to admire and want to emulate the compassion and forgiveness exhibited here, especially in the Plato quote, I go back to a profound concept that I'm not so sure I can express well in this brief form or based on what I know. Very roughly it's - to be kind to the cruel leads to being cruel to the kind. I think its roots are Talmudic.

rori said "the worst lies we ever tell are the lies we tell to ourselves." Yet many of the responses here seem to have a tone of absolving dishonesty if its foundation is self-deception, as if people who lie to themselves can't know better.

I think self-deception is something you have to work at and those who practice it assiduously have to direct all their resources at maintaining it. Invariably they hurt pretty much everyone they influence because nothing matters as much as that - as hiding whatever it is they're hiding from. The more power they have over other people the more damage they do.

In my experience, the deeply self-deceptive are deeply narcissistic so it follows that the harm they do to others does not matter, probably does not even register in any honest way - maybe a cursory nod because it's an expected component of the facade.

Can it be overcome? Is the narcissistic or sociopathic personality fundamentally incurable? I really don't know. What I know is that all my life I have seen people work really, really hard at maintaining self-deception, so much so it tells me that it's really, really necessary to them. Bit it also seems that if takes such hard work and often personal pain to maintain it, it has to be something that can be lost.

What this amounts to in Haggard's case, if he hadn't used a therapist who could maintain the lies by concluding, “You are a heterosexual. With homosexual attachments” he wouldn't even have put three weeks into it. He'd have been out of there during the first session.



.
Lainey:

Is there any meaningful difference between the label 'bisexual' and 'heterosexual with homosexual attachments'?

This is putting a very fine point on it. If he is, indeed, bisexual -- then it seems to me that he is authentic enough. If he is really gay and in denial, not so much. But, I don't have finely tuned gadar and I think that simply taking him at his word, having come out as pretty weird, isn't all that far fetched.

I just have this feeling that people tend to put way too much emphasis on cultural norms as impediments to their happiness. I will be surprised if, in say a decade or two, we won't start seeing truly awful gay divorces and gay military tyrants. I suspect that gays are more or less like everyone else, give or take their sexual orientation.
You know, Nick, I wondered that myself--the distinction b/t bisexual and heterosexual with homosexual attachments. But Haggard himself seemed somewhat relieved at the semantics. Where for you and me, what the therapist was essentially "bisexual," for him I think he focused on the heterosexual thing and thought, Thank God.

Anyway, you're probably right about the word authentic. At the end of the day, I was defining authenticity for Haggard. I suppose he has made his own authentic choice, messy and difficult as it seems to me.
Lainey, I'm just thinking there is no happy ending for this guy.

Lets say he switches teams and announces he is gay. I don't see happiness for him just by switching teams.

The world is much too nuanced. Just saying.
He's no Pat Robertson, but he *is* a hypocrite, and has hurt many others because of it. I'm so tired of these self-serving narcissists. You are being kind.
Excellent essay, Lainey. I don't like a lot of things Haggard did in the name of religion - such as knowingly promulgate hypocrisies he knew to be limiting and hurtful to others, and oh by the way enriching himself by preying on other people's fears, the better to promulgate my dear - but I have compassion for Ted Haggard, and I think he has a chance to live an honest life,, but needs to recognize that he's going to have to go ALL THE WAY DOWN the path of facing hs real internal self, and being honest with that self. I think he has it in him, somewhere, actually, but it will take enormous strength, and he's surrounded by many who seem invested in him continuing the deception. Sad.
Haggard and those like him are despicable. Not because of his/their sexual predilections, but because of the abject hypocracy they exhibit that soon follows their exposure. Even more disturbing is the way their followers, (In the religious parlance: "Sheep"...so appropo), immediately either refuse to come to grips with the fact that the bastard is just as, if not more so, terribly flawed, or, in Haggards case, miraculously "cured" of his affliction...Or the idiots rationalize his plight, saying because he was a "Man of the Cloth", that Satan tries harder to corrupt those of the Church, he should be absolved because, as Flip Wilson said, "The Devil Made Me Do It"...Bullshit. This is the same con that politicians use to 'regain' their stature after getting their dirty laundry aired. Too bad that a majority of Americans can't make a command decision about anything in their lives, and feel the need to blindly obey pompous assholes like Haggard, Oprah, The Republican Party, ad infinitum, ad nauseam.

Joe
Hypocritical closet queens are the ones who have no self control, "Nick." Your smug heterosexist analogy to the young girls you passingly fancy doesn't work.

And speaking of bisexuality --

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjKpPerVuU0
ha! I'd forgotten about that Seinfeld, David. Love the reactions of Jerry and George throughout. But I don't think Nick is being even the tiniest bit smug. I think he's just trying to be thoughtful about the whole thing, keeping in the forefront that we don't really know other people's minds.

Thanks to all who recently commented--I appreciate your views. nerdcred, yours is interesting, the idea that it takes some time and effort to create a web of self-deception. Very interesting, indeed. You assume these people are narcissistic or sociopathic, but I'm wondering about plain avoidant. There used to be something the DSM called Avoidant Personality Disorder that they now call Social Anxiety Disorder. It involves tremendous avoidance about stuff to keep humiliation at bay. He doesn't fit the bill, to me (great, now I'm playing psychologist)--I think narcissism fit better--but I'm just throwing it out there.
When I wrote my book Open Secret in asked around about that "Seinfeld" episode. I had presumed their lesbian staff writer (the late, great Marjorie Gross who invented "Elaine") had come up with it. But it turns out it was all Larry David's idea.

He's just so fabulous.
Haggard is comparable to Cheever in his mendacity. They both wanted to maintain an image -- Haggard as a "amn of God," Cheever as a "Country Squire." Both were false. Both treated their families like props. The difference is outside of his wife Haggard carried on with young men and boys. Cheever had a major affair with actress Hope Lange during his marriage, and STILL had untold zipless fucks with countless sundry males. He once gave Ned Rorem a blow-job during lunch at a college cafeteria.

Just as Mrs. Haggard has profited from her hubby's adultery with an "inspirational" memori, the Cheever family has made a cottage industry out of "My Life with Dad" books.
@David Ehrenstein

I've been called a lot of things, but never heterosexist. Guilty as charged.

Seriously, I saw Haggard's wife on television, and was impressed with how unchanged they seemed to be. Her, anyway.

Whatever the value of my theoretical arguments, the reality is that I have changed my mind. They are lost.
Fascinating! And so are the comments!!!!
great post, lainey, and with an interesting twist. I don't have any particular philosophy to add, but I did just listen to a radio program featuring his wife speaking about her marriage, and seemed very (very) proud of her marriage. I grew up in a strict conservative religious community where I could sort of see the way her reasoning works. The bigger the "sin," per this line of thinking, the bigger and more beautiful the redemption tale. In her own view at least, she is living proof of the power of Jesus to redeem sinners in such a powerful way!

It's a different way of looking at it than I can imagine many might feel if they were married to a partner who found the other gender super hot. I guess I'm trying to say that I felt some compassion (in addition to irritation and some eye rolling) for her too. She's the definite product of a certain way of looking at the world and although I can per my background *understand* it, I also can't quite *understand* it.
I was just thinking about you today, dolores! Thanks for the comment--I know just what you mean.
Lainey, you have written a piece that is saturated with compassion. The ending astonishes me.

Lately I find it very hard to suffer fools. I elevate compassion, I practice it, i have been tested and I know I have it -- then i get some wicked thought or become so impatient with some beknighted fool.

Thank you for this reminder. Thank you for the insanely great video, and the balanced and well-considered profile.
Maybe I'm having a bad day, but I have no compassion for this man. He cheated the old and the gullible out of millions of dollars. Some of these people sent their grocery money to this fraud and ate dog food. He was living a life like a king, consorting with the high and powerful not just in this nation, but the world. If he spent one dime on a male prostitute or on Meth, he is a liar and should be giving no compassion until he starts working in food kitchens and really making amends to the people he screwed. His wife may forgive him, hell I imagine she liked living the high life too. Going on Oprah and crying is no reason to forgive a man who screwed the poor of the world. I could careless about his sexuality. I do care he's a cheat and a liar and a thief. If he can cure this in such a short time, Jesus himself must of had a hand in it!
I see two things at issue here. First, I see the problematic confluence of traditional religious ideology and human sexuality. Religion has been used historically to place controls, limitors on instinctual behavior, which helped to support the development of community and social organization.

Secondly, I see the inadequacy of attempting to fit human sexuality into a binary system.

There is a tremendous parallel between religious thought and binary thought. They both attempt to interpret the world through a black/white lens; good/bad, male/female, gay/straight, virtuous/sinful, believer/non-believer. These are simplistic systems for simple minds, a reassuring way of looking at and labeling a complex world, a world which confounds simplistic solutions at every turn.
You are much kinder to the guy than I am disposed to be. I can't easily forgive the hypocrisy of denouncing homosexuality whilst harbouring the same desires you condemn, although I know it;s common enough to do this.

Thanks for the comments on my blog - I have only just found them, as I haven't been around for a while. There is some more stuff on language and language teaching on my 'main blog' at www.giaklamata.blogspot.com
How can I possibly have missed that lovely last quote all these years? Wonderful article, wonderful close.
Sorry, I can’t summon up even the tiniest vestige of pity for anyone who has enjoyed a lucrative career in the Religious Right Hate and Bile Industrial Complex. We lived in Denver for many tears so we frequently had to breathe the noxious fumes wafting out of Colorado Springs (the “Evangelical Vatican.”) These people have perfected the business of profitably demonizing huge numbers of Americans while at the same time leeching off their tax dollars. If Focus on the Family, the Family Research Council, New Life Church and the whole scowling, self-righteous, Psalm-singing crew were to disappear tomorrow, this world would be a better and healthier place.
It would be so much easier if male sexuality could be entirely explained with a simple binary: gay or straight?

I don't think the popular dualistic label even begins to explain something so complex as human sexuality, so I tend to allow people to interpret/explain their sexuality when and where and to whom they wish, and avoid insisting they adhere to what I consider an unsophisticated system.
I appreciate the latecomers to this post--thanks so much for your thoughtful comments. To bachelorpod (who it seems only just stopped by): I agree with you completely.