I Can't See Through This Gorilla

SEPTEMBER 23, 2010 1:17PM

Male circumcision vs female circumcision?

Rate: 1 Flag
  http://www.surgeryencyclopedia.com/images/gesu_01_img0053.jpg

Which justification for male circumcision cannot be used for female circumcision?

 

Author tags:

female, male, circumcision

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
There is no justification for either, having said that, I refuse to judge those who circumcise their sons. People need to be educated about the truth, not scorned.
I HAVE PROPOSED THAT OUR MITOCHONDRIAL
DNA MAY PROVIDE A MATCY-CONFIRMATION-REVELATION.
I WOULD ONLY TRY CONFIRMING THAT WITH
ONE WHO WAS THE DAUGHTER OF A CIRCUMCISED
FATHER LEST VIRAL DEGRADATION SPOIL THE
EXPERIMENT

Crazy as it sounds, I’ve stumbled on a blushy “hook” affording
a sudden, simultaneous mutual proving of
science - history -morality inviolving all religions, fully sincere,
experimental science, actually with the entire planet and all
recorded human history operating as control.

Surprise! I believe we’re being visited by surprisingly moral
beings (that match.) I believe they aim to prove
freedom - equality -brother/sisterhhood (love) are defined by
matched mathematical human / universal fabric, that defining
an original moral design.

I’ve taken an expansive view of religion which, with patience, need
not be found to contradict anyone’s traditional beliefs.

I’ve let religion resonate with current moral, historic and scientific
revelations.

I BELIEVE THE PURPOSE OF CIRCUMCISION, particularly among those
who, as foretold by the willingness to sacrifice Isaac, have
served a revelational historic function, was to prevent viral
degradation where that might defeat the proving of a match.

I am fully aware of parallels: Aztec, Mayan, Egyptian, Hebrew,
Roman Catholic anthologies, calendars, codes, even
city layouts.

These, because of their hemispheric separation, plus, frankly,
the absolute fact of not 1, not 3, but importantly 2 foreseen
personalities, have only served not to condemn religion but to confirm that glimpses from religion should resonate.

FORMERLY ATHEIST


FORMERLY ATHEIST

Pot smokers are scapegoated by drinkers, drinkers by fatty food eaters, and so on and so on.
Majority here. Minority there. Minority here, majority there.
Paranoia. Ego defense mechanisms. Transference (someone looks like someone who
was an obnoxious, paranoid, insulting, annoying, even threatening clown.)

Laughing all the way to the bank are the gay leaders of the religious right in the business of
taking any political foe, generally those taking frauds and monopolists to task, and associating themwith gays, the demonized. If anything the hypocritical gays resent the fear otherwise intended for
them. So those thereby afraid of being wrongly ferreted out as gay face a choice of sooner or later health
premium death spirals or "going naked," oil imports and a weak dollar, minimal mass transit,
paying for funds borrowed from abroad benefiting the ultra wealthy behind the Tea Party, water monopolies,
communications monopolies, etc.


IT'S ONLY WITHIN THE GAY-BASHING COMMUNITIES WHERE GAYS ARE ENCOURAGED TO MARRY HETEROSEXUALLY.

It caused the propagation of gay GENETICALLY, so Hitler was feminine, the religious
right's leaders routinely prove being gay, virtually all murderers of gays
have proved being conflicted gays.

Associate any political foe with the demonized (and so most barbaric today,
simply make someone afraid of being wrongly ferreted out as gay--indeed,
somein Montana want it to be a status crime, just as in the Arab states.

To teach a universal lesson of freedom, equality and brotherhood / sisterhood to newly emergent apes, such that the complete prospect of deception based on paranoia, ego defense mechanisms, and transference could be understood, only the
heterosexual instinct itself was available as the basis of
scapegoating for profit.

That the hypocritical, often financially privileged, but most anti-socially GENETICALLY-PRODUCED gays, given to
let people murder, who do not care one iota about your children's future, are in the
business of sending the DEVELOPMENTALLY gay (optimal--served genetic numerical advantage FOR THE GROUP) to the lions, PROVES A SCIENCE, + THUS RELIGION.

Though based in the blushiest of ideas,
I’ve offered the utmost experimental science based controls, including the entire
human race, the whole of Earth, and our complete recorded history.

This because of, not in spite of, Western religion, Egyptian religion, the Mayan
and Aztec religions being apparent parallels or possibly outright copies
of each others’ codes, anthologies, calendars.

I maintain personalities (actually just 2, not 1, not 3, for lock-and-key value)
have been foreseen, which doesn’t in itself prove any particular esoteric
idea but sure works great with the idea, first proposed by the top originators
of computer technology, that the universe works something like a computer.

I've proposed:
* that we’re indeed being visited


* that we’re related, possibly demonstrably through partially matched mitochondrial DNA
*
* that these visitors are surprisingly moral-based, perhaps because


* (also proposed:) they share with us a universal mathematical fabric, at the level of
* life’s most basic energy regulation, connecting them and us with the full universe,


* actually running the full geographic extent, which is then its full time extent as
*
* well, and vice versa (distance is measurable by time.)_


* beyond those points, I’ve proposed informational gravity and a commonality


of spin physics combining the physics of quasars with magnetic field in your hard drive (and specifically travel being possible in
data point to data point mode, though with Dr. Hoagland’s hyerdynamic space idea potentially helping with the idea of conduits,
unless, as is entirely possible, of course, this:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KoR2t-iM9k&feature=related is a hoax.)

* (actually seriously considerably more)



Said visitors may have imparted a simultaneous science - moral - history based
proof (all proving each other simultaneously, suddenly, or otherwise considered
as science proving morality and history, morality proving science and history,
history proving morality and science.)

Precisely with this happening:

http://www.enterprisemission.com/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv1zn50KFZc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6OvvKBgHm8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KoR2t-iM9k&feature=related

http://sites.google.com/site/holychanges
sites.google.com.site.holychanges