I was sorry when Will Someone Feed the Cat pulled the plug on her blog here at OS. I thought she was an excellent writer, so I wasn’t surprised when she sent out a PM disclosing her true identity as a Canadian newspaper columnist. A couple days ago, I finally got around to checking out her official blog over at the Toronto Star. Same first-rate writing, as you’d expect, but I can’t really imagine myself going there to read her posts on a regular basis, even though I’d eagerly read the very same words here. How come, I wondered?
I decided to solicit the opinion of my buddy Mumbletypeg, a font of wisdom on many things. Interestingly, M-peg had a similar response when she visited Cat’s site. And she came up with a tentative theory: OS is like a box of chocolates (ack…not going there, exactly), while someone’s private blog is more like a bulk bag of caramels. You might like the caramels but they’re all the same and therefore not nearly as enticing as the box of chocolates, where you can fish around the box taking random bites of whatever you’re in the mood to sample. Might be a lemon creme. Or a gooey marshmallow. Even an occasional nut.
Sure, I can see that, OS as a nice box of all-dark Godivas, say, or maybe something more along the lines of a Whitman’s Sampler, depending on the day and your particular point of view. Back when I was a kid in Detroit, every now and then my dad would buy my mom a box of Sanders candy, the Motor City equivalent of Godiva, which she would share with me under strict supervision. When it came to candy, I had a definite larcenous streak and I remember sneaking into a near-virgin box one time, promising myself I’d eat just two or maybe three chocolates at most, a level of pilfering that I’d perfected on previous raids, one that was easy to cover by spreading out the remaining pieces to cover the gaps. But my resolve weakened that morning and in the time it took to my mother to shower and dress, I’d pretty well cleared out the entire box, leaving behind little more than a crumpled mass of brown wrappers and a couple of half-finished nougats, which have never been one of my favorites. Though my tolerance for glucose was stratospheric in those days, two layers of a Sanders Deluxe Assortment proved to be well beyond my limit and I felt woozy with self-recrimination.
I’ve experienced a similar sensation right here on occasion after binging on one too many posts, particularly where cute pets or salacious personal revelations are involved. As with chocolate, the feeling is only temporary, however, and it isn’t long before I’m rummaging around for more.
But getting back to the subject of personal blogging vs. community blogging, bear with me a moment while I extend the food analogy a bit further. Visiting a personal blog, I've noticed, is sort of like sitting in a restaurant where you’re the only customer. It can feel uncomfortably quiet. For better (and, every so often, worse) there’s a palpable energy here on OS, something more akin to table hopping at a busy joint where you happen to be one of the regulars. Writing can be a distressingly solitary occupation at times, and being here makes it less so. Sure, some folks always seem to get the great tables in the front while others languish in Siberia, but the management seems pretty reasonable and I appreciate the fact that they don't expect extravagant tips...at least, not so far as I'm aware...
Of course, a private blog can differ in other ways, too. Over at the Toronto Star, Cat is the professional and I’m just a lowly reader, a relationship that’s not nearly as appealing, at least from my perspective. Here on OS, we're all thrown in together like a bunch of kids in a freshman dorm (which may explain a lot, come to think of it).
Anyway, I’m curious about what you think. Are there personal blogs away from OS that you regularly read? Meanwhile, as long as I’m in meta mode, here are some guidelines I’ve established for myself to get the most out of my own OS experience:
Don’t get into the habit of hanging out with the same circle of people all the time. Expand horizons regularly.
Try never to comment with an eye towards boosting my own readership. Focus energy on posts I truly can take time to appreciate, rather than racing through too many at once.
Avoid praise inflation. If I think something is brilliant or if I LMFAO over somebody’s humor, by all means let them know, but don’t overdo it to the point where we’re all going to have to invest in shovels in order to wade through a comment thread.
Don’t ignore Gail Collins because I’m too busy blogging. Or that guy snoring over on the next pillow, whose name temporarily escapes me.
Further thoughts, anyone?
UPDATE: Cat said it was okay if I revealed her true identity. She didn't intend to make a big mystery out of it. Her name is Lorraine Sommerfeld and you can find her at www.lorraineonline.ca


Salon.com
Comments
Pass the candy. :-D
I like it here because it's more a playground than a spectator sport, which is what reading other blogs is. There's some not fully quantifiably different quality to writing when the writer knows that the commenters are coming.
I'm rattling on here because these are all subjects I've thought about some, albeit not very coherently, and because I've never really stopped to figure out how other sites work.
And if you'd like, I'll take those nougats off your hands.
It's like writing in a Cafe, here. I've even tried writing essays not specifically for OS here, because I feel buoyed by the sociability. Ted Hughes wrote with the door open.
Cat got out while her Reputation was intact. (You can do "this" for awhile, but you must find your way back to the Times.) Remember the way she entered. Star can have its Cat; We prefer our Emma.
If I'm going to be a font of wisdom, it better be a chocolate one, and not Hershey's. Ghirardelli. And I think maybe I meant Brach's Bridge Mix, not Whitman's Sampler. And yes, I like Brach's Bridge Mix. To a point.
Seriously, I am in awe of your eating almost 2 pounds of chocolates (?) in one go. I once ate a whole lot of Reese's peanut butter cups in one sitting, but unfortunately I neglected to record the amount. I was sort of sorry afterwards.
As a non-professional, I find OS to be a place in which I may hone my writing skills by reading diverse styles, opinions and forms. (narrative, poetic, humor, sarcasm, review, commentary, photos, artwork, embedded music and varied clips) Comments are often astute and highly creative, in and of themselves. Box of fine chocolates, indeed.
--rated--
I agree with you. I really like the experience of community blogging. I also wish I knew what she was talking about being "sheltered." She took down her posts, so I can't read it. Sheltered from what?
I do like your tips. But when you're first starting I think over reading and over commenting is fine. Nothing wrong with being friendly. I absolutely think you're right about changing up your readers every once in a while. Writing here should be fun. It shouldn't become a grind like sending Christmas cards out every day.
People can be friends even if they aren't always interested in the same things. Even if they hardly ever agree.
I think one of the greatest things about OS is that it teaches you flexibility as a reader and a writer. And you get a better sense of people not just from their blogs, but how they respond to other people's blogs.
I think this gets right to the core of it. Plus the fact that we ARE all bunched together. I like that. I rarely read other sites or blogs unless a post here recommends it.
your list fits in a nutshell. Nothing wrong with brevity and I've begun to search out new bloggers here or at least some that I'm unfamiliar with. Ther is just so much you can cover in a day. It's hard to do with only 15 hour self imposed time limits, but it's often rewarding.
This was rated, brilliant, outstanding and a bunch of other good words.
I still post stuff on both blogs, but I have no idea if anyone goes to my original one.
Rated.
Juliet, as a non-Canadian, I'm curious about what you mean by a Toronto tone. And I appreciate the Christmas card reference. When I reach that point, I know it's time to knock off for the day.
And speaking of Christmas, M-peg, funny you should mention Mozartkugels. My parents have been regifting the same box of Mozartkugels for several years now. I think they originally got it at Costco back in the early nineties sometime and every year it makes the rounds through the family and eventually winds up back at their place. So as far as chocolate goes, I prefer to think of myself as a slab of Dagoba extra bittersweet. That or a Bendix Bittermint.
But I do like the fruits and nuts here. I do. I am not suprised that woman was a newspaper writer. I thought as much for some reason.
This is a very appealing (and sometimes intimidating) aspect of OS for me. I love that I get to share space with pros and amateurs alike and we all feel like colleagues. Is that depressing for the pros I wonder? My posts tend toward, as Steve puts it so well, rancid bouillabaisse (although probably not even that high class, more like rancid mac 'n' cheese)
Michael -- is that a typo or did you really say 15 hour time limit? Sorry I ignored your country music post, btw. One of my most important personal guidelines, which I forgot to mention earlier, is that I never comment on posts that feature videos of scantily clad women who are much younger and hotter-looking than I am.
Bill S (sorry, WAY out of order here), I love it when you put up candy posts, especially ones about the bars we ate as kids. So anytime you're in the mood to do another, send me a candy gram. And look how much fun it is getting all these candy ads! Much better than what previous posts have been generating.
Interesting folk! I worried Why:`Who gonna feed a cat?
I felt sad.
It seemed like someone crawled up on the dinner tables.
Ripped off?
Abandoned!
Why go wriggling out of Ya sweatpants? Ya tear off diaper?
I mean this:`
Why pull off thoroughly clean enjoyment as if it was panties?
Then, place it:`
Atop a bowl of:`
Spaghetti, O. I'm
no food cat-critic.
Cat, you're back! And blogging on Gail Collins. I didn't know Gail Collins had a place where people could blog. (See, we are still sheltered here). Sorry about the freelancing mix-up. I did see that you're a car writer, which partially explains why a Motor City girl like me would be drawn to your writing. Anyway, now that you're here, why not stay awhile? I have a second avatar for things I don't want my real life friends to read, and so far haven't experienced even a pang of guilt. It can be done!
Sandra, thanks for stopping back...(hey, aren't you supposed to be lolling my the pool or playing slots or something? I like Whitman's Samplers, too, especially the filling key on the lid, though it does spoil the surprise element. But at least I can avoid the nougats that way.
damn...dog scratching at door...back later
This site has been my sanity since I lost my newspaper job. Writing stuff, putting it out there for consumption and then receiving feedback is wonderful. I’ve learned I write not for money, though getting paid wouldn’t be such a bad thing; I write for writing’s sake, and I write to be read.
The one thing I miss about working at my old newspaper (in addition to the paycheck) is the camaraderie of my fellow writers. Here on OS, I get to write and enjoy a lively community. This just wouldn’t be possible if I wrote only on my own blog.
It is well done though LnL. I enjoy many of the things I come across and also enjoy many of the connections I have made here. And I miss anything from Sanders. Those were the days, weren't they?
The thing about OS that troubles me is the promotion of personalities by the eds. I don't want to start any kind of flame war, and won't, but there are some public celebrity/personalities who blog here and always get EP and cover (automatic) because of who they are, and then it becomes self-fulfilling. A lot of time their posts are mediocre by any standards. I have noticed that there are fewer OS reader views per post now than just a few months ago. So I stick to just cruising around and find entertaining and well written posts.
I trust that you are doing well.
Mrs M, I really like the spectator sport vs. playground analogy, too, though I preferred Mumbletypeg's because it involved candy. Btw, have you sold the Navigator yet?
Many visitors to this post I don't recognize (ah, the metas always bring 'em in...), which is SO great. I look forward to reading your stuff.
Just juli -- enough with the rancid mac n' cheese! But I've wondered if the pros are demoralized, too, hanging out with the amateurs. Sort of like one of those dreams where you wake up and suddenly find yourself living with your parents again or else back in some sophomore math class.
imsurly -- just be careful or you might find yourself clicking on those candy ads over to my immediate right.
I'm reading all these comments and feeling as remorseful as if I'd just eaten a box of Russel Stover cremes. Again, the chocolate box analogy belongs to Mumbletypeg, not me, though she did say she didn't feel like writing it up...one of the many perils of having a garden.
Stellaa -- Twitter and tapas, that sounds very au courant, just like you. I still haven't gotten up the nerve to check out Twitter. I don't think I'm fast enough with the one-liners. Do they have a slow lane?
ocularnervosa, the Halloween analogy works for me, too! With the comments as the treats. Gotta watch out for those apples with the razor blades, though.
"Here on OS, we're all thrown in together like a bunch of kids in a freshman dorm" - This is a big part of the unique experience of posting here. In spite of the wide disparity in the experience and talent of writers on OS, we are still all writers and readers. It levels the playing field...realistically we don't all have the same chance of an EP/cover or heavy readership, but it is possible.
I only regularly read one non-OS blog. I spend entirely too much time here daily, dipping into the box of candy.
I so agree which is why my old pick'post sported a box of chocolates. And also agree that it is more like a party, where you can hear other's conversations and know who they are.
Nothing like OS that I know.
For me, OS is one small side dish in the vast smorgasbord of the Web. It never occurred to me to view it as an either/or thing. In addition to the blogs here, I currently read (you just prompted me to count) 22 publications and 87 blogs. I also maintain 3 Twitter accounts and actively follow about 50+ Twitterers (passively follow a couple hundred). I know I'm an extreme example -- I'm a writer, so a big part of my job is reading!
I wasn't familiar with Cat’s/Lorraine’s work, and it’s so interesting to me to read her explanation of her decisions about Salon. I’m just slightly past 6 weeks in my own 8-week OS experiment, and am debating whether I’ll continue posting here.
Inflation aside, this is so apt. You and WriterVixen make me look like a dyslexic kindergartener -- which in web terms I probably am.
This site is so much like an entire candy store that I hardly dare enter these days... I leave hours later, full and high and guilty. But I do peek in from time to time.
You nailed this, my dear.
Er, sorry. I'm not supposed to do that for this one, right?
Actually, I found this very interesting for a couple of reasons. I'm abstractly fascinated by the social dynamics on OS; in some ways it's like an MFA program, with (slightly) less sleeping around. And on a personal level, Will Someone Feed the Cat was the first person who commented on my first real post here. She left before I could get to know her or her writing, and I'd have liked to.
I agree with your point about the differing power relationships on a community blog like this and a personal or corporate blog. It's not unlike the difference between being in that MFA program I mentioned and going to someone's book-signing.
>>I recently discovered that I love Floyd Elliot even though he's short, for example. Shame on me for not loving him sooner!
Exactly. Everyone should love me. Looooove me! Loooooove me!
Was that too needy?
And...even though I'm short? Or because I'm short?
I was very good at punching and then smoothing over the bottom of pieces I didn't want. Ohhhhh how I long for the chocolate/chocolate combo or chocolate/maple or chocolate/coconut! I'm sorry what was the post about again?
GailMaria -- But metaphorical candy has no fat or calories! However, if it's the real thing you're after, you might want to consider clicking on one of those nice ads there to the right of my post.
Lisa, why not have some real candy while you're at it? The store's open.
So many visitors to this one...better go talk to Mumbletypeg and find out what my next post should be about.