
The messy news about Natasha Richardson’s skiing accident has been grotesque and rushed. So was last week’s Enquirer headline, “The End,” featuring a photo of a gaunt, bald Patrick Swayze. Rush Limbaugh recently assured his millions of listeners that Ted Kennedy won’t make it to see health care reform.
The ghoulish, hasty public death watch by the media exploits and reflects our dark side, our urge to rubberneck at an accident site, to read the tabloid headlines and talk about the terminally ill.
A public figure's life may offer privileges, but dying is democratic, arriving eventually for all, often too early. In fact, in many ways celebrities are worse off when dying; they have to endure rumor and innuendo along with their grief, along with photos and video and headlines of their imminent demise. We observed Tony Snow's hair and weight loss at his press briefings for Bush. We read speculation about Elizabeth Edwards' health problems forcing her to stay with her unfaithful husband. We will no doubt be closely following Ruth Bader Ginsberg's chemo schedule and energy level.
A few public figures manage to avoid it. Ed Bradley, the easygoing 60 Minutes journalist with the earring and the big laugh told few about his leukemia, and was spared the death watch. But when it comes to public scrutiny, most celebs are dead -- dying -- ducks.
I'm especially sensitive to this, as my late husband Chaim Stern endured this kind of thing in Miami as he was dying of a brain tumor similar to Kennedy's. In July, 2001 the Miami Herald ran a photo essay about his coming to town to become rabbi of a temple there; because Chaim wrote the prayer books for the reform movement of Judaism, his move to Miami was warmly welcomed. Just a month later, when we arrived, the paper's gossip column noted Chaim's sudden brain surgery, and from that point the local media tracked his health and hinted about his imminent death.
All the while he was still trying to lead a temple, and I was trying to keep his hopes up that he had maybe two more years of life. Hope is a fragile and precious thing. But Chaim read the columns, and he heard the dire comments from those who read the columns. He kept his grace and composure, but the hounding and speculating made things more difficult for both of us. He died on a ventilator three months after the first news.
I once saw vultures waiting for an animal to die. Those wrongly reviled birds clean the environment and subsist on the remains. But media vultures? They mostly just play "gotcha," and get off on bad news and higher ratings.
And I guess the public is interested - it's human nature, after all. But the media should not rush, and should not exploit the dying. There should be greater care and responsibility to report people's death with dignity, clarity and fact-checking. The stricken should be given respite and respect, whenever possible. The ill and their loved ones should not have to read exaggerated and false reports about their demise.


Salon.com
Comments
Too true, but they shouldn't be exploiting anyone for that matter.
I am sorry that this issue hits so close to home for you. I hope that your husband has found the peace those mongrels denied him. Your feelings are in my thoughts.
Be well.
The worst interview I ever had is something that haunts me to this day. I interviewed a young woman at her request. Three months before her house had burned down containing her ex-partner and their three children, as well as another 3 people. There was nothing in her eyes, they were lifeless. When got into my car afterwards I just sat there for 5 minutes and wiped away the tears.
I got into financial journalism as fast as I could after that.
What you have to remember about vulture journalism is that it is perpetuated by the dregs of the industry that write for the tabloids. It's gutter journalism. Which is why I don't read tabloids and if I ever end up running a press conference I will refuse to take any questions from a tabloid journalist, 'cos they're scum.
I know that's not going to happen.
Rated
Cymrag, your stand is admirable. I think papers like that Times do try to wait it out. The Post, Time Out and blogs like Huffpost have been changing their stories since the skiing tragedy happened, taking rumor as fact. Those local tv interviews with victims of murder and tragedy are the absolute worst. Drek.
However, I think the Richardson thing is a little different than what your husband or Swayze had to endure. Accidents are newsworthy even when celebrities aren't involved. Illnesses are not.
Illness and dying are hard enough with only one's close circle involved and inquiring. Hard to imagine (tho you've given us some insight) how it would be when it's public.
Makes me ashamed of my (mostly) former profession and long for the civility of the good old days when at least a decent time period was decreed and even J. Edgar could wear a dress and die in peace.
Thumbed. Chaim sounds like a real mensch. So sorry your time together was so short.
Monte
It makes it crystal clear the reason media outlets are losing credibility day in & day out. They build up readership & viewers by exploiting people in good times & bad. They tend to exploit before the full facts are out of about a given subject. The recent examples are perfect illustrations to the depths the media will go, just to effect their ratings or revenues.
Thanks for calling this despicable practice to our attention.
-rated
I almost threw something at the TV in disgust when I saw helicopter shots of the tent John Travolta and his wife had set up for their son's funeral. Have these people no shame?
However, before I read your post I had a different take on this event and its coverage. I was relieved that people appeared to respond with grief and offer their heartfelt prayers to Natasha Richardson and her family, just like I felt that humanity was redeemed when people responded to Princess Diana's death, the Christopher and Dana Reeve tragedy, or Michael J. Fox's illness.
There is an abundance of gruesomeness that happens every day that is reported on routinely --the dead in Iraq and Darfur, the homeless, poverty, the shooting down the street, or the middle school girl in our town that was raped by 13 and 14 year old boys-- and we don't respond to it, maybe because we can't. I can't maybe because it's a self-preservation mechanism, or maybe it's because these individuals aren't personalized like my favorite movie star or politician.
I think it's natural for people to respond emotionally to this sort of thing, and they do because they can.
I'm sorry about your husband.
And it seems also to be more enlightened than what I perceived to be the rush to be the most sensitive fan as was happening here on OS yesterday.
As I've mentioned around here before, I've done a lot of caring for dying people and when I hear stories like this, it's all too real to me what the family is probably going through. It's terribly hard for anyone to go through that, but to have media and public scrutiny on top of that personal experience....I just literally can't imagine it. It sounds unbearable.
Although they lead privileged lives, I've always felt sorry for celebs when they have something bad happen like a family death or their own illness because on top of dealing with it as an individual just as every person has to do, they have to figure out how to deal with the public, too. It just sounds awful to me.
In the case of Fox News’ reporting of Ms. Richardson, I guess they’d have moved from a ‘C’ to a ‘D’, no? Alright, ‘D’ to an ‘F’.
Edgar, I agree accidents are news; even deaths of celebs. It's the way they are rushed in order to scoop, and all the messy, competitive back-pedaling and competition. And the ghoulish headlines designed solely to sell. This is agenda driven for the benefit of the papers and leaves the readers confused and the family having to contend with news that may not be news. Few media outlets hang back long enough to check things.
fingerlakeswanderer, of course it speaks about our culture and the cult of Britney and all that. Is it media-driven, just us, or both? I understand it, I just hate to see headlines like "The End" when the man is still alive.
Bill S. Exactly my thoughts.
Middleaged, yes it goes to everything that comes with the celebrity worship, which I read is calming down a bit with real economic problems taking precedence right now.
Leandra, yes the Travolta tragedy was another that was exploited beyond what was newsworthy into all kinds of crime theories, etc.
denese, I agree that it is natural to respond when people we have come to know and respect are dying. The problem is when the death becomes simply a means to sell papers or increase viewers by constant, often false articles and mentions. Then it is ghoulish and too much, at least for me. I get disgusted.
David, we rate with our readership or viewership I guess.
coachcaptain, yes I think that the "balanced" thing is a product of having to fill 24/7 cable news with others doing the talking. It's awful and has helped spoil the type of honest reporting I remember in the past.
the death watch is terrible. i wish your husband had jsut not read those things in the paper. they had nothing to do with who he was or the way you and he were managing his disease. i'm so sorry for your lost and for you enduring that ugliness. this is an excellent post, as all of your are. love lvoe love and gratitude for taking this on.
I treated people the way I would want to be treated. Not all my colleagues did, and some of the worst offenders didn't even work for tabloids but broadsheets and TV/radio stations, especially TV. I only did this kind of reporting for 3 years before moving on to courts and later, entertainment, but I consider it one of the best parts of my career. I learned a huge amount, and my conscience is clear.
I'm not living in a cave mind you. To others it may seem that. I pick and choose what and who I read, or read further. Your blogs are always great and informative to me. Thank you, again. You have a great soul. A keen mind. And a kind heart. wow..
OS is probably not a whole lot better, though. Just look at what gets the most readership: sex and tragedies. And I'm not sure anyone who writes here can express too much outrage, as we also try to maximize our stats by appealing to what is base in others. But that's just the cynic in me talking. I'm still trying to come to terms with the fact that I revealed my own private tragedy, got a huge readership for that one story, and am now back to writing my usual thoughtful prose and getting 7 or 9 ratings and a few comments because my subjects are not sensational.
Once I had 3 vultures as neighbors for four years. I have no idea why there were three of them that always roosted together. But I grew fond of them.
Judging by behavior, it would be more insulting to call a vulture a human than to call a human a vulture. And the media are all too human, encouraged by other humans who lap up their nasty brews.
emma, the more I read what you have done and how you think, the more I admire your centeredness and truthfulness.
latethink, yes Michael Landon had to go through what Patrick Swayze is and what Ruth Bader Ginsberg might. It's the way the media works --fueling our well-wishes and curiosity into a premature death watch.
James, too kind. But I like your kindness.
The vulture aspect you describe especially toward a loved one is disturbing, but it is public demand that makes these stories sell. There will always be gutter press showing pictures of bald heads and shaved ho has and chasing down mass fatality car wrecks. No excuse for false reporting on any topic. monkey fingered.
Hawley, we can learn so much from other creatures. Hypocrisy is minimal. Nothing is wasted. They lead lives of purpose. Where did we go wrong?
Another great post Lea.
BBE, you make a great distinction between news and vulture culture. It is indeed news that Ginsberg is ill. But it would not be newsworthy to see photos of her looking ill and walking with a cane for weeks and weeks.
Natalie, the English tabs are even worse than ours. I heard about that young woman you reference, who in turn is trying to use her death stories for money for her children. Princess Diana is the prime example of milking a story and making up all kinds of conspiracies, to sell papers. It's one thing when folks are alive and can refute it. But when someone is dying or dead it is especially bad. We tend to overdo in this country. Too much info, and to make $$.
I admit that I have hit the refresh button too many times for Natasha Richardson's story and it is a grotesque part of human nature. I remember doing the same when it was announced that Anna Nicole Smith was hospitalized.
It is exploitation in a way, but why would I feel I have a vested interest in a person I have never met that I am wondering from hour to hour if life support has been pulled or if a miraculous recovery has been made?
I am truly sorry about the death of your husband. Life is too short and precarious.
1WomansVu, I am so very sorry that this has happened. I had a taste of it myself, but it only lasted three months. That the intrusions went on so long after such tragedy is really disturbing and I guess goes to my point about overdoing.
And thanks Cindy for your comment-- it needed to be said, considering that we are commenting in this OS forum. You are holier than I am my dear (not watching t.v. for example), and somehow that's okay with me because you always cut to the heart of the matter even if your comments involve self criticism.
In their zeal to get a 'sccop', I have seen journalists shove microphones in the face of people who stood struck dumb with grief at the scene of a murder or a fire, being asked "How do you feel?" I think it is a mistake to assume that is what the public *wants* just because it *watches*. Watching is passive.I'd keep reading or watching the story whether the title was "Stage Actress Concussed In Skiing Accident" as I would "Natasha Richardson hovers near death." The hyperbole is not caused by us, but it might be stopped by us if we publicly decried it more.
So innappropriate but what our world is made of now. Getting to the point where the speed at which information is transmitted is catching up to itself and zooming on past.
ugh
good piece and rated
But the media vultures, disturbing.
I felt particularly bad for Patrick Swayze, with those recent shots of him. I think the man is doing an admirable job of staring at his situation right in the face, with a certain aplomb, finesse and feistiness.
I never particularly liked him as an actor, but as I watch him in interviews, my admiration for him has grown. He's a strong man, it seems. I hate to see him being hawked like that.
Would that I could have achieved the level of taste and restraint you all did.
I am overawed to be allowed to share pixel space with you here. You are models of dignity and composure.
(And Lea, I still say "yes" to your post.)
http://www.nowmagazine.co.uk/celebrity-news/312889/see-pics-patrick-swayze-looks-thin-as-he-smokes-on-shopping-trip/1/
Sandra, wise comment. Yes, we are passive and fed what the media decides.
JR,the worst of all perhaps, was Terry Schiavo, the woman in a coma, used by pols to advance their agenda. Remember Bill Frist announcing her not brain dead from the video he watched.
Verbal, as great as we are, we're not national media -- yet. What happens in OS mostly stays in OS -- that is until we win the National Magazine Award and shall have to be more careful of our power. I don't think posts are the same as media which spreads rumors for money and increased circulation.
Bill E, yes drs and hospitals often leak info. I've known drs who have told me personal info about patients. And in my husband's case I know they leaked info.
Cindi, I agree.
Made me do a double take. But then, I'm obtuse.
Our media-happy culture is ravenous at times. I'm reminded of the Alan Parson's Project album called Vulture Culture.
You write, "Those wrongly reviled birds clean the environment and subsist on the remains."
That is certainly far more honorable than what the media vultures do, who rather than cleaning the environment, they trash it up.
RATED
My heart fully goes out to Liam Neeson, their children and entire family and friends. It's another sad, sad story that was picked up and ran with by the likes of TMZ giving out false hopes and lies a plenty...
I'm sorry your husband had to read about himself, how alarming that must have been. Thanks for bringing attention to this issue, very well written!
Susanne, I don't see that happening as long as we're a celeb-worshipping country. Maybe this economy will shake us up.
Rick, I think we can learn from all creatures. Bird-brain is not a pejorative to me.
Blue, I can't bring myself to listen to the sorrow fest, again, a way to get ratings/bucks. I'm sure there are many sincere discussions and many insincere, prolonged discussions and articles that will go too far and too long. The excess is what irks me.
Bill W, hypocrisy is rampant!
We haven't come very far.
alsoknownas, I debated referring to that quote. Thanks for adding it.
dcvdickens, ambulance chasing is exactly right. And then the chaser parks at the deceased's house for weeks, months, years.
tragic tragic
vultures not helping
Avatar, your description of how keen the pain is, that even a trembling leaf can invoke a memory is so true. But to have ghoulish stories go on for months can truly be painful to the families and takes us all down a bit.