Lea Lane

Lea Lane
Location
Florida, USA
Birthday
August 26
Title
freelance writer/editor
Bio
I've been around the block (more like around the world). I've played and loved and lived an unconventional life in conventional trappings. I've been a corporate VP, worked with foster kids, acted in an Indie ("Nurse 1"), was on Jeopardy!. I'll write just about anything, from speeches to comedy sketches to feature articles. I've been managing editor of a travel publication, authored six books, including Solo Traveler:Tales and Tips for Great Trips (Fodor's), blog regularly on major sites, and have contributed (mostly anonymously) to everything from encyclopedias to guidebooks. I was divorced late, widowed early -- and dated lots -- and I survived a scary illness. After being happily, peacefully solo for many years, I just started a live-in relationship. I founded and still edit www.sololady.com, a lfestyle Website for single women. I'm truly grateful for each precious day, each well-earned wrinkle, my family, my cat. Truth, laughter, friendship. And now this blog -- on this wonderful site!

Lea Lane's Links

Some of My Fave Posts
My Website
S is for Surely Special
Two Exceptional World Charities
Editor’s Pick
MARCH 18, 2009 11:00AM

The Media Vultures on Death Watch

Rate: 65 Flag

 


vulture11b

 

The messy news about Natasha Richardson’s skiing accident has been grotesque and rushed. So was last week’s Enquirer headline, “The End,”  featuring a photo of a gaunt, bald Patrick Swayze. Rush Limbaugh recently assured his millions of  listeners that Ted Kennedy won’t make it to see health care reform.

The ghoulish, hasty public death watch by the media exploits and reflects our dark side, our urge to rubberneck at an accident site, to read the tabloid headlines and talk about the terminally ill.

A public figure's life may offer privileges, but dying is democratic, arriving eventually for all, often too early. In fact, in many ways celebrities are worse off when dying; they have to endure rumor and innuendo along with their grief, along with photos and video and headlines of their imminent demise. We observed Tony Snow's hair and weight loss at his press briefings for Bush. We read speculation about Elizabeth Edwards' health problems forcing her to stay with her unfaithful husband. We will no doubt be closely following Ruth Bader Ginsberg's chemo schedule and energy level.

A few public figures manage to avoid it. Ed Bradley, the easygoing 60 Minutes journalist with the earring and the big laugh told few about his leukemia, and was spared the death watch. But when it comes to public scrutiny, most celebs are dead -- dying -- ducks.

I'm especially sensitive to this, as my late husband Chaim Stern endured this kind of thing in Miami as he was dying of a brain tumor similar to Kennedy's. In July, 2001 the Miami Herald ran a photo essay about his coming to town to become rabbi of a temple there; because Chaim wrote the prayer books for the reform movement of Judaism, his move to Miami was warmly welcomed. Just a month later, when we arrived, the paper's gossip column noted Chaim's sudden brain surgery, and from that point the local media tracked his health and hinted about his imminent death.

All the while he was still trying to lead a temple, and I was trying to keep his hopes up that he had maybe two more years of life. Hope is a fragile and precious thing. But Chaim read the columns, and he heard the dire comments from those who read the columns. He kept his grace and composure, but the hounding and speculating made things more difficult for both of us. He died on a ventilator three months after the first news.

I once saw vultures waiting for an animal to die. Those wrongly reviled birds clean the environment and subsist on the remains. But media vultures? They mostly just play "gotcha," and get off on bad news and higher ratings.

And I guess the public is interested - it's human nature, after all. But the media should not rush, and should not exploit the dying. There should be greater care and responsibility to report people's death with dignity, clarity and fact-checking. The stricken should be given respite and respect, whenever possible. The ill and their loved ones should not have to read exaggerated and false reports about their demise.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Vultures get a bad rap. Media vultures should.
'But the media should not rush, and should not exploit the dying.'

Too true, but they shouldn't be exploiting anyone for that matter.

I am sorry that this issue hits so close to home for you. I hope that your husband has found the peace those mongrels denied him. Your feelings are in my thoughts.

Be well.
Speaking as a Journalist I loathe media vultures. I gave up being a local journalist because I hated asking people the most stupid and obvious questions that my editor wanted me to ask - "how do you feel about XXX dying?" How the hell are they feeling? What kind of moronic question is that?
The worst interview I ever had is something that haunts me to this day. I interviewed a young woman at her request. Three months before her house had burned down containing her ex-partner and their three children, as well as another 3 people. There was nothing in her eyes, they were lifeless. When got into my car afterwards I just sat there for 5 minutes and wiped away the tears.
I got into financial journalism as fast as I could after that.
What you have to remember about vulture journalism is that it is perpetuated by the dregs of the industry that write for the tabloids. It's gutter journalism. Which is why I don't read tabloids and if I ever end up running a press conference I will refuse to take any questions from a tabloid journalist, 'cos they're scum.
Lea I was going to skip over your post, because of the "death watch" behavior of the media, but I'm glad I stopped to read. Your personal story is moving and I would hope jar these editors and reporters into covering these stories with dignity and grace.

I know that's not going to happen.
Yes they should get a bad rap Lea. I find most media outlets repugnant and stick to only a trusted few. Well said. I really feel so badly for Patrick Swayze and his wife and the Richardson/Neeson family.
Rated
Thanks for the comments.

Cymrag, your stand is admirable. I think papers like that Times do try to wait it out. The Post, Time Out and blogs like Huffpost have been changing their stories since the skiing tragedy happened, taking rumor as fact. Those local tv interviews with victims of murder and tragedy are the absolute worst. Drek.
Absolutely true. I was appalled at the way, without any confirmation from anyone with substance, these vultures were reporting her dead. my god. Appalling.
good points, Lea.

However, I think the Richardson thing is a little different than what your husband or Swayze had to endure. Accidents are newsworthy even when celebrities aren't involved. Illnesses are not.
Great post. Sounds also like you had a great husband.

Illness and dying are hard enough with only one's close circle involved and inquiring. Hard to imagine (tho you've given us some insight) how it would be when it's public.
Everything nowadays is ratings and money oriented. When did we lose our respect and empathy for others when they are at their most vulnerable, regardless of their celebrity? It doesn't say much for us as a whole.
Such a spot-on indictment of the media's and the public's insatiable desire to invade the privacy of the famous and anyone the media anoints as vulture-worthy... when rubbernecking overcomes sense and sensibility. I'm sorry you and Chaim had to endure this on top of all else.

Makes me ashamed of my (mostly) former profession and long for the civility of the good old days when at least a decent time period was decreed and even J. Edgar could wear a dress and die in peace.
Lea, this is brilliant. But I also think it points to part of the "celebrity media clusterfuck" that we live in right now. It's not just waiting for someone to die; it's speculating on whether someone has gained weight or is pregnant; whether so and so has anorexia or bulimia; what's going on in the relationship between celebrities (see: Rihanna and Chris Brown). I don't think that anyone signs up to be a celebrity to have every bowel movement recorded. I take that back. There are attention whores among certain celebrities, but for the most part, I'd prefer that we let their private lives be private.
This was such a clear and beautifully written post. My father died from cancer in a very short period of time and, vultures or not, it is a heart breaking thing to witness. On the other hand, I do find myself sucked into reading certain stories...Ted Kennedy and yes, Natasha Richardson, because they remind me of how fragile life is. Richardson's hits close to home because we ski as a family, though with helmets on, and as I watch my kids become more and more confident and speed ahead of me down the mountains, I try to only live in their joy and not flash to visions of Sonny Bono hitting a tree. We do what we can to teach them to be safe, in control, watching out for others but there is never a guarantee. I am not defending the fact that I find myself reading stories like Natasha Richardsons', just recognizing my own inclinations and hoping that her family finds peace and privacy, whatever it turns out they are dealing with.
you contemplate and illuminate the thin line tween legitimate curiosity and ghoulishness well, better than the MSM ...
The problem became epidemic when everyone in the media tried to perfect the art of the scoop. By rushing to be the first, they leave off such niceties as fact-checking and dive directly into the "I may be wrong, uh huh I know, but I may be right".

Thumbed. Chaim sounds like a real mensch. So sorry your time together was so short.
Thank you, Lea. This needed to be said, and you said it well.

Monte
This is well-written, and I am sad for your loss. You must be very proud of your husband.
This is why I do not read the gossip mags, whether online or in print, and do much to avoid any news program that reports gossip. It's terrible that your husband had to go through that.
So well written! And not just the vultures on death watch, but the ones so ready to out people for anything.. being gay, having an affair, being drunk, being broke, being sick... you name it... Pfft on them!
Lea, I know this is even more difficult for you because you have experienced these vultures, first hand. ( Loving thoughts going to you, for that fact). I can't stand this type of journalism. I remember having a car accident in my younger years that was quite devastating. As people drove by and stared, not even thinkin' about extending a helping hand, I vowed to never rubberneck again. And I have lived by that vow! Thank you so much for writing about this. It needs to be said!
Lea, great post. They say it is all in the name of news.
It makes it crystal clear the reason media outlets are losing credibility day in & day out. They build up readership & viewers by exploiting people in good times & bad. They tend to exploit before the full facts are out of about a given subject. The recent examples are perfect illustrations to the depths the media will go, just to effect their ratings or revenues.

Thanks for calling this despicable practice to our attention.
-rated
Well said.

I almost threw something at the TV in disgust when I saw helicopter shots of the tent John Travolta and his wife had set up for their son's funeral. Have these people no shame?
I understand your point. Yes, misreporting is cruel, and exploitation shouldn't be encouraged. And now I feel embarrassed at my rush to read the news about a beloved actor's possible death or disability, as I guess that I am a part of the reason that reporters rush to get the scoop on this sort of very personal, tragic story. It sells.

However, before I read your post I had a different take on this event and its coverage. I was relieved that people appeared to respond with grief and offer their heartfelt prayers to Natasha Richardson and her family, just like I felt that humanity was redeemed when people responded to Princess Diana's death, the Christopher and Dana Reeve tragedy, or Michael J. Fox's illness.

There is an abundance of gruesomeness that happens every day that is reported on routinely --the dead in Iraq and Darfur, the homeless, poverty, the shooting down the street, or the middle school girl in our town that was raped by 13 and 14 year old boys-- and we don't respond to it, maybe because we can't. I can't maybe because it's a self-preservation mechanism, or maybe it's because these individuals aren't personalized like my favorite movie star or politician.

I think it's natural for people to respond emotionally to this sort of thing, and they do because they can.

I'm sorry about your husband.
I appreciate you writing from a first person perspective. Nobody is well known in my family so I will not have a similar experience.
And it seems also to be more enlightened than what I perceived to be the rush to be the most sensitive fan as was happening here on OS yesterday.
Lea, wonderful piece. I've been checking the news on Richardson as I've always liked her (and her family) and am very saddened by this news and want to know what happens, but I have found the reporting disturbing, and it's hard not to feel I'm participating by even looking at it, like someone who slows down to gawk at a car accident.

As I've mentioned around here before, I've done a lot of caring for dying people and when I hear stories like this, it's all too real to me what the family is probably going through. It's terribly hard for anyone to go through that, but to have media and public scrutiny on top of that personal experience....I just literally can't imagine it. It sounds unbearable.

Although they lead privileged lives, I've always felt sorry for celebs when they have something bad happen like a family death or their own illness because on top of dealing with it as an individual just as every person has to do, they have to figure out how to deal with the public, too. It just sounds awful to me.
Yes, yes, yes. When media ethics began running downstream, I started wondering why we don’t have a rating system for the media. As in many areas, where I live, the L.A. County Public Health Department gives restaurants letter grades. Why not the media? For every inaccurate or unsubstantiated story, a news organization should have its rating downgraded.

In the case of Fox News’ reporting of Ms. Richardson, I guess they’d have moved from a ‘C’ to a ‘D’, no? Alright, ‘D’ to an ‘F’.
Lea, I was thinking just this when I was standing in line at the grocery story this week and saw the photo of Swayze. The frenzy over Natasha Richardson is another example. We are fascinated and frozen with fear about death and the media uses it to its advantages. This is an excellent post.
The local tv nooze (as opposed to news) just pisses me off so I avoid it. They're good for weather & sports (unless a sports figure is involved in a "tragedy" or a "scandal". What's worse is their hypocritical reporting of opposition to the President's efforts to fix the mess in the name of balanced coverage. In my opinion the media is amoral - interested in profits only regardless of damage to people or even in our country . And getting worse as time passes...
Would that the ambulance chasers on cable news believed as you. Well said Lea.
I once saw a Vulture waiting for an African child to die, in fact the photograph won a Pulitzer in the mid-90's, and eventually the photographer comitted suicide over it.
Thank you for all the cogent comments. As usual, the thread adds immensely to the post itself. Just a few shout-outs:

Edgar, I agree accidents are news; even deaths of celebs. It's the way they are rushed in order to scoop, and all the messy, competitive back-pedaling and competition. And the ghoulish headlines designed solely to sell. This is agenda driven for the benefit of the papers and leaves the readers confused and the family having to contend with news that may not be news. Few media outlets hang back long enough to check things.

fingerlakeswanderer, of course it speaks about our culture and the cult of Britney and all that. Is it media-driven, just us, or both? I understand it, I just hate to see headlines like "The End" when the man is still alive.

Bill S. Exactly my thoughts.

Middleaged, yes it goes to everything that comes with the celebrity worship, which I read is calming down a bit with real economic problems taking precedence right now.

Leandra, yes the Travolta tragedy was another that was exploited beyond what was newsworthy into all kinds of crime theories, etc.

denese, I agree that it is natural to respond when people we have come to know and respect are dying. The problem is when the death becomes simply a means to sell papers or increase viewers by constant, often false articles and mentions. Then it is ghoulish and too much, at least for me. I get disgusted.

David, we rate with our readership or viewership I guess.

coachcaptain, yes I think that the "balanced" thing is a product of having to fill 24/7 cable news with others doing the talking. It's awful and has helped spoil the type of honest reporting I remember in the past.
the media is just broken now. when octomom and rush stay in the news cycle way past their expiration point, it's just scary. the same way they gave palin so much press and still do. i could go on and on about all the travesties that have cuased me to keep a news fast going and to avoid even my favorites on tv. i don't want this crap in my head.

the death watch is terrible. i wish your husband had jsut not read those things in the paper. they had nothing to do with who he was or the way you and he were managing his disease. i'm so sorry for your lost and for you enduring that ugliness. this is an excellent post, as all of your are. love lvoe love and gratitude for taking this on.
I think labelling all tabloid journalists as "scum" is an overstatement. I worked at a tabloid for more than a decade in many capacities. Although I talked to many a grieving person, and even inadvertently told someone that their son had died because the military hadn't done it 12 hours after the fact (a cover up was in the works) I never took the vulture approach. Most people appreciated it and as a result, I often had the better story.

I treated people the way I would want to be treated. Not all my colleagues did, and some of the worst offenders didn't even work for tabloids but broadsheets and TV/radio stations, especially TV. I only did this kind of reporting for 3 years before moving on to courts and later, entertainment, but I consider it one of the best parts of my career. I learned a huge amount, and my conscience is clear.
Excellent post. I'll never forget when Michael Landon was sick, the way he was hounded, and he had young children, just like Patrick Swayze. I am sorry for your loss and the suffering of your husband.
And Lea, I agree with your premise for the most part, and I'm sorry you had to live through that.
Lea, I'm sorry. Sorry about your loss for sure, but more sorry I don't take more time and read all those posts to the left side of this screen. I will begin this journey soon. I do not watch TV. I do not read tabloids, and only read certain sections of a newspaper. I hear the stories just fine from others conversations. I still do not know anything about Natasha Richardson. In fact, don't know who she is.
I'm not living in a cave mind you. To others it may seem that. I pick and choose what and who I read, or read further. Your blogs are always great and informative to me. Thank you, again. You have a great soul. A keen mind. And a kind heart. wow..
Lea, you make good points. I never watch TV, that's never ever (no "except-fors.") I wish more people would just turn the idiot box off for good. What a great way to stick it to the advertisers, and revolutionize programming decisions. (Yeah, and I imagine world peace, too.)

OS is probably not a whole lot better, though. Just look at what gets the most readership: sex and tragedies. And I'm not sure anyone who writes here can express too much outrage, as we also try to maximize our stats by appealing to what is base in others. But that's just the cynic in me talking. I'm still trying to come to terms with the fact that I revealed my own private tragedy, got a huge readership for that one story, and am now back to writing my usual thoughtful prose and getting 7 or 9 ratings and a few comments because my subjects are not sensational.
I knew a wonderful naturalist who died young. He said he wanted to come back as a vulture, because it's the vultures who keep our lands free of rotting corpses. Now when I see a vulture, I wonder if it is he.

Once I had 3 vultures as neighbors for four years. I have no idea why there were three of them that always roosted together. But I grew fond of them.

Judging by behavior, it would be more insulting to call a vulture a human than to call a human a vulture. And the media are all too human, encouraged by other humans who lap up their nasty brews.
theo, yes, it's when the news gloms onto octomom, or whatever dire celeb event crowds out the real news that we get a vulture culture. I totally understand curiosity -- up to a point.

emma, the more I read what you have done and how you think, the more I admire your centeredness and truthfulness.

latethink, yes Michael Landon had to go through what Patrick Swayze is and what Ruth Bader Ginsberg might. It's the way the media works --fueling our well-wishes and curiosity into a premature death watch.

James, too kind. But I like your kindness.
The media should report the illnesses. Many are news worthy. Take Ginsberg. The only woman justice. Her health is of national concern and impacts the highest level of our government. It may signal a period of only eight justices voting on cases or the appointment of a new justice. Not reporting her cancer would be contrary to public interest. I don't want to go back to the time when the press covered up illness and scandal for the elites like they did for FDR and JFK.

The vulture aspect you describe especially toward a loved one is disturbing, but it is public demand that makes these stories sell. There will always be gutter press showing pictures of bald heads and shaved ho has and chasing down mass fatality car wrecks. No excuse for false reporting on any topic. monkey fingered.
Cindy, your point is exactly what the media understands. Sensationalism sells. But they go too far, I think.

Hawley, we can learn so much from other creatures. Hypocrisy is minimal. Nothing is wasted. They lead lives of purpose. Where did we go wrong?
I haven't read the comments so I apologise if anyone has already said this, but there's a British reality TV star who is in the final stages of cervical cancer. She has two small sons and OK magazine just prematurely published news of her death and a eulogy. They used a photograph of her and her little boys on the front cover. She's fighting for each hour left with her family - I felt ill when I saw the retraction.

Another great post Lea.
Well said. While I want to know about my favorite celebrities, I refuse to deal with thoughtless, greedy gossip mongers who have no souls.
Great idea to eliminate Media Vultures....Fox News first. (I wish we could, but that would be censorship which I am opposed to.) I boycott MV where ever I see them. Regular Vultures at least leave a clean corpse.
Thanks again for the input all, and a few comments.

BBE, you make a great distinction between news and vulture culture. It is indeed news that Ginsberg is ill. But it would not be newsworthy to see photos of her looking ill and walking with a cane for weeks and weeks.

Natalie, the English tabs are even worse than ours. I heard about that young woman you reference, who in turn is trying to use her death stories for money for her children. Princess Diana is the prime example of milking a story and making up all kinds of conspiracies, to sell papers. It's one thing when folks are alive and can refute it. But when someone is dying or dead it is especially bad. We tend to overdo in this country. Too much info, and to make $$.
That poor British celebrity, Jade Goody, is also the subject of a death watch. I think she has embraced it so as to have a nest egg for her children.
I admit that I have hit the refresh button too many times for Natasha Richardson's story and it is a grotesque part of human nature. I remember doing the same when it was announced that Anna Nicole Smith was hospitalized.
It is exploitation in a way, but why would I feel I have a vested interest in a person I have never met that I am wondering from hour to hour if life support has been pulled or if a miraculous recovery has been made?

I am truly sorry about the death of your husband. Life is too short and precarious.
very good points. this so needed to be said and thank you for saying it.
media has a problem with exploiting not only the dying but also the dead. My husband was killed in the attacks of 9/11 and while I was willing and able to speak out on issues affecting the families, I can't tell you how many reporters asked me where he was, where he sat, if I think he knew what was coming, etc, etc. This went on for months - no years. My previous career involved interacting with the media and I have many, many reporter friends but I bear a grudge - make no mistake about it...
Thanks for the comments/

1WomansVu, I am so very sorry that this has happened. I had a taste of it myself, but it only lasted three months. That the intrusions went on so long after such tragedy is really disturbing and I guess goes to my point about overdoing.
I do too Lea. I was mostly responding to my culpability in fueling this industry that is journa-tainment.

And thanks Cindy for your comment-- it needed to be said, considering that we are commenting in this OS forum. You are holier than I am my dear (not watching t.v. for example), and somehow that's okay with me because you always cut to the heart of the matter even if your comments involve self criticism.
Agreed. I once read a short story, The Crowd. The premise: the protagonist discovers, quite by accident, that the crowd rubbernecking at an accident is the same crowd, and that it's reaction actually determines whether the victim survives or not. The protagonist reveals his knowledge of the crowd, which condemns him to die at its hands when it is his turn to be in a moderately serious traffic accident.

In their zeal to get a 'sccop', I have seen journalists shove microphones in the face of people who stood struck dumb with grief at the scene of a murder or a fire, being asked "How do you feel?" I think it is a mistake to assume that is what the public *wants* just because it *watches*. Watching is passive.I'd keep reading or watching the story whether the title was "Stage Actress Concussed In Skiing Accident" as I would "Natasha Richardson hovers near death." The hyperbole is not caused by us, but it might be stopped by us if we publicly decried it more.
I watched Larry King live last night, Lea and I couldn't believe the specualtion and guest surgeons speculating and so on.

So innappropriate but what our world is made of now. Getting to the point where the speed at which information is transmitted is catching up to itself and zooming on past.

ugh
good piece and rated
Thank you for saying this. I was upset when the media rushed to report that Natasha Richardson had died and had been picked up here when the news was still out. Now that CNN has finally confirmed her death, I still feel sad. We shouldn't be watching with baited breath and reporting on the imminent death (or falsely reporting of death) until that person has actually died, nor should we be stating that someone is about to die unless that person comes forward to say as much. This is all extremely sad.
I adore vultures. They are...what do you call it...one of my totem animals. Love them.

But the media vultures, disturbing.

I felt particularly bad for Patrick Swayze, with those recent shots of him. I think the man is doing an admirable job of staring at his situation right in the face, with a certain aplomb, finesse and feistiness.

I never particularly liked him as an actor, but as I watch him in interviews, my admiration for him has grown. He's a strong man, it seems. I hate to see him being hawked like that.
Beth I agree. PS has really kept a strong front. But being a celeb, the vulturing is bound to heppen.
Hey, a few of you commenters: I'm now suitably shamed. Terribly sorry I posted about being upset that one of my favorite actresses was being reported to be near death yesterday.

Would that I could have achieved the level of taste and restraint you all did.

I am overawed to be allowed to share pixel space with you here. You are models of dignity and composure.

(And Lea, I still say "yes" to your post.)
they harp on about his smoking....how pathetic

http://www.nowmagazine.co.uk/celebrity-news/312889/see-pics-patrick-swayze-looks-thin-as-he-smokes-on-shopping-trip/1/
Well said. I was shocked last night when I got a news update on my computer and Fox News had Ms. Richardson 'brain dead.' It doesn't matter whether it was true or not, their info must have come from a hospital worker, and it was, indeed, premature. I found it offensive, and I noted that no other news outlet was reporting anything other than she was in critical condition. Is it really necessary to get a big 'scoop' on such a matter. How tasteless can you get?
VR, are you serious? You weren't anchoring a news show. OS allows interactivity, and I assumed you were not only reacting in disbelief, but looking for anyone else who knew anything more. Did you get actual critical comments? If so, that's too bad.
A few more comments:

Sandra, wise comment. Yes, we are passive and fed what the media decides.

JR,the worst of all perhaps, was Terry Schiavo, the woman in a coma, used by pols to advance their agenda. Remember Bill Frist announcing her not brain dead from the video he watched.

Verbal, as great as we are, we're not national media -- yet. What happens in OS mostly stays in OS -- that is until we win the National Magazine Award and shall have to be more careful of our power. I don't think posts are the same as media which spreads rumors for money and increased circulation.

Bill E, yes drs and hospitals often leak info. I've known drs who have told me personal info about patients. And in my husband's case I know they leaked info.

Cindi, I agree.
I think there's an important distinction here that's been missed. Most mainstream, responsible media would never engage in this kind of behavior. The sensationalist ambulance-chasing, celebrity-ambushing trailer trash media do. Those of us who work for respectable media don't want to be lumped in with their ilk. It's like comparing "Jerry Springer" to "Frontline." Not fair.
I hope you're right Del, but not always true. Sometimes "columns" in these responsible papers do the dirty work, like the one in the Miami Herald in my case. I did mean tabloids and cable tv mostly.
Lea, I thought in your last comment "mean" was being used as an adjective. I did tabloids. What kind? Mean ones.

Made me do a double take. But then, I'm obtuse.
I think she was just well liked, and the story got so many readers it fed on itself. A lot of these sites do it blindly anyway. Featuring stories with the most views, so there may not even be a person deciding what to feature on Yahoo, software determines whats featured by page hits. I don't think anything was disrepectful of Natasha Richardson. It was just shocking news.
Oh Lea, I am so sorry that your family had that experience. I know the press treats public figures as fair game, but it seems to me that they don't seem to know how to construct respectful limits and its about time they did.
Hi, Lea,

Our media-happy culture is ravenous at times. I'm reminded of the Alan Parson's Project album called Vulture Culture.

You write, "Those wrongly reviled birds clean the environment and subsist on the remains."

That is certainly far more honorable than what the media vultures do, who rather than cleaning the environment, they trash it up.

RATED
Well Lea, the vultures are feasting now that Mrs. Richardson has passed away...It's very sad and I only watch the stories about her on "legit" (are there really any legitimate news services left?) out of respect for her and her family to remember her.

My heart fully goes out to Liam Neeson, their children and entire family and friends. It's another sad, sad story that was picked up and ran with by the likes of TMZ giving out false hopes and lies a plenty...
I love and agree with your post. One aspect that also bothers me is the way some media outlets, while engaged in this media vulture activity, pepper their items with expressions of sympathy. The hypocrisy of it is amazing.
Lea, this is so true. The media vultures are despicable and will go to any extreme for ratings. This is the reason I do not purchase the gossip rags. The tragedy with Jennifer Hudson's family is a good example as well as John Travolta's son.

I'm sorry your husband had to read about himself, how alarming that must have been. Thanks for bringing attention to this issue, very well written!
jimgalt, yes, it was shocking news and deserved reporting, but not a rush to calling her dead. The news could have been reported without all the messy conjecture of Larry King and the surgeons, for example, before anything was clear. As for Patrick Swayze's gruesome and mean death watch, and that headline I mentioned, it is inexcusable and designed solely to exploit his suffering.

Susanne, I don't see that happening as long as we're a celeb-worshipping country. Maybe this economy will shake us up.

Rick, I think we can learn from all creatures. Bird-brain is not a pejorative to me.

Blue, I can't bring myself to listen to the sorrow fest, again, a way to get ratings/bucks. I'm sure there are many sincere discussions and many insincere, prolonged discussions and articles that will go too far and too long. The excess is what irks me.

Bill W, hypocrisy is rampant!
Lea, another blatant vulture imposition on family grieving was John Travolta and Kelly Preston's loss of their son Jett. That was really sad too. There are so many cases.
Mark Twain said that the reports of his death were exagerrated. Then he died nearly a hundred years ago.
We haven't come very far.
Well-said. News is news but the death-watch" stuff is ambulance chasing, grisly, and cruel.
Just Pamela, the Travolta death was news, but not the conspiracy theories and discussion of Scientology and so forth. The excess of it.

alsoknownas, I debated referring to that quote. Thanks for adding it.

dcvdickens, ambulance chasing is exactly right. And then the chaser parks at the deceased's house for weeks, months, years.
What a great post, Lea. Vultures, indeed.
oh it is painful when something on tv or news or radio or just the tremble of a leaf reminds us of lost loved ones

tragic tragic
vultures not helping
Screamin, thanks.

Avatar, your description of how keen the pain is, that even a trembling leaf can invoke a memory is so true. But to have ghoulish stories go on for months can truly be painful to the families and takes us all down a bit.
It's almost as if the media wish them to die.
Must be subconscious thing, Peter. We're fascinated and happy we are ok.