No, Lee, tell us what you REALLY think...

OCTOBER 30, 2009 1:05PM

She's got Leggs.

Rate: 20 Flag

Dearest and most esteemed readers, 

In honor of all the slutty Nurse/ slutty cheerleader/ slutty Dorothy Gale/ slutty witch/ slutty zookeeper/ slutty teacher/ slutty nun/ slutty bride/ slutty slut costumes complete with visible garter belts and stocking tops we'll all be seeing tonight and tomorrow night, I give you this oldie but goodie from February 12, 2008, originally posted on my now-defunct MySpace blog.  Happy Halloween, everyone!

Leeandra

 In honor of the upcoming feast of St. Valentine, today I would like to discuss things that are supposed to be romantic and sexy, but are actually quite irritating in the real world. To wit:

1. Bathrooms lit by candles. This is neither romantic nor sexy. This is bullshit. I have had one of these for the past three days. My bathroom has no electricity or heat due to a short in the Depression-era wiring which melted the plug of the space heater. My landlord is "getting around" to fixing this.

Now, granted, I am not doing things according to the book (Cosmopolitian). This bathing beauty is shivering and showering instead of luxuriating in the (filthy) tub. Also, the candles are not classy white beeswax columns but have misspelled Spanish on them alongside pictures of either the pope or various saints getting cooked alive on spits/ tied to a post and shot with a thousand arrows/ flayed alive. Also, I have supplemented the ambiance of their flickering glow with a large Rayovac flashlight balanced on the toilet. Still, there is not enough light to adequately shave my legs by, so I have nicks and cuts and patches of black fuzz all over my shins. Which brings me to...

2. Garter belts and stockings. I normally wear support-weight hose because regular-weight hose tears too easily. The problem with supp hose is that they roll into a tight little rope around my waist. I have ranted about this before. I want supp-weight hose in a thigh-high style with a wide elastic band at the top so you didn't need garters (they make these in regular weight).

Lo and behold, a few weeks ago I found the Holy Grail (in Wal-Mart, of all places). I bought a pair for $5.96. The package promised exactly what I was asking for. The size I bought was to fit people between 5'6" and 5'10" and from 110 to 165 pounds. The photo on the package showed the stockings as coming all the way up to the woman's crotch.

Today I take them out of the package. Unstretched, they are the length of tube socks. I put them on. With major pulling and untwisting, they come up to mid-thigh.

Bob and I were going to go to Wal-Mart anyway before I had to go to work. We go downstairs and around the corner to the car. The left stocking works its way to kneesock level. We get in, I fix the stocking and decide to buy some hose at Wal-Mart.

We get to Wal-Mart. Halfway through the parking lot, the right one goes. I go back to the car and just take the damn things off. It was cold and windy in New Orleans today. So I'm wearing a winter coat, wool sweater and skirt, heels that give me blisters without stockings--and running around bare-hairy-sliced-up-legged.

I get to the hoisery section. It seems they are out of pretty much every color of pantyhose in my size EXCEPT navy blue. I do not own anything navy blue. It makes me look like I have TB. So I go to the old-lady-underwear section and look for something to hold my stockings up. I find one garter belt in my size, which comes with a free pair of back-seam stockings (which I've always thought looked cool and sexy in a 1940s kind of way).

Bob drops me off at work. I go into the bathroom to put my damn hose on. Now, despite the ease with which Elizabeth Taylor puts on her stockings in Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, I spend ten minutes trying to hook everything up. Finally, I figure out it's easier just to hook everything up and then pull it on like hose. That's when I discover that for some reason the back garters are shorter than the front garters, which, given basic physiology, should be the other way around. So I unhook things and put the belt on backwards. Now the garters are the right length, but it won't stay hooked around my waist for some reason. So I turn it inside out and backwards (for those of you who are masturbating along at home to this whole scene, I was also wearing a baggy-ass pair of cotton Hanes underwear that used to be white but now is a dull gray and has holes in the elastic).

I get everything all in place and go out to the front of the gallery. A customer walks in. I begin the sales pitch. Pop goes the right front garter. Customer doesn't notice anything, but after he leaves, I go to attend to this. While walking to the back of the store, pop goes the left back one.

Figuring that the elastic at the tops of the stockings is just too thick for the garter clips to handle, I switch to the stockings that came with the belt. These last all of ten minutes before the same problem develops. So, I fix everything up, hang a "Back in Five Minutes" sign on the door, and go down to Walgreens to hopefully buy some hose.

The same garter malfunctions happen on the way to Walgreens and while standing in the checkout line. (All Walgreens had in my size and a normal color was "control top" hose, which combines the runnability of regular-weight hose with the tight-little-rope-around-the-waist effect of supp hose. But I bought a pair.) On the way back, right in front of the Hotel Monteleone, the clip at the waist on the garter belt comes loose.

So I make it back to the shop with my stockings bagging at my ankles (though not, fortunately, visibly coming out from under my skirt) like a crazy bag lady's, and I go into the bathroom to change. I take it all off, put the "control top" hose on (which promptly runs AND rolls into a little rope at my waist), and stuff the back-seam stockings and garter belt into their box because I AM GETTING MY DAMN MONEY BACK.

That's when I notice on the back of the box it says "Real Sexy Fun for wear on 24/7." Aside from the dubious sexy fun of wearing the same pair of stockings night and day for a week straight, I have never understood the whole idea of dressing for sex. I mean, who really does that?

(A fella I know once wrote a "confessional" poem about a couple of sexual encounters in which he wore nothing but a silk smoking jacket a ala Hef. Now, I never for a minute thought this was anything but a personal jerk-off fantasy masquerading as autobiography, but really, how does that scenario work? Do you hang around starkers in your silk robe for your lady friend to come by? Do you wear it on the walk, drive, or (in this person's particular case) public bus ride over to her love nest? Do you wear street clothes till you're together, then strip naked, then dig around your dresser/backpack for your smoking jacket to put on, THEN get down to business? HOW IS THIS SUPPOSED TO WORK? Then I learned (much to my expectation) that said person did not actually own a silk robe, but (much to my surprise) was saving up Camel Cash to redeem for an official Camel cigarettes "silk-like" smoking jacket. Of course, chain-smoking and going through the trash at the bus stop in order to score free-by-mail-in-rebate polyester man lingerie IS pretty damn sexy, but only if you realize it isn't. Which this person never did. But I have digressed.)

Anyway, maybe I'm wrong here, but I thought the whole reason garter belts and stockings were sexy was that the woman wearing them could have sex with them on. Um, I'm no real expert on these sorts of things, but THIS PRODUCT WON'T STAY ON THROUGH WALKING. Come on, political prisoner in Chinese sweatshop, have some pride in your work! Make a better fetish item!

Anyway, you all now have spent entirely too much time thinking about me naked and/or in my underwear. Happy Valentine's Day!

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I know it's wrong, but my favorite part is your pep talk to the Chinese political prisoner. But yeah, having attempted thigh highs, and having given up on thigh highs, you have my sympathies. It took me years to find THE right pair of hose in the right color, only for Dillard's to quit selling it two months later.
Great post, and so true. I can just imagine the boiling frustration of the stockings thing. I always wondered why they weren't rigged with hooks, like the ones at the back of your bra... wouldn't that be more secure? Or, is it supposed to be easier for the fellas to dislodge them? I don't get it. And the ones with the stay-put silicone rubber lining are horrid... it's like, all the fun of control-top hose, with the added bonus of unskilled upper thigh waxing. Rated!
Personally I find the whole thing a silly modern fashion as senseless as the tie. In my Neanderthal world there's plenty of room for women that have hair on their legs and wear jeans.

If fashion makes who you are rather than expressing who you are there's something wrong. Or; if dress in costume then no one will take you serious.
Mrs. Michaels--I want the reverse of control-top hose. I want the support-weight legs and the regular weight panty. As far as I know, no one makes this, which is complete and total bullshit.

Raving Bits--I've always wondered that too. Those little slider-button thingies aren't very secure.

Wschanz--I work in art sales in the Deep South. I'm on commission. There is no room for hairy legs, and I live in jeans on on the weekends.
I've never been a fan of pantyhose but I recently bought a few of the trendy patterned ones to try--haven't opened them yet but my bet is when I remember what it feels like to wear them I won't waste any more money!
I think panyhose should come with suspenders.
Karin--I've been told that pantyhose are dreadfully out of style and that the bare-leg look is in, even with heavy wool winter skirts. I can only conclude that fashionistas in charge of said things have no major leg scars, are immune to blisters, and do not walk to work.

Jess--I think that back when boys wore short pants or knickers until they stopped growing so fast, both little boys and little girls in cold climates used to wear over-the-shoulder suspenders under their clothes which buttoned onto the tops of thigh-high wool stockings. You may be onto something...
I hear you. Been there, done that, got the full set and turned them into dusters.

Which probably explains why I cling onto going barefoot in sandals for as long as possible, then spend the winter in socks and boots.

If only men were supposedly sexy in such garments - sex would soon go out of fashion. Thanks for the laughs.
Why does hosiery have to be such a bother? Ugh.
As a man this was a very interesting read. My perception on this subject was exactly the same as your next to last paragraph.

After reading the whole post I think I will never view this subject in quite the same way.
Linda--I found a pair of non-shiny, non-running, non-binding, black tights at the giant Oxford St. Primark in London. I bought them because I was there for the tail end of the heat wave this summer and had packed accordingly, only to freeze my ass off two weeks later when the temperature dropped at night. They work great and they were something like three pounds. Of course, I did not have the foresight to buy ten pairs, and we don't have Primark over here yet.

tai--grrrrr....

OES--Admit you wear a garter belt.
Lee - not with these hairy legs.
...and people wonder why I live in jeans...

This was hilarious.
Look at the bright side, Leeandra. Not having electricity in your bathroom means you can't electrocute yourself by accident. Every cloud...etc.
Cat--Thanks.

John--I could burn the place down, though.
Uhhhhhhhhhh? Like reading hyroglyphics to me. But I think I understand ... and empathize. Let me see: Women don't like to wear sexy clothing or take baths in candlelight. Oh yeah, and finding a pair of pantyhose that fit right is next to impossible. Am I close? Just one question: Does anybody actually equate pantyhose with sexy? Lee: Good post, but I waiting for those slut/chics to show up, AND I am saving the *good* candy for them!
Rod--Pretty much.

(And trust me, there are all SORTS of people who have a thing for pantyhose. Rule #43 of the internet: if you can think of it, there is porn of it.)
Lee - well you have enough kindling for an outdoor fire anyway. The 'degression' split me up (!) and I'm with a couple of folks here who admitted they haven't worn visible leg coverings since 19xx. I was in NYC last week though and shorty skirts with something patterned on the legs was the rage...inspiring thoughts of getting creative with a marker. Your informative post has tuned me in and turned me off to other options. (been there, no WAY going back to 1969)
Wolford Stay-Hip Tights - everything else is ridiculous
Ok, let me catch my breath. This is so funny. I get the panty-hose waist thing, totally. My stomach hates being squeezed. But those support stockings--I could not wear them either. Anything that fits a 5'6", 110 lb person might do as a neck scarf for me.

Now I want to run out and get a garter belt. I have not had one since I was 12. Yes, that was the first and last garter belt. My 12-year-old catechism cohort were allowed to do our confirmation ceremony in stockings. We were all grown up or something. This was around the advent of Leggs, but we were still in stockings. Confirmation was a lingerie opportunity, because Catholicism is all about sex, even if I didn't know it at 12. Well, I sorta sensed it.

Here is what I know about hose, and I struggle to understand women's clothes so I pay attention. Hose is out. You get your legs airbrushed (I've seen women with perfect leg skin, there must be a procedure for it, probably costs a few grand) and dispense with the hose altogether. If you don't believe me, watch some courtroom dramas on TV. Squint closely at the women attorneys' legs. Designer suit, no hose. I'm about to go for that look myself, knee surgery scars and all.
Gabby--I want for those thick sock-weight cable-knit hose that were popular in the 1970s to come back. I wore those all through grade school (when they were out of fashion, they were hand-me-downs) and those could keep you warm through a Midwestern winter, and they never ran. Alas.

Marcelle--I will look into that brand.

Sirenita--Airbrushing doesn't do shit for blister prevention, which is my biggest motivation for hosiery. Those invisble hose-sock footsie things aren't invisible and don't stay in place, either.
This is just one of many reasons I'm glad I'm a dyke.
no such thing as too much time spent think of you naked...
Owl--Even if I were, I'd probably still have to wear hose to work.

Brian--Down, boy.
Leandra- I know what you mean by "thick sock-weight cable-knit hose" and haven't seen any around. At least in Canada, Wal-mart sells thick bamboo tights in ladies sizes, under the George brand, and they're similar. Limited colours, but they're super warm.