It had been a longtime dream; I had thought about it and wanted it since childhood. But then, with my dream in hand, my only response was a small nod and a sotto, "oh, alright." Akin to a tepid "how nice." My book was to be published by a well-regarded NY publishing house, and I couldn't even muster a facade of enthusiasm. I assumed I was numb; that it hadn't sunk in yet. So I went about my business and I waited for the thrill to fill me up.
It never did. The process had been long—a cryptic agent who condescended to take my once-a-month call, a fake chuckle to hide her irritation as she complained about having to hold clients' hands. It was on one of my monthly calls that she told me that I had sold a book. I wonder if she would have bothered to mention it if I hadn't phoned. I guess I'll never know.
The production process was—subliminal. I spoke with the book's ostensible editor for a grand total of about 5 minutes—in my entire life. A proof showed up with a picture of a flirty, naked black woman on the cover—when the only black female character died before the beginning of the book and she wasn't the flirty type. It was a nice cover, but it had little to do with the book beneath it.
The publicist sent the requisite press release to the usual suspects, who probably gave it the attention it deserved (They ignored it). Gamely, I stepped into the breach, purchasing some cheap online ads, hawking the book to reviewers, etc., all to middling success, but infinitely greater satisfaction than I got from any other stage of the process save the writing. Finally, I had some control, and I began to suspect that I was a sophomoric cliché of the passive writer-victim—passively awaiting my agent's actions; passively awaiting publisher response; passively awaiting for someone to design my book, passively awaiting critical and commercial reaction. Yes, I began to suspect... but I was still to programmed and scared to do anything about it.
As the next novel hit editors' desks (from a new, and altogether more suitable agent) and I passively awaited reaction, my agent received notes like these:
"It’s an impressively gripping story, and a fascinating story about a time and topic I knew little about."
"I can see what you mean about the strong pacing of Gaiter’s narrative, and the novel’s strong sense of place, which seems to stem from deep research into and thorough knowledge..."
"I thought this was a really well-written and fascinating story. I loved the historical details and enjoyed the book on a personal level."
Each of these statements preceded a "pass." One editor told my agent that "the market" was telling her that only frothy, "feel good" books have a chance at sales success today. This was an odd statement, considering that it presupposes that the publishing industry has a good idea of what "the market" wants. I quote author and business writer Michael Levin from Forbes Magazine:
...the books that publishers choose are almost entirely of zero interest to actual book-buyers. After 9/11, there were a ton of books about 9/11, which nobody bought. Same thing with the Iraq War, the rise of Obama, the economic meltdown... Or the books are rehashed business lessons, religious truths, sports clichés, motivational babble, exercise fads, weight loss techniques, or pandering to the political left or the right. Who wants these books? Almost no one.
Most of the major publishers today are owned by international conglomerates who, at some point, will awaken to the realization that English majors in their employ are spending millions of dollars on books that no one wants to read.
Levin further points out the antediluvian hilarity of the publishing "business model," in which "the publisher bears the entire risk of buying, editing, printing, and shipping copies of the book to bookstores all over the country on a 100% returnable basis. If your local Barnes & Noble doesn’t sell a particular book, it goes right back to the publisher, at the publisher’s shipping cost, for a full refund. Especially in the Internet era, you can’t make money putting books on trucks and hoping someone buys them."
After my first book was released, I was scheduled for a radio appearance. The day prior, I was informed that Amazon was out of my book. Publicity can generate sales. It's bad form to generate publicity for a product, and then inform prospective buyers at a primary outlet that the product is unavailable. When I screamed loudly about this to my agent and editor, the editor said, and I quote, "If they want the book badly enough, they'll wait for it or find it." My jaw dropped. Apple Computer can afford to be that lazy and arrogant. James Patterson can. Leonce Gaiter and Carroll & Graf Publishers could not. This man was so clueless to business realities, he expected people to seek out or wait for a product about which they knew little or nothing from someone they had never heard of. To him, the reader had to do all the work. Our job was to look pretty while we sat back and waited for them to do it.
I read reports from one of the large book conferences in which a major editor insisted that the "intrinsic value" of a book justified their exorbitant price tags. ($12.99 for an ebook? Fuck you! Even Amazon wanted to sell them for $9.99.) Again, the ignorance is blinding. In a market economy, no product qua product has "intrinsic value." Suggesting that it does stinks of the arrogance of decay drenched in decadence. See also this shamefully smug op-ed.
With respect to my own work, I had to realize that some NY Editors are sufficiently egotistical to believe that they are so advanced in their educations and outlook that a book they find "fascinating" could not possibly engage a more general audience (unless it includes vampires or comes with pictures, of course). That, and the fact that their marketing sense and infrastructures are as outmoded and inefficient as the rest of their business, so they only have the ability to sell books that run the gamut from A to C to audiences that are equally diverse.
Finally, I had to accept both the death of my romantic vision of publishing and the gross facts of the corporate publishing reality. With my agent's help and blessing, I found the tools and mustered the will to do things differently.
Ingram, the major book distributor, owns Lightning Source, which gives authors access to distribution channels similar to those the publishing houses get, and at reasonable prices; your book can be available for print-on-demand from any bookstore, online or off. That takes care of the physical books. Ebooks, of course, are also within any author's grasp; between Smashwords and Amazon's Kindle Direct Publishing, you can pretty much cover the territory. This time, I chose my own physical book's format, dimensions, and I laid out the text within the appropriate template myself. A wonderful designer I know provided the marvelous cover art. The novel is mine, soup to nuts. I feel an ownership and pride that never even teased me with my traditionally published book. From an economic standpoint, if the book sells as well as my largely-ignored traditionally published novel, I will make three times the money from it. Carroll & Graf put a $24 price tag on my first book. Consumers will be able to buy this one for less than $10.
How can you not recommend this option to authors? With today's tools, the idea of waiting for approval from the minions of a multinational sounds as lazy and self-defeating as a band that won't burn CDs until they get a major label record deal. Just as musicians have to know their way around a sound board, writers need facility with the layout and design software used to create books, the ins and outs of formatting for ebooks; they need design sense enough to guarantee that their book looks good inside and out.
We used to wait passively for the pearly gates to open and then gratefully pass our manuscripts through to hallowed ground. In music and in books, those days are gone forever. And good riddance.


Salon.com
Comments
I've had success with Kindle. My ebooks are selling faster than print versions, which isn't saying much. Like being the tallest building in Manhattan, Kansas.
r
Rated
I think it's a mistake to suggest that "marketing" is some ephemeral talent that only a select few possess. It's a skill set and no more and it's within anyone's reach. That's like saying that only writers good at research will be published and thus we'll miss out on all the great writers who suck at it. Research is no different from marketing. Just another skill set. Yes, writers will have to do more work--just like playwrights (most of whom do not write their plays, send them off and hope for the best; they participate in production), and musicians (who work the studio), etc. You say that "there's no reason to believe that the skill set that makes one a good marketer coincides with the skill set that makes one create truly excellent, high-quality books." But I'm sure you're not suggesting that one can have only one skill set? I'm sure you're not suggesting that marketing is so rarified an art that few can grasp it. I'm also sure that you're not suggesting that marketing is "beneath" a 'real writer.'
Thus, nolo problemo. Talk to your audience in every available medium. That's all marketing entails. Every writer should do it.
Very interesting and candid take. I got published by a big house, went with extensive editing to their specifications, and I think that it ruined the piece. Totally tanked in sales, too. But I'm still torn about trying to get into the machine, and trying to do it all myself.
I think part of the nostalgic delusion is that editors at large publishing houses possess some particular gift for, or insight into narrative and dramatics. I went to Ivy League school with some people who wound up in these jobs, and trust me, they did not possess special gifts in that area. They had their likes and dislikes just like the rest of us. Their exposure to and experience of writing and books was as limited as yours or mine. Suggesting that a paycheck from Random House suddenly confers special skills is ill-advised.
Rated.
"But if you go the eBook route, how will anyone ever know you published it, let alone whether it's any good? I'm also skeptical of "gatekeepers," but if a book gets published by a large publisher, on paper, that shows that at least somebody thought it was good (and edited it), and it will end up on a shelf somewhere where potential buyers can see it."
With everything at our disposal from Facebook to HTML email to blogads to forums like Open Salon and Huffington Post, writers have no excuse to do at least as poor a job at selling most books as trad publishers. As for the "gatekeeper" issue, I can't get through the first 50 pages of 50% of the books I start. I mean, really. There's heaps of rancid shit out there. Again, we have got to get past the idea that some recent Brown graduate is suddenly imbued with the spirit of Maxwell Perkins when they get a cube at Random House. Bookstores are dying. The idea of books "sitting on shelves" is akin to talking about typewriters in 1995. We will know what to read by the case the writer makes for having us read it. The site for my book is "buckrampage.com" and it's designed to give you a feel for the book--to help you decide if it's something that might interest you. I will soon add a sample chapter. These are the tools we will use draw readers. They have taken the shelves down and they're not going back up any time soon.