MAY 20, 2009 5:31PM

What Kind of a "Fucking" Church Are They Running?

Rate: 15 Flag

Last time I checked, Christ said "Suffer the Little Children to Come to Me," not Make the Little Children Suffer who Come to Me.  But that's exactly how the Irish Catholic Church, evidently the most benighted major church of the twentieth century, performed their sacred mission. The report is out, and even by the standards of the rapist friendlly Catholic church this is utterly stomach-turning. 

Dublin-- A fiercely debated, long-delayed investigation into Ireland's Roman Catholic-run institutions says priests and nuns terrorized thousands of boys and girls in workhouse-style schools for decades _ and government inspectors failed to stop the chronic beatings, rapes and humiliation.

Nine years in the making, Wednesday's 2,600-page report sides almost completely with the horrific reports of abuse from former students sent to more than 250 church-run, mostly residential institutions. But victims' leaders said it didn't go far enough _ particularly because none of their abusers were identified by name.

The report concluded that church officials always shielded their orders' pedophiles from arrest to protect their own reputations and, according to documents uncovered in the Vatican, knew that many pedophiles were serial attackers.

The investigators said overwhelming, consistent testimony from still-traumatized men and women, now in their 50s to 80s, had demonstrated beyond a doubt that the entire system treated children more like prison inmates and slaves than people with legal rights and human potential.

"A climate of fear, created by pervasive, excessive and arbitrary punishment, permeated most of the institutions and all those run for boys. Children lived with the daily terror of not knowing where the next beating was coming from," the final report of Ireland's Commission to Inquire Into Child Abuse concluded.

The leader of Ireland's 4 million Catholics, Cardinal Sean Brady, and religious orders at the center of the scandal offered immediate apologies.

"I am profoundly sorry and deeply ashamed that children suffered in such awful ways in these institutions. Children deserved better and especially from those caring for them in the name of Jesus Christ," Brady said.

The Sisters of Mercy, which ran several refuges for girls where the report documented chronic brutality, said in a statement its nuns "accept that many who spent their childhoods in our orphanages or industrial schools were hurt and damaged while in our care."

"There is a great sadness in all of our hearts at this time and our deepest desire is to continue the healing process for all involved," the Sisters of Mercy said.

And the Rev. Edmund Garvey, spokesman for the Christian Brothers order that once ran dozens of boys' schools, said that reading the report's "presentation of the history of our institutions, it is hard to avoid feeling shame."

More than 30,000 children deemed to be petty thieves, truants or from dysfunctional families _ a category that often included unmarried mothers _ were sent to Ireland's austere network of industrial schools, reformatories, orphanages and hostels from the 1930s until the last church-run facilities shut in the 1990s.

The report, unveiled by High Court Justice Sean Ryan, found that molestation and rape were "endemic" in boys' facilities, chiefly run by the Christian Brothers, and supervisors pursued policies that increased the danger. Girls supervised by orders of nuns, chiefly the Sisters of Mercy, suffered much less sexual abuse but frequent assaults and humiliation designed to make them feel worthless.

"In some schools a high level of ritualized beating was routine. ... Girls were struck with implements designed to maximize pain and were struck on all parts of the body," the report said. "Personal and family denigration was widespread."

Victims of the system have long demanded that the truth of their experiences be documented and made public.

But several victims _ who were prevented from attending Wednesday's report launch and scuffled with police outside a central Dublin hotel _ said the report didn't go far enough and rejected the church leaders' apologies as insincere.

"Victims will feel a small degree of comfort that they've been vindicated. But the findings do not go far enough," said John Kelly, a former inmate of a Dublin industial school who fled to London and today leads a pressure group called Irish Survivors of Child Abuse.

Kelly said the report should have examined how children like himself were taken away from parents without just cause, and demanded more answers from Irish governments that ceded control over their lives to the church. He said any apologies offered now were "hollow, shallow and have no substance or merit at all. We feel betrayed and cheated today."

The report proposed 21 ways the government could recognize past wrongs, including building a permanent memorial, providing counseling and education to victims and improving Ireland's current child protection services.

But its findings will not be used for criminal prosecutions _ in part because the Christian Brothers successfully sued the commission in 2004 to keep the identities of all of its members, dead or alive, unnamed in the report. No real names, whether of victims or perpetrators, appear in the final document.

Irish church leaders and religious orders all declined to comment Wednesday, citing the need to read the massive document first. The Vatican also declined to comment.

The Irish government already has funded a parallel compensation system that has paid 12,000 abuse victims an average of euro65,000 ($90,000). About 2,000 claims remain outstanding.

Victims receive the payouts only if they waive their rights to sue the state and the church. Hundreds have rejected that condition and taken their abusers and those church employers to court.

Wednesday's report said children had no safe way to tell authorities about the assaults they were suffering, particularly the sexual aggression from church officials and older inmates in boys' institutions.

"The management did not listen to or believe children when they complained of the activities of some of the men who had responsibility for their care," the commission found. "At best, the abusers were moved, but nothing was done about the harm done to the child. At worst, the child was blamed and seen as corrupted by the sexual activity, and was punished severely."

The commission dismissed as implausible a central defense of the religious orders _ that, in bygone days, people did not recognize the sexual abuse of a child as a criminal offense, but rather as a sin that required repentance.

In their testimony, religious orders typically cited this as the principal reason why sex-predator priests and brothers were sheltered within the system and moved to new posts where they could still maintain daily contact with children.

But the commission said its fact-finding _ which included unearthing decades-old church files, chiefly stored in the Vatican, on scores of unreported abuse cases from Ireland's industrial schools _ demonstrated that officials understood exactly what was at stake: their own reputations.

It cited numerous examples where school managers told police about child abusers who were not church officials _ but never did when one of their own had committed the crime.

"Contrary to the congregations' claims that the recidivist nature of sexual offending was not understood, it is clear from the documented cases that they were aware of the propensity for abusers to re-abuse," it said.

 

The sickest bastards in this whole sickening affair are actually the leaders of the Christian Brothers today , who sued the government so that none of their members should be brought to justice, and who arranged that recompense will only be made to those who renounce the right to sue. In light of this rapist friendly policy, how can their apologies be credited as anything other than insincere posturing and an attempt to deflect the entirely justified outrage of the public? It seems clear to me that the no-comment Vatican and their Irish agents care a good deal more for the criminals of the cloth than all those children to whom they pretend to abase themselves.

American politicians, George Bush himself, look pristine compared to these villains.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
"It seems clear to me that the no-comment Vatican and their Irish agents care a good deal more for the criminals of the cloth than all those children to whom they pretend to abase themselves. "

suffer the little children indeed. sad. maybe there's a reason my friend who grew up in Ireland won't step foot in a catholic church though he lives next door to one.
I never cease to be amazed at the kinds of treatment humans can perpetrate on other humans. Christians…Catholics…clergy and clerics are not exceptions.

They are no different from other humans who have debased fellow humans…not especially disgusting just because they profess a love of some god or another.

We all have to come to grips with the fact that we humans are just recently down from the trees.

We are savages.

If we last long enough…something not at all certain…we may grow out of our barbarism.
Wow, this is just fucked up. I'm glad many of the victims are rejecting the hush-money to bring their tormentors to court, and I'll be keeping an eye on this in the future to see if any of their suits are successful. But it's sickening that the Christian Brothers--who according to their press release want to reconcile and help the victims and are very sorry and yadda yadda yadda--would actively keep these monsters from prosecution or at least condemnation. What a bunch of hypocritical pricks.

Thank you for bringing this to OS, I had no idea this stuff was happening and, in a sad way, am trying to decide whether or not I'm glad I found out. Rated.
This is the saddest thing but it did not surprise me. I read a book years ago by Nuala O'Faolain about growing up in Ireland. The intimidation she writes of doesn't come close to what's described in the above-mentioned article, but the arrogance, corruption, and contempt the Catholic Church had for those in need came through loud and clear. These are the people telling us how to live. They're a disgrace.
My first knowledge of this travesty came from Joni Mitchell's song, "The Magdalene Laundries", then from Peter Mullan's movie "The Magdalene Sisters". Why is it nowadays that the only way to get the truth about past crimes is to have some guarantee of immunity for the perpetrators?
Inexcusable. Absolutely inexcusable. There aren't words to express my disgust over the compounding crime of putting reputation over justice. I don't know enough about Ireland's government: Is there a tighter connection b/t Church and State there? If so, this provides a major argument against such an arrangement.
Lainey,

There certainly was a tighter connection between church and state than elsewhere from the founding of the
Free State in 1922 until the 1980's (notice that the last of these houses closed in the 1990's. Roman Catholicism formed a central component of native Irish identity through much of period, the centuries long period, that Ireland labored under British colonial rule. The Church acquired enormous influence over the island, to say the least, and it carried into the independent state formation that arose in the wake of the Anglo-Irish war. While mainly a tribal impulse, the Northern Protestant insistence on remaining part of the UK rather than being absorbed into Republic of Ireland has oftenexpressed itself as a fear of Roman domination.
libertarius,

Thanks for this. I had not known of this report. Of course, this sort of thing has become fairly commonplace at this point. Sadly ...


Frank, heh, I’m not picking on you; it’s just that your particular comments struck me.

You make the comparison between us and animals saying:

“…we humans are just recently down from the trees. We are savages.”

It’s interesting to note that animals, those savages from which we are recently removed, do not treat their young this way. Hell, they don’t even threat other adults this way.

I think I would have to say that, given the special claim to morality that these Catholics claim, they are more disgusting for their behavior.

As for the likelihood that we will “…grow out of our barbarism”, I’m not so sure that we haven’t actually grown into our barbarism. And I’m not sure that religion is not a facet of that particular growth.

RATED
I read about this yesterday. Words fail.
Hi Libertarius, I just posted a personal response to the report this morning. May I recommend (?) to those interested in more info 'Song for a Raggy Boy', the movie of Patrick Galvin's memoir, and 'The God Squad' by Paddy Doyle, as well as Don Baker's memoir of his childhood in Artane 'A Winner in Me' and Colm O'Gorman's 'Beyond Belief'. I would like to write a Magdalen Laundries post, but it is difficult. As a psychotherapist I am confounded by the inadequacy of this commission, its report and its conclusions. That the abusers are not named is shameful. The report was originally to be prepared by Ms Justice Lefoy who resigned her position in protest at the limitations imposed upon her. Justice Ryan took over and one of the first amendments made was to agree that the names should be protected. I vacillate between despair and anger. My rating for your article is also an expression of respect for those who have suffered this abuse, and suffer still.
@psychomama,

Being a psychotherapist, and thus knowing the dynamics of trauma as you do. you must be especially maddened by the persistence of the secrecy and unaccountability in this case. May I also suggest two other texts, Childhood Interrupted, which is on the not so tender mercies of the Sisters of Mercy, and Suffer the Little Children, on the Industrial schools.