I went to see Red Tails yesterday, without having read any reviews of the
movie. I went because I saw George Lucas on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart explain how difficult it had been for him to get the picture made, saying “Hollywood isn’t interested in a film with an all-black cast.
My mailman, on the other hand, took his 13-year-old son to see it last weekend, when it opened. The youngster told his dad it was “the best movie he had ever seen.”
I am in favor of any movie that sets out to portray African-American heroes who aren’t totally fictitious and based on wishful thinking. The Tuskegee Airmen, the “experiment” in the U.S. Army to test the widespread belief that Negroes were innately inferior cowards who either couldn’t or wouldn’t stand up in the face of life-threatening combat, were and remain bona fide war heroes.
I was born six months after May 1944, the date stated at the start of the movie. My bio-father and all the other age-eligible men in my family were not there for my arrival because they were fighting in World War II. With my frame of reference so tied to the events covered in the movie, I was instantly along for the ride.
George Lucas is known for spectacle -- epic stories told with eye-boggling special effects. I might be wrong, but I don’t think he is the first movie producer who comes to mind when we think of pithy dialogue, historical detail or exemplary dramatic acting.
The story is becoming better known than it had been before HBO produced The Tuskegee Airmen made-for-television movie in 1995. A 1925 Army War College report concluded that African Americans might be effective soldiers, but maintained that "in the process of evolution, the American Negro has not progressed as far as the other subspecies of the human family." (Red Tails opens with a quote from this report.) “Colored” men, it held, were both physically and intellectually incapable of enduring the demands of combat, much less flight. And, they lacked bravery, the report claimed.
“Although African Americans had valiantly served in the Civil War, on the frontier in the Indian Wars, in the Spanish American War and in World War I, white politicians and military officers still publicly professed to doubt black ability and patriotism, as part of the ideology and propaganda that undergirded Jim Crow in all of its pernicious forms. The crucial change came in 1938, primarily because of the efforts of an African-American woman, Mary McLeod Bethune, who saw, before most other black leaders, a way to break the hold of racism on black participation in the military, by striking at the most resistant obstacle of all: the integration of the pilot program.” {The Root.com, 1/25/2012, Henry Louis Gates, Jr.}
The movie uses the quote from the War College report as the film’s jumping off point, apparently giving the audience generous credit for knowing their Black History.
I watched the movie as a clueless movie fan, without giving much thought to what critics might think. I was, at times, breathless with the excitement the cinematography provided. The video game quality of action we have come to expect from deftly-applied CGI is a major part of the film. One can easily see why a 13-year-old boy would find it captivating.
I left the theater very pleased. I had been entertained. I had seen at least passable acting, although I am starting to question what the very busy Terrence Howard brings to the table besides his undeniable fineness of face. I had fun, like I used to when I went to action movies with war themes.
There was, however, only one character who seemed to be bothered by the actual result of his unit’s heroics – the flight captain. It is fitting that he would have developed a drinking problem as a result of his concerns, but I had to conclude all that for myself, because the script never really makes the connection. The young pilots regarded their targets the same way our gaming children look at targets on their X-Boxes. There is no regard at all for the humans who are manning the ships they blew up or flying the enemy planes they shot down with glee. I told myself I was trying to be too evolved for the genre.
I came home and immediately searched out the critics’ opinions. Rotten Tomato.com was my first stop. I was stunned to see that most professional critics had panned the film. Fifty-five of the 85 critics who reviewed it, gave it negative reviews.

While not standing on their stadium seats cheering, the paying audience liked the film far more than they didn’t. And look at this:

The movies that received the highest ratings last weekend also took in the least amount of money. And Red Tails came in second!
My theory is the following:
- Movie critics take themselves way too seriously. Not every film has to be laden with historical context at the expense of entertainment. This film is more like a super hero flick, in the fashion of Dark Knight (Batman) and Iron Man. The difference is it attempts to stay true to the 1940s.
- The one-dimensional character charge is unfair, given the intent of the film. No, we don’t learn the backstory of each of the pilots. Neither do we learn the slings and arrows the officers played by Howard and Cuba Gooding, Jr. suffered to attain their ranks. Do we really need to?
- One of my stepfathers fought in the Japanese theater of WWII. He came home from the war with a “souvenir”-- the dagger he had used to slay a Japanese soldier in hand-to-hand combat, blood stains intact. He spoke a language that was pure military. It was as corny as hell. That’s the way they talked back then. But the average age of the critics who reviewed the film on Rotten Tomatoes is probably at least half of mine. What would they know about the veracity of the dialogue? Roger Ebert, on the other hand, critic extraordinaire and a man of a certain age, rated the film much more positively.
- Does every film that deals with race have to be somber and reverent, true to every aspect of what has gone before? Maybe, just maybe, we can teach a lot more white audience members more about black history if we don’t try to bludgeon them with deep historical dives. This story speaks for itself. Brave people lobbied for a chance; when given the chance, the pilots rose to the occasion; and the white pilots they protected and escorted to their destinations while fighting off enemy fire were damned happy to see them when they showed up.
What happened before and after this relatively isolated story of prejudice, valor and realization? Another movie; another time.


Salon.com
Comments
I wouldn't worry about what the \8%)#4 critics say. Back in the day, they mercilessly panned Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid ... which went on to be a box office smash that stands up even today.
So yes Lezlie its those damn kids that do not get it.
You did..
Thank you.
HUGGGGGGGGGGGGG
The problem is that critics are irrelevant now. Asians, Hispanics and Black people are backing our own films. Who isn't ignoring the growing crowd of so-called critics? They always manage to find something wrong with color. They are no longer deconstructionists, they are corporate shills.
I discovered the irrelevance of the critics when it was revealed that Tyler Perry is worth over $350 million from what used to be considered chitlin' circuit films.
Thanks for writing about this film. A good friend of our family was a Tuskeegee Airman. Another one moved to our community after I left home, and I met several of them in my Air Force travels.
Next, I want James Beckworth.
The problem I have with this film is same one I have with most WWII films. We want to live in a time warp where we can prop ourselves up against the conveniently evil Nazis so we won't have to deal with any nuances of war. Ask most people and they think we're still fighting Nazis today. In the end it becomes just another (well made) propaganda film.
One of things I read in the reviews is that there is little attention given to the training that these pilots were forced to endure at Tuskeegee. The earlier movie on HBO focused on that dimension. Perhaps it is just a well that the emphasis here is more on the exploits of these men in Europe during the war.
Another I'd like to see on the big screen? The Code Talkers. It's also an historical military story which a few authors have written about.
I am not surprized the caracters looked a little flat to contemporary film critics. These were men who were not about getting in touch with their innermost feelings and their inner child. They were men who worked and did things in the world.
I saw this young gentleman on my local news stations this week.
I can't wait to see it!
I thought it looked so exciting in those trailers...
Jan Sand: The pilots in the movie showed up to the airfield in Italy already trained and ready to fly, so I don’t think there was a character comparable to Archie. I’m so glad you did realize your dream to fly.
Boanerges1: I hear you. It’s just that the Hollywood recognition machine, which drives an awful lot of the “luck” for the actors, is most often based on critical acclaim, much less than box-office. My son is not in this film, but he is an actor. It’s a rough business for anyone.
Linda: I’d rather have a hip 60 year old woman who has lived an extraordinary life writing for me, than some clueless under-30. But that’s just me… :D
Chicken Maaan: Thanks, pal!
Zuma: A Beckwourth bio-pic would be fascinating.
Jeanette: Everybody’s a critic! LOL Even me.
Harry’s Ghost: You are so right. Between “Saving Private Ryan” and “Platoon” I was rudely awakened to real war nuance.
Walter: The training aspect could be the basis for a whole new movie.
Belinda: I’d like to see that done as well.
another steve s: These guys didn’t even know they had an inner child! They were definitely depicted as the highly intelligent KIDS that they were, though.
greenheron: Television is endlessly frustrating that way. Every time I get hooked on a brainy, well developed premise of a show, it gets canceled for lack of ratings. Infuriating. I don’t get HBO or Showtime, so I’m going to have to do a The Wire marathon this weekend. I watched the first episode of Boardwalk Empire last week because my nephew, a The Wire fanatic, is also a huge fan of BE. I hope you enjoy Red Tails.
Belinda: Thanks for the link! It proves my point, doesn’t it?
Maurene: I hope your husband won’t be disappointed. The characters are pretty appealing, each in his own way, flaws and all. Please let me know what he thinks after he’s screened it.
Mime: Which is one of the many reasons I love you!
JT: Take the kids with you. They will love it.
The critics - meh. They have their fads and fashions, they often judge with categories and pigeonholes. Ebert is among the best and one that will influence me so I'm glad he liked it more than most.
I won't go expecting it to be all-encompassing. No story can or needs to be all things to all people. Sometimes a movie has to select a part of the whole to focus on. Which leads me to the admission that I saw "The Help" tonight and liked it more than I expected to, was more moved and sympathetic than I thought I would be or wanted to be. It told a part of a whole story and did it well enough.
Two more actors from "The Wire" than have been mentioned in the comments are credited in Red Tails: Michael B. Jordan who brilliantly played Wallace, the first Wire character to rip my heart out and leave me on the edge of despair; and Tristan Wilds who played Michael Lee, a character I don't remember (which means I have to watch it all over again.)
Lezlie, I've watched The Wire all the way through twice and some of it a third time. The first time I had my son's full DVD set and watched it obsessively, with all the commentary, all the way through in about a month. The second time I only watched one or two episodes a week. It is without any doubt the very best thing that's ever been on TV and better than most movies I've seen besides being brilliantly effective social commentary - again, the story of a part, but closer to the whole than most. If you're going to marathon it this weekend, be prepared for intensity, especially if you start at the beginning - which I would recommend.
Thanks for the excellent review, sorry for the over long commenting again.
Thanks for the info. :D
Lezlie
__★____/)______./¯)))"/')
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯\)¯¯¯¯¯'\_)))„„\) ❤ℓϑɤɕ❤¸.•★
╔╦╦═╦═╦═╗╔═╦══╦═╗╔╗╔╦══╦╦╗
║╔╣║║╚╣═╣║═╣╔╗║═╣║╚╝║╔╗║║║
║║║║╠╗║═╣║╔╣╚╝║║║╚╗╔╣╚╝║║║
╚╝╚═╩═╩═╝╚╝╚══╩╩╝░╚╝╚══╩═╝♡
橱••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••橱
rated with love