Lisa Romero

Lisa Romero
Location
Salfordville, Pennsylvania, USA
Birthday
December 31
Bio
Welcome to the AMEROCENTRIC ECCENTRIC - challenging the way we look at things from our American perspective, while cherishing and celebrating our unique culture. I'm an average American, on-again-off-again journalist of 20 years and astute student of humanity with too many questions, never enough answers and an unwavering, if not at times pitiable faith that people (even the most twisted specimens) are inherently good.

Editor’s Pick
OCTOBER 1, 2009 1:03AM

You kicked the girl outta me - but not the feminist

Rate: 16 Flag

WHEN I WAS A LITTLE GIRL, you know, back in the early ‘70s (born in the far-out ‘60s), I wore dresses. And roughly cut-off, hand-me-down jeans as shorts. And pixie-cut hair – and no shirts.

I looked like a little boy. The way my sister and I ran around the sandy, piney, woodsy outdoors of southern Jersey, chock full of blueberry bushes and bramble, who was to say otherwise? On Sundays, I was a girl. Every other day of the week during summer, I was a tanned, scratched up little boy, and lovin’ life.

Dawn and meBut in my heart, I was a girly girl. And in the end, when you couldn’t hide my girliness (but could still hide the scratches), I grew up that way, as anyone who knows me can faithfully attest.

I played with Barbies (and G.I. Joe was welcome to tea parties, of course). I spoke the King’s English and read The Secret Garden and all the Nancy Drew mysteries, and I knew my ultimate role in life, because it was pretty clear-cut: Go to school. Perhaps attend college. Be a good girl. Plan on being a mom. Don’t talk back. Do as I was told. Find a husband who was like my dad (downfall, that). Maybe work someday, but that was not a given, nor was it exactly expected. Don’t play sports. Do crafts. Do sing or cheerlead. Do defer. Do look pretty. Don’t be unattractive (multiple meanings).

What the hell. How utterly ridiculous by today’s standards. Oh, wait - and by my grandmother’s standards, which were a million times more restrictive. If you're a man, you don't get it. If you're a woman over age 35... how can't you get it?


All I have to say is, I didn’t ask to be born now. And, despite all the "rights" I have, I certainly wasn't BORN FREE. I know my sister-friends agree. 

With all the roles we’ve been saddled with over the years, I’ve been anything BUT free to be me. I've had to carve out every last crevice of my life as if it were the first time a woman had ever done so. No joke.

Listen: I understand the roles have changed. No one has to tell me that.  The girls of today would laugh at the girls of yesterday, and today's women feel beyond "emancipated" now. But I disagree with their definition of freedom. In the past 120 years, women's roles have probably changed more than at any other singular time in human history. And in the past 25 years, the transformation is positively mind-boggling:

  • Girls in my high school who were winners (winners!) on the track team were considered gay. Imagine that today. No, really. IMAGINE THAT TODAY.
  • I wore power suits to my first jobs in journalism: shoulder pads, full skirt suits, dark colors, nylons, high heels. Every day.
  • Sexually explicit jokes were common and expected. (Good, cutting comebacks from women among the men were especially appreciated, and a sign you had “moxie.” Oh, and potential.)
  • As recently as five years ago, women were still learning, in workplace training classes I attended, how to “be more like men in business.” Ohhh, but let’s take that back another 8 more years…. It’s a long-standing issue – wrong to the nth degree, as almost everyone agrees now. Women add something to business – and don’t have to “ape” (sorry, it’s the best word that comes to mind, nothing personal) what men do to contribute value.
  • Women fought sexual stereotypes – so much so, that in the early ’90s, harassment laws were passed, discussed ad infinitum, ad nauseum. We wrote STORIES about the change, for God’s sake.

And now. And NOW. And now. What can I say?

  • I mentor women who wear pants that show their ass crack. And they think this is acceptable to wear to a JOB INTERVIEW. Or CHURCH. I wish I were kidding.
  • I regularly watch women debase themselves for the attraction and approval of society, associated with an “image” of what they are supposed to be: sexual. They don’t strive to look intelligent, diligent, focused, demure. They’re aiming for the gut, what I call the "3 Bs": boobs, butt, belly. The trifecta of imperfecta. Shoot. Me. Now.
  • I cringe when sorority images show dumb blondes navigating the most superficial of worlds…. But, being an older sorority woman, I cannot say strongly enough how wrong those images are about women who embrace the GREEK image of striving for excellence of the mind, spirit and body (health), an appreciation for all that makes us human: intelligent thought and discourse, the arts, the impact of science on people and the world around us, diverse cultures, etc.

In my current life, in this media-bastardized world, I’m grieving while watching so many women take a step back, oh, about 40 years where their personal reserves of power and, yes, sexuality, are concerned. I want to pull my hair out. Almost on an hourly, if not daily, basis.

Get me: I’m no prude. I’m a student and a child of the feminist movement – which started in the early 1900s. Which started well before that, but who’s counting, right?... Which culminated in the 1960s. My mother was a quintessential feminist – working full-time as a nurse in a male-dominated medical profession in the '70s and making a difference in the world, never asking for special consideration. She has known and forgotten more about medicine than (I venture to say) many or any of the young buck docs she hands instruments to in the O.R. today. And they know it. And I love it.

The other day, I had a 50-ish woman say to me, “I can’t figure out what to do…. I’ve retired. But I can’t find my passion. I don’t know what to be going forward. Can you help me?” My response: “Why are you beating yourself up about that when the roles have changed so much in the past 100 years, let alone during your lifetime? Compare yourself against the past millennium. Or, if not that, what I call the ‘normal woman’ theory…. Would a normal woman, considering the totality of change in the past century, feel as you do?” She answered, hesitantly, hopefully, “Yes!” Absolutely.

Bottom line: As a woman in the midst of the greatest female-role transition of all time, I am who I am, and not who you think I am. And a part of who I am must speak for women – and say this: Who we are is who we’ve been, and please don’t forget it. And please don’t abandon it. And please remember our most promising future. Not as sexual playthings. Not as professional adversaries or partners. Not as scintillating sports or intellectual characters. But as the nurturing, communicative, fully integrated, community-building and ultra-connected human beings we are - who help weave and preserve the beautiful fabric that keeps this screwed-up world together.

 If it feels schizo to be a woman, sister, it is. Join the club. Girl-boy, man-woman: Be yourself. In the end, no matter how much change, there's value in you being you. Never forget that. I sure as hell won't.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Excellent summary of our feminist history! The three "B's", so right! The mindless search for acceptance from horny dunderheads. At what price? I hope every OS woman reads this. Thank you.
Great post! I have been thinking about so many of these things lately and I love how you put my exact thoughts into written word.
I do believe our time in history has been nothing short of amazing and as an artist I ask myself often; "What is my job in terms of relating what I know as a woman-human. How do I pass it forward?" Will the ass-crack brigade even care?
Woman defined: "the nurturing, communicative, fully integrated, community-building and ultra-connected human beings who help weave and preserve the beautiful fabric that keeps this screwed-up world together.

Absolutely perfect definition, Lisa.

You and I are on the same page. I have been thinking about writing a novel exploring some of our transitions, but it is a daunting task. As you say, the roles have changed so much, how could I ever touch on the "all" of it?

Like your 50-ish woman, once again, I am looking to redefine/reinvent myself. I am not inclined to hang in to deal with the next wave of foreclosures in my real estate career until the banks are made to start working with homeowners. It wears me down.

I want to take a six month break and do something completely "community-building". Not sure just what that will be but I am working overtime to find the inspiration. Thank you for helping me toward that end by acknowledging our true nature as women. :)
Ed and I were just talking about the complications of raising a daughter in a society where the gender roles are consistently in shift. He heard a piece on the radio that talked about the challenges women face in raising their own daughters after realizing that their roles are so different than that of their own mothers. My mother raised me to be like my father. She was a housewife who loved it, but didn't want me to be the same. At the time, I remember appreciating it... but now I realize, if she raised me to be my father, how do I learn how to be a wife?
Very interesting piece, but I don't know as if I agree with much of what you say.

I can't help but feel some condescension, though. Now don’t get me wrong. I respect what you had to deal with and the progress your “generation” made, just as I honor and respect the strides forward that were made by feminist leaders like Sue Anthony. However, this doesn’t mean that I have to allow someone else to define me and/or look down upon the lifestyle I now enjoy. Women over the last several decades have worked very hard to give me this choice and, if I choose to exercise it as I see fit, my choices shouldn’t be condemned just because they don’t fit perfectly with YOUR choices.

For example, I am a homemaker. I am a homemaker because I CHOOSE to be. I love raising my kids and being here when they need me. This role certainly doesn’t fit with what most 60’s and 70’s feminists would have chose, but it doesn’t matter because it is what I chose. I was always pushed by these same feminists to not have a college major that would be considered frivolous (like being an English Lit major) because I would never make it in the business world. My answer to them, then (as it is to you, now) was “Meh. I have no interest in living your dreams. I have dreams of my own to live, which may or may not include yours.”

So bottom like, understand that, although I respect you and all that you’ve accomplished, it doesn’t give you the right to define me or to “poo-poo” the choices I make (including having my ass crack showing, instead of wearing a “power suit”) That’s your thing, not mine.


As for the "Girls in my high school who were winners (winners!) on the track team were considered gay. Imagine that today. No, really. IMAGINE THAT TODAY."

Honey, been there, AM that! Nothing has changed. If you excel at anything physical you get called a dyke. In my case they were right! ;)
Oh, Oh, Oh! It is all I can do to avoid picking up the phone and calling you right now. That's how much I adore this post.

I have felt this way for so long, that the girls of today are undoing all of the progress that we've made through their apparent need to "dumb down" and overemphasize their sexuality. I'm not saying that women shouldn't be sexual beings, but women need to realize that being overtly sexual, especially in corporate environments, detracts from the person you are inside and paints a very different image from how you may wish to portray yourself.

I also see so many stories of girls and women harmed and murdered by abusive men in their lives. The underlying thread is the same: none of them felt worthy of anything better.

If I could, I would become a public speaker and reach out to these girls while they're still in school with the same message you are saying: Be yourself, not someone else's ideal. I'm afraid that when they look outside of themselves for guidance, they're only finding a twisted, shallow media version. Is that what we want for ourselves these days?

Wonderful essay and message, Lisa.
You know, there's a lot of great stuff here. But I'm afraid that there's too many generalizations for me to agree with you fully.
I mother two teenage girls. One of them is pursuing bio as a major after an outstanding high school career, including being a varsity athlete, holding down a full-time job in the summer, and now wants to go to med schools so she can serve the underserved women and children in our communities. She's focused on human rights. She loves her girlfriends, loves her boyfriend, and is finding time to balance college, school, friends, and her "own" time.
My second is 12. Has been dancing since she was 3, wants to go to school to be an architect, but continue dancing, is whip-smart, and, once again, is aware of the world around her.
I mention this because both of them are surrounded by young women of the same ilk. Yeah. They wear their pants cut low, but that's the style. I wore tube tops and flared jeans--didn't make me a bimbo.
I think that wanting to be attractive is a part of the human condition. I don't think it negates everything else.
yes. I know that those of us born in the 1960s watched our mothers and looked at ourselves and asked a lot of hard questions. But I think the younger generations are also asking hard questions. Maybe not everywhere. Maybe not everyone. But I don't think it's time to write off this generation.
I flail angrily at the "dumbing-down" of our culture, but you know what? Socrates himself complained that the youth of his day were lazy and immoral.
And so it goes.
But this is a great essay in its appreciation of just how far we've come, and I want to give you props for that. Just please don't assume that those of us who are feminists, who have raised feminist daughters, don't have hope for the future. Because it's out there. And I've seen it.
Thought provoking essay and as Penrose states an excellent summary of feminist history as well as your own.
Fingerlakeswanderer stole my comment. I like a lot of what you've got to say here, Lisa.
Stella wrote: First and foremost thank you for still being a feminist.
Second, I do not think that in any way Lisa put down women for making their choices.

Sorry, but I think it is kind of condescending to say things like :

And now. And NOW. And now. What can I say?

•I mentor women who wear pants that show their ass crack. And they think this is acceptable to wear to a JOB INTERVIEW. Or CHURCH. I wish I were kidding.
•I regularly watch women debase themselves for the attraction and approval of society, associated with an “image” of what they are supposed to be: sexual. They don’t strive to look intelligent, diligent, focused, demure. They’re aiming for the gut, what I call the "3 Bs": boobs, butt, belly. The trifecta of imperfecta. Shoot. Me. Now.
•I cringe when sorority images show dumb blondes navigating the most superficial of worlds…. But, being an older sorority woman, I cannot say strongly enough how wrong those images are about women who embrace the GREEK image of striving for excellence of the mind, spirit and body (health), an appreciation for all that makes us human: intelligent thought and discourse, the arts, the impact of science on people and the world around us, diverse cultures, etc.

Just because I don't embrace HER idea of a GREEK image, that doesn't mean that mine isn't just as valid. FLW's daughters I CHOOSE to do my own thing and I'll be damned if I'm going to feel bad about it because somebody else doesn't like it.

P.S. and, yes, I HAVE fought a LOT of my own battles for equality... some even to be free of the ideas trying to be forced upon me by feminists who insisted that I do it THEIR way.
safe-bet
I count on you to make outstanding comments on my blog. I would never condescend to you, and my understanding of the core of feminism is this belief: women are entitled to the same human rights as men. And as for the choices we make: well, that's what feminism fought for, right? Choices? I think the choice you've made is amazing, and I am grateful to you--especially after yesterday's post, where you made it clear that you are helping other parents pursue their choices.
I want to assure anyone reading this observation about two things:

1) There are many ways to celebrate the life of women (call it feminism, call is whatever you like). My path has been professional, I am married to a male, and I wasn't able to have children. Many women I know, love, respect and admire are homemakers, have female life partners, work in communities or jobs or make their way in the world by carving out a life that is uniquely theirs. Our paths can be different and yet the same in many ways.

2) I would not presume to suggest my observations apply to everyone. They're just my observations about changes I've seen, and some things I'm dismayed about - primarily the hypersexual image some younger women appear to be embracing. It's not just about fashion styles. I submit there's something more there... something which is impacting the role of women in society in a less-than-positive way. And perhaps that's another column.

I value all comments here. Condescension truly isn't part of my being, so perhaps it helps to know that's a filter through which this article definitely is not meant to be read.
Lisa: Got'cha. Please excuse my bitchiness. *scurries away to put away her own filters :blush: *
It's so great to see "feminist" in a headline--thank you for this post.
Wonderful post, Lisa! I'm probably your mother's age; my children were born in the 60's and 70's. I've watched the transition to "sexualization" with dismay. Thank you for your validation.