Lisa Solod

Lisa Solod
Location
Savannah, Georgia, USA
Birthday
January 03
Bio
Writer, Mother, Mother, Writer Visit me at www.lisasolod.com

Lisa Solod's Links

New list
DECEMBER 20, 2009 8:17PM

Health Care Shouldn't Be A Cake Walk

Rate: 16 Flag

 

 

 

                Ever since I was a little girl living in rural East Tennessee, I remember seeing jars by the cash registers of drugstores, convenience stores and small supermarkets. The jars had hand-lettered signs, often accompanied by black and white photographs, asking for donations for a young boy’s cancer treatment, a father’s hospital bills from an accident, or some other dire medical emergency for which a family had no health care and no money.  Signs announcing cake walks for the same kinds of causes would litter the same store.  For those unfamiliar with the cake walk, it goes like this: people (women) bake cakes and donate them.  At the cakewalk, usually held in a church social hall or school gym, the cakes  are placed on large tables around a room. People pay a fee and then walk around the tables of cakes to music until it stops.  They then get the cake they stop in front of.  The game continues until all the cakes are claimed. If one wants extra chances, one pays another fee.  It’s kind of like musical chairs. With cakes. For people without insurance.  Those jars litter the counters of stores still.

                At the same time I was growing up, my cousin’s wife, a nurse, used to volunteer several days a week to head up into the Appalachian hill country to administer health services to people who had never seen a medical professional.  And just a couple of years ago, a friend who was studying for her RN had, as part of her degree requirements, to board a bus with other nurses, doctors and dentists and head to West Virginia to see hundreds of people who had never had  any kind of health care.  My friend was shocked:  she saw forty-year-old women with no teeth, men in the seventies who had never seen a doctor.  The group did mammograms, exams, children’s exams.  It was a grueling and eye-opening long weekend.

                Now that I am no longer on my ex-husband’s insurance policy my insurance is twice as much per month, has a large deductible (where I had none) and my medicines cost me sixty percent of their retail cost.  Additionally, the medication is doled out as the insurance company sees fit: I could not refill my migraine medication today because it was too soon in the month.  Apparently I am allowed only nine (or fewer if I need two pills) migraines a month:  If I happen to have more, then I am shit out of luck, as they say.

                               And a Republican senator on CSpan today actually said that ours was a “patient-centered” system.

                The bill that will finally get to the Senate for a vote this weekend is an incredible compromise.  Even at 2700 hundred pages, it’s a watered down version of the House bill, which is nothing to write home about.  And the chance that these two bills will have to be reconciled in order for them to pass at all is slim.  Mitch McConnell assured the American public that “we will not have a health care bill by Christmas, which is a good thing.”  Other Senators won’t vote in favor of the bill because they feel “rushed.”  As if they shouldn’t have been thinking about and considering health care for the past year since the election, knowing full well that the issue was at the top of President Obama’s to-do list.

                Obama’s’ leadership on this issue has been questioned by better and brighter than I.  I wonder most why the idea of a single payer system was not offered up at the first so that any compromises could have gotten us much farther than we are now.  I wonder that Obama did not spend some of his capital early in the game to assure a victory that would be a real victory, and not a panacea to the American public after months of ugly wrangling and a deep dip in the President’s popularity.  Even though he can’t pass health care alone, I fear that if the bill as it is passes now it will not be enough to convince the American public that something real has been done, that actual change has been effected.  Because it hasn’t.

                Even as the Republicans say over and over that Americans don’t want health care reform, the truth is that we do.  We do.  And anyone who thinks the current system can stand as it is without bankrupting more and more Americans is playing a fool’s game.  Painting the government as an evil entity who will take health care choices away from good, God-fearing Americans, is just the same as the Congresspeople sayin that they themselves are evil.  That may actually  be true: The majority of our Congress is corrupt, evil, self-absorbed and out of touch with the people they govern.  They are bought and paid for by big industry including Big Pharma, banks, and insurance companies.  One radio host has suggested that our Congress wear their sponsors on their suits as racecar drivers do.  That makes a lot of sense to me.  Then we could see who is in thrall to whom.

                Meanwhile, no matter what happens with the new health care bill, which is hardly reform, there will still be people who cannot afford health insurance. I simply do not understand how forcing people to buy health care and claiming that their costs will be lower (when they most likely did not have care in the first place) makes any sense. Additionally, it seems to be that the cost of the subsidies to the poor in order to help them purchase health care will be more costly in the long run than a single payer system or a Medicare buy-in or a government option. We all know that at this point, no reigns will be placed on either the costs of drugs or the costs of premiums. Subsidies will have to rise as the insurance companies continue to strangle the people and as Big Pharma raises its prices as it wishes.

                I wish I could be content with the small measures that the Senate and House have finally taken to reform health care. But if it has taken forty years to get this far, if Obama’s falling popularity causes him to lose in 2012, if Republicans win back the House and Senate in 2010, even the small inroads that have been made will be rescinded. And more and more of us will have to resort to asking our neighbors for help, in the guise of a social event.

 

 

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
It's a difficult question. I've listened to Howard Dean, who wants to abandon the bill and start over, and to Paul Krugman, who believes we should pass the bill, despite its limitations. Both men make valid points. I decided to side with Krugman after reading this: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/18/opinion/18krugman.html
I respect Krugman but I despair that this will be it for two years and then we will go back to nothing. It's so weak and watered down that I am afraid by the time it actually gets going (2013?) the middle class will no longer really exist.
Atul Gawande's New Yorker piece is an excellent view of how health care "reform" could occur within a framework that now seems politically feasible.

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/12/14/091214fa_fact_gawande

My take on his article is that he splits "reform" into two pieces. Expanding coverage to include virtually all Americans is one element. The second is cost.

They both need to be done and I am not sure that the order matters as much as the will to simply began. Once coverage is expanded, the current equilibrium - which I see as relatively unstable -- will be subject to new and unpredictable pressures. The end result is unknowable -- except if something "can't happen" it won't happen. In other words, there are constraints that will force change -- even if they aren't explicitly legislated.

However, the idea that we can't afford a system like, for example, the Swiss, is simply absurd. Me and Al Franken have at least one thing in common.
From your mouth to God's ears, as my grandmother used to say. Nick, I hear you, I do. But I am with Al. We need a truly humane health care system.
I, too, have been torn about the bill as it is now written. I feel as if we are giving in to hostage-takers, as Krugman put it. On the other hand, if more people actually get insurance, and get coverage, that would be a good thing.
I cannot stand the fact that we live in a country where you die because you can't afford healthcare. It's barbaric; it's uncivilized; and it's so reflective of the thought that somehow, those who don't have insurance have surely brought this upon themselves. The same way we demonize the poor.
WTF is wrong with us as a nation?
Lisa, I'm sorry you couldn't get your migraine pills today. I went through the same problem with my insurance company, and my doctor had to write letters on my behalf until they caved.
This afternoon, for the second time in two weeks, I was in the urgent care (actually, last week it was the ER) because I was in so much pain I had gone beyond my limits.
I have insurance. I would be bankrupt from my cluster headaches if I didn't have it. Even still, I have to fight for certain things, and my insurance company will not pay for procedures that my doctor wants to do.
Some person with no medical expertise is interfering in my doctor-patient relationship.
But, what I want to believe is going to happen is ultimately what Krugman argues. We start here, and next year, we make it better. And it gets better and better. I cannot stand the idea that we leave people uninsured.
I have to stop typing now. I am getting more and more mad as I write.
I am so sorry for your pain.
Very well said. It is so depressing and sad and unnecessary. We all get kicked in the teeth by this "system". We will never be a great country without some more aggressive reform. The House Bill would have been a great step forward. The Senate is the entire problem. The media have falsely presented that Dems control everything which is a lie and the cause for frustration. I hate Lieberman and Ben Nelson and the other Blue Dogs who are not now or were ever true Democrats. It is not Obama's fault that people with D behind their names act like Republicans. What a mess.
Lisa,
And we hope. I hope they pass something because, if they fail this time, it will be decades before they touch on it again.
Money owns too much of our 'representatives'.
agree totally. well written. rated.
The Senate just voted. And I am awake.....
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/21/opinion/21krugman.html?_r=1&src=twt&twt=NytimesKrugman

It's interesting re the paralysis of the Senate.
Lisa--you illustrate masterfully how bad the current situation is. Believe me, I understand. I have to go to a doctor tomorrow and am terrified he will find something wrong. And health care is not for people who have something wrong.

So the question I have to ask myself is NOT whether or not the bill is good or right or will hurt me next year. The question is whether it's better than what exists right now. And from what I've seen it is. Like others, I gotta go with Krugman.

Starting over, like both John Boner and Howard Dean want to do; is what's been going on since 1915 and nothing has happened since then. It's just gotten worse. And the results are your migraine medicine (or lack of) and my terror.

If there is any good that has come out of this (and I wouldn't argue that there is---I said IF) It's that we now know down the dollar just how big and how powerful the anti-human health crowd is.

If pre-existing conditions and prohibitions against dropping people who get sick are gone---even if it is a giant pig trough for "Big Pharma, Insurance etc" I will have more than I had before.
Chicago Guy, you make a powerful argument. I am not one of those you wishes to start over, believer me. I am just so damned disappointed in how little we seem to get done.
Lisa---"I am just so damned disappointed in how little we seem to get done."

Me too.
good if long piece in HuffPo today about Obama's lack of leadership, which I, sadly, agree with:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/drew-westen/leadership-obama-style-an_b_398813.html
Please mark me down as attended.
I'm too disgusted to leave a comment Lisa.
Here is Krugman's logic for giving into a bill which he says, "is like giving into blackmail - because it is":

"At its core, the bill would do two things. First, it would prohibit discrimination by insurance companies on the basis of medical condition or history: Americans could no longer be denied health insurance because of a pre-existing condition, or have their insurance canceled when they get sick. Second, the bill would provide substantial financial aid to those who don’t get insurance through their employers, as well as tax breaks for small employers that do provide insurance."

No, it wouldn't. This is the INSURANCE INDUSTRY people. They are beholden to their shareholders, not the sick and will continue in unethical business practices which engage this way. Dean pointed out the triple cost to older Americans. Wait until you see what they are doing with the new parody law, for example, coming into effect in 2010 which is "supposed" to treat mental health like any other type of doctor visit rather than limiting the # of visits. Their solution? Go after the providers, who are barely making a margin with all the insurance rigamarole, and tell them at 20 visits they must fill out substantial paperwork waiting on pre-approval for continued visits and if denied, any out of pocket costs falls to the provider/patient to figure out - typical claims negotiations. Number two, the tax breaks and coverage come from somewhere, their bill is from the very plans which are for the middle class (rather than taxes on the upper 1% of Americans which hold 96% of America's wealth) and this new group of members will be left to deal with the same unethical practices which have not been reigned in. Krugman is wrong. This is not incremental change - this is counterproductive. I strongly disagree.

Also, for someone who is a Nobel Laureate, I wonder where he finds the basis for making the claim, "But it [social security] was improved over time, and it’s now the bedrock of retirement stability for the vast majority of Americans." Bedrock? Really? Am I asleep or has social security not been considered the third rail of politics for the last two decades?

The idea that someone is right because they have "credentials" is the very thing which gets us into these messes - hiding behind the coat tails of our officials is going to erode our freedoms and create an America we will not be able to recognize in short order.

Great post - Rated.
I know we seem to have to take baby steps. But I just don't feel good about this.....unless those baby steps turn big pretty damn soon.
Although I haven't researched it I've heard several of the talking heads say that this is how Medicare got started and then was amended over the years. Many mistakes were made by the Dems and Obama. Thinking that the GOP would be interested in any support was a huge tactical error. They bargained away the farm and got nothing in return.

Obama had a behind closed doors deal with big Pharma and gave away single payer without so much as a blink of an eye. Those that footed the bill to get him elected (big insurance), called their markers in immediately and he gave them the farm while trying to make it look like he really wanted reform. I don't see any other way of reading it. The banks will end up with the same sort of "reform".

Still, I feel we have to start somewhere. Even a turd can make good fertilizer. We will just have to hold our collective noses or shut the system down until we get what we want.