Lisa Solod

Lisa Solod
Location
Savannah, Georgia, USA
Birthday
January 03
Bio
Writer, Mother, Mother, Writer Visit me at www.lisasolod.com

Lisa Solod's Links

New list
FEBRUARY 11, 2010 11:52AM

Why is Health Care Such a Cakewalk???

Rate: 6 Flag

 

 

 For King and Cary, with love, a re-post

 

                Ever since I was a little girl living in rural East Tennessee, I remember seeing jars by the cash registers of drugstores, convenience stores and small supermarkets. The jars had hand-lettered signs, often accompanied by black and white photographs, asking for donations for a young boy’s cancer treatment, a father’s hospital bills from an accident, or some other dire medical emergency for which a family had no health care and no money.  Signs announcing cake walks for the same kinds of causes would litter the same store.  For those unfamiliar with the cake walk, it goes like this: people (women) bake cakes and donate them.  At the cakewalk, usually held in a church social hall or school gym, the cakes  are placed on large tables around a room. People pay a fee and then walk around the tables of cakes to music until it stops.  They then get the cake they stop in front of.  The game continues until all the cakes are claimed. If one wants extra chances, one pays another fee.  It’s kind of like musical chairs. With cakes. For people without insurance.  Those jars litter the counters of stores still.

                At the same time I was growing up, my cousin’s wife, a nurse, used to volunteer several days a week to head up into the Appalachian hill country to administer health services to people who had never seen a medical professional.  And just a couple of years ago, a friend who was studying for her RN had, as part of her degree requirements, to board a bus with other nurses, doctors and dentists and head to West Virginia to see hundreds of people who had never had  any kind of health care.  My friend was shocked:  she saw forty-year-old women with no teeth, men in the seventies who had never seen a doctor.  The group did mammograms, exams, children’s exams.  It was a grueling and eye-opening long weekend.

                Now that I am no longer on my ex-husband’s insurance policy my insurance is twice as much per month, has a large deductible (where I had none) and my medicines cost me sixty percent of their retail cost.  Additionally, the medication is doled out as the insurance company sees fit: I could not refill my migraine medication today because it was too soon in the month.  Apparently I am allowed only nine (or fewer if I need two pills) migraines a month:  If I happen to have more, then I am shit out of luck, as they say.

                               And a Republican senator on CSpan today actually said that ours was a “patient-centered” system.

                The bill that will finally get to the Senate for a vote this weekend is an incredible compromise.  Even at 2700 hundred pages, it’s a watered down version of the House bill, which is nothing to write home about.  And the chance that these two bills will have to be reconciled in order for them to pass at all is slim.  Mitch McConnell assured the American public that “we will not have a health care bill by Christmas, which is a good thing.”  Other Senators won’t vote in favor of the bill because they feel “rushed.”  As if they shouldn’t have been thinking about and considering health care for the past year since the election, knowing full well that the issue was at the top of President Obama’s to-do list.

                Obama’s’ leadership on this issue has been questioned by better and brighter than I.  I wonder most why the idea of a single payer system was not offered up at the first so that any compromises could have gotten us much farther than we are now.  I wonder that Obama did not spend some of his capital early in the game to assure a victory that would be a real victory, and not a panacea to the American public after months of ugly wrangling and a deep dip in the President’s popularity.  Even though he can’t pass health care alone, I fear that if the bill as it is passes now it will not be enough to convince the American public that something real has been done, that actual change has been effected.  Because it hasn’t.

                Even as the Republicans say over and over that Americans don’t want health care reform, the truth is that we do.  We do.  And anyone who thinks the current system can stand as it is without bankrupting more and more Americans is playing a fool’s game.  Painting the government as an evil entity who will take health care choices away from good, God-fearing Americans, is just the same as the Congresspeople sayin that they themselves are evil.  That may actually  be true: The majority of our Congress is corrupt, evil, self-absorbed and out of touch with the people they govern.  They are bought and paid for by big industry including Big Pharma, banks, and insurance companies.  One radio host has suggested that our Congress wear their sponsors on their suits as racecar drivers do.  That makes a lot of sense to me.  Then we could see who is in thrall to whom.

                Meanwhile, no matter what happens with the new health care bill, which is hardly reform, there will still be people who cannot afford health insurance. I simply do not understand how forcing people to buy health care and claiming that their costs will be lower (when they most likely did not have care in the first place) makes any sense. Additionally, it seems to be that the cost of the subsidies to the poor in order to help them purchase health care will be more costly in the long run than a single payer system or a Medicare buy-in or a government option. We all know that at this point, no reigns will be placed on either the costs of drugs or the costs of premiums. Subsidies will have to rise as the insurance companies continue to strangle the people and as Big Pharma raises its prices as it wishes.

                I wish I could be content with the small measures that the Senate and House have finally taken to reform health care. But if it has taken forty years to get this far, if Obama’s falling popularity causes him to lose in 2012, if Republicans win back the House and Senate in 2010, even the small inroads that have been made will be rescinded. And more and more of us will have to resort to asking our neighbors for help, in the guise of a social event.

 

 

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
More timely than ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ridiculous for not a just First World country, an industrialized nation, but self-appointed Greatest Nation in the World. Why not the Canadian system, eh? Single payer (government), free choice, universal, no bankruptcies, nobody not covered. Oh, but that's SOCIALISM. What's the matter with you people? - riot in the streets, dammit.
"Additionally, the medication is doled out as the insurance company sees fit: I could not refill my migraine medication today because it was too soon in the month. Apparently I am allowed only nine (or fewer if I need two pills) migraines a month: If I happen to have more, then I am shit out of luck, as they say."

When my husbands neurologist refused to give him xanax for anxiety [he has M.S.] we both thought about buying it black market in Chinatown. Maybe we'll all end up going blackmarket.
If people thought the real estate bubble bursting was a nightmare wait until the health "care" bubble explodes.
No one wants to say or admit this, but the reason why it has taken 40 years for anything to be done on health care, and the reason why this health care bill will fail and the reason why president Obama, despite his lofty rhetoric about being the last president to tackle health care, wont be the last president to tackle health care is simple.

None of these moves or measures or policies has ever done anything in any way, shape, or form related to health care.

I hate to tell you this, but the Republican senator who said this is a patient centered system is correct. We do have a patient centered system.

The problem is that "patient" is defined by people who are already sick and who are being treated, and thus, those people already HAVE insurance.

But if you don't have insurance, you can't be a patient, so you're SOL.

The problem is, no one is even coming close to tackling the underlying problems in health care.

People getting sick in the first place.

The only thing we are doing is trying to make it cheaper and easier for *some* people to get treated once they get sick. Of course, the treatments and procedures we have are nothing more than temporary band-aid symptom suppression treatments, so is it any wonder that there are cases where a kid at 15 sprains his ankle, develops arthritis at 40, goes on medication that causes kidney and liver damage over the course of 2 decades, and that kidney and liver damage causes heart damage, which causes the once healthy kid who sprained his ankle at 15 to die of a heart attack at 60.

The truth, the honest truth, that no one can handle (as Jack Nicholson would say) is that the climate and energy bills will have a far greater impact on health care in this country than any revision of insurance, because those bills will remove the reasons people get sick in the first place.

And that isnt even going anywhere near the issues of BigPharma and the FDA....

Ugh...

Sorry, didn't mean to hijack your blog, but people don't realize that this so-called "health care reform" has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with health care

And people should have known that when the bill came out of the finance committee, not a health and welfare committee.

But, hey, what do I know, I've only been dealing with the medical system for going on 40 years as a disabled man who is now effectively terminally ill...

And I HAVE insurance
"On your own"?

Really? Does anyone really do anything on their own? And, what if you are a disabled man, who CAN work, say at a low impact secretarial job, but the companies you interview with look at your disability and see the expense they are going to have to pay out for medical insurance, and deny you a job because you are a "medical liability"

When society gives the less advantaged, such as the congenitally disabled, the chance TO do things on their own, then you have an argument. But, so long as a company's bottom line, in the form of insurance pay outs, means more than humanity, government has the responsibility to fill in the gaps where societal bigotry fails
The only costs that would be prohibitive in hiring a disabled person are in terms of profit margins, so long as a company cares more about its profits than it does about the people who work for the company, the company is bound to fail. I am not, nor have I ever lobbied for any kind of affirmative action quota. I am asking for a fair and honest evaluation of abilities, based on performance, not on appearance and assumed levels of performance. And the only way to assess my performance is to hire me, then if I do not live up to the job's expectations, sure, fire me. But to not even consider hiring me because I *MIGHT* not live up to the company's expectations is discriminatory.

And, sorry, but that IS bigotry, however you cut it
Trunky... not much appreciating having my post hijacked by a man who wants us all to pull ourselves up by our own bootstraps even if we not only don't have boots but don't have legs..... This is a repost in light of the very real condition of King and Cary: two men who have health insurance but were hit in the face by catastrophes not of their own making and who, in this land of plenty, cannot pay their bills. There but for the grace of God go the rest of us.
Lisa:

I can understand the frustration of people like your quasi thread hijackers.

Your image is so powerful -- the rural store -- the people with a jar and a sign and maybe a picture if it is child. Sad but understandable if we were in the 1950's and this was a part of the country that had barely made it into the 20th century.

But.

But this is 2010!!!!
Salon.Com is the the future.

And the future right now looks more like Eastern Tennessee in 1955 than New York/San Francisco in 2010.

This is so wrong on so many levels.

Thank you for reposting.
I'm glad you re-posted this, since I didn't see it the first time.

I don't know where people like "trunky", with his disgusting avatar, come from. I guess they've never seen anyone they care about have to suffer without access to health care.
Dare I mention medical marijuana for migraines and you can buy when you need it (if you are registered) without fear of denial? Just something to think about.
They keep us out of public office by making it a pay to play prospect. Most people cannot afford to run without the money of others who might have powerful influences then. All the people in there have great health insurance because we pay for them to have it. How about a bizillion man/woman march on Washington this spring and a speech on the mall about what is not fair about the current healthcare system. Don't get me started..................
Trunky, you mention Canadians coming to the US for heart surgery. I've got another perspective on that: can you explain to me why, when I was a student working as a medical typist in an Australian radiology clinic, we saw many Americans on holiday coming in for CT scans and ultrasounds? They told us that even having to pay the full local price was a fraction of what they paid in the US. Or how about the Americans now who travel to countries like India and Thailand to get medical procedures done?

Also, this argument about people not having kids until they can afford them. Could I point out that children are a social good? I'm childless but am more than happy to pay taxes so other people's children can have good educations and health care, because I know those children will grow up to be the doctors, nurses, plumbers and other people who will make my future liveable.
Thanks for the information, Scott!