littleboxofspoons

littleboxofspoons
Location
California,
Bio
I muck about with filmmaking, writing and general artistic impulses as often as possible. I chose my photo because it reminds me of a quote from 'Labyrinth': "It's so stimulating being your hat!"

MY RECENT POSTS

Littleboxofspoons's Links

Salon.com
JANUARY 22, 2010 2:25PM

This Blog Will Self-Destruct in 24 hours

Rate: 8 Flag

Lest you mistake my meaning, this is not a rant, merely an observation.

Every time I write a new post (so, not terribly often) I am a little bit sad because I know that in all probability this means no one will ever read any of the previous posts on my blog ever again.  What, never? Well...hardly ever.

Admittedly, I participate in the behavior that has made it so.  I will read many posts from many dates in time, but I will only comment on a "current" blog, by which I mean, one that was written today or yesterday and other people are still commenting on.  This is simply because I feel silly commenting on older blogs as I know that it is likely no one will read the comments.  I guess I just feel like the purpose of commenting is twofold: to express your appreciation or lack thereof to the author, and to be a part of an active  conversation that includes others.  I presume these are the reasons other people tend to have the same habit, but maybe there's more to it.

So essentially, if no one happens to notice a post within 24 hours, it might as well not exist.  This happens with my posts a lot.  When it does happen, and a post sits unread, uncommented and unrated for several days, I generally delete that post so as to forget it happened. It could be because they were crap posts to begin with, or it could be because I'm not good at coming up with cool titles, or it could be just because.  

I have noticed that sometimes the "cover" will resurrect old favorites, and I wonder, is this because there are no worthy new posts, or what?

I notice that for the most part, these conversations only last 24 hours or so.  I don't think there's anything wrong with that, I just think it's sad sometimes that some of our good writing is so short-lived.

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I know what you mean. But I'm new here, so maybe I do it wrong; if I like somebody's work, I'll go back and read his/her earlier posts. It's a pretty remarkable place. Maybe your latest entry will encourage others to do the same.
Shelf life around here tends to be less than 24 hours, with very few exceptions. There are some people who are exceptional at going back and finding older posts and commenting on them. Steve Blevins comes to mind.
Ah ha! Now this is a good title. Well, maybe not good so much as eye-catching.
Yes. It's tough to get your fifteen minutes, let alone twenty-four hours.
Yes, it makes me sad too sometimes and I fantasize about just reposting until the damned (good) thing gets read!
Yes... it is a get it while it's hot little place we inhabit here.
@Randy: There's no wrong way to read or comment! :) I think there is just habit.

@WSFTC: Yeah, I know I don't write often. I keep meaning to, but school tends to get in the way. Still, I'm glad you do read my stuff. I make a point of reading yours too. :)
you've got it about right, and it's harder not to miss the good stuff in that one-day time frame when there's so much flying onto the feed. still, i try. and i don't usually miss yours, so keep writing, spoons.