Lonnie Lazar

Lonnie Lazar
Location
Here, And, Now
Birthday
August 08
Bio
Everything changes.

Editor’s Pick
OCTOBER 23, 2009 3:59PM

McCain Looks to Block Net Neutrality, Appease Telecom Donors

Rate: 25 Flag

AZ Republican John McCain

In response to a Federal Communications Commission Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published Thursday, John McCain introduced his own Internet Freedom Act of 2009 in the United States Senate, revealing the administrative style the U.S. would likely have faced had he won the 2008 presidential election over Barack Obama.

The FCC's proposed rules, which seek to codify guidelines that have been in place since 2005, would require Internet Service Providers to allow their customers open, non-discriminatory access to the applications, devices and services of their choice, and would also require ISP's to be open and transparent about their reasonable acts to manage network congestion. First announced last month by FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, the rules are intended, in Genachowski's words, "to provide a fair framework in which all participants in the Internet ecosystem can operate, ultimately minimizing the need for government involvement.”

McCain, the long-time Arizona Republican whose electoral efforts and pet Political Action Committees are generously funded by the very corporations whose rapacious behavior the FCC was created to monitor, called the proposed "net neutrality" rules a "government takeover" of the Internet that would stifle innovation and further depress an "already anemic" job market in the U.S.

The senator appears to be aligned with Glenn Beck and other right-wing malcontents, who see any government effort to ensure fairness or a level playing field among participants in the social economy as a Marxist takeover.  His bill would strip the FCC of its authority to regulate the nation's communications assets, and leave operation of the Internet in the hands of telecommunications carriers and cable companies, which have already shown a propensity to favor certain (read: lucrative) content over others and to secretly throttle content, applications and services which threaten their profits.

The public comment period for the FCC's proposed rules will remain open until spring 2010 and it is unlikely McCain's Orwellian take on the meaning of "Internet Freedom" will garner enough votes in the senate to pass before then.

What's clear is that, despite the reasonable criticism sparked by President Obama's measured approach to undoing the damage caused by the Bush administration, we are lucky reality-based citizens made it to the polls in sufficient nummbers last November to keep McCain and his daffy ticket mate out of the White House.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Very fine reporting here Lonnie. This kind of post could do very well on a site that tries to look at politics in shades of black, white and gray instead of the usual red and blue. Excellent choice by the editors for recognizing the value of your contribution.
McCain is scary...thanks for the heads up. Makes me wonder what kind of crap he may have up his sleeve for AZ...

Congrats on the EP!
" and it is unlikely McCain's Orwellian take on the meaning of "Internet Freedom" will garner enough votes in the senate to pass before then. "

Unlikely enough that we won't see a bullshit circus thrown by comcast and att? Because I'm worn out from the all the other BS.
Thanks for an optimistic article.
Freedom, indeed. Like Bush's "Blue Skies" rules would have cut down on pollution. I think most of the media gave McCain a pass last time around. He is and has always been bought and paid for.
There will be bullshit circuses because, well, that's just what they do. The cable & satellite companies and telecom providers (both wired and wireless) will put up a huge, well-funded stink over this and their doublespeak, fear-inducing propaganda will be given prominent play in all media. People have to learn to read things like the FCC's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (pdf) for themselves and must lean on their representatives in congress to do the right thing. This is an easy one, because Genachowski is a good steward and what the FCC is proposing will -- despite their protestations to the contrary -- benefit ISPs (and consumers) over the long haul.

There's tougher nuts to crack, such as healthcare, energy policy, the environment and banking&finance; if this one ends up going the wrong way somehow, it will be a sign of imminent doom.
I wonder how many Vicki Isemans it too for McCain to come to that decision.
good on you, Lonnie, for paying attention and spreading the word around, this kind of story is too easily overlooked
McCain lecturing the left on the Internet- that is what the right tried to foist on us, and why they lost in a landslide. This is a pure, unadulterated joke- from a guy who can't even log on to yahoo by himself ... repubtards have the harddddesssssttt time with technology ... bwahahahaha. should have studied fractal geometry like us instead of rails and kegs, oh well now its too late. bummer.
Amen to that last sentence!
Congratulations on the EP! I just heard of this on The Rachel Maddow Show. It was a slam dunk: the man has no computer savvy, wants to hand over a chunk of the internet, and is the top recipient of dollah from the industry.

Do these people have no shame or no minds?
How dare you suggest that John "War Hero" McCain could possibly be influenced by campaign contributions. Why every knows he sponsored McCain-Feingold. John-Boy is as pure as the driven slush -- fund.
Oh, and let us not forget that McCain's financial "adviser" was Phil Fucking Gramm, and he might have been Treasury Secretary -- makes me appreciate Geithner -- but only in comparison. Imagine where Gramm would have taken us -- I can't because I don't know what's beyond the poor house.
Very interesting, Lonnie. I was not aware of this. You've inspired me to examine this issue a bit more. Thank you.
This is definitely an issue to keep an eye on. The web is definitely one of the last bastions of real democracy left and is an absolute necessity in keeping a semblance of real dialogue going. I Do think it is partially responsible for the Dem's victories in the last election. What I find distressing is the Right's twisted notion of what constitutes fair play in the marketplace. Like their insistence that campaign finance reform is akin to prohibiting freedom of speech, this is just another example of corporate interests purposely being mistaken for democratic ideals. It's the old bait and switch. But you can't blame McCain as he only recently became acquainted with The Google.
We can have all the equal opportunity we want so long as we don't start expecting (or God forbid getting) equal results.
Great post, more Reaganomics up his sleeve...Capitalism toppling up and over...

Thanks for this, great EP. Rated!
So glad he isn't President! Excellent post Lonnie.
To think that I ever thought of McCain as a decent republican.
We live in a rural area where shopping and services are limited. Thanks to satellite we're able to get relatively decent (though spendy) Internet access. Rather than drive 40 miles to the nearest town of any size, we do most of our shopping online (clothes, books, tools, garden supplies, gifts that can then be shipped directly to the recipient). If we want a daily newspaper we must either receive it a day late by mail or access it on the Internet. We choose the latter. John McCain wants to take away some of those choices.

If I understand his proposed legislation, our ISP couldn't total block us from shopping at, say, LL Bean, but they could make the experience too tedious to bother (unless, I assume, L.L. Bean paid a legal bribe to my ISP?)

As noted, our satellite internet service is by no means cheap and, until a second provider began soliciting in our area, service was awful. Under McCain's plan I see prices going nowhere but up. "L.L. Bean? It's a premium site," they might say. "To access premium sites you have to buy the more expensive premium package.'

We readily accept the fact that our country living comes at a price and we don't expect others to subsidize our choice. On the other hand, I find it hard to understand why Sen. McCain thinks it's okay to line his already rich friends' pockets by letting them dig deeper into ours.
This is a continuation of the Net Neutrality battle that began when Colin Powells kid was running the FCC...the big ISPs, (especially the "Darth Vader" of the net, Comcast), already had political whores like McCain in their back pockets, seeking to turn the Internet into "Pay-Per-View" , and squeezing every penny out of their available bandwidth. Fortunately, these vultures got caught, and one or two of the FCC commissioners at the time stood up to Powell and his puppetmasters, thereby temporarily squelching these ISPs Internet "Land Grab"... This is going to be an on-going, ever more ruthless fight between corporate greed an the publics' right to equal access to the 'Net. Stay on top of this: it's going to get ugly.
Does McCain even know what the internet is? Doubt it.
What part of the "fox guarding the hen house does McCain not understand? It ain't rocket science there, John, it's Common Sense not to let your money suppliers control access to the internet. But that won't stop you from putting forth a bill designed by them with your picture all over it.

So ask yourself, what would Sarah P. do? Then do the opposite.
Great work Lonnie. Emphasize that Lenin would have voted for McCain, and that Stalin would be envious of the level of state control. We have spent years to remove central state monitoring options abroad to find the USA excel. Commenting central monitoring of individuals raises claims of "leftist liberalism", and I wondered who alerted them of the discussion.

Now the USA has a unique telecommunication technology, to allow the country to export this to all other countries in the world. It is as unique as that which was found in collapse of the communism in Albania. Good luck old chum, when eagles fall it is usually not gracefully.