Sex after death: The new "Body Worlds" exhibit shocks Berlin

WOODY ALLEN ONCE QUIPPED to Newsweek in 1975, “The difference between sex and death is that with death you can do it alone and no one is going to make fun of you.” Back then he might have been right, but today neither sex nor death can guarantee you privacy.
Gunther von Hagens has seen to that. Once again, the famous – and infamous – German anatomist with the pale face and the black fedora has practically written his own headlines with a new “Body Worlds” exhibition in Berlin featuring two “plastinated” male and female corpses engaged in sexual intercourse. Ever since von Hagens’s first display of preserved human bodies opened in Mannheim in 1997, protests have been part of the show. It has been banned in Paris and Poland, and has attracted lawsuits virtually everywhere it has gone. In fact, von Hagens’s fame is due just as much to the attacks launched against him by religious authorities and human rights groups as to the eery fascination of his transparent cadavers in lifelike positions. So far some thirty million visitors have viewed his work in over fifty cities worldwide. But just who is this "Dr. Death" and what drives him to bring dead people back to "life"?
The son of an SS soldier, Gunther von Hagens was born as Gunther Liebchen in the waning days of the Third Reich in the town of Alt-Skalden in a region of modern-day Poland formerly called the Reichsland Warthegau. As the Soviet Army advanced on Gunther’s home town, his mother snatched up her five-day-old baby and fled with him to eastern Germany, where he grew up and attended school. As a medical student in Jena, the future plastinator fell out with the communist regime and protested the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968. After two escape attempts to the West, von Hagens spent two years in an East German prison before being bought out by the Federal Republic. He continued his medical studies in the West (where he adopted the aristocratic surname von Hagens from his first wife) and pioneered the process of plastination. This is a method whereby human body parts, and even entire corpses, are preserved by replacing the water and fat found in human tissue with plastics. These substances include silicone, epoxy and polyester-copolymer. After hardening, the prepared bodies are not only preserved from deterioration but can also be positioned in lifelike poses. By peeling away the skin and several layers of body tissue, plastination allows viewers to penetrate deep into the secrets of human life – and death.

Von Hagens’s original intention was to prepare exhibits for anatomy teaching, but he soon had bigger plans. Hence the birth of the “Body Worlds” exhibits, which have toured the world since the late 1990s. Here dead people are shown engaging in a variety of everyday activities, such as dancing and playing soccer. Hagens’s hitherto most celebrated display was of two plastinated men mounted upon a rearing plastinated horse. His work first gained a truly global audience in a sequence of the 2006 movie “Casino Royale,” where James Bond kills a man near a display of plastinated poker players.

Everyone who has ever seen a “Body Worlds” exhibition always ends up asking the same two questions: Where do the bodies come from? And: Did their donors really volunteer to be displayed this way? Von Hagens swears that each of the many hundreds of corpses he has plastinated over the past thirty plus years was properly donated with the owner’s consent. This has not satisfied his critics, however. At the very first exhibition in Mannheim, visitors identified tattoos on some of the corpses as being identical to those found in Russian prisons, suggesting that they may have been sold on the black market and smuggled into Germany illegally. Later on, the authorities in Kyrgyzstan in Central Asia accused von Hagens and his staff of clandestinely removing cadavers from local hospitals and plastinating them for his exhibitions. More recently, the German weekly news magazine Der Spiegel has tried to demonstrate that many of Hagens’s latest bodies actually belonged to executed Chinese convicts, who likely had no say in the disposal of their remains. So far, von Hagens has successfully warded off such accusations, using a court order to stop Der Spiegel from making these claims. And in the case of the copulating couple, he assures his detractors that the man and woman involved (who never met during their lifetimes) expressly stated their desire to be immortalized in what many might regard as a compromising position.

When you read about the “Body Worlds” exhibitions, they sound like a giant chamber of horrors. Not so when you actually take the plunge and visit one. The declared intention is strictly educational, the atmosphere sombre but focussed. “People are only scared when they hear about it,” von Hagens says, “but not when they see it. When you understand death, you will live a healthier life and worship your life.” This is a sentiment that von Hagens, a hemophiliac who has known about death since he first stepped on this planet, probably understands better than most of his critics.

While the exhibition’s educational impact is beyond dispute, the issues of taste and human dignity refuse to go away. Looked at from this point of view, the "lovers" are no more repugnant than any of the other poses on display. After all, in Germany the very notion of showcasing human remains in any form is not only ethically questionable, it is also downright unconstitutional. After experiencing twelve years of a Nazi regime that systematically murdered and humiliated millions, the framers of West Germany’s Basic Law enshrined the following words in Article 1: “Human dignity shall be inviolable. To respect and protect it shall be the duty of all state authority.” This emphasis on human dignity goes so far as to prevent people from keeping the ashes of their loved ones in an urn in their own homes, let alone scattering them to the wind. Dead people belong under the earth in a cemetery and nowhere else – certainly not on display having sex. As one outraged Berliner recently wrote in a letter to the Tagesspiegel newspaper: “There was a time when the mere thought of Nazi monsters making lampshades out of human skin sent a cold chill down the spines of (almost) every post-war German. Today, hundreds of people are lining up to gawk at this display of human scraps.”
And in what form does Gunther von Hagens plan to shuffle off this mortal coil? His will calls for his body to be plastinated in a series of slices, which will be sent as educational material to medical schools around the world so that he can continue “teaching” long after his demise. But this somewhat eccentric version of heaven can wait, for he and his staff of experts have a new challenge ahead of them: their next project calls for plastinating an entire elephant….
The “Body Worlds” exhibition is on display at the Postbahnhof in Berlin from May 7 to August 30, 2009.


Salon.com
Comments
We had ED GEIN!!
At christmas time, he used to give out cookies~~lady fingers.
I'm also curious about your own post. The times I've been, the experience is strictly controlled with regard to photography. The guides and attendants were quite aggressive with people trying to take photos--of course the entrance literature and signs were explicit in the prohibitions--but that didn't stop people from trying. So, where did these images in the post come from? Just curious, and thanks.
I think the issue of whether the people consented is huge. But if they donate their bodies for this, or any other scientific purpose, I don't see a problem...if the poses are tasteful (they were in the exhibit I saw). The exhibits are truly educational and also I think inspirational or even spiritual if that's your bent. They really show the marvel that is the human body and get you to think about what is inside you that you take for granted. It's incredibly to contemplate the complexity of human systems.
If we want to get into what's disrespectful of human life, there's a very long list that I'd rank ahead of these exhibits, starting with most violent movies that show people being brutalized and killed.
Obviously, the key issue is that of consent, which still has not been resolved to anyone's satisfaction.
--> bbd: "Body World" allows for no private photography, so these are the official publicity shots.
--> neil fiertel: yes, by displaying plastinated cancerous lungs and other diseased body parts that we could protect better through a healthier lifestyle, von Hagens is arguably performing a valuable public service.
--> Dustbowldiva: "placing the bodies in sexual positions disturbs me - what purpose is really being served by it?" Well, it's certainly gotten us all talking!
Also, although sex is certainly a natural function, and nothing to be ashamed of, I'm not sure that I would want my dead body posed in the act of copulation with a stranger's body for eternity, even if I did donate my body. (If there is a consent agreement, I think an individual should have the the ability to "opt out" of an exhibit of that nature.) If I hadn't given explicit consent to that, I think it would be a violation of my body.
The LA exhibit also featured an ostrich and a giraffe, which were amazing.
At least in my state, there are different levels of consent on the driver's license form -- e.g., there's one for organ donation only, which would help people who need transplants, but exclude use of your body for something like this, or for medical school or other research use. You might not like what is done with your body under those auspices, either, if this bothers you.
Again, for me, the issue is consent. If people gave general consent for use of their bodies after death, there's no issue here. I've known many people who truly don't care what happens to their bodies after death - they feel at that point, it's just dead meat. And/or they'd be thrilled to have their bodies become something like this - which they'd feel was educational, a work of art, or spiritually moving.
People's feelings about dead human bodies vary widely. To assume it's objective truth that it's sacrilege to do anything with them is evidence of one's own cultural/religious beliefs, nothing more. To make sweeping judgments based on those beliefs is to inflict harm on living human beings in defense of dead ones. (When we judge someone's actions as evil or wrong, we often tend to punish them.)
Also, again, there is more than one entity that does shows like this. The one I saw was not called Body Worlds and none of the bodies were posed in provocative or disrespectful ways such as having sex. Almost all were simply standing.
I’ve never seen this exhibit or heard of Von Hagans. Thanks for enlightening me. While I can appreciate the art behind the science, I side with the readers who question whether proper consent was obtained in using these cadavers. Additionally, I fail to see any incremental artistic value in posing dead bodies in a coital position.
this attitude however, totally freaks out my husband. i can tell that he would feel very hurt if i passed and there was no grave or otherwise "sacred" space for him to come and commune with my body.
that's why i had to comment on silkstone's comments. there is no way for me to either ok or disapprove of these exhibits without more knowledge about the origins of the bodies. this doesn't have anything to do with making sweeping judgments about what is ok or not ok for human bodies, it is all about empathy for what was once a person, with a family. if these people did not consent to be displayed like this, then there's little difference between this and the soap made out of holocaust victims. i think the comparison to horror movies is misplaced: horror movies depict actors who were compensated and consenting (and most importantly, often still alive to star in other movies). this is more like watching a snuff film with the assumption that the subject was intending suicide.
until i know how these bodies were obtained, i can not see these exhibits. and i say this as a person who enjoyed the heck out of a school field trip to a chiropractor's school where we got to dissect a human corpse. this is not a visceral reaction, it's an empathic one.
Rated
And I don't believe that the allegations about the corpses being victims of torture has ever been proven. Until then, I will withhold judgment. The same certainly cannot be said for those incarcerated at Guantanamo.
The shock is largely reserved for the churches, human rights groups, and newspaper readers. I agree that it would take a lot more than this to shock the Berlin art world!
From what I could tell, each body was well documented, with personal explanations from each body "owner". Of course, I'm sure some could have been forged. The attendants were also very vigilant about visitors taking pictures and being respectful.
But it never occured to me to be offended by this. Sure, "grossed out" might apply, in the same way you might be grossed out by videos of live medical procedures or autopsies.
My overall impression was one of amazement, wonder and curiosity. It struck me as very "DaVinci-like". It didn't occur to think of it as art - the whole experience was a scientific one. The corpses give viewers the opportunity to see the human body in a way that the general population has never had access to before - an up-close, personal view of a body that's very like one's own. Even seeing images or video of this does not come close to replicating the experience of attending the exhibit.
The fact that there are some people offended amazes me. Let's take it for granted that every one of these bodies, when inhabited by a soul, gave its consent to be used thusly.
This is SCIENCE! It's EDUCATION! It's perfectly valid (although I don't feel this way myself) to wish that your body not be used in such a way after death, but let's be honest here - once you're dead, you pretty much don't have the power of consent any more! Those around you who are trusted with the care of your corpse may be (and hopefully are) respectful of your wishes, but COME ON! This man, from what i could tell from the exhibit, meant this as an educational exhibition. If there are those out there who see this as art or blasphemy, they are entitled to their opinions. But we should not let old systems or doctrines dictate the uses of new technology without reevaluating those systems/doctrines first.
Phew. I don't think i've felt that serious about something all week!
I urge all of you, if you haven't seen this exhibit, to go see it before you pass judgment.
And I second the comments about your take on this, Alan. Thanks for the information and update!!