Is nothing sacred? The sad demise of Norway's "sex priest"

The now ex-Lutheran pastor Einar Gelius
presenting his new book in Oslo last month
(Source: side2.no)
I NEVER THOUGHT I’D live to see the day, but in a recent interview the Pope finally conceded that condoms just might be permissible under certain conditions – in this case, when used by a male prostitute to prevent disease (gee, I wonder how he came up with that example?). The Pontiff’s comments have aroused the media like few other reports from the Vatican in recent years, exciting the WHO and other usual suspects and giving traditionalists a severe case of the dry heaves. (It can’t be doing prophylactic stocks any harm.) But regardless of the controversy his possibly premature comments have caused, one thing is certain: no matter what Benedict says about sex or anything else, his job is secure. The same cannot be said of a Norwegian cleric, however, who published a kiss-and-tell book on sex in the Bible last month, only to encounter a Norwegian religious establishment that is, as Queen Victoria used to say, “not amused.”
Fifty-one year-old Einar Gelius is a Lutheran pastor at a parish near Oslo who has a reputation for unorthodox interpretations of the “good news.” He thrives on controversy, and has gained a reputation as a “soccer priest” for his frequent use of sports imagery in his sermons and for once holding a mock funeral for his favorite soccer club. In 2003, he gave the hidebound Lutheran church some not entirely welcome publicity by performing a wedding ceremony for a couple in a telephone booth. Four years ago, he scandalized many in the Norwegian church by appearing in the TV program “Shall We Dance?” waltzing around a church dressed in his minister’s cassock. This sort of stunt can be forgiven, but Gelius clearly went one pew too far when he dared to question the church’s deepest and darkest taboo. Are you ready for it? Sex. “Christendom, as propagated by the church,” he says, “has been more hostile to sex than any other religion,” leading directly to widespread rape, abuse, and general unhappiness. In his new book, Sex i Bibelen (“sex in the Bible”), Gelius went through the entire Bible in search of salacious material - and discovered a bookful.

Gelius's memorable telephone booth wedding of 2003
(Source: Dagens nyheter)
At a press conference in October, Gelius told the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet that the Bible, and particularly the Old Testament, “reeks of horniness, lust and pleasure, and is an endlessly rich tale of sex that can stimulate people’s own sex lives.” He also raised the possibility that Jesus enjoyed sexual relations with Mary Magdalene, but that - unlike Dan Brown - the Bible provides no definite proof that they actually got it on. Moreover, Gelius’s volume urges the faithful to watch all the porn they like and provides intimate details of his own sexual experiences with women. “I am a sexual person,” the good pastor told journalists. “Both with and without my clerical collar. I feel it powerfully.” When challenged on the wisdom of describing his own sex life in a religious work, he pointed out that eighty percent of the book is made up of his own retellings of actual racy Bible stories. So that’s all right then.
The response from the church authorities was tepid at first. When he heard about Sex i Bibelen, conservative bishop Ole Christian Kvarme of Oslo, who generated headlines three years ago after firing a pastor for living in a gay relationship, called it “a book we could have done without,” saying that he would read it before passing judgement, but had no desire to sully his mind with such fare.
Is there anything to complain about in the book? Gelius maintains there is not. “Many people have an image of the church as being moralistic and judgmental,” he said in October. “I wanted us to focus on what is positive. To highlight the good texts in the Bible that deal with joyful and wonderful sexuality.” He added: “Sexuality is part of creation. That’s why the first thing God said [to humanity] was, ‘Go out and have sex.’” To his critics, Gelius said: “Read the book first, then we can talk.”

No sense of humor? Oslo's hard-line
Lutheran bishop, Ole Christian Kvarme
(Source: nrk.no)
Gelius will have plenty of talking to do on November 29. That’s the date for a special church hearing called by Bishop Kvarme, who has finally read the book and determined last week that sex “is not the central theme of the scriptures.” Until the committee meets, Gelius is suspended and will likely be spending this Christmas combing the want ads. So whether you’re talking about Rome, Oslo, or Washington, DC: after two millennia, basic human nature remains organized Christianity’s biggest and least attractive hangup.
But not all Norwegians are as gloomy as Bishop Kvarme. The Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation quotes one contributor to its online forum as saying, “If all pastors had been like Gelius, I would still be going to church. And I would even leave something on the collection plate.”
UPDATE: Following a meeting with Bishop Kvarme on November 23, Pastor Gelius formally resigned from his position with the Norwegian Lutheran Church.


Salon.com
Comments
2010 New Year's gifts, birthday gifts, Valentine's gifts, parents gifts, friends gifts, alumni gifts travel equipment, sports equipment, warm clothingAre you ready?I'm ready, I buy a lot of gifts on this site。
there are
jordan air max oakland raiders $30
First, if we weren't supposed to want to have sex, women would come into 'heat' once a year for a few days and then men would be in a frenzy ramming their heads into one another around us. Meanwhile the woman would stand around and then probably start to kick and bite the male. Once a year bloody battle with a few males dead, that's breeding for procreation.
Proverbs is easiest for me, Solomon was brilliant and direct. He says be hot for your wife always, using different words. He also says don't chase someone else's wife or they'll kick your tail, don't be promiscuous or get drunk all the time. This all makes sense! The church doesn't want people to fall too deeply in love, they might be loyal to God and their family first, then where would the church be? Alone with no money and no sex.
Will bring you different surprise.
Dear friends, do you want to have some different things? Whether you want to give your relatives and friends,
take a few different exotic gifts? Whether you want to buy some cheap benefits of thing? So please, let us
begin now!
a pleasant surprise . Reputation , quality, absolute guarantee .
The same style, not the same, the quality with the price . please log in: " fashionsb "com .
so what, move your mouse Our services: "customer is God."
with catholics, you know why they joined the clergy: where else can a man wear a skirt, have nothing to do with women, be put in charge of minors and have a very secure retirement?
but lutherans must get restive, dancing in church, sex in a clerical collar are symptomatic. searching out the dirty bits in the bible is the final stage, this guy will be working in a used car yard soon, hand on heart, "only used to take a widow lady to church on sunday, i was there..."
sorry to disturb u. just take u a little time.
If you are in need,
welcome to : (http://www.b2bjordans.com )
puma gucci LV,CHANAL,HANDBAGS$35
I don't think it's Christianity's hangup. I think the secular non-Christians are hung up on sex.
We live in a society that is preoccupied with sex. Thousands of products are marketed with sex, and everyone wants to be "sexy" and have "sex appeal," even to the extent of having plastic surgery. A huge percentage of children are born out of wedlock, and sexually transmitted diseases are at epidemic levels throughout many populations. The gay community was decimated by AIDS, and that disease has spread into the heterosexual population. Pornography of all kinds is freely and easily available, and nudity and sex scenes are common in movies. We have something around a million abortions a year, and we are so devoted to the destruction of developing human life that, unlike virtually any other medical procedure, young girls can get abortions without parental consent. And anyone who suggests any kind of sexual restraint is thought to be a Puritan.
In the middle of this ocean of sex, people in the secular world think that the real problem is that we're not having enough sex. And according to a few comments on this post, some people think that the big problem with church is that you can't hear enough about sex in church.
In other words, the secularists want the church to be the world. But what I think they miss, is that if the church is the world, and there is little or no difference between the church and the world, why should anyone go to church? What would be the point?
I think a lot of people go to church precisely because they want something other than what the secular world has to offer. They aren't hung up on sex; they see sex in the context of love and marriage, not as recreation. A radical idea for sure, but there it is.
Gelius has been one of those "When he will get fired?" ticking bombs for years (sort of like Juan Williams or Rick Sanchez). He's very popular among people who never go to church, but I'm not sure how well liked he is among the loyal faithful. They tend to agree with the bishop.
Thanks for your understanding, I'll be sure to check with you the next time I cross the Norwegian news border ;-). Mostly I restrict myself to what's going on in Sweden (although why I bother to write about it here, god only knows), but I can understand enough Norwegian to arouse my curiosity.
@mishima
Your points are all well taken and thanks for stopping by. It just appears to me that the bishop is making a mistake by actually firing this provocateur, thus inspiring stories like the one I just wrote. Why not ignore Gelius or laugh the whole thing off? These days, firing someone, particularly someone as attention-hungry as a Lutheran pastor, is the least effective way of silencing them. Just think of all that free publicity! No doubt the book will become a bestseller now.
Sorry about that.
sorry to disturb u. just take u a little time.
If you are in need,
welcome to (httpwww.jacksbsneaker.com )
puma gucci LV,CHANAL,HANDBAGS$35
click my name to my link you can find many thing for you needs
aerbaerbaerb
So one brother makes the news, the other reports it. A brilliant setup!
As to the dirty bits in the Bible, my favorite is Genesis 32:32. When Jacob wrestled the angel, they may have touched pee-pees !O O!
_
I was once an inmate of a monastry when I found sex to be the last and the only indimitable frontier to be conquired which I could nbot do and am now I father of four kids. I respect the Institution of Christianity or any other religious tradition. But it is high time that, we ressurrect sex and sexuality from repressive regimes.
Ezekiel of the famed wheels.
Wrong. Not the beliefs and the values in the Bible, but the interpretations that people make from selectively reading the Bible.
Example: The Ten Commandments say, Do Not Kill. Meanwhile, a few more rules in Leviticus suggest that men shouldn't have sex with men (exact interpretation varies), and the punishment is exile. So, people put these two together, and go out and kill homosexuals. Not just men but women. Are we supposed to respect people who think this way?
Example: Creationists claim that they interpret the bible 'literally', but in fact they've made up all sorts of ideas, never in the Bible, in order to reconcile it with some of modern Science. So they can reject other parts of modern Science. The Bible never mentions fossils; creationists insist that all fossils were buried during Noah's flood, acknowledging the reality of fossils, while rejecting the details of what the fossils tell us.
In fact, they go and change stuff in the Bible they don't agree with. Genesis 7:2 clearly states that Noah took 30 animals on the ark, period. The creationists have reinterpreted '7 pairs of clean animals' to mean '7 of each kind of animal', and then wave their hands to evade the contradictions that come out of that. I was not taught that lying is a virtue.
Why can't they just worship God and admit that, like any other old book, the Bible was written by people who did not yet have the whole story?