Alan Nothnagle

Alan Nothnagle
Location
Berlin, Germany
Birthday
May 04
Company
InterpretBerlin.com
Bio
I am a freelance writer, YA author, and interpreter based in Berlin.

Editor’s Pick
JULY 1, 2011 5:19PM

Berlin's primary schools poised to teach "sexual diversity"

Rate: 9 Flag

 Klaus Wowereit
"Gay, and that's a good thing":
Berlin's Lord Mayor Klaus Wowereit at Christopher
Street Celebration, 2001
(Source: wiki)

WHILE NEW YORK WAS legalizing gay marriage, the city and federal state of Berlin were finalizing plans to teach “sexual diversity” in the municipal primary schools. The new curriculum, recently approved by Berlin’s education department, will introduce full information on homosexuality in the already existing sex education classes, which are begun here in fourth grade.  However, tolerance for “the normality of being different, acceptance, gender roles” will be taught from the beginning of a child’s education, at an age before such things become “a subject for giggles.”

According to the education department, “children are to learn social competency, empathy, and sensitivity” to homosexuality, transsexuality, gay partnerships, and alternative lifestyle choices involving sexuality. In the words of Ammo Recla from the gay organization “ABqueer,”  “[I]t  makes sense to prepare children for a life in diversity early on. There are other family forms aside from Papa-Mama-child-golden retriever.” The education department is currently preparing a special “suitcase” full of educational materials for teachers. It includes twenty-five picture books, a “concentration” game and an audio CD with an accompanying book.

Berlin’s city parliament already approved a corresponding educational reform measure back in April 2009. Such a step might still be considered extreme in some parts of Germany, let alone in other European nations. After all, while “registered life partnerships” were recently legalized throughout the Federal Republic, gay “marriage” as it is understood in places like Iowa and New York is still impossible anywhere in Germany, and life as a gay person in small provincial towns is the closest thing to hell on earth on this side of Riyadh, from what I’ve been told.

However, in swinging gay and godless Berlin people are more likely to wonder what took the education department so long? After all, Berlin’s mayor, Klaus Wowereit, famously defused a potentially embarrassing moment when discussing his candidacy at a Social Democratic party conference in 2001 when he responded to the controversy over his open homosexuality by saying: “I’m gay and that’s a good thing.” Berlin has been Germany’s gay capital for decades, and Christopher Street Day attracts hundreds of thousands – not all of them gay, I might add. Against this background, the educational reform merely appears to be a long-overdue case of catch-up. In any case, discrimination on the basis of one’s sexual orientation has been illegal on the basis of the national anti-discrimination law for many years now. 

But is it all as easy as that? Can homophobia be eliminated from this city using a “suitcase”? As journalist Malte Lehming recently pointed out, “it is often a different matter talking about homosexuality with white (post-) Christian, enlightened middle class kids in [the wealthy suburb of] Zehlendorf than with Christian-Orthodox Russian or Muslim-Turkish immigrant children from Neukölln.” 

In fact, according to a survey of 1,000 teenagers that was undertaken in 2007, two thirds of Turkish kids and half of Russian kids living in Berlin expressed homophobic sentiments, as opposed to “just” twenty-six percent of ethnic German teenagers, who have in any case become a minority in their own city. “Faggot” is one of the most injurious insults heard on playgrounds, rivaled only by “Jew” and the curious catch-all “victim.” Considering that the teachers will be facing opposition not only from the kids’ conservative ethnic parents but also from the immigrant community as a whole, they may need more than just a suitcase and a “concentration” game to get the job done. In some cases, a police escort might be a good idea. 

Eucharia Uche 
"I cannot tolerate this dirty life!"
Nigerian soccer coach Eucharia Uche
(source: supersport.com)

Lehming might also have added that anti-gay discrimination is a much bigger problem elsewhere than in relatively liberal Berlin. This became evident once more in the runup to the Women's Soccer World Cup, which is being held in Berlin and other Germany cities this summer. In an interview with the New York TimesNigerian coach Eucharia Uche told journalists that "Yes, the lesbians in our teach were really a big problem. But since I'm coach of the Super Falcons, that has been cleared up. There are no more lesbian players on my team. I cannot tolerate this dirty life." Please, someone send that woman a suitcase!

So what to make of the new curriculum? Since my kids have been out of the public schools for a couple of years now, I can’t pretend to have a dog in this race. My own spontaneous reaction is that “the lady doth protest too much, methinks.” In other words, I have the feeling that tolerance for “alternative lifestyles” should be the default position and should be regarded as common sense rather than something that has to be specially taught in schools. 

But this is admittedly a naïve position. Some things do indeed have to be carefully taught: not just discrimination itself (remembering the famous song in South Pacific), but also traffic rules, let alone the pooper-picker-upper law on dog shit and the ban on smoking in most bars and restaurants. These too were seen as extreme measures not so many years ago. Today, it’s hard to imagine a time when people even thought to behave without common courtesy for their fellow human beings. 

And that, as mayor Wowereit would say, “is a good thing.”

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I certainly hope that Germany does a better job with human sexuality than it has done with multiculturalism. But it makes you wonder when a openly gay soap is shown on TV, why this is a problem. But living in America, I can understand.
I currently live in relatively liberal Seattle, but will be moving to conservative Colorado in September. Many of the parents there are fighting for Creationism in schools. Tolerance should be taught and sex education, including everything.
My danish cousin was taught about HIV/AIDS and condom use, safe sex probably about first grade, complete with cartoon depicting partying drinking teenagers. It talked of not making presumptions, taking care to be careful, and taking personal responsibility to protect yourself. Growing up with an attitude of openness, tolerance and permission with support teaches children to respect themselves and others.
It had to happen eventually
I am very sceptical of the notion that students must be taught to behave in a certain way. At the basis of this seems to lie a deeply misanthropic mentality, that may be used to indoctrinate others in a plethora of different ways, even if it seems to applied for a deceptively positive sense in this instance. Essentially they are using the same methods as fundamentalists Christians/Muslims who teach their kids to disavow homosexuality. This is a very slippery sloap to be on, and if we turn to doing this, we have lost the moral high ground to our idiological enemies. I believe that condescending to children by forcing them to accept a certain world view yields deeply counterproductive results, with many children becoming openly homophobic simply to vex authority figures. If this goes on we will soon see a sort of mirror image of the revolution of '68 springing out of the ground that is essentially under way, what with many comtemporaty youngsters embrassing rap music the first youth culture that is explicitly conservative, not progressive in nature. Instead of belittling them, the priority should be for teachers to set a positive example for children, perhaps even rendering conventional schooling, certainly that which is ideological in nature, obsolete.
It seems that the proposal is basically to teach that there is no such thing as "normal" when it comes to sexuality and family life. Children apparently will be even taught to accept unspecified "alternative lifestyle choices in involving sexuality," whatever that means.

It will be interesting to see what mental gymnastics will be performed in order to deny and denigrate the concept of "normal." And it will also be interesting to see what actually is taught. Will children learn that normal married life is no better than a life of getting blow jobs in the men's room? Will the dominatrix from the local BDSM club be asked to give a presentation? Will "sex worker" be presented as a legitimate and possibly desirable career? Who knows.

The great majority of children will grow up, marry a person of the opposite sex, and have children. In that context the most important thing is for children to understand the values, norms, expectations, and roles that make for a successful marriage and family life. Of course, along the way they will discover that not everyone fits that pattern. But one comes to understand the exceptions by first understanding the norm.

But for some people, the idea of the "normal" is unacceptable. Thus the children need to be propagandized to "approve" of "alternative" sexual practices no matter how weird. Traditional marriage is presented as one lifestyle choice among many, something not to be approved over and above anything else.

I wouldn't say that this is the end of society as we know it, but it probably is one of the signposts along the way.
Does this mean I can hump the teacher?
Good on them and you for sharing this. Yur stuff gets far too few readers. I am glad Emily recognises it.
Rated.
This is lovely... once Junior learns ( in the 4th. grade) that anal sex will never result in unwanted pregnancy... the sky's the limit.
This is a good thing?
@davyboy
That's an excellent question - you tell me!
"Please, someone send that woman a suitcase!" LOL
Seriously, though I'm all for teaching tolerance but this approach seems a bit too over the top. It will probably end up alienating people instead of changing their minds.
This (teaching bio-diversity) is self-evidently insane. Mish has it right, as usual. And Lucy, there's no connection between wanting to teach creationism (also nutz) and this piece. Well, then again, there is: Those who want to teach creationism are just about as nutz as those who want to teach this diversity inanity. Gawd help the chil'n.
If their schools valued the parent-child relationship over so-called educators' political agendas, they wouldn't have to worry about this at all.

I hope parents who want to teach their kids themselves about sexual issues leave the German schools. Which, by the way, is what parents in the US should continue to do as well.

If enough people opt out on behalf of their kids, then one would hope schools would return to teaching clear educational subjects in as non-biased a way as possible.

Shame again on the Left for using kids as fodder for their political needs and for pretending it is about "education".
Though it seems like we have joined the slide to taking the low ride by teaching tolerance, versus starting from a point of -- tolerance should be the baseline-- from which to grow, I applaud the wise people in Berlin that recognized this deficit and have taken action to remedy it by including it in the curriculum. Children learning it en masse can only make it better for generations to come.
Gretal vorsichtig Hansel !
Achtung meine herren, bitte nicht fallen das einseifin in das duche! Est ist eine schande.
What a fascinating piece of news! Ultimately, I"d have to say ich bein eine Berliner (sorry if that is in any way incorrectly written - French has fried my brain and I will never be able to learn another language!), because I am all for this. I know there are arguments and issues against it, which you pointed out in your wonderfully presented piece, but I really love the basic idea behind it. Also, I am pleasantly surprised that another major European city has an openly gay mayor - our longtime mayor, Bertrand Delanoë, is the same. Just a lot of good news here. And I even mentioned it to the boyfriend and started a dialogue (the French are very wary of any kind of educating about a belief of any kind, be it religious, sexual, etc, no matter how much they're for it personally). Just great reporting. Thank you.
No. It's just the end of mishima666 as we known it.
"If their schools valued the parent-child relationship over so-called educators' political agendas, they wouldn't have to worry about this at all.

I hope parents who want to teach their kids themselves about sexual issues leave the German schools. Which, by the way, is what parents in the US should continue to do as well."

Most parents are dumber than mud. Especially the "Home schooling" enthusiasts.
Thank GOD someone has at least half a functioning brain cell. This idea that ONLY what is "NORMAL" (as defined by whomever is using the term at the moment) can be taught to anyone is absolute twitterpated nonsense.

There is no such thing as "normal" and anyone who believes there is needs to spend a bit more time with the Wizard, Dorothy, Toto, etc... in Oz learning all the words to "If I only had a brain" and "If I only had a heart".
@Mrsraptor
Your words in god's ear...
MrsRaptor writes: "There is no such thing as 'normal'," & etc.

A typical dictionary definition of "normal" is "conforming to the standard or the common type." Since most people are heterosexual, and most will eventually marry and have children, that surely meets the definition of "normal." So when, with respect to sexual orientation and family life, you say that "there is no such thing as normal," I don't know what you're talking about.

You also write "This idea that ONLY what is "NORMAL" (as defined by whomever is using the term at the moment) can be taught to anyone is absolute twitterpated nonsense." But "normal" is not a personal, idiosyncratic concept. "Normal" is defined by the set of facts and context under discussion. Thus we have the "normal curve" in statistics, and "normal body temperature" in medicine. When someone is sad after the death of a loved one we say "it's normal to feel that way." When someone acts in a bizarre way, we often say "that's not normal behavior."

As I understand it, the stated purpose of these "tolerance" and "diversity" classes in public schools is to prevent homosexuals and people in various other relationship and genital configurations from being bullied or mistreated. But it is a mystery to me why, in order to do that, we have to train students to deny the obviously legitimate and meaningful concept of "normal."

But many people share your views. Alan, for example, writes "Your words in god's ear..." But why the Deity has supposedly developed a dislike of the concept of "normal" is also a mystery to me.

Perhaps people deny the concept of "normal" because they fail to distinguish between central tendency and distribution of traits. For example, part of what we mean by "normal vision" is that most people can distinguish colors. At the same time, we know that around 8 percent of males and .5 percent of females are born color blind in some way. So in the context of the total population, we can say that it is "normal" for a small percentage of individuals to be color blind. (Given a large enough population and a trait that shows up with some regularity, I suppose everything could be said to be "normal.") Nonetheless, color blindness is not "normal," i.e., the great majority of people are not color blind.