Since 1994, when he officiated at the trials of Jessie Misskelley Jr., Damien Echols and Jason Baldwin, otherwise known as the West Memphis Three, Judge David Burnett has had several opportunities to make further rulings in their cases.
Some of the petitions he heard concerned new DNA test results. Others focused on the arguments that these three young men had inadequate counsel at their trials.
Burnett denied them all. He handed down some of his rulings even after retiring from the bench.
Now it seems Judge Burnett has campaigned for and won a seat in the Arkansas Senate, and whether that's good news for Misskelley, Jr., Baldwin and Echols, remains to be seen; the Dixie Chicks, and Johnny Depp and Eddie Vedder may sing the boys' praises, but I am very much afraid their innocence or guilt has long since ceased to matter.
On May 6, 1993, three young boys reported missing the prior evening were discovered dead near a creek bed in a wooded area outside of West Memphis, Arkansas. The discovery of the boys would lead to yet another crime, the wrongful first degree murder convictions of Jason Baldwin, Jesse Misskelley, Jr, and Damien Wayne Echols.
A witness said two of the 8-year-olds were raped and one was castrated. Prosecutors presented evidence suggesting Mr. Echols was a devil worshipper and the younger boys his loyal followers.
An affidavit was submitted to Judge Burnett last year from an attorney named Lloyd Warford; in it, Warford says the jury foreman at the Echols-Baldwin trials, Kent Arnold, disobeyed Burnett's order not to discuss the case outside of court.
Warford also claims that the foreman told him he persuaded the jury to consider information that the prosecutors were not allowed to introduce.
Burnett sealed Warford's affidavit and took no action on it.
Burnett also dismissed as unimportant results of new laboratory tests on evidence from the crime scene that found no DNA from any of the defendants. He was unimpressed by evidence that a hair from the stepfather of one of the victims was found in the bindings on one of the other boys.
And he was not troubled by the testimony of prominent forensic pathologists who concluded that marks attributed to a knife attack, which prosecutors claimed was part of a satanic ritual, were actually inflicted after death, by turtles and other animals in the stream where the bodies were found.
On November 8, 2007, CNN reported “new evidence may clear West Memphis 3″. Attorneys for Echols stated there was no physical evidence tying the three to the murders while new DNA evidence, hair fibers, were found to be linked to the stepfather and a friend of one of the murder victims.
In September of 2006, however, Judge David Burnett rejected claims DNA evidence would exonerate the three men and refused a new trial.
I live in Memphis, TN. Memphis is just across the Mississippi River from West Memphis, AR, but it's a world away, in some ways. I remember when this happened, before they even arrested Baldwin, Misskelley, Jr., and Echols; in May of 1993, satanic ritual abuse hysteria was still going strong, not to mention that the Southern part of the United States is chock-full of all the backwoods, ignorant prejudices you've probably heard about.
It was certainly no surprise to anyone down here, that when they couldn't hang this on the first black man unlucky enough to have been in the vicinity, they found the black-clad, black haired and black-fingernailed kid with the demonic name and charged him and his two mentally-challenged buddies with it. Memphis, TN is slightly larger than its sister city, New Orleans; in Memphis, Damien Echols wouldn't have attracted much notice from anyone.
In West Memphis, AR, however, Damien Echols stuck out like the proverbial sore thumb; rightfully angry, and aware that he possessed more intelligence than most or all of his examiners, at the time Echols acted like a punk. He seems a bit more humble now, but back then he was cocky and arrogant and I don't think he realized at all just who and what he was dealing with. Like most people of the age he was then, Echols probably believed that being innocent actually means something in this country.
Mike Huckabee was sworn in as Governor of Arkansas on July 15, 1996 and served until 2006, a full ten years while the West Memphis 3 story gained traction. Because of his political aspirations and quaint religious views, Huckabee once denied Echols clemency while at the same time he set a serial rapist free, who, upon release, then raped and murdered another woman. And I'm guessing that Echols' actual guilt or innocence makes about as much difference to Judge Burnett, as, apparently, it does to Mike Huckabee.
In December of 2009, Burnett told a reporter for a Little Rock newspaper he was “sick and tired of this West Memphis case”.
In an interview from June of that same year, Burnett made the jaw-dropping statement that he had excluded testimony, and evidence, from the trial; a bloodspot was found, consistent with the blood type of Damien Echols, along with a second spot consistent with the blood type shared by both Jason Baldwin and murder victim Stephen Branch.
And by 11% of the world’s population.
To prove he'd been impartial Judge Burnett stated that he “excluded a lot of damming evidence found on the boys.”
Sorry.
I mean, Senator Burnett.
He's only off the bench, though, because he's found a better seat; I sincerely hope the Dixie Chicks, and Eddie Vedder and Johnny Depp are bringing some awareness, and interest to this case.
Because for all intents and purposes—I'm very much afraid “the boys” are screwed.


Salon.com
Comments
I'm proud of my race
sometimes.
Sometimes, I'm disgusted and ashamed.
Burnett is a gddamned racist fool.
"Like most people of the age he was then, Echols probably believed that being innocent actually means something in this country."
Congratulations on the EP!
Lezlie
The animal predation theory of the wounds is a joke.
The hair found on one of the shoelaces was described by defense counsel as "weak evidence". You discount the bloodspot on the necklace because it matches 11% of the world's population, yet claim the hair is "linked to the stepfather", and conveniently leave out it also matches 7% of the world's population.
Damien Echols was not rightfully angry, or more intelligent than his examiners, he was a dangerous psychotic. The police didn't find him because he wore black, they found him because his accomplice came in and confessed.
The Warford affidavit is a legitimate concern. It may mean Echol's and Baldwin's convictions were unconstitutional. But that doesn't mean they are innocent.
You need to research the case beyond the very misleading HBO documentary.
Misskelley was not questioned for 12 hours without parental consent. He gave his statement after about 4 hours of questioning, after a detective drove him to his father's place of business and had his father sign a waiver for a polygraph. Jessie also signed a Miranda waiver.
He is NOT considered mildly retarded, which his own expert witness admitted during his rule 37 appeal hearing.
He did NOT recant his confession the next day, and in fact confessed 3 more times over the next several months. Once to the officers transporting him after his conviction, once to his own attorney, and again to prosecuters with his attorneys in the room pleading with him not to speak. The confessions to his attorney and to the prosecutors were transcribed and recorded and are available on the internet as part of the case documentation.
There was fiber evidence introduced in the Echols and Baldwin trials. Not much physical evidence, true, but that is largely because the bodies of the victims were submerged in water for about 18 hours.
In fact, there isn't a hair, a fingerprint, an allele, a footprint, or a strand of DNA .... and they've tested many, many items over the years. And Damien wore Army boots and had hair down his back. There's NADA that links them.
There is DNA and a footprint that links the actual killer... whose day is coming.
Anyone interested in following the case should check out http://www.wm3blackboard.com -- run by one of the victims' families (who is a vocal supporter of the WM3).
Justice for 6 = Free the 3 + Arrest the 1
It really makes it hard to believes any of the other claims in this blogstatements, or take their opinion seriously when it contains incorrect statements. True, much of the blogger's information seemed accurate and has been established for quite some time, but when such a blatant misstatement of fact is present, I'm pretty sure that it contains other glaring problems (at least to an objective observer who still has unresolved questions).
I actually have always doubted the claim that Miskelly is "mentally challenged." One reason is that if I am to believe that so many people in West Memphis were responsible for treating these boys as outcasts, how can I trust the people who supposedly established Miskelly's IQ score. A IQ of 72 certainly isn't enough today for educators or parents to jump to an automatic conclusion that someone is mentally slow, mildly retarded, etc., which is what is always implied. A child could have some sort of test anxiety, ADD, ADHD, or any number of other learning disabilities that don't deter from their overall intelligence...or the child could have just done poorly on the test because they didn't care or take it seriously. I would actually like to know what Miskelly's IQ could be measured at today.
I say all of this because, when I was younger, I was also labeled by educators as someone with some sort of learning disability because of my behavior during school. I was tested further by certain teachers not
trained to make such determinations, and other poorly
trained members of the public school system who
concluded that I had a lower than average IQ for my
age. I had no idea what they were testing me for, but I
knew that I was getting to leave class to take silly tests,
which was fine by me. When my father returned from
his work travel, he was furious to find out that I had
been put in some special classes and was receiving
help with my reading, because I had always read several grades above my level, and I excelled in mathematics.
It turns out that when my teacher researched my records, she "accidentally" pulled my scores starting from 2 years previous instead of starting the previous year, so what She perceived as borderline actually showed that I was in the upper tiers. Also, one of the people who subsequently tested me made some critical errors, one of which was explaining the instructions to the test incorrectly. The other tests I performed poorly on was later attributed to me simply not taking the tests seriously, because they were so easy that they seemed so silly to me.
I have long sinced realized that I was singled out by
this teacher because I was different and because I was
often a pain to deal with. Since she didn't want to
handle me she tried to attribute all of it to some
nonexistent learning disability. My dad easily could
have attributed all of it the same way, because I was
definitely a pain to him to have to deal with.
Anyway, this is why I'm skeptical about the whole "mentally challenged" since so much of this case comes from Miskelly's confession and the defense's assertion of Miskelly' inability to consent due to a mental handicap, I worry that many people, which may include future jurors, may feel as I do and conclude
that an IQ of 72 doesn't justify the defense's assertion of inability to consent.
Please don't freak out and attack me for my opinion. I understand how many of you feel about all of this, and I believe that I have more than explained why my opinion is valid.
The real shame is Jason Baldwin. Not one scrap of evidence against him, just guilt by association with Damien, which is terrible. I've always felt the worst for him, had he been tried seperately from Damien he probably would not have been convicted, they had nothing at all on him...they told the jury how horrible Damien was over and over again, and then said "by the way, Jason is his best friend so he must be involved too"...it's probably the worst miscarriage of justice in recent years, I think of Johnny Frank Garrett...