lpsrocks's Blog

lpsrocks

lpsrocks
Location
Rockville, Maryland,
Bio
web developer, NOLA native, mom of two, concerned citizen living apparently waaaayyy too close to the Beltway, as I have become part of the "chattering classes"... just a political junkie, I guess...concerned about the environment, the wetlands, and keeping the world safe for democracy... no wonder we can't sleep at night...

MY RECENT POSTS

JULY 12, 2009 3:29PM

Our Cultural Rorschach Tests: Michael Jackson, Sarah Palin +

Rate: 6 Flag

So, this is what a slow news week looks like in July. Yes, we are all weary of the incessant (insipid? ridiculous?) media coverage and analysis of Michael Jackson’s death and Sarah Palin’s resignation.

There is an aspect of it that fascinates me, though. I have taken to calling it our cultural Rorschach test. You are probably familiar with the famous inkblot tests.


–Image from Wikipedia

The theory behind the test, created by Hermann Rorschach, is that the test taker's spontaneous or unrehearsed responses reveal deep secrets or significant information about the taker's personality or innermost thoughts.
From http://deltabravo.net/custody/rorschach.php

In more modern renderings, Malcolm Gladwell’s book Blink puts forth a similar psychological theory –

… about rapid cognition, about the kind of thinking that happens in a blink of an eye. When you meet someone for the first time, or walk into a house you are thinking of buying, or read the first few sentences of a book, your mind takes about two seconds to jump to a series of conclusions. 

Per Gladwell – “Blink" is a book about those two seconds, because I think those instant conclusions that we reach are really powerful and really important and, occasionally, really good.
–From http://www.gladwell.com/blink/index.html

I submit that we can stop the media frenzy around Michael Jackson and Sarah Palin because our minds were made up in the first two (or maybe thirty) seconds of hearing the news of their respective death and resignation announcements.


I happened to be in the Philadelphia airport with my family waiting for a flight to Barcelona, Spain to embark upon a long-planned-&-saved-for Mediterranean cruise when I heard (or read via Twitter more precisely) the news about Michael Jackson. My first reactions: shock, disbelief, and then sadness. And a deeply personal punch to the gut with the realization that I had indeed passed a certain stage of life (young, I think it’s called).

For some reason, I needed to call my best friend in New Orleans. As I looked down to call her, my phone was already dialing her number (weird, but true).

Me: “Ok, it cannot be true that Farrah and Michael Jackson died the same day.”
Her: “Nah-unh, Michael Jackson died?”
Me: “Yes, put on CNN. I mean, they were our childhood icons.” [yes, we used to play Charlie’s Angels on the elementary school playground and WERE the Thriller/MTV generation]
Her: “They’re saying he’s in the hospital.”
Me: “But, Twitter-folks are confirming he’s died.”
Me: “I’m a little freaked out to fly now, you know bad things come in threes.”
Her: “Sorry, Lis, but you’re not quite in the same, uh, category, as them.”
Me: “I know, but still…”

My husband, who is 16 years older than I, and rather unperturbed by most things, had trouble relating to why I found Jackson’s death so deeply resonant and tragic. My kids, on the other hand, just found it kind of hilarious and annoying that when we got to Barcelona the only thing on ALL of the TV channels in several languages (Spanish, French, and perhaps Farsi/Arabic) was Michael Jackson news or as they took to calling him –

MEE-KAHL YACK-SOHN – le Roi de Pop

My kids know him only as the Freak-show Pop star he had become. They didn’t grow up with the Jackson Five, or have WAYYY too many friends who danced their first wedding dance to “I’ll Be There.” They seemed more entertained by the news of it all than affected by his death, which I can forgive them for. Nor do they need to know about the conflicted feelings I have about Jackson’s alleged (& probably certain) pedophilia and psycho parenting style.

In my personal Rorschach reading, I’ll remember him by Thriller, Off the Wall, ABC, the white glove and white socks & loafers, and my favorite, Rock With You, and try to forget the tragic-comic figure he’d become.

Quite like Elvis, another musical genius who many remember as the bloated white-polyester-suit-wearing drug- addicted fallen star playing Vegas. Not incidentally, Lisa Marie Presley was once quoted as saying she was sure Jackson would die like her father. I prefer to remember the young, suave Elvis breaking new ground in Rock n Roll and singing…”Wise Men say…only fools rush in”


Now, Sarah Palin, in another cultural genre, provides another interesting Blink or Rorschach test.

Cynics and doubters like myself had only to hear the news, without even listening to her rambling statement, to know she wasn’t leaving the national stage and certainly wasn’t going to go quietly. I, for one, believe it’s about the money. Isn’t it always?

Others, like my husband, aren’t sure what all the fuss is about.

And, my kids, well, they just think she’s a whack job. My 10-year-old son who happened to be the only person in our 10 person van who knew that Machu Picchu was in Peru, still doesn’t understand how someone running for VP didn’t know that Africa was an actual continent. Dear about-to-be-teenage daughter is trying to make sense of why Bristol is on TV talking about abstinence.

I’m sure there are Palin supporters who greeted the news with eager anticipation and joy that she will somehow save the GOP now. I know this makes no sense, but I don’t think her base is reality-based.

Listening to John McCain’s response and ridiculous attempt to explain her reasoning on TV this morning, I can’t help but think in his personal Blink test how relieved he must feel that he isn’t President right now.


And then there’s Lance.

Armstrong, of course. Love him for the Live Strong, cancer-beating, iron man thing. Hate him for the wife-ditching, Sheryl Crow, ego thing. But, watch the Tour de France, and if you’re American, you can’t help but root for him to win the damn thing. Again.

wordpress stats

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
How does your son feel about a president who doesn't know how many states he's in charge of or the difference between a surviving soldier and a dead one?

And how can one be shocked or disbelieving about the inevitable outcome of a man who was on a notorious path to self-destruction for years?
Gordon - thanks for the read and comment.

umm, my son knows an idiot when he sees one. Palin is a self-serving moron and has continued to prove it. Obama made a speaking mistake - most people see the difference between the two.

And yes, I should not have been shocked by Jackson's death and upon reflection, it is not shocking at all, but the immediate reaction was a sense of shock.

But your comment proves the main point of this post - our minds were made up about these folks long before the news and our reactions reflect more about "us" than about "them".
lps--
I agree with some of your analysis, but I think the Palin resignation is going to have longer legs because it's not the "manufactured" emotion we saw with Jackson's death. What makes Palin's course interesting is to see if she is the first wave of the "we're resentful" crowd dominating the news.
The sad thing about Sarah is she thinks she is smart and "The true America" loves her. As for Michale, my reaction was "well that's three" since celebrity deaths are suppose to run in threes and with Ed and Farah he was the infamous third.

And it makes me chuckle that those who blindly followed bush as he blathered his way through 8 years of slaughtering the English language cling to the one and only time they can remember President Obama misspeaking.
Good post, lps!

The most interesting celebrities & public figures are the ones who defy quick & simple categorization, because they surprise you occasionally. Or they change their stripes, or at least your perception thereof. Steve Martin is one. Clint Eastwood is another. From a younger generation, maybe Amanda Peet? (I concede, the testosterone may contribute to my regard for the latter.)
flw - you are exactly right about Palin. I read Frank Rich's piece and your excellent post after I wrote this, but I do find it scary that she speaks for anyone in this country.

I don't think the politics of resentment, and their sibling, the politics of fear are going away anytime soon.

ocular - thanks for the excellent point.

MTM - exactly. I would put Winona Ryder in that crowd, as well...I was so happy to see her in Star Trek.
Welcome home.

Yay for Lance!

Yay for ocular's gentle sensibilities (and a ha(!) for the referenced myopia).

I think you're right Lisa, we all are blinded by our paradigms. I'm content to be in my own where progressive empathic thoughts usually prevail. It's been a lifetime journey for me, and I'm happy to say I have not abandoned the ideals of my youth, though I am a bit more curmudgeonly and skeptical now, that never having the wherewithall to be selfish in real life, it spilled out into my own political sensibilities.

As for the celebrities going...I generally have a problem with celebrity anyway. It's sad to be sure to have cultural icons you've had some passing acquaintance with go, and in a couple of these recent cases with some tragic backstory, but I just couldn't get worked up about them. The Staples Center scene, what little I saw, just gave me the creeps.

Anyway, glad you're home. Get to work on the travelogue!

xo b
barry - thanks.

I skipped the whole Staples Center thing; I think all the Michael hoopla is incredibly creepy and getting creepier the longer it drags out. It has moved into the space of things I never care to hear about again: Natalie Holloway, JonBenet Ramsey, Sarah Palin...

which is probably a contradiction since I wrote this post, but sometimes you just have to get things off your chest

p.s., re: trip - oh gosh, I have a lot of photos
I'm sure I'm younger than your husband, but I'm alot like him in his MJ thinking. I wasn't really effected at all. I grew up knowing MJ for Bad and Captain Eo and Man In The Mirror, but more for the spectacle that surrounded him, which never seemed like a big deal to me. In my youth, MJ was a pop star, famous for music that I never really connected with and making the most expensive music videos known to man. I grew up before all of his real crazy started to happen, but well into his reign as king of pop.

As far as Palin goes, she represents the politics of ignorance. Palin is the Neocon's Bush 2.0 - slightly more articulate and prettier to look at, but actually says less than even W's dumbest "isms." All politicians are actors playing archetypes and Palin is the antithesis of the Obama archetype. Obama comes off as the cool headed high falutin liberal elitest and she plays the role of the hot-headed stick to your guns conservative.

Your Rorschach comparison is fantastic. We see what we want. What the thinker thinks, the prover proves.