Truth, Justice and Tacos

All The News That's Fit to Blog

mad_typist

mad_typist
Location
Alexandria, Virginia, USA
Birthday
September 18
Bio
I'm a liberal secular humanist who enjoys writing, reading, playing video games and watching sports. I am a former member of the Armed Services who now enjoys the sweet sweet freedom of civilian life. My blog will be centered mostly on politics, football and video games. I'm not a professional hater, but I am a highly ranked amateur. Also, yes, I am a girl.

Mad_typist's Links

Links you need to visit
Editor’s Pick
JANUARY 27, 2010 2:41PM

First Cynical Impressions of new Apple tablet

Rate: 16 Flag
First Cynical Impressions of new Apple tablet


Quickly written, poorly edited first response to the newly unveiled Apple tablet device.

1. The Name
The "iPad"? What's up with that name? Sounds like something that Always or Tampax would market. I'm not sure why they didn't go with the infinitely more awesome "iSlate" or "iTablet".

2. Battery Life
Awesome! 10 hours of usage, up to 1 month of standby time. That's amazing. However, the cynic in me thinks, "Hmm, just like the iPod and iPhone, I suspect that the battery won't be removable, and will probably suck after about a year of ownership. Which means I can look forward to paying $99 so an Apple tech can put a new battery in."

3. Storage Space
I'm not dazzled with this feature. The base (read: most affordable) model will have only 16GB of storage. That's not great, especially if you want video. The storage space tops out at 64 GB, which isn't great for people who want to carry a lot of multimedia. I also question the storage space given that developers will likely start to develop games and apps that are larger for this platform.

4. No Flash support
Great. You've got a web browser built in, but you can't visit Flash-based sites. That means Hulu.com won't work, thus eliminating a competitor in the video-on-demand market. This means that a lot of interactive sites you might visit won't function correctly either. This is lame.

5. 3G
Available through AT&T, though it will cost you $29.95 per month for unlimited data. I like that the device can be used on other carriers, if you want.

6. Looks sexy
Of course it does. It's an Apple product. It's nothing, if not beautiful. The tablet is super light weight too - I can't wait to see how it feels in my hands.

7. New iBooks storefront
Looks pretty spiffy. Slightly higher price point than Amazon, but unsure how much extra cash that might mean for publishers. Major kudos for offering ePub format, which is an open standard.

8. Sounds a little pricey
Per Engadget.com, the price points are as follows:
"It starts at $499 for 16GB, 32GB for $599, and $699 64GB. Adding 3G costs a $130 per model, so the most expensive model (64GB / 3G) is $829."

That's.... a bit rich for my taste, especially since you need to toss an extra $29.95 per month on top of that if you want to actually leverage the 3G capability.

9. But I love to feel actual keys when I type!
Comes with built-in Bluetooth or you can get a keyboard dock. Either way, those of you who hate typing on the screen itself have options. Nice feature.
 
10. Doesn't seem to come with a camera
Frankly, that's sort of disappointing. I think this could have been a product that really made videoconferencing more mainstream. I sort of envisioned a camera on both sides of the device, utilizing technology such as Skype to handle the videochat functions. 
 
11. Does it multitask?
If it's using the iPhone OS, it probably doesn't multitask. That's surprising/disappointing. With the larger screen, it'd be nice to have a few apps open at a time.
 
update #1: Engadget has an interesting price breakdown of 3G service on the iPad versus the iPhone.
 
update #2: No stylus/handwriting support? I'm surprised - you'd think that would be a natural addition, and would have gone a long way towards making this a Kindle-killer. I would have loved to see a demo of annotating an ePub document with a stylus.
 
update #3: Git yer purdy iPad pictures here at the official Apple site.

note: this post may change, as more details come out, but this is what I'm thinking right now. Pic above is from the AP.

Author tags:

ipad, tablet, technology, apple

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
My biggest disappointment is lack of flash, but otherwise, pretty happy with the apparent product and price points, getting in line.
Since the iPad runs the iPhone OS (and it doesn't support Flash), how would you magically expect the iPad to have that capability? Flash is a prprietary resource hog and the single largest cause of crashes on Mac OS X, so there is no reason to include any support for it.

The iPad is not pricey at all. Since you can't get such a device with nearly these features from a Windows PC maker for less, how does that make the iPad pricey, especially when considering that all the analysts and pundits were expecting it to be $999?
The price point for the high end model just isn't that attractive to me. I bought my netbook, which supports Flash and works fine for day to day web surfing at home, for just $329.

I would expect Flash support, even though it's a resource hog, because I expect the Tablet to act more like a laptop than an iPhone.
Nobody's forcing you to get the high-end model. But there is no support for Flash in the iPhone OS, and therefore there can be no support for it on the iPad.

It doesn't matter what you paid for a Windows netbook; it's not an iPad and it can't do what the iPad does.
Fair enough, Mulder. Some people will run out and buy this and love it. I'm just voicing my own concerns. Right now, this feels like a giant iPhone. Which... I already have an iPhone. I don't need a bigger one.

It's a new product, and there's a ton of hype around it. My point is that it would have been nice to see Apple improve their OS to support a widely used technology like Flash.
Apple is not going to be adding support for Flash—count on that. It's proprietary, has security and stability problems, and it puts control of web video in the hands of one company, making it a monopoly, which is dangerous for all businesses and leaves users hostages to the whims of that company.

It will never happen.
iMovie redux. Is it actually called iPad or did they just misspell IPos?
this is a repackaged Newton. BFD. How's that for cynicism?
It's all about the iBooks. Let's see if this turns into a Kindle killer.

More battery life than I expected.
Mad_Typist: You can save yourself $85 by buying an iPod battery on Ebay and installing it yourself. I have zero mechanical aptitude and I can swap out a battery in a few minutes. They even provide you with the tools.
@Travis - I'm a bit squirrely about doing self-installs that will void my warranty.
Nice assessment! I'm pretty shocked by the Flash thing - that does seem to kill a major use, video streaming, which is a hot and growing market. I envisioned it as a device you could hook up to your TV to avoid cable, but that kills that idea.

Perhaps a v.2 will appear soon to solve the problems you note. I'm never an early adopter for just that kind of reason.
From what I have read, you are correct about the encased battery, no camera, and no multi-tasking.

Personally, I think it looks awfully awkward to carry around. Like a Flintstones version of the iPhone.
This just looks like a big ipod (really getting tired of everything starting with 'i', sort of like everything starting with 'mc' at mcdonalds) Having used a pen tablet for years, I would never buy a tablet without the option of writing with a pen - it's pointless. This may compete with Kindle, but Fujitsu and Toshiba have nothing to fear.
If there is no multi-tasking, that pretty much kills any interest I would have.

When I first read that it has an ebook app, and also runs Pages, it sounded great. I could do research, either in books or on the web, while cutting and pasting into an open Pages document. Ditto for compiling info and incorporating items into emails. But if there really is no multi-tasking, then it would be useless for any of the work I do.
You first take is pretty much mine--it's a lovely thing, and I want it, but not right away. The "no Flash" is a problem. Also "iPad" is a terrible name--manages to evoke sanitary napkins and ancient paper-and-pencil technology at the same time.
good first take, m_t.

this is absolutely a Kindle killer.

lack of Flash is no biggie with HTML 5.

huge win for Apple today.
I think I'd much rather buy a bunch of books...and I'm a Mac person.
Frankly, I'm happy that Apple continues to snub Flash in it's mobile devices. Flash has too many problems to be a valuable member of the internet tech community. With any luck, the horribly named iPad will expedite Flash's death.

When they announced the price, my jaw dropped. I'm surprised you think it's too expensive. Most of the people looking at estimated component prices spec'ed it as closer to $800. I wonder if Apple is pushing their margins well below iPhone levels to get this established.

I'll need to get one in my hands first, but I'm definitely thinking about getting one as coffee shop computer. Assuming attachable keyboard isn't too expensive, it would suit my needs better than a netbook or really cheap laptop.
Next up for Apple: The IPutz! If you run your fingers over it, it'll make you feel nice! Killer app!
I'm sure it will be a nice toy for some. I was actually a bit surprised by the price, though; I thought it would cost a lot more.
The $499 price point only applies if you're willing to take a pretty watered down version of what is essential a giant iPod Touch. 16 GB doesn't seem like enough space, plus the lack of 3G limits your range. I suppose if all you want the device for is sitting on your couch or in coffee shops reading the internet, that's fine, but again, 500 bucks seems like a lot to plop down for such limited functionality.

There's a lot to like here, but I think that I'll wait to see what the next gen iPad has to offer. I just don't think that the iPad fills a crucial need for most people.
Hilarious post from a friend of mine that I thought I'd share with you:

"I've always looked at my iPhone and wished it was bigger and didn't fit in my pocket. And sometimes I would look at my laptop and wish it had no keyboard couldn't multitask or install whatever I want and was mostly glass.

THANK YOU APPLE."

Also, for those of you wanting an alternate to the iPad, check this hotness out (and it's looking like it'll be priced at $250): http://www.maximumpc.com/article/news/freescales_tablet_reference_design_looks_good_200
The name appears to reveal a desperate need for more women in product development at Apple.

Mac's iPad? Really? Think about it. Awful.

That lack of space is not a good thing. I think it would have been a better choice to do some sort of iNetbook or some such thing that is thicker and runs OS X. With more capabilities including a camera and the ability to run all Internet flash.
Yes but... it's priced comparably to the Amazon Kindle and it does a lot, lot more. Who wouldn't want this over a Kindle?
To answer incandescent...who the hell would want a Kindle? An eye-straining toy that reads books only available from one source?

It's understandable that someone would want to come up with a different form of computing than the laptop. But this iPad isn't even vaguely interesting. It would take a great increase in computer power, plus a great price drop, to produce a device that would really make people desire it. In a time when people are losing their homes, another Satan-inspired overpriced yuppie toy is pointless.
I'm not sure I'd agree that it prices favorably compared to a Kindle. The lowest model iPad is literally almost twice the cost of a Kindle ($259 versus $499). And the Kindle comes with built-in 3G, which the base model iPad does not.

Now, obviously, for the increased cost, you get features on the iPad that the Kindle does not provide, including a full color screen and games, so obviously you have to consider that.

Given the state of the e-reader market, I'd almost prefer the cheaper Kindle, because I believe that in just 1-2 years we'll be seeing some amazing development on the e-reader and tablet market. And in 1-2 years I won't feel too bad casting aside my little $259 device for the latest and greatest.

Of course, I'm cheap, my netbook and paper books satisfy my reading and web surfing needs, so really... this is all theory for me, since I don't plan to buy either a Kindle (hate Amazon's DRM) or an iPad at this time. I'm going to wait and see what the market looks like in a year or so.
So it's a big iPhone, or an extremely limited and expensive laptop. And you can't watch 90% of the videos on the net with it. Are they kidding?

Obviously, the Apple congregation will stand in line for 14 days to get this. Me, I'm getting a Kindle. Or a laptop.
I think that the base model will be wildly popular as a Web and online game interface (Imagine a Second Life client for this thing!). A few people will insist on cellular access, which is why this feature is available for a price.

Its most widely cited problems are in software, and therefore will be addressed first: lack of Flash and multitasking. I can see it being used to test-market changes to the iPhone version of the software, so watch for multitasking to appear in the iPad first.
I would love one, because it's easier to take to the toilet than a laptop, I wanted a camera and I wanted flash. Otherwise, I will most likely own one, cause I am a total and have been since the beginning of time, Apple loyalist. Partisan in politics, partisan in computers.

People complain that it's just a big iPhone, so? The problem with the iPhone, is that you want one that is a tad bigger.
On the iPad, gee, people what is this Jr. High? I thought hip dude from the 60's: Come to my pad.
I like your idea for a camera on both sides.
Who the Hell would want a Kindle? Apparently these folk -

http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2010/01/amazon-kindle-sales-are-officially-not-embarrassing/

You know, millions of people like myself that find it neither eye-straining nor a 'toy' - if I go to a local library that is one "source" of books that has far, far less books than a Kindle does - or if I go to my local bookstore; again, far, far less books than I can get on my Kindle.

Is my local bookstore a toy? Looks like lots of people will like the Kindle. I bet many more people will like this. My mom, not computer savvy at all, is already interested in this.

Apple products just work, they're sleek, and with the 2 year full service warranty that you can get with most all of them, you have pretty much a guaranteed tech product that provides top notch quality lasting for a year.

People just hate successful products sometimes. I'll never get it. Sour grapes, or something. ;)
Quote:
"In a time when people are losing their homes, another Satan-inspired overpriced yuppie toy is pointless.

tomreedtoon"

Oh, come on. Hyperbole much? Should all technological innovation immediately stop and should I donate all my income left over after food and mortgage to support other people losing their homes...?

Of course not. Like it or not, the rich yuppie class you hate pushes technological innovation that ultimately benefits the masses. A lot of poor people use iPhones now. Know why? As a PC substitute that allows them to email, text, and pretty much virtual-office for a monthly fee and a phone. You can cut out internet and landline service completely. Not a bad deal.
From what I have read, you are correct about the encased battery, no camera, and no multi-tasking.
http://www.evildrome.com/
Personally, I think it looks awfully awkward to carry around. Like a Flintstones version of the iPhone.