GOP: Mortgage crisis caused by loans to minorities
This is the GOP talking point du jour, it seems: blame the Community Reinvestment Act, which "forced" lenders to lend to "minorities and low-income folks."
No, seriously, they're THAT RACIST.
Basically, once again, who is to blame? President Clinton. It never gets old with them, even though Bush has been in power for 8 years. Whenever there is trouble, it's Bill Clinton's fault and only his fault. Whenever there is a success, it's thanks to Dubya.
According to the GOP, this Community Reinvestment Act was ressurected by Bill Clinton and forced banks to lend to minorities, who are "riskier." So, once again, it's them minorities and the "liberal guilt" Democrats trying to help them that are to blame for the current crisis.
Forget that sub-prime investment instruments were in very high demand by Wall Street, forget that everyone was making a killing on them and everyone thought they were the greatest thing since sliced bread. No, no, it's not the deregulated greed of Wall Street that made this crisis, it's the liberal do-gooder policies that somehow FORCED all those hoity-toity innocent banks to purchase tonnes and tonnes of bad debt.
And then they wonder why blacks vote Dem 90%+ of the time.


Salon.com
Comments
Worse than that, they might move into one's own neighborhood.
I informed them that they were sadly misinformed if they thought Fannie and Freddie made loans. Then I informed them the CRA has been around since the 1970s.
Then I informed them that the liar loans which are at the heart of the liquidity crisis we're seeing now were made by private companies in order to goose their returns, and they often were made to middle class borrowers.
They do have a point, though, when they say things like why is it the government's job to have entities like Fannie and Freddie trying to increase homeownership?
If you can't afford a house, then you shouldn't be allowed to buy one. Nobody benefits when someone buys a house they can't afford other than the realtor and the mortgage salesman. Everyone else loses. The person who loses the house gets their credit destroyed. The bank loses out because now they have a property they need to get rid of. The neighbors lose out because their house values go down.
Everyone loses.
One thing I would do if I were financial king is only allow loans that conformed to the standards of Fannie and Freddie. I'd also put in place strict maximum percentage of income limits on loans, and all loans would pay off not just the interest, but at least one percent of the principal of the loan each month.
Boom. Liar loans gone. Loans where you actually increase the amount of money you owe gone.
The FNMA loan default rate at its HIGHEST couldn't have caused this.
The pisser is that nobody in journalism land seems to know how to pick up the phone and talk to people in the business who actually qualify people to get a sense of how it works.
I hope that with generations changing that those old stereotypes will as well but I am not convinced. Grandparents teach parents who teach their own children and the sins repeat. Just this morning I got an email from my Aunt blaming the current mess on FDR of all people for underestimating the cost to us of Social Security and the Democratic congresses tax increases. Can't someone actually research these things and broadcast the facts instead of some skewed speciousness. Ugh. I am very, very unhappy.
granted, it is much easier than trying to understand the concept of "leverage" and mortgage-backed securitization, which is what is creating the crisis, not the loans themselves. Thus, I think that Kris and Tony Wang are both right.
I am not a finance expert, but I have some loose consulting experience with MBS c/o GNMA, so I can kinda relate to "the idiot's guide to the mortgage mess" since I had to do a sorta quick study a few years ago.
Here's another take and excellent explanation for us dummies on the Fannie Mae leverage problem
Fannie Mae secure
from before the bailout, but it explains the concepts nicely.
This is the crux of the matter. Mortgage brokers were able to get loans for just about anyone that breathed -- with credit scores as low at 520 (maybe even lower.)
These were 100% financed loans for the most part -- the buyers had little to no equity position in their homes. They lived in a home they "owned" instead of having to pay rent and were able to deduct the interest payments from their tax return. Who could walk away from that sweet deal?
The drama negativity played out for them for many reasons:
1) Some people with low credit ratings really do not know how to manage their money, even to the point of realizing what would happen with late mortgage payments, thereby quickly losing their home. (Not the same as negotiating with the landlord.)
2) At least in Florida, property taxes increased with soaring market values sometimes doubling or tripling. During the same period, home owners insurance also doubled for many. If the buyer had an adjustable rate mortgage, their entire payment increased. Since most people bought as much home as they could possibly afford, these three increases pushed the budget beyond the limits of the middle class.
3) The housing crisis, gas prices, and other economic woes slowed the construction industry's growth, putting many people out of work. This then trickled down through every related industry, and then to restaurants and other small businesses. Even nail techs and hair salons find their business dwindling.
The blame should rest squarely on the shoulders of those underwriting and approving the mortgage loans with hugely relaxed credit standards.
in addition to blaming minority homeowners they are also trying to
tie Obama to Franklin Raines, former head of FNMA, who by the way is also a black man...hmmmm
In case you haven't seen the recent TV ad?
McCain Ad
For the record, their source is one article in the Washington Post Style section that mentioned an off-hand conversation between Raines and an Obama advisor.
I got nuthin that says it all better than that.
Living in the wasteland of the free,
Where the poor have now become the enemy.
Let's blame our troubles on the weak ones,
Sounds like some kind of Hitler remedy.
Living in the wasteland of the free.
(Released in 1996)
Neo-neanderthals always loved pounding the poor.
Best line of this discussion: "good taste to jump out of buildings." Hilarious, Stellaa.
The really sad part is that the poorest among us (regardless of race) may work the hardest on paying their bills. I haven't got specific statistics to point to but my gut guess would be that even though they may miss payments now and then, they're going to try to get those loans paid. I wonder if some of the problem relates to how focused our entire loan system is on an all-or-none strategy of paying everything on time or having your credit rating ruined. I wonder if that policy exists less as a way of measuring who's a good risk or not and more as a way of giving a marginally plausible excuse to charge more money on interest just because they can.
They are not financial experts, but most Americans aren't watching Bloomberg or CNBC, they're watching Fox or MSNBC, where these clowns can reach them better. Consensus of experts be damned -- perception is reality, the end.
The noise machine, megaphone effect of people like Limbaugh, Beck, Kudlow, Cavuto and so many others, whose fundmantally racist, paranoid, anti-science, anti-humanitarian views are given such platform, such volume because it sells advertising - I mean my gag-reflex is still pretty functional. But despite the perception that these clowns speak for a preponderance of my fellow citizens, the reality is that they do not. So I don't get any more exercised about them or what they say than I do about the homeless guy on the corner with the sandwich board that reads THE END IS NEAR.