Six "Centrist" Senatorial Sellouts on Health Care Reform
According to today's New York Times, the health care bill is being held up by six "centrist" senators who meet daily to put together a bill that would have "broad bipartisan agreement"; as opposed to a bill that would, you know, reform health care.
Also according to the Times, this wrecking crew already has tossed out the public option. Many in the House and Senate are waiting for their eventual proposal. According to the Times, the bill from the Sellout Six is the one most likely to pass. Because, you know, it's bipartisan.
Did I mention that at least some of these senators get big campaign contributions from Big Pharma and other stakeholders in the medical-industrial complex? Also, the populations of the states they represent added together come to 8,444,956 people. To put that into perspective, the population of New York City alone is approximately 8.3 million people.
David M. Herszenhorn and Robert Pear write in the New York Times:
The fate of the health care overhaul largely rests on the shoulders of six senators who since June 17 have gathered — often twice a day, and for many hours at a stretch — in a conference room with burnt sienna walls, in the office of the Senate Finance Committee chairman, Max Baucus, Democrat of Montana.
President Obama and Congressional leaders agree that if a bipartisan deal can be forged on health care, it will emerge from this conference room, with a huge map of Montana on one wall and photos of Mike Mansfield, the Montanan who was the longest-serving Senate majority leader, on the other.
The battle over health care is all but paralyzed as everyone awaits the outcome of their talks.
Why this little scenario needs to change, right now:
Already, the group of six has tossed aside the idea of a government-run insurance plan that would compete with private insurers, which the president supports but Republicans said was a deal-breaker.
Instead, they are proposing a network of private, nonprofit cooperatives.
They have also dismissed the House Democratic plan to pay for the bill’s roughly $1 trillion, 10-year cost partly with an income surtax on high earners.
The three Republicans have insisted that any new taxes come from within the health care arena. As one option, Democrats have proposed taxing high-end insurance plans with values exceeding $25,000.
The Senate group also seems prepared to drop a requirement, included in other versions of the legislation, that employers offer coverage to their workers. ...
...In the House, centrist Democrats have temporarily stalled the health care bill, many lawmakers want to see what Mr. Baucus’s group produces before voting on tax increases in the House bill.
I read this first thing this morning, and I cannot tell you how sick I feel. That the lives of Americans rest with this corrupt little crew -- at least some of them are essentially sponsored by Big Pharma and other parts of the medical-industrial complex, who are major campaign contributors -- is beyond outrageous. It is the utter failure of American democracy in microcosm.
My favorite quote:
"If this is the only bill with bipartisan support," Ms. Snowe said, "that will really resonate. It could be the linchpin for broad bipartisan agreement."
And we need broad bipartisan agreement so much more than we need health care.
These people need to hear from us:
Senator Max Baucus, Montana, Democrat
- Washington Office:
511 Hart Senate Office Bldg.
Washington, D.C. 20510
(202) 224-2651(Office)
(202) 224-9412 (Fax) - Other office locations, with phone numbers
- Email form
Senator Jeff Bingaman, New Mexico, Democrat
- Washington Office:
703 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-5521
TDD: (202) 224-1792
Tollfree (in NM): 1-800-443-8658 - Links to state office addresses/phone numbers on this page
- Email form
Senator Kent Conrad, North Dakota, Democrat
Washington Office:
530 Hart Senate Office Building
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510-3403
Phone: (202) 224-2043
Fax: (202) 224-7776- Email form
- State offices and all other contact information
- Also, a toll-free number: 1-800-223-4457
Senator Michael B. Enzi, Wyoming, Republican
- Washington Office:
379A Senate Russell Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Main: (202) 224-3424
Fax: (202) 228-0359
Toll free: (888) 250-1879 - All office locations
-
Email form
Senator Charles E. Grassley, Iowa, Republican
- Washington Office:
135 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-1501
(202) 224-3744 (O)
(202) 224-6020 (F) - State offices
- Email form (scroll down)
Senator Olympia Snowe, Maine, Republican
- Washington Office:
154 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: (202) 224-5344
Toll Free: (800) 432-1599
Fax: (202) 224-1946 - District offices
- Email form
Also:
The White House, so you can tell President Obama to veto any bill that doesn't contain the public option:
- 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20500-0004 - Phone Numbers
Comments: 202-456-1111
Switchboard: 202-456-1414
FAX: 202-456-2461TTY/TDD
Comments: 202-456-6213 - Email form
And
I looked up state populations (as of 2008) and calculated that all six of the senators put together represent 8,444,956 people. The population of New York City is approximately 8.3 million people.
2008 Populations
- Montana 967,440
- New Mexico 1,984,356
- North Dakota 641,481
- Wyoming 532,668
- Iowa 3,002,555
- Maine 1,316,456

Salon.com
Comments
The goal with many advocacy groups is 50,000 contacts to Congress TODAY on health reform. We just need people to pick up the phone, to email.... TELL THEM.
Thanks for your good posts on this.
that's the trouble with voting for people, instead of referenda. i would conclude that democracy was better than oligarchy, how about you?
Al: Pay attention. A majority of Democrats in the House and Senate at one time or another have expressed a willingness to vote for the public option. The will of the people is being held hostage by a minority of legislators from mostly rural, conservative states. The six senators in the post collectively represent a population that is barely bigger than the population of New York City by itself.
And a lot of the reason this is happening is that lobbyists from the medical-industrial complex are waving money at congress. So voting for "referenda and not people" doesn't do any good, either. We end up with oligarchy either way.
I guess the idea that government looks out for the most vulnerable in society is now considered quaint. After all, a CEO somewhere is needing his $100mm fix just to make it to Christmans.