Barbara O'Brien

Barbara O'Brien
Location
New York, USA
Birthday
October 01
Bio
Barbara O'Brien blogs at Mahablog, Buddhism.About.com and the Mesothelioma and Asbestos Awareness Center.

Editor’s Pick
JULY 28, 2009 7:58AM

Six "Centrist" Senatorial Sellouts on Health Care Reform

Rate: 2 Flag

According to today's New York Times, the health care bill is being held up by six "centrist" senators who meet daily to put together a bill that would have "broad bipartisan agreement"; as opposed to a bill that would, you know, reform health care.

Also according to the Times, this wrecking crew already has tossed out the public option. Many in the House and Senate are waiting for their eventual proposal. According to the Times, the bill from the Sellout Six is the one most likely to pass. Because, you know, it's bipartisan.

Did I mention that at least some of these senators get big campaign contributions from Big Pharma and other stakeholders in the medical-industrial complex? Also, the populations of the states they represent added together come to 8,444,956 people. To put that into perspective, the population of New York City alone is approximately 8.3 million people.

David M. Herszenhorn and Robert Pear write in the New York Times:

The fate of the health care overhaul largely rests on the shoulders of six senators who since June 17 have gathered — often twice a day, and for many hours at a stretch — in a conference room with burnt sienna walls, in the office of the Senate Finance Committee chairman, Max Baucus, Democrat of Montana.

President Obama and Congressional leaders agree that if a bipartisan deal can be forged on health care, it will emerge from this conference room, with a huge map of Montana on one wall and photos of Mike Mansfield, the Montanan who was the longest-serving Senate majority leader, on the other.

The battle over health care is all but paralyzed as everyone awaits the outcome of their talks.

Why this little scenario needs to change, right now:

Already, the group of six has tossed aside the idea of a government-run insurance plan that would compete with private insurers, which the president supports but Republicans said was a deal-breaker.

Instead, they are proposing a network of private, nonprofit cooperatives.

They have also dismissed the House Democratic plan to pay for the bill’s roughly $1 trillion, 10-year cost partly with an income surtax on high earners.

The three Republicans have insisted that any new taxes come from within the health care arena. As one option, Democrats have proposed taxing high-end insurance plans with values exceeding $25,000.

The Senate group also seems prepared to drop a requirement, included in other versions of the legislation, that employers offer coverage to their workers. ...

...In the House, centrist Democrats have temporarily stalled the health care bill, many lawmakers want to see what Mr. Baucus’s group produces before voting on tax increases in the House bill.  

I read this first thing this morning, and I cannot tell you how sick I feel. That the lives of Americans rest with this corrupt little crew -- at least some of them are essentially sponsored by Big Pharma and other parts of the medical-industrial complex, who are major campaign contributors -- is beyond outrageous. It is the utter failure of American democracy in microcosm.

My favorite quote:

"If this is the only bill with bipartisan support," Ms. Snowe said, "that will really resonate. It could be the linchpin for broad bipartisan agreement."

And we need broad bipartisan agreement so much more than we need health care.

These people need to hear from us:

Senator Max Baucus, Montana, Democrat

Senator Jeff Bingaman, New Mexico, Democrat

Senator Kent Conrad, North Dakota, Democrat

Senator Michael B. Enzi, Wyoming, Republican

  • Washington Office:
    379A Senate Russell Office Building
    Washington, DC 20510
    Main: (202) 224-3424
    Fax: (202) 228-0359
    Toll free: (888) 250-1879
  • All office locations
  • Email form
     

Senator Charles E. Grassley, Iowa, Republican

Senator Olympia Snowe, Maine, Republican

  • Washington Office:
    154 Russell Senate Office Building
    Washington, DC 20510
    Phone: (202) 224-5344
    Toll Free: (800) 432-1599
    Fax: (202) 224-1946
  • District offices

  • Email form

Also:

The White House, so you can tell President Obama to veto any bill that doesn't contain the public option:

  • 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
    Washington, DC 20500-0004
  • Phone Numbers
    Comments: 202-456-1111
    Switchboard: 202-456-1414
    FAX: 202-456-2461

    TTY/TDD
    Comments: 202-456-6213

  • Email form

And

I looked up state populations (as of 2008) and calculated that all six of the senators put together represent 8,444,956 people. The population of New York City is approximately 8.3 million people.

2008 Populations

  • Montana  967,440
  • New Mexico  1,984,356
  • North Dakota  641,481
  • Wyoming  532,668
  • Iowa 3,002,555
  • Maine  1,316,456

Author tags:

health care, senate, politics

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Thanks for this.

The goal with many advocacy groups is 50,000 contacts to Congress TODAY on health reform. We just need people to pick up the phone, to email.... TELL THEM.

Thanks for your good posts on this.
when the next election comes, if you are burning with rage that there is no public option, much less single payer, you can vote for the other candidate. s/he will also be a no public option supporter.

that's the trouble with voting for people, instead of referenda. i would conclude that democracy was better than oligarchy, how about you?
that's the trouble with voting for people, instead of referenda. i would conclude that democracy was better than oligarchy, how about you?

Al: Pay attention. A majority of Democrats in the House and Senate at one time or another have expressed a willingness to vote for the public option. The will of the people is being held hostage by a minority of legislators from mostly rural, conservative states. The six senators in the post collectively represent a population that is barely bigger than the population of New York City by itself.

And a lot of the reason this is happening is that lobbyists from the medical-industrial complex are waving money at congress. So voting for "referenda and not people" doesn't do any good, either. We end up with oligarchy either way.
I heard program the other day breaking this down even further (the population stats). The minority populations in these states is very small, compared to the rest of the US, and if you take New Mexico out of the mix, its almost infintesimal.
I guess the idea that government looks out for the most vulnerable in society is now considered quaint. After all, a CEO somewhere is needing his $100mm fix just to make it to Christmans.