Editor’s Pick
APRIL 16, 2009 11:33AM

The Wife of Bath Effect: The Glomming of Susan Boyle

Rate: 35 Flag

The following linked video has been seen by millions--no doubt most of you who find this post will have viewed the clip on YouTube or watched it repeated ad nauseum on a parade of TV shows.  If you haven't seen it, take a quick look:

 Susan Boyle - Britains Got Talent 2009 Episode 1 - Saturday 11th April

Like most, when I first heard and saw this video, I was amazed.  Still am, actually, since that's a damn hard song for anyone to sing.  However, the fuss over Susan Boyle has a lot less to do with her talent--which seems ample based solely on this effort--than with her looks.  When Boyle first steps up to the microphone, Simon Cowell's (yes, THAT Simon Cowell) look echoed my own:  this woman thinks she can sing?  Frankly, Boyle appears to be a cast member from a faithful film adaptation of The Canterbury Tales wherein she would be the Wife of Bath. 

 She proceeds to stun everyone in the audience, Cowell included, with her beautiful rendition of a song from Les Miserables.  Yet, the more I repeatedly watched the video, the more I realized how petty I am still. Had a beautiful woman in her 30s stepped out onto that stage and belted out that very song, would I have been so thrilled?  No.  Would Simon Cowell have raised those estimable eyebrows with such improbation?  No.  Would over 11 million hits on this particular video have been recorded in less than a week?  Again, no. 

I was fascinated because Susan Boyle is not an attractive person.  She doesn't look like a model; she doesn't have flawless skin nor a hip hair style.  She dresses frumpily, and when she smiles, it appears to be more of a grimace.  She is not someone I would go out of my way to say "hello" should we pass on the street.  The epiphany struck me:  I'm shallow.   Why should I have been surprised?  Good singers, pretty much like every other walk of life, aren't such because they're physically attractive.  No, it's because they've been blessed with lovely pipes and perhaps have received a bit of training, as is the case with Susan Boyle.

 So, I'm disappointed at myself.  I should know better.  Just when I think I've managed to accept people for who they are no matter how they appear, I find myself falling into old habits.  And that's not a pretty sight. . .

 

Author tags:

music, behavior

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Maybe that's why it's such a hit: We are all reminded that talent doesn't have to come in pretty packages.
Actually, I have to disagree. She's got a real voice--not one of those heady, yippy, acrobatic, stuff-sixteen-notes-into-a-syllable-when-one-would-do voices that have been the trend over the past five years or so.

Had a gorgeous nineteen-year-old belted that tune out from her chest (not her head), I'd have been gobsmacked by that, too. Because it's not easy. Elaine Page is widely regarded as a master because of her ability to hit the high notes without ascending into her "head voice." Susan Boyle's got the same ability--a rare gift.
Smack me for starting a sentence with "Actually," will you? (Rated for giving me something to argue with)
Don't be so hard on yourself. It is our tendency to judge on the basis of looks. If we did no judging on that basis, we would get into a lot of trouble. (Think: "Is this tiny kitten a danger to me or is this giant rottweiler?") We judge unfairly when we fail to let further evidence, such as Susan's singing, alter our first impressions.
Most opera singers are not model quality in their looks either. Pop singers have made everyone expect attractive packages, but if you have any classical training what so ever you'd know better. monkey fingered.
I think it's not just her looks, but her "nobody-ness." She's from a tiny little village in Western Scotland. She's unemployed. She lived with her parents until they died, and now lives alone in her childhood home with her ten-year-old cat. She's never been married or even kissed. She doesn't have much of an education. She is, in her own words, "slow." (Oxygen deprivation at birth left her with a lot of learning disabilities, and she struggled a lot in school.)

And she's been dreaming of being a professional singer since she was twelve, and for thirty-five years, no one outside of her church choir and the folks who go to karaoke night at her local pub knew that she could sing like an angel.
The woman has a five star voice but at nearly 50 has no entertainment "look." Most performers by that age have developed an entertainment persona. They say, "This one's for everyone from (name of town they are playing to today)." They have a certain kind of wardrobe and hair. They may not be a fully polished machine, but by age 48 most people who have those kind of pipes have some kind of local career and stage presence.

She had none. She's 8 years older than me and dresses like my grandmother did 40 years ago. She flubbed a basic question. Her stage presence in the introduction was fifth grade.

That's why it was such a surprise when she into the song and suddenly she commanded the stage, stayed in control of both her voice and her body while the crowd went insane, and became a professional through and through.

Afterward she ran off stage, no idea of what to do next, went back to being the little nobody from the village.
What I love about her is that she she had the confidence to perform despite everything about herself that made it clear she didn't belong there. She was amazing - her crazy eyebrows and potato sack dress didn't detract from the quality of her voice. I'm of the opinion her dowdiness enhanced everyone's opinion of her performance.
I've heard your comment above a bunch of times about this performance, "I underestimated her because she is ugly," but I've seen plenty of older, less attractive musicians or performers who still have a presence on the stage. Someone brought up Ethel Merman, okay, she's a great example. The woman was hilarious. She was practically brought up on the stage. Good voice, yeah, okaaaay, certainly unique, but also, she knew how to play to a crowd.

This is what Susan Boyle did not have at all. It was like she'd never been on a stage before in her life. But then her performance seemed like a very well trained voice, polished and easy stage presence while singing.
I agree with Verbal, Susan Boyle has a real voice. She seems to have some training, maybe self-training, but her singing contains no tricks.

Certainly, the disparity between the expectations based on her looks and her talent add to the impact of her performance. However, I believe if I had only heard her sing, I would have still been stopped in my tracks.
A few have commented that it was more than her looks--Leeandra calls it her "nobody-ness," for example--and I must agree. It was the whole package that did me in. I had little clue about Susan Boyle's life beyond what I had seen on a couple of TV segments but, yes, she seemed a nobody; she appeared mildly slow and ponderous. There is something uplifting about seeing someone reach beyond what barriers we sometimes put there, too. It is a feel-good story, no matter what. One friend suggested that it was the "incredible transformation that came over her, the air of confidence" she exuded that was so astonishing to see. Agreed.

As Suzn said, I would have been stopped in my tracks by such a voice if I had no picture to see, yet I would have been even more amazed once I looked, I'm sure. Still, I will attempt not to be quite so distasteful of my initial response, instead accepting the beauty of the package for who she is--talented and lovely despite what my eyes tell me.

Thanks, Nurse, for the kind words. There's a whole backstory behind that guilt that I'll save for a rainy day.

And, Verbal, do I get equally smacked for my "actually" in the middle of my original post? ;-)
I agree that it's not just her looks but her "nobodyness" (which only seems to increase the more facts you hear about her!) and the contrast of how incredibly confident she was to sing on live TV (yes?) in front of a large audience. Even seasoned performers find that incredibly intimidating (which is why many lipsynch or just don't do it). And she performed like a star, yet without ego.

I also think there was a perfect marriage of singer and song. I never saw Les Miz and didn't know that song, but it's been going on in my head since watching that video a few times. It's a powerful song but she also did what all great singers do - she put the song across to the audience, including to someone like me who'd never heard it before. I feel like it's indelible now, like I'll never forget it.

And that's what true artists do.
When I saw a small excerpt at the Times of London site, I cried. The Youtube video of the whole event with judges' and audience response is just inspirational. She deserves every accolade -- the whole world seems abuzz with this today -- our whole staff here can't stop reading or talking about it. Good news we need!
I think this inspires and encourages the rest of us "nobodies" who may have some talent and value, but didn't get the gorgeous looks. I am glad for her...I always try not to judge quickly. It's funny how much better looking people get after you get to know their personalities.
wow, thanks for writing about this. i would never have seen it otherwise, and it is profound to watch. i have seen les miserables performed and it is one of my favorite musicals. this woman WAS fantine. it's worth looking at the lyrics if you've never seen them before.
http://www.stlyrics.com/lyrics/lesmiserables/idreamedadream.htm
"It's funny how much better looking people get after you get to know their personalities." A very apt and truthful statement. Thanks, Sage, for both comments.

Bstrangely, thank you for the lyrics link. I saw Les Miz a couple of decades ago, so I couldn't place the song right away. It's noteworthy that Susan Boyle chose this song for her coming out party, so to speak. It is hauntingly beautiful, and I'm glad it and Boyle are serving as an inspiration to many. Too often, we don't get stories which make us smile.
I thought her stage presence was marvelous. She owned the song and the stage, and the audience and knew it. That was a huge part of the whole phenom for me. She has a fire in her belly.
I can not get over how widespread the Susan Boyle phenomenon has become. Cartouche posted a link to the YouTube video on OS on Tuesday. Tuesday night I am showing it to my wife, and there she pops up again on the muted TV, on the KNBC news in LA. Yesterday I get in my car late afternoon, and there is her voice again. This time it's on Ron Reagan's radio show on 1150am. This morning I get in the car to go to work, having left the radio on KLOS (classic rock) last night, and she's singing *again*! Apparently one of the morning news shows on TV also had her singing to them live this morning from her house in Blackburn.

Leandra, Blackburn is not in Western Scotland, it's in the Eastern part of the Central Belt, just West of Edinburgh. That part of West Lothian is most known for endless spoil heaps from coal mining and shale extraction. It's not picture postcard Scotland by any stretch.
I moved my freshman son into a new dorm room with three strangers a couple of weeks ago, knowing that both he and we were nervous about how everyone would get along. As we moved him in (these three had been together already for most of the year) the most pointed thing we noticed was the neatness of the room. It was incredible, really, given that these were 18-year-old boys. They were "clean cut" looking--whatever that might mean to any of you--and polite. By the time my husband and I were driving home, I was walking on air, mentally. I called a couple friends who knew this was happening and said, "It turned out great. The boys seem really nice..." and all of a sudden I realized, crystalline fashion, that I assumed they were nice because they were neat! I honestly made that connection. Sometimes a little kick in the pants about our biases is a really good thing. Nice post.
I don't know. I loved the video and, having suffered through way too many American Idol tryouts with the grandchildren, would have been amazed at anyone older who just happened on and came out with that voice. To me it's the 2009 version of "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty".
I find it interesting how much analysis we seem to think is necessary here. We analyze our initial reaction, and then we analyze why we had it and why her singing made us happy and filled with awe.

In my case I watched and listened to it three times straight with tears of joy in my eyes. And I did not once analyze why.

Then we decide we need to analyze her and dissect her past and her deficits. Always her deficits and ask how is it possible that she has in this one area of an otherwise plain life overcame all that because she sings like an angel.

We need to remember simply that she has overcome. Like Sinatra, she did it her way. And it finally worked.

All this analysis makes me uncomfortable because I love to analyze things as much as the next person. But it was the feeling that I had that I want to remember. And I don't want to feel bad because I forgot to analyze it.

I want to remember that lift of my spirit when something marvelous happens that I didn't expect. That feeling of blessing that reminds me that everyone has gifts that they may never get to share. It is that I want to celebrate.

It is not analyzing whether or not my reaction was because of her looks or her dress or her awkward conversation with bonehead.

I just want to feel and enjoy and give thanks. I want to simply stop and listen and thank and celebrate.

And I don't want to analyze that away.

Monte
I TOTALLY agree. My husband and I decide that it was because her marginally good singing voice was in such direct contrast to her looks, thats what got the attention. I guess with my own voice, I could be on "America's Got Talent" if I was super homely.
There have been any number of Canadian performers over the years (mostly past) who weren't especially good looking or slick on stage, yet had incredible popularity. I mean, when I was a kid there was a show called Don Messer's Jubilee and seriously, everyone on it looked like your great aunt Bessie or something but it was the most popular show on the air for years because those people could sing and play and they looked liked they enjoyed singing and playing.

People will always respond to what's authentic and from the heart, no matter what the package is like.
VR, I had the same reaction to her voice, that it came from a deeper place, not just her head.

That, and she just plain has a lot of heart.
For what it's worth, I found out about this from Cartouche's post yesterday. I deliberately listened to the clip without looking at it, so I didn't see Sarah herself or the judges or the audience reaction shots. I heard people take a mocking tone to her, for no good reason that I could hear in her spoken voice. Then, when she sang, from the first phrase, her voice amazed me. The sound was moving all by itself; it had that feel of deep command. (And no, I wasn't familiar with the song either.)

*Then* I watched the video. So I'm clear that my response to Sarah's voice didn't come from a contrast to her looks. But in retrospect (literally), I can think of half a dozen pretty young female singers, "professionals," whose voices bore me.
Lainey, a "good kick in the pants about our biases" is more succinct than my original post. Well put.

Monte, I agree that sometimes we should let the moment happen, that analysis is flotsam. In this particular case, I needed a bit of self-inspection. . .see my comment to Lainey above. Still, what defines a guilty pleasure (guilty as in "you bet I watch that" vice feeling bad for watching it) for me whether it be a TV show, song, or even wine is that I live in the moment free of analyzing the content for just a little while. Nice point, Monte.

Finally, as both Emma and ktm note, authenticity and from the heart never go out of style. Nor should our ability to see beyond packaging. Thanks for your comments.
Emm
Thanks for replying, Mal. I reread my comment and wondered if I had poorly worded my comment to imply that I was complaining about the fact that we were analyzing her. I think it can be read that way, but that is not what I meant to emphasize. You picked up on my point, maybe better than I did, in that there are times when we miss a lot of the joy in life by being too damned analytical about everything. I am very guilty of that. And I am trying in my dotage to just let certain beautiful things BE. Just accept them with gratitude and not be always saying to myself: "I wonder why that looks so beautiful?" Instead just say "God, that is really beautiful!"

Monte
I finally saw it and my word what a voice! I was so happy for her. She seemed like a goofy, fun lady who really didn't care what was thought of her.
My God, you could practically see the dollar signs in Simon's eyes.
Did anyone catch that limey little snot in the audience making faces when Susan said she wanted to be a professional singer? Never have I wanted so much to jump into my tv and smack a bitch.
I've been hearing people talk about her this week and was curious to see the video, which I watched on Youtube earlier this morning. She has a moving voice with real soul, and she delivered that song beautifully. I think Simon is the world's snarkiest bitch, and it was a wonderful surprise to see that even the bitchface was moved by Susan's dream. I hope that her dream will take her further.
Monte~
Actually, at first glance, I did think you were whacking us upside the head (as I used to say in east Texas) regarding being too analytical, not that I thought you didn't have an argument to do so. Upon further reflection, however, I gleaned the concept that what you truly wished was for the collective us to just enjoy being in the moment sometimes. . .and I couldn't agree more. Thanks, again.

Though Simon does come across as snarky sometimes, I attach a grain of salt to my views on him. First, keep in mind that all we see is his on-camera antics, and you have to admit he's entertaining which, after all, is what TV is all about. I don't tune into American Idol just to watch the singers, and most certainly not to view the paint-drying-on-the-wall commentary by Paula, Kara, and Randy. No, I like to watch Simon. Second, one must keep in mind that Simon has been in the business for decades, and during that time has undoubtedly seen his fair share of quacks, quirks, and downright queer performances. Susan Boyle appeared to be one of those self-deluded souls producers let through for sheer entertainment value. Even Simon recognized that, and caustic though he often is, when he sees talent (regardless of whether it's because he sees dollar signs or not which, by the way, is why he's in the business) he doles out praise that is sincere. Besides, who among us doesn't like to see his god-awful haircut and never-ending line of t-shirts?
BBE--opera is one of the places where the audience doesn't expect physical beauty--I recall the Met's 1989 production of Die Walkure, in which the young lovers Sigmund and Sieglinde were played by 2 250 lb-ers. But when you sing the part as Jessye Norman did, no one cares.

But sometimes : http://www.annanetrebko.com/
So, I've heard this Susan Boyle name around the webs, and I haven't taken the time to watch the video until today -- 3 times in a row. And I got all choked up every time. Initially, I was so overwhelmed with pride in her, for smacking that smug smile off everyone's face that thought "sure, hun, give it a whirl, this oughta be good for a chuckle." Then, I wept from the beauty of the song itself, and her gorgeous rendition of it -- maybe not for the technical quality (I admit I don't know the first thing about music that way) but for the way that the sound of her voice made an ache in my belly, and I really believed the words and felt the sentiment. That's how music is intended to be, I think. She will make an incredible stage singer -- especially if she stars in the story of her own life. And I will buy her music.

I'm so incredibly grateful to Miss Boyle. I love little twists in life, pleasant surprises, when something that doesn't seem like much to begin with turns out to be the best thing you've seen/had/done all day (or longer!), it really renews my appreciateion of things.

Also, how appropriate that you tagged this with 'behavior.' I love that about your insights, MB. (I'm a long-time lurker/fan, just lately posting here and there.) An interesting note on behavior, indeed. This reminds us that even outside singing/art there are things average "nobodies" do every day that are equisitely incredible, heroic even, and should be appreciated, so don't write off a gift because of the wrapping. I wish I could shout my rating. :o)
Thanks for the rave, er, Raving. You add a nice voice to the chorus echoing the old sentiment, don't judge a book by its cover. Yes, it's an old saw, but lit is my background so I'm partial to any analogy involving books.

For all, Leeandra Nolting has somehow managed to scrounge up a distant recording of Susan Boyle singing "Cry Me a River." Once again, her voice is unencumbered by affectation--if this is truly Susan Boyle (I'm so wary anymore) she proves her talent is tremendous. Go take a listen over at Leeandra's blog. . .
Frumpiness is not reserved for opera stars. A few lauded popular performers whose looks are or were....ummm....underwhelming:
Bob Dylan - doesn't have a great-sounding voice, either
Neil Young - ditto
Cass Elliott
Others?
She is amazing. I love her.