Several years ago I had a trusty handyman. He looked like a handyman, he talked like a handyman and he did excellent handyman-type work.
I found Mike, or maybe he found me, in a Sears hardware store. He mixed paint for me and we got to talking. He said he'd been laid off from his full time job and was working part time to make ends meet. One thing led to another and before I knew it, he was at my house on a regular basis, fixing things, painting, power washing and more.
He was reliable, his work was top notch and his hourly rate was much less than any other handyman I'd used.
Mike was chatty and easy to be around. He was a pleasant looking middle-aged fellow with a slight paunch and the kind of loose, beat up jeans that rode down a little too far in back when he bent over, just like any respectable handyman's or plumber's jeans.
He joked around with my young children and they loved it when he came by. I'd lucked out with him, I thought to myself.
There was an added bonus. If I had to run an errand while Mike was at my house, as I tried to round up my reluctant kids to take with me, he'd say, "Oh go ahead and leave them here. They'll slow you down. I'll keep an eye on 'em."
That just made me like him more.
One day I called him and had to leave a message. He didn't return my call. I called again and left another message. Still no return call. That was unusual. So I made a trip to Sears.
"Hey Mike," I greeted him. "Was it something I said? I have a bunch of stuff waiting for your expert touch."
For the first time in three years, Mike was neither friendly nor chatty. He was gruff and almost rude.
"I don't do that kind of thing anymore. I hurt my back. Sorry. I've got to get back to work."
I was hurt and confused. If his back bothered him, why was he still working at a hardware store, I wondered, a place where he had to lift heavy objects and climb ladders.
Not long after that I got my answer. Someone told me they'd seen his name and photo on a sex offenders website. He was there for unlawful sexual conduct with a minor. I refused to believe it; he had a common last name. It just wasn't possible.
I didn't want to go to the site but I forced myself. I stared in disbelief at Mike's picture while I went numb as I thought of the times I'd blithely left my children alone with him.
To say I was blindsided is an understatement. He was nice man. He had a nice family, I'd met them a few times. He looked and acted exactly like what I assumed he was. A friendly, benign, middle-aged handyman.
Some dormant thought, one that had been buried in my brain for a while began to take root and grow and it was this: Is there nothing in life that can be taken at face value and accepted for exactly what it seems?
I know when the seed of that thought blew into my head. It happened when I began hearing about the Catholic clergy sex abuse scandal. As it grew in magnitude and overflowed, much as my faith had over the years, I found I could never look at a priest quite the same way again. I'd think of the priests I'd known and admired through the years and against my will, I wondered about them and the altar boys. Altar boys who'd been my neighbors, my friends, my cousins. And later, my nephews.
Something ugly and hard to ignore forced itself on the beautiful Catholic Mass I loved so much. The rituals I never tired of, the mystery of faith, and the priest like a ringmaster, front and center in his flowing robes, calling us to pray and believe and have no doubt that an extraordinary change was possible.
He did this via the Eucharistic sacrament which resulted in that most cryptic yet bedrock element of every Catholic's faith: transubstantiation. The priest was the only one who could change the bread and wine into something they were not: the body and blood of Jesus Christ.
I believed this and still do, with absolutely no proof.
Then the priests themselves changed, although they still looked the same. They became something they were not, or shouldn't have been. Not all of them, of course not. But how could one know the difference? Faith was suddenly not good enough, not for me.
With all the ugly revelations of sexual abuse of minors in the news these days, the face of sports in general and football in particular, doesn't look the same to me either. The notion of those big macho football players and tough-as-nails-coaches who only care about the game ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing, boys!") now gives me pause. It seems the score may not be the only thing on some minds after all.
But how many minds? Which ones?
Suddenly lots of things, everywhere, don't look the same to me because they may not be what they seem. I find myself questioning everything.
When a charitable organization for troubled youths may actually have been founded as a hunting ground for a sexual predator, how does one process that? When institutions that have stood for one thing for years and even centuries, become something different seemingly overnight, how does one make sense of it and not question every other institution.
I don't know what to think anymore. When trusted coaches, and respected pediatricians and beloved teachers and maybe even the nice family man next door are arrested for possessing child pornography or worse, sexually abusing kids, it shakes the very bedrock of a person's beliefs about lots of things.
Sometimes I find myself staring at a man and his child, laughing and horsing around and I think things I shouldn't. Things like, "Looks good, but what happens when you get your kid alone."
I don't like thinking this way. I try not to. I feel like I'm also changing, against my will.
Recently, I read something in my newspaper about a task force set up to catch sexual predators who prey on kids. I read the quotes of a male investigator as he referred to child molesters as "sickos" and "depraved" and "the worst of the worst."
My first thought was not "That's wonderful, and it's long overdue."
No, my first thought was, "How do I know you're not doing this work so you can get closer to kids. How do I know you're not just like the guys you call depraved. Because in your newspaper picture you look like them."
They all look the same. Some are handsome, some are not, some are old, some are young but they all look the same. Unremarkable. Ordinary. Benign.
My question is, have they all undergone transubstantiation, turning from one thing into another without a change in appearance, or were they always like that. Either way, it's nearly impossible for me to accept let alone understand, although I don't doubt it for a second.
The fact that sexual abuse of children is commonplace is even more difficult to grasp. Knowing it happens on a regular basis, almost everywhere in the world, just like the consecration of the bread and wine at countless daily Masses, is testing my faith in many things, in ways I'd never imagined.
The Bible says, "And God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them." In His own image. That was always a difficult concept to grasp but I never questioned it. I accepted it at face value. Now, I doubt.


Salon.com
Comments
in my life last week. i checked my town. 86 of them. in a town of
maybe 60,000 people. i checked addresses. at least a dozen live
within a mile of me. there is an elementary school around the corner
which looks more like an armed compound than what i remember
school to be. cop car in the parking lot all the time. fences.
transubstantiation, hm? i like the metaphor very much.
look, we know why this happens. the culture, the economy,
is pornographic. sex sells commodities. all this accumulation of
wealth is about enjoying this life, this only life u will ever get,
to the maximum by burning out your sensory apparatus.
by stimulation, then more stimulation,
then when the nerves are deadened,
inured,
more and more and more radical stimulation.
be naughty to be nice to yourself, wink wink.
(misssed the victoria''s secret show last night, dammit!)
but isnt it because there is nothing else to live for?
just the flesh?
keep that flesh healthy! anoint it. medicate it.
this is rampant hedonism.
we are taught we may or may not have a "mind".
scientists are looking for it in the spaghetti of billions of neurons.
all we have is a brain, and chemicals squirting.
a soul? forget it.
this is why the nutcase religious people hate us.
at least they believe in a soul.
we are soulless.
r
Excellent and evocative post. R
" I heard it on the news" or " I saw it on the internet".
For many there isn't anything new about all these reports. They disbelieved early because it didn't take news or the internet to tell them the Bogeyman was real.
So Margaret, without being disrepectful I would say to you that your later awareness here in life probably feels like the first sharp slice of the paring knife sliding off the fresh fruit. It will bleed and taint the fruit. You'll throw it out . The cut will hurt and make you think you can't handle a knife and that you don't really like fruit anyway. Then slowly it will form a small scar you can feel when you touch it, but eventually you'll pick up the knife again. This time you'll be more careful with your grip. Some of us have known to check our grip since we were very young, so we don't get cut. It's all you can do.
Part of the problem - maybe a large part - is the emphasis on sexuality being paraded on TV constantly, topped off by "stage mothers" entering their little girls in beauty pageants and shows dressed as hookers or at least as mature women. Doesn't excuse the men who allow themselves to be "fooled" by these illusions once they know the "women" are really little girls. But we have to wonder if this atmosphere of cultural decadence doesn't arouse a latency in men who might otherwise better manage to keep their perverted urges inchoate or at least suppressed.
yeah :/
Lezlie
Really? That wasn't red flag enough? I've never met any handyman or any other worker who comes to the home to ever cross such a boundary. They are there to work, not even notice you, your children, or your belongings outside of professional basis. This is priority #1 for those who are ethical tradesmen.
I'm so sorry it took his arrest for you to realize...and VERY glad your children weren't harmed.
`
Spirituality/Religion, and Beliefs.
"There are some forms of religion that are bad; just as there's bad cooking or bad art or bad sex, you have bad religion." K. Armstrong.
There have always been pedophiles, child abuse - sexual and physical, all manner of evil. But for so long, so many were blissfully unaware of the evil that swirled all around them. As painful as it is to know the depths of depravity that exist in our world, as much as we wish it weren't so or that we could still live in blissful ignorance, I think it's better for us to know. Forewarned is forearmed, or so the saying goes. As alsoknownas so wisely stated, some of us have long known the Bogeyman was real. If our current state of hyper-awareness saves even one child from confronting that truth, it's worth it.
~R~
The "still do" troubles me deeply; but in any case, you have captured the essence of the dilemma of faith -- a dilemma far too many religious people simply don't realize exists. Faith by definition is not subject to proof, for once something can be proven, faith is no longer necessary. Theologian Paul Tillich dealt with this matter brilliantly with his observation that "doubt isn't the opposite of faith; it is an element of faith".
The truth is, most of us should be far less concerned about our doubts than we are about what we "know" to be true. All too often what we think we know, we only assume to be true -- as you discovered with your handyman.
Too many Christians of my acquaintance assume what they were taught about their faith as children is still true, and they rigidly cling to those assumptions. Thus I refer to them as Kindergarten Kristians. They may have outgrown the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy, but they haven't outgrown other fairy tales.
Those who believe they can prove elements of their faith are kidding themselves, and those who believe in the literal truth of myths like Noah's Ark or the parting of the Red Sea or Jonah and the Whale make a mockery not only of themselves, but of their religion. The purpose of these myths is to teach lessons far more important than "how many angels can dance on the head of a pin."
Religion, at its best, teaches us the importance of moral values, but it should also teach us to question those who profess to have a corner on the truth. As I've said many times, riffing on Socrates, the unexamined faith is not worth having.
True faith requires us to follow a righteous path in spite of our doubts, and in my view, without expecting reward. Virtue is -- or at least ought to be -- its own reward. That is true faith, faith in the importance of doing the right thing for its own sake -- and for our own sake.
James: I'm sorry you missed the show; surely you recorded it though! I've never watched; are there lots of miracles in it? (I think of it as a sequel to one of my favorite TV shows, "Touched By An Angel", called "I Want to be Touched by a Victoria's Secret Angel.") Actually "Joan of Arcadia" was my favorite. No wings or supermodels though.
Anyway - the sex offenders list is a real show-stopper in another way, isn't it. Especially when you note how many are on it and how close they may live to you. As far as our culture goes, it may be true about sensory overload, radical stimulation, etc. But it's not just here; in other countries men marry 10-year-old girls. That's not new. And America supposedly has a lower rate of occurrence than Asia and Africa. I've read many explanations for why someone does it - power, dominance, emotional immaturity, having suffered abuse as child. But there's no profile for an abuser. So is it inborn or learned? There's no treatment either.
I don't think a pedophile believes it's wrong either - as an example, there's NAMBLA which maintains sexual abuse isn't harmful to a child. And why are the vast majority of abusers men? Yes, some women are sex offenders, but it's rare.
This isn't a quiz, btw. I'm just wondering. I liked it so much better when I was able to believe it was a horrible but rare occurrence. Unfortunately, it's not.
Victoria: I'm looking forward to it. Will check your blog soon.
Barb: I know. They look so normal. How do you know who to be wary of when everyone looks and acts so normal? Thanks for reading.
aka: Of course it's true, the Bogeyman doesn't live under the bed; he walks among us. And I like your analogy of getting hurt and focusing on the incident instead of how it came to be; sort of "the first cut is the deepest." But you can't be on high alert all the time. And if something like sexual abuse hasn't happened to you or anyone you know, it's not like you're going to be thinking about it all the time. For someone who's been abused and has been crippled by it, it may dominate their existence. For others, like me, it's shocking and a rude awakening to learn how commonplace it is. Of course I knew it existed long before the Catholic church sex scandal erupted. What's so hard to understand is the prevalence of it.
Linnnn: It seems that way, at times. Yet I don't like thinking that way; going too far in that direction is just as bad a being too trusting and naive. Strange times we live in, but I'm sure people have been saying that since there were people!
desert_rat: I suppose you're right. Healthy skepticism maybe? Can you be healthily skeptical? I'm glad you liked it.
keri: It was intense to write as well. It went in a completely different direction than my original idea; it sort of wrote itself. The natural world is a good place to find peace, I agree. Even a good long walk around my neighborhood, to clear my head, sometimes does it for me. Pets too. They are good way to experience peace.
CM: "One of their arrests was a sheriff's captain from a neighboring jurisdiction, who said he suspected the "girl" he was coming to meet was really an adult male and that he, the captain, was planning to make his own arrest. Guess who won that one?" I'm guessing the sheriff's captain won. Good God. I hope he slipped up, later.
Have you ever watched Dateline's "To Catch A Predator"? It's kind of surreal. The excuses they make are also surreal, like the sheriff's captain's. I think you're right about the sexualization of young kids being a part of it. I've seen the "Toddlers & Tiaras" type of shows too. To me that is a whole other kind of abuse, I don't care how those mothers rationalize it. It is a freakish thing to do.
Sarah: That is an interesting concept and I'll have to check out the post you commented on when I'm done here; the brain evolving to the point of errors creeping in. I don't know enough about brain development to know if that's possible or not. Funny that you mention confession troubled you; I haven't been to confession in years but am planning on going soon, oddly enough. I miss it and I miss that cleansing feeling.
Julie: YEAH!!! Those things are NOT supposed to be the opposite of what they are!
Erica: Thank you very much; I do still believe in people. I also believe good will result from all this exposure of and focus on abuse. You can't put the genie back in the bottle. But it is overwhelming at times and yes, the world can seem like an awfully dangerous place.
I've been thinking about your post all day and I wanted to take a moment to post a more thoughtful comment.
I cannot imagine what it must have felt like to find out this beloved handyman was a sex offender after you had, in faith and goodwill, left your children in his care. You must have felt absolutely sick. It is entirely understandable and deeply unfortunate that your trust in people has been forever altered. After what happened with Father Paul and me, I never looked at priests the same way again. How can you ever know who the good guys are anymore?
I'm so sorry you had to go through that and I am thankful your children were not harmed.
I guess we just have to use our best judgment, tell our kids where boundaries lie and go on. That's the insidious thing about abusers, pedophiles and other predators; they do a very good job of looking and acting like everyone else. You can't expect to sniff them all out.
It's got to be a shock to discover this about someone you clicked with - probably at least partially b/c it causes you to doubt yourself. I hope you can go forward without losing your ability to see the good in people. It IS hard, but I am still choosing to believe that it's worth it. (Easy for me to say, since we haven't had anything negative happen, I know.)
It's fascinating to read those transcripts, and it also seemed strange that a burly, manly detective could so convincingly impersonate a teenage girl that way. A little over the top with the "ewwwws" and the "awesomes," but he had mastered the shorthand codes and the attitudes.
Just Thinking: Over time, I began to consider Mike a friend. He was at my house frequently over a three-year period and I got to know him much better than the parents of some of my kids' friends. Sometimes he'd have a cup of coffee with me and we'd talk. A couple of times I had to stop by his home. I met his wife and son on several occasions. By the time he offered to watch my kids while I ran an errand, it wasn't the first or second or even third time he'd been there. I'd never have left him with them without feeling that I knew him well enough first.
And to be honest, I don't know the circumstances of how he came to be on that list. I don't know if he was a pedophile. Maybe the person he supposedly had contact with was an underage prostitute who looked much older than she was. I'll never know. My point is, often we just don't know and there's no amount of background checking or preparation than will allow us to see another person as they really are.
Parents arrange playdates with other parents' children all the time with only the flimsiest of knowledge of the other kids' mother or caretaker. I've done it countless times, I guarantee you almost every mother has. And vice versa. Sent their kids home with a friend that they know nothing about. But what are you supposed to do? Go over to the home in advance with a dog and a detective and also a computer expert, to see if there's any kiddie porn on it? Sometimes you gotta trust your gut and hope for the best.
Art: Bad religion, yes there's that. Maybe most religions! Karen Armstrong: former nun, am I right? I have not read her though I know a little bit about her. Just looked her up on Amazon. I'll check out some of her work. I've enjoyed Lee Strobel's The Case for Faith and The Case for Christ. Also like Philip Yancey; Reaching For the Invisible God.
Unbreakable: You make an excellent point: "I wonder sometimes if the world really has evolved to a more evil place or if it just feels like that because of our awareness of it." Almost-instant global communication makes almost anything accessible and easy to find out about, both good and bad. And yes, child abuse has been around for ages; childhood hasn't always been perceived as a time of carefree innocence either. In many places in the world, it still isn't. And I wholeheartedly agree with you: ignorance is not bliss, it can be deadly.
Deborah: "I refused to believe it; he had a common last name. It just wasn't possible." What do I mean? I meant, I hoped the person who told me he was on the list was mistaken, because he had a common name. (His first name wasn't Mike, by the way, but something equally as common.) I hoped that the "Mike Smith" she'd seen was a different "Mike Smith." She knew his name but had never met him. Until I saw the photo, I was hoping it wasn't him. It also listed his home address. I'm sorry about what happened with your uncle. And as for the Catholic church, don't hold your breath waiting on the apology. I don't look at priest the same way either.
Don: Thank you so much. I know what you mean about letting your kids walk to school. I walked everywhere and also rode my bike as a child. Stayed out all day and evening too in the summer. That would never happen with my kids or most kids now. Are we overprotective? Maybe a little. But the intentions are good!
Scarlett: I've talked to mine too and the thing is, it's rarely a stranger who molests a child. It's someone the child knows - a relative, mom's boyfriend, a teenaged sibling's friend. And it is terribly shocking. No matter how common it may be, if we're not shocked by it then something's wrong with us too.
Tom: I was hoping you'd check in. I have to ask: why does my "still do" trouble you? Because if I didn't feel that way anymore it would mean I didn't believe? For a while, I had some trouble reconciling the fact that priests who'd broken their sacred vows and committed an unforgivable sin, molesting children, were consecrating the bread and wine. In a way, performing a miracle. It seemed obscene and unclean to me and not sacred anymore. As if a devil's disciple were up there, making a mockery of the Mass. I eventually made my peace with it however.
"Doubt isn't the opposite of faith; it is an element of faith". It is. Like the father of the possessed kid said, "Lord I believe; help Thou my unbelief!" I think if we don't question our faith occasionally and put it to the test, then it's only blind faith or as you put it, "The unexamined faith is not worth having." But Tom - this made me laugh: "Virtue is -- or at least ought to be -- its own reward." Spoken like a true atheist!!
Victoria: Have not gotten to your blog yet; now I'm really intrigued. But as far as me feeling sick; I can't say I felt sick. I felt numb at first, then betrayed, then horribly confused. I don't know for sure what Mike did, only what I read on the site, and I have to admit, by not knowing if he was or wasn't a child molester, it allowed me to give him the benefit of the doubt. For better or worse, that made things sit slightly easier with me. Slightly.
Blue: You've really summed up the crux of the whole dilemma beautifully. We can't know. There's just too many people, coming at us from every direction, too quickly. So we have to have faith, in something. And we have to consciously choose it. Ultimately, I'm with you, choosing to believe it's worth it. If I didn't I couldn't raise my kids. I'd have to tell them the world's a bad place, most people will hurt you and you can't trust anyone. Then why have kids in the first place? What's the point?
CM: I'm glad I was wrong. I never even thought about "entrapment." Those transcripts must have been something else to read. A "burly, manly detective" impersonating a teenage girl." That had to have been both weird and hilarious. I wonder what it felt like to be him, doing that. How you're able to stay in character and not let the detective in you come out.
In later years I did prison visitation. That was unsettling. I met people who had done ghastly things (two cannibals that I know of), and some more straightforward things like robbing banks, and among them were guys who had done sex crimes against kids (and murdered the kid in one case). And a couple of *nice* fellahs who had committed rape-murder of old ladies. For the most part, they were just regular people on the surface.
So, theoretically, I wouldn't be surprised at finding out anything about anyone. In practice, of course, I'm shocked all the time (about much smaller 'crimes') at what people do...
I have great respect for your mind, but I have a hard time believing (there's that word again) someone as bright as you obviously are still does believe in transubstantiation as a literal fact. I find that religion can have that sort of power over people's minds literally frightening.
And if I've given you the impression I'm an atheist, I'd like to correct that misimpression. Yes, I am no fan of organized religion, particularly the virulent fundamentalist strain practiced in Christianity and Islam; and yes, I am a Doubting Thomas, but doubt must allow for the possibility of God or Allah or a Creator as well.
Myriad: I know you've seen a lot. And yeah, I get what you're saying about even the small crimes saying something shocking about a person. Sometimes a minor transgression speaks volumes. It's the intent behind it.
Deborah: Sorry I wasn't more clear. And as far as your caregiver's husband goes - did she know? How could it have gone on for that long? Is your daughter okay, I hope?
Tom: Of course I believe in literal transubstantiation. Not the way you're thinking though. It's not the same as turning lead into gold. The appearance doesn't change, the molecular components don't change. It still looks like bread and wine, smells like bread and wine and tastes like bread and wine. And yet it is different. At the Last Supper Christ didn't say, "This bread represents my body." He said "This is my body." He didn't say "This wine represents my blood." He said, "Drink ye all of it, for this is my blood of the New Testament..." Yes I believe it but not because it has some "power over my mind." But it does have power over my soul.
And no, I know you're not an atheist! I was joking.
A woman I admire recently wrote a blog that was featured on HuffPo. It is at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/diana-nyad/penn-state-not-by-any-mea_b_1122064.html
She was the victim of molestation by her swim coach. You might want to read her thoughts.
r./
Whatever I said was overlooked, on the night. It was only two nights ago.
Today it came back to me, with bells on.
I hear the way Grace Slick spat the word "truth," in Somebody To Love, & wonder or despair. Nothing in my soul wants to despair.
The hardest thing, losing your identity, is to find this out :
When the truth is found
to be lies
& all the joy
within you dies ...
... wouldn't you love somebody to love ?
onislandtime: Just read it; thanks for the line. She says so many things there that should be required reading for just about everyone, and also makes a point that I haven't heard anyone else drive home:
"And we need to begin to understand the full-circle psychology of these predators."
She says at 62, what happened to her so many years ago is still with her and always will be. The astounding number of kids who suffered abuse is probably vastly underestimated, as she points out, and it'll stay with them in one form or another as well.
As she pointed out, in that audience she was addressing, there were probably several predators there as well as victims; maybe some were both. It has to be understood. We can't just keep on being outraged by revelation after revelation. There's a reason for it and it's not going to go away just by locking people up. I'm not a psychologist or psychiatrist and I don't know how to get to the root of a problem like this but if it's as rampant as it apparently is, I hope all of this recent publicity will result in some serious, long-term study, investigation and ultimately, answers.
Kim: I love that song and re-reading those lyrics startled me, how they apply to so many things about life. I always really liked the way she just tore into it, at the same time as the music, the way she starts singing almost like she's been chomping at the bit to get right at it. Yeah, I know about the despairing soul; trying to avoid it at all costs can be a tricky dance.
The trouble is when despair just waltzes in uninvited, right when one least expects it.
...Margaret?? Mom okay?
Great post!
Very thought provoking post. Thank you.