Maria Stuart

Maria Stuart
Location
Howell, Michigan, USA
Birthday
February 17
Company
mariastuart on Twitter
Bio
Maria Stuart is a journalist without a print job who lives with her husband and son in southeast Michigan. She is currently working on Livingstontalk.com, a hyper-local information and conversation site.

Maria Stuart's Links

Salon.com
Editor’s Pick
MAY 29, 2009 10:42AM

I have seen the future of journalism: Requiem for a blog

Rate: 17 Flag

 

Jim HopkinsIt didn’t take former USA Today editor and reporter Jim Hopkins to tell 42,000 Gannett Co. employees that newspaper life as they knew it was undergoing a dramatic and fundamental change.

However, it took Hopkins and his Gannett Blog (http://gannettblog.blogspot.com) to connect these employees at scattered sites across the county in a new and meaningful way, delivering to them “critical, vital” information and signaling an end to “the days of one-way communication between management and employees.”

The biggest story at papers large and small across the United States in the past couple years has been the economy; the biggest challenge in those same newsrooms has been the Internet.

Before September’s big economic meltdown, those of us still working in traditional newsrooms were scrambling for new and innovative ways to cover the personal side of foreclosures and job loss, the pain of consumers at gas pumps and grocery checkouts.

The rise of the Internet made the fast-moving delivery model of daily print organizations — and the even-faster model of broadcast outlets — seem wheezing, lumbering and old.

The speed with which the Internet could get information to people was breathtaking: It was inconceivable a couple years ago that journalists would be tweeting important stories in bites as things unfolded, yet here we are, receiving Twitter reports from hot spots around the world.

Media giants chose to happily overpay to gobble up smaller media companies and family-owned newspapers, as if they were at an all-you-can-eat buffet. In the end, they saddled themselves with a mountain of debt to buy things for which there is no longer a need.

People using laptops and free wi-fi connections at the local coffee shop are bloodying traditional media companies, which are invested dearly in production facilities, equipment, and bloated newsroom and corporate structures.

The result, which feels disastrous right now, should end up being liberating. At least that’s what Hopkins thinks.

“We’re going through a messy transition, and there’s going to be a big gap for information in communities,” he said from San Francisco during a phone interview. “We know there’s a big demand for information, so there will be investors.”

Hopkins took a buyout after a 20-year career with Gannett Co., whose flagship is USA Today, the paper at which Hopkins worked. Gannett Co. owns 85 daily newspapers, some weeklies, and 23 television stations.

In September 2007 — a full year before the great economic collapse — Hopkins started Gannett Blog.

In the beginning, it had a lot of attitude mixed with snark. Ever the David to Gannett’s Goliath, Hopkins relentlessly nipped at the heels of company executives, calling them out for the perks of their positions and questioning the wisdom of their decisions.

“From (Gannett’s) perspective, it was a jarring experience,” Hopkins said. “For many years Gannett (executives) did not have a blogger watching them and they were not quite sure how to approach it.”

Then, while Hopkins peppered the publishing behemoth with his digital slingshot — “I made some of it too personal,” he said — things for the corporation began to change; Gannett employees felt the ground begin to rumble beneath their feet.

“In the early stages, we (Hopkins and Gannett Co.) got off on the wrong foot,” Hopkins said, describing that time as him doing a “not particularly interesting version of other blogs.”

“The reason why I dialed it back in a big way,” he said, “was the first layoff.”

And what a layoff it was.

When the smoke cleared in November, 10 percent of Gannett’s workforce — over 4,000 people — was gone.

“Everything got very serious,” Hopkins said. “The blog seemed to take on a less-adversarial tone.”

While Hopkins continued to pursue corporate executives, the site became THE source of inside information for Gannett employees and industry watchers.

Through Gannett Blog, we witnessed the 2008 fourth-quarter job slashing, paper by paper. Sources at various properties posted who was gone and who was left standing; they chronicled the pain of it all.

We watched as newsroom jobs at USA Today got whacked in December. Then came weeklong, unpaid furloughs for all Gannett employees in the first quarter of 2009, followed by layoffs at other properties; I lost my job at the paper where I worked for nearly two decades. Then came a second-quarter round of furloughs.

Through it all, Hopkins solicited information; post after post after post reported the casualties online as axes fell across the country. He stayed ahead of the story, consistently providing eerily accurate information about what would happen next from sources across the company.

Every newsroom in the Gannett chain worried that the Gannett Reaper would appear at the door at any moment. As the layoffs happened, Gannett Blog became that for which Hopkins had always hoped: “It was a place where people could feel safe to share. … In addition to the hard news information, it became a cathartic place to grieve their careers and the loss of their coworkers.”

“If you dipped in (Gannett Blog) once in a while, it was depressing,” Hopkins said. “I read maybe 200 posts a day, and it became toxic for me.”

The news this week is that Hopkins will continue to work on Gannett Blog in a limited fashion, and cease active management of it on Oct. 1.

He’s anticipating another huge round of job cuts at Gannett.

“I don’t have the stomach to go through another big layoff,” he said. “I’ve done my part. It’s someone else’s turn now.”

The blog, which debuted as a site devoted to reporting the inner workings of the largest publisher in the United States, instead became an example of the power of connecting with sources via the Internet.

“I offered management an up-close and personal experience about what blogging is all about,” Hopkins said. “My suspicion is that until I started this blog, citizen journalism was (to them) an abstract notion.

“Readers and I were giving management on a daily — even hourly — basis an important lesson in how technology can change the landscape for a very large company.”

Hopkins also wanted to prove the money-making potential of a “really newsy site.”

“What I demonstrated is that if you provide accurate, fair, original content, you can ask readers to pay for it,” he said. “How many papers today ask readers to pay for what’s online? If you simply ask, people will do it.”

Since mid-October, Hopkins estimates he’s taken in about $12,000: $8,000 from a core group of between 500 and 700 consistent donors, the rest from advertising. Hopkins estimates that with all the hours he’s devoted to the blog, he’s earned minimum wage. Not a lot, to be sure, but enough to spur him along to other projects.

He reports that Gannett Blog gets more than 100,000 page views a month, ranking it in the top 8 percent of all blogs, according to Technorati’s State of the Blogosphere 2008. He also reports that Gannett Blog gets more than 10,000 unique monthly visitors, ranking it in the top 12 percent.

All this from a one-man operation.

Hopkins always intended the site to be a short-term project. “…Two or three years max,” he wrote. “That was because I assumed management intended to break up the company — something it might have accomplished, if the board of directors hadn't waited until it was too late (i.e. the real estate bust and the credit crisis that followed).”

Hopkins’ new blog is Ibiza Confidential, which he describes as a “new community for adventurous gay men”: “We’re chronicling our journey to the globe’s top financial, cultural and spiritual destinations. Our inaugural ’09 stop: Ibiza, the glitzy Mediterranean resort island.”

It seems poised to become a blog hit: “One week after its soft launch,” Hopkins writes, “Ibiza Confidential has become one of search-engine giant Google's Top 10 results when you enter the keywords gay men Ibiza!”

Hopkins remains optimistic about the future of journalism, predicting an amazing renaissance and redefining of the profession, in which he wants to take part.

“My No. 1 job as a journalist is to carry on the tradition, to teach younger people about the really important stuff,” he said. “…The younger people will bring the technology.”

Gannett Blog for Hopkins was a virtual classroom. “I was blessed with the opportunity to use the blog to teach.

“Maybe in three years, we’ll look at this amazing stuff we’re doing now,” he said. “We have to grit our teeth, hang on really tight and wait it out.”

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Excellent assessment - thank you for presenting such a polished piece.

I am particularly enamoured of the word 'renaissance', and feel that is how we must move forward. Ditch the fear, claim the sword.
just wanted to rate & let you know still reading.
Video killed the radio star; the internet killed millions of journalists, myself included -- lost my job as an editor following an ownership change and emerged into a job market drying faster than super glue. Now, almost two years later, I have thrown in the towel. Don't even browse the journalism job boards anymore. What's worse, and even more demoralizing, is that my own story has become a cliche; there are so many sad tales just like mine.

Enjoyed your post, though. This "messy transition" will end somewhere, and professional journalists will be in demand again. You managed to keep your own opinions out of this story for the most part -- like a good journalist is supposed to -- but I get the feeling you'd like another shot. I'd hire you if I had a job to offer.
Fascinating stuff. Thanks for taking the time to let us know about it.
I did stop by earlier to read and rate (I know I'm always going to rate your thoughtfully rated posts.) There are so many interesting, sometimes depressing, sometime hopeful angles on the blogosphere. But I do believe that the world needs good media. And as long as it needs good media, there will be always be jobs for us. Hopefully better paying that this one. But never less important,whether we're making money at it or not.
Well done! In addition to gritting our teeth, those of us with "in-transition" jobs need to be entrepreneurial as all get-out. Hard to know how any number of career fields will morph--the only certainty is change. He who can adapt will survive. Beautifully written, Maria.
I have not a clue how this dust will settle.

I have some concerns, grave concerns. You see, I happen to believe that a solid and healthy, functioning press, is a keystone of democracy and liberty. In other words if newspapers and journalism goes down the tubes it does not bode well for our world as we know it.

Yes, it is wonderful that everyone has a video camera and the average person appears to be eager to report on what is going on in front of their lives. Bearing witness is not the same as reporting. Reporters interview witnesses and typically ask questions that the witness never thought to offer up.

I could go on and on and here, I know, it is preaching to the choir.

This post struck me in another way though. I was the editor of a monthly newspaper, a tabloid style physically, though certainly a magazine in every other sense of the word. We printed it at the Gannett facility and over time I got to know the hard working pressman. The machines that are employed in the printing of newsprint are mind boggling. There are many ways to hurt yourself, and the sheer volume of paper and ink is humbling. It is magical too though. Their is (or was) the hum of democracy in the cavernous building that could be heard above the din of the presses and the ringing of the conveyors as they move the printed words to the trucks that will deliver them eventually to our human eyes.

I worry about those guys. What happens to them?
Hi, Cat – Thanks for the good words. And I polish them all -- some a little more than others!

Brian – Thanks.

T. Michael Stone – I sure hope professional journalists come into demand again. Thanks for the sort of job offer -- I think I’d like to work for you.

Emma Peel – Thanks. And cool name, by the way.

John – Thanks.

Hi, Juliet – I hope there will be jobs for us. I really do.

And thanks again for the Sotomayor post. (http://open.salon.com/blog/juliet_waters/2009/05/26/must_see_sotomayor_tv)

Nancy – I am adapting as fast as I can!

Ablonde – I share your concerns. Journalists are essential for democracy. While the Internet seems an interesting, democratic place on its face, I worry about the mindset that anyone – just anyone – can do journalism right. You can’t just decide to go into business as a dentist without the proper training, nor can you go into business giving haircuts or doing manicures. Why does journalism matter any less?

Gannett is currently doing some big consolidations of functions. They’re going to centralized copy desks and printing plants, so there are copy editors and press people out of jobs right now; more coming, I’d guess. There are fewer days of home delivery here with the Detroit Free Press – no Monday or Tuesday papers landing on front porches anymore. This means the folks who get paid by the piece to deliver papers saw their pay drop by over a third.
Well done. Who knows where we will be going, but right now I'm happy to be waiting here.
Lea -- I am with you on that.
its an era of transformation, some of it wrenching, similar to invention of printing press in 1500s.
yes, its also a renaissance.
from what I can tell, the future of journalism is going to look something like huffpost, dailybeast, newser, gawker..
some other musing in the 1st post on my blog
Whenever I read your work, I feel sorry for all of your local readers who are now missing out on your talent - unless they have followed you here! Everytime I go to buy our little weekly paper at the Wesco, I wonder how long it will survive, it seems to be thriving. Maybe it is because it doesn't try to report the big news but wants to be a community gathering place, and we all need community these days. Thanks again for a really well written and informative post.
Maria: Well reported and interesting story. Always nice to see stories about Gannett being forcibly introduced to reality.

I was struck by Ablonde's statement "Bearing witness is not the same as reporting." So true. In that sense, a good reporter needs have no fear of being somehow "replaced" by a citizen journalist. Ditch the fear, as Cat says.

Here's an anecdote to illustrate: a couple of years ago, a local mall was shot up by a deranged young man. Shoppers called Fox News which without bothering to check reported that three people had been killed. Not true. We helped set the record straight, calm what had become national hysteria. One of our reporters was getting a haircut at the mall at the time and he reported what happened throughout the day and night.

Later, Geraldo's people called and asked to interview the reporter and were flabbergasted when his editor declined the offer.

When talking or writing about the journalistic shape of things to come, we project an either-or view -- it'll be this rather than that. It won't. It'll be a mix. There'll even be a place for those enormous presses Ablonde has glimpsed and the pressmen who make them work.
A lot of the talk of this new paradigm is amusing in an odd way because it all rests of the supposition of the Internet as a permanent thing.

Here's a disturbing fact, folks: When the Petroleum Age winds down, the Internet will pass away with it. One reason is the plastics that make the Web what it currently is, plastics derived from relatively cheap oil keep computers affordable. Without the proliferation of personal computers (including hand held devices), bye-bye Web.

The other aspect of the current era that the Web rests upon is the proliferation of affordable energy. Unless some drastic discovery and the necessary infrastructure arises from as yet unseen sources, when petroleum begins to trickle, our entire system will slow immensely.

Newspapers might return but it won't be without a lot of pain along the way.
Former Gannetteer, here. I left the company before finding Jim's blog and it has been a source of information and intrigue for me since. Between Jim and my old co-workers at 2 Gannett properties, I have often been reminded that leaving journalism when I did was a good thing. On the other hand, hell, I wish there was a newsroom to go back to. Rated.