Mark Blackmon

Mark Blackmon
Location
Richmond, Indiana, USA
Birthday
May 27
Bio
MARK BLACKMON is a freelance playwright, essayist, journalist, and general-purpose raconteur for all media.

MY RECENT POSTS

Mark Blackmon's Links

New list
Editor’s Pick
SEPTEMBER 7, 2010 9:42PM

Losing Our Stories

Rate: 6 Flag

On Friday, September 17, 2010, the soap opera As The World Turns goes off the air after a run of 54 years. A significant event? Yes, I think it is.

 "We are a narrative species," wrote Roger Rosenblatt in Time a decade ago. "We exist by storytelling — by relating our situations — and the test of our evolution may lie in getting the story right."

I have always found true profundity in that quote and I have gone back to it hundreds of times because all of us relate to students, to colleagues, to friends, acquaintances and strangers, by telling our stories. And I often wonder if a generation gap is not widening because our outlets for teaching young people how to develop, expand and express their own stories have severely diminished in recent decades.

By way of example, we seem to be reaching the bitter end of serialized storytelling, something which can be dated back more than 500 years to Persian storytellers. Serial fiction became wildly popular in the 19th century with Charles Dickens, most famously, and other authors who published stories in magazines by installment. In the U.S., serialized stories began to be broadcast daily on radio in the 1930s. Derisively called soap operas, as most were sponsored by household products manufacturers and featured overly dramatic plots, they fast became the chief escapist fare for an audience of millions; most of whom were women.

If not the originator of the idea, certainly the most prolific purveyor of soap opera was Irna Phillips, an iron-willed, opinionated genius who acted-out her stories for a secretary to transcribe in lieu of literally putting pen to paper.

Character First

When Phillips created As The World Turns in 1956, it fast became the number one drama in America and stayed at that top spot for more than two decades. In writing about the program, Robert LaGuardia called Phillips "ahead of her time. … Irna saw daytime drama in terms of time and character, rather than story. She understood something that only loyal soap fans truly know: that people want to become involved with the lives of other people. … Story to Irna was simply a vehicle; it was from the moment-to-moment emotions of her characters, expressed to each other in quiet scenes, that viewers derived true vicarious pleasure."

Soap operas exploded thanks to the advent of television and at the height of their reach some 30 years ago, daytime dramas reached a staggering 50 million viewers a week and raked in more than $700 million in profit annually. The size of the soap audience, argued essayist Robert C. Allen, made the programs "a significant cultural phenomenon."

In the often laconic pacing of daily serials, audiences get to know characters on a level more intimate than in episodic storytelling and their emotional investment in those characters intensifies. The late Christopher Schemering, a journalist devoted to daytime drama, once noted that "as characterizations grow and the narrative stretches out over months and years and becomes more complex and ambiguous, one's involvement deepens, forcing one to come to terms with the quirks of human nature, the darker sides of fundamentally good people. And thus there is the possibility of the viewer experiencing something new or complex or feeling some way he has never felt before."

Theatre practitioners often say that the purpose of the art form is to illuminate the human condition and, arguably, soap opera's true calling may be exactly the same.

Old-Fashioned Relevance

While many soaps have been derided over the years for outlandish plots, poor writing and occasional injections of science fiction or utter madness, As The World Turns remained relevant, said Schemering, because it told "powerful stories slowly and surely. The show was old-fashioned in the best sense of the word." LaGuardia called it the "most historically important soap opera in modern times."

In its early years, the show introduced what is believed to be the first illegitimate child on television and though the show was never considered cutting-edge like the early days of All My Children — where a young Erica Kane had television's first legal abortion — the show did not shirk from the exploration of social issues. Over the years, alcoholism, cancer, adoption, racism, Alzheimer’s disease, and many other issues have been mined for stories.

Margo's Rape

In the early 1990s on As The World Turns, the rape of police detective Margo Hughes was allowed to play out in real time. The character, who had to wait six months before she could take a test to determine if she had contracted HIV/AIDS from her rapist, was allowed to explore her own emotions, those of her husband, family and colleagues, and the impact her rape had on everyone in her life in a way that mirrored what happens in the real world. Nearly 20 years after this story first aired, actress Ellen Dolan says that it remains a touchstone for long-time viewers.

Luke's Coming Out

The show has also, in recent years, been lauded for its long-term treatment of Luke Snyder's homosexuality and its sensitive portrayal of young gay men. When the teenager came out to friends and family, he was met with both acceptance and derision, often from surprising or unexpected sources, but the character was allowed to hold to his own truth and the story showed the long-term positive effects of that truth-telling on members of the community.

And while soaps can be innovative and forward thinking, they can also be prudish. When the character of Luke fell in love with Noah Mayer, a young man with a completely different, harsher and occasionally frightening coming out story, the two finally shared daytime's first gay male kiss — nearly a decade into the 21st century.

A gripping story such as Margo's rape showed millions of women how one woman, married with children, reacted to such an unspeakable act and how it impacted her life. Luke and Noah's story was written with intense courage and deep feeling and showed how one town accepted and embraced people who may have been different. Both stories allowed viewers, some of whom may not have had other avenues in which to explore them, new and potentially empowering ways to confront difference and prejudice and violence in their own lives.

A Real American Drama

Nearly 50 years ago, playwright William Inge said that while people may sneer at soap operas, they have "a basis for a truer, more meaningful drama. … I feel that in soap opera we have the roots for a native American drama." Inge may have been right, but he could not have foretold the societal shifts that have occurred over the last three decades that has pushed the soap opera onto a cultural endangered species list.

Soap opera viewership is down a staggering 30 million weekly viewers since the mid-1980s and the number of dramas on the air has shrunk by more than half as well. The news from the Nielsen ratings continue to show a continuing sharp decline across all daytime dramatic programs in women viewers 18-49, the bread and butter demographic for soaps. In an era when working outside of the home is the norm rather than the exception for both genders, when DVR’s have released viewing from time constraints and online video has even freed it from TV sets, the soap audience has dwindled and is increasingly split between older viewers and teenagers; neither is a group that excites daytime’s traditional advertisers.

"There are two universal human needs or motives," a colleague of mine wrote recently, "the need to know and the need to belong."

That's as important, I believe, as Rosenblatt's assertion that "[w]e exist by storytelling."

If Rosenblatt is correct, what becomes of a society that loses its stories? What happens to people who forget who they are or where they came from or who their ancestors were or how they deal with fellow citizens in a crisis? How do we write our history if we have no stories to tell? If there is a primal need for knowledge and belonging — and I fervently believe that there is — how can we satisfy that need if no one tells us our own story? How do we move forward if we cannot add to the narrative? How do we entertain each other without a collective act of imagining? How do we continue to educate future generations if we have no stories to bind us together?

You may be thinking this is all well and good, but when you get right down to it, it's just a soap opera; it's just a television show. Does it really matter? I think it does. And I think that any story that can be told without a break for more than 50 years, such as As The World Turns, deserves to be celebrated and its passing deserves to be mourned.

There are still people who need experiential outlets and serial drama may be an important and overlooked one to help people deal with their personal issues and to teach them to tell their own stories in a meaningful way.

What happens to those folks when we can no longer “tune in tomorrow?”

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
As the first human commenter I want to say that it isn't just the lack of interest that has killed off the daytime serials, it is the way that people are being worked. They work 24 hours a day seven days a week and often the shifts rotate or have mandatory overtime so the audience is just too damned tired or busy to settle down and watch the soaps. Like you said they became an American staple in the days of both radio and the stay at home parent. Radio was overly dramatic to help listeners to paint the scenes in their minds while they did chores or took care of the children. The forties were a time for a lot of needed distraction from reality and the combination of women and radio in the workplace kept them growing. By the advent of television these women who grew up in households where "the Stories" were on daily returned to their own homes with children and thanks to an economic explosion and labor saving devices, they had time to turn on their new televisions and watch. The soaps died at the same speed as the single income family more or less. For a time the death was slowed by the implementing of video recorders. As shift work took control and the factory work with regular hours faded in favor of part time service jobs people were forced to work multiple jobs to keep up their lives. These jobs featured irregular hours and a level of exhaustion not seen in workers since the thirties. With so little time for leisure, they didn't have any left to even watch recorded broadcasts and employers were banning the distraction of radio in the workplace there was no hope for even a revival of the radio soaps.
I was never much on the soaps, I do regret their passing since it is merely a death knell for people with actual leisure time to spend on true distraction.
I'm very surprised that soap operas haven't embraced the Internet. Their serial storytelling seems perfect for the instant gratification of the Web. They just need to trim down their plotlines to bite-size chunks of 5 minutes or less, place their sponsor ads right upfront, and viola. But they seem set in their ways and are dying and traditional broadcast TV dies.
I agree with Nick. I've seen a few serial shows that have started showing up on the net, and I keep wondering if they'll bring forth the new era of writing in this online genre. Never was into soap operas myself, but that's mainly because I always felt their drama was a little too generic, and a little too slow in orchestration. But personally I've always felt that there was something there from a writer's perspective that often gets overlooked because of the condemnation of the genre in most circles.
Mom called it "my story"--as in "I might have time to watch a little of 'my story' today." She juggled three jobs, but if she was home around 1 o'clock, As the World Turns would be on.

I remember Bob. My mom thought he was the nicest man. And, oh, that nasty John! Hell, I remember Meg Ryan on the show. Thanks for taking me back!

On a different note, I have to ask this: Having suffered in the late '90s through works bemoaning the death of reading and writing and all of that, I have become quite sensitive to looking at the other side of a supposed loss.

In other words, yes, something significant is being lost here. And yet, I have to wonder, what's being gained? Is it simply a matter of time being spent on other things? Or is it really the inexorable diminution of narrative?

What's going on in all of the writing we're doing? Maybe we're keeping the story alive in less obvious ways? There's a Stanford writing and rhetoric prof whose research suggests that, as she puts it, "we're in the midst of a literacy revolution the likes of which we haven't seen since Greek civilization."

(http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/17-09/st_thompson)
Loves and sorrows of small-town citizens
sing me muse to reveal human nature
of average people struggling to survive
and navigate their way to peace and love
through tangled emotions in maze of life.
We sat around the fire and told stories in the beginning. Then we told them sitting around the wood stove in the evenings. Reading aloud to each other became our entertainment in the long winter nights. Radio appropriated the tradition. And then TV fleshed it out, some say eliminating the imagination needed previously. But narrative has always been a teaching method for the human race. The stories of our families and our ancestors have guided the young with examples, bad and good, for behavior. I worry this guidance may be lost in our flurry of digital thrills and violence. Thank you for this piece.